Abstract
The objective of present study was to assess the performance of electro-Fenton (EF) process for treatment of the simulated sulphidic SCS (sulphide concentration = 10 g/L and pH = 13.7) using iron electrodes. The experimental runs were performed with simulated wastewater at an adjusted pH of ~ 5 with varying H2O2 dosages of 0.31–1.56 M. The current density, electrode spacing and agitation speed were maintained at 1 mA/cm2, 3 cm and 500 rpm, respectively. The treatment process resulted in complete degradation of sulphides, though the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was not fully removed (upto ~91%). It was observed that the addition of super-stoichiometric H2O2 dosage (i.e., 1.56 M) even caused a decrease in the COD removal. Mere adjustment of wastewater pH to 5 resulted in ~ 48% sulphide removal due to H2S stripping which is just almost 50% of the overall sulphide removal during EF process. Hence, EF process can be considered a potential alternative for the removal of sulphides from spent caustic stream.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alipour Z, Azari A (2020) COD removal from industrial spent caustic wastewater: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 8:19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103678
American Public Health Association (APHA) Handbook (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn, Washington
Bhagawan D, Poodari S, Golla S, Himabindu V, Vidyavathi S (2016) Treatment of the petroleum refinery wastewater using combined electrochemical methods. Desalin Water Treat 57:3387–3394
Brillas E, Sirés I, Oturan MA (2009) Electro-Fenton process and related electrochemical technologies based on Fenton’s reaction chemistry. Chem Rev 109:6570–6631
Davarnejad R, Bakhshandeh M (2018) Olefin plant spent caustic wastewater treatment using electro-Fenton technique. Egypt J Pet 27:573–581
Gameel A, Malash G, Mubarak AA, Hussein M (2015) Treatment of spent caustic from ethylene plant using electro-Fenton technique. Am J Environ Eng Sci 2:37–46
Hawari A, Ramadan H, Abu-Reesh I, Ouederni M (2015) A comparative study of the treatment of ethylene plant spent caustic by neutralization and classical and advanced oxidation. J Environ Manage 151:105–112
Khatri I, Singh S, Garg A (2018) Performance of electro-Fenton process for phenol removal using Iron electrodes and activated carbon. J Environ Chem Eng 6:7368–7376
Nasr Esfahani K, Farhadian M, Solaimany Nazar AR (2019) Interaction effects of various reaction parameters on the treatment of sulfidic spent caustic through electro-photo-Fenton. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:7165–7174
Nidheesh PV, Gandhimathi R (2012) Trends in electro-Fenton process for water and wastewater treatment: an overview. Desalination 299:1–15
Nuñez P, Hansen HK, Rodriguez N, Guzman J, Gutierrez C (2009) Electrochemical generation of fenton’s reagent to treat spent caustic wastewater. Sep Sci Technol 44:2223–2233
Paulino JF, Afonso JC (2012) New strategies for treatment and reuse of spent sulfidic caustic stream from petroleum industry. Quim Nova 35:1447–1452
Pino-Cortés E, Montalvo S, Huiliñir C, Cubillos F, Gacitúa J (2020) Characteristics and treatment of wastewater from the mercaptan oxidation process: a comprehensive review. Processes 8:425, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8040425
Rathore V, Gupta S, Thorat TS, Rao PVC, Choudary NV, Biju G (2011) Catalytic oxidation of spent caustic. Pet Technol Q 16:1–6
Ribeiro JP, Nunes MI (2021) Recent trends and developments in Fenton processes for industrial wastewater treatment—a critical review. Environ Res 197
Rodriguez N, Hansen HK, Nuñez P, Guzman J (2008) Spent caustic oxidation using electro-generated Fenton’s reagent in a batch reactor. J Environ Sci Health Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 43:952–960
Seyedin S, Hassanzadeganroudsari M (2018) Evaluation of the different methods of spent caustic treatment. Int J Adv Res Sci Eng Technol 5:5275–5283
Zopfi J, Ferdelman TG, Fossing H (2004) Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates—Sulfite, tetrathionate, thiosulfate, and elemental sulphur—in marine sediments. Spec Paper Geol Soc Am 379:97–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Declaration of Conflict of Interest: We declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
James, M.S., Garg, A. (2022). Electrochemical Treatment of Sulphidic Spent Caustic Waste Stream Generated from Petroleum Refineries. In: Ratan, J.K., Sahu, D., Pandhare, N.N., Bhavanam, A. (eds) Advances in Chemical, Bio and Environmental Engineering. CHEMBIOEN 2021. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96554-9_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96554-9_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96553-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96554-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)