Abstract
Developing a sustainable food system can be achieved by reducing the amount of food waste generated. Large amounts of food are wasted worldwide. In the European Union alone, 88 million tonnes of food wastes are discarded annually. The high amount of waste generated is a significant threat to the environment. Food waste is generated at each stage of the life cycle, but the largest amount is recorded at the household level. In order to design preventive measures and contribute to environmental planning measures, the consumer behaviour must be evaluated. This paper presents the results obtained by observing the behaviour of young Romanian consumers regarding food waste generation. A structured questionnaire was developed, and face-to-face interviews were conducted. The research data were collected during 2 months (October and November 2016). The results show that most of the respondents prefer to buy food from the supermarket and almost half of them are buying food products every day. They specified that sometimes they are attracted by special offers and they agree that the main reason for food waste generation is the expiration date. The internal consistency of the results was determined using statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance was used in order to find how well the model fits the data and if the model meets the assumptions of the analysis. Regarding the epistemology of the research, this study was conducted in a constructivist paradigm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeliotis K, Lasaridi K, Chroni C (2014) Attitudes and behaviour of Greek households regarding food waste prevention. Waste Manag Resour 32:237–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14521681
EC (2011) Preparatory study on food waste across EU 27. Technical report-2010-054. European Communities
EU (2013) Technology options for feeding 10 billion people. Recycling agricultural, forestry and food wastes and residues for sustainable bioenergy and biomaterials. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/513513/IPOL-JOIN_ET(2013)513513_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017
FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste—extent, causes and prevention. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2697e.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017
Farr-Wharton G, Foth M, Choi H-JJ (2014) Identifying factors that promote consumer behaviours causing expired domestic food waste. J Consum Behav 13:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1488
FUSIONS (2016) Estimates of European food waste levels. http://www.eu-fusions.org/phocadownload/Publications/Estimates%20of%20European%20food%20waste%20levels.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017
Ghinea C, Gavrilescu M (2016) Costs analysis of municipal solid waste management scenarios: iasi—Romania case study. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 24:185–199. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2016.1173041
Ghinea C, Petraru M, Bressers HThA, Gavrilescu M (2012) Environmental evaluation of waste management scenarios—significance of the boundaries. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 20:76–85. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2011.644665
Ghinea C, Dragoi EN, Comanita E-D, Gavrilescu M, Campean T, Curteanu S, Gavrilescu M (2016) Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis. J Environ Manag 182:80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.026
Girotto F, Alibardi L, Cossu R (2015) Food waste generation and industrial uses: a review. Waste Manag 45:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.008
Griffin BW (2005) Advanced educational research, Cronbach’s alpha (measure of internal consistency). http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur9131/content/cronbach/cronbachs_alpha_minitab.htm. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
Iacoboaea C, Luca O, Petrescu F (2013) An analysis of Romania’s municipal waste within the European context. Theor Empir Res Urban Manag 84:73–84
INSSV (2017) Population by residence, by age group, on 1 July. National Institute of Statistics, Suceava. http://www.suceava.insse.ro/main.php?id=471. Accessed 15 May 2017
Jörissen J, Priefer C, Bräutigam K-R (2015) Food waste generation at household level: results of a survey among employees of two European Research Centers in Italy and Germany. Sustainability 7:2695–2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032695
Koivupuro H-K, Hartikainen H, Silvennoinen K, Katajajuuri J-M, Heikintalo N, Reinikainen A, Jalkanen L (2012) Influence of socio-demographical, behavioural and attitudinal factors on the amount of avoidable food waste generated in Finnish households. Int J Consum Stud 36:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01080.x
Kolbe K (2014) Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding waste management options in Romania: results from a school questionnaire. J Econ Dev Environ People 34:95–107
Laerd (2013) Cronbach’s alpha using Minitab. https://statistics.laerd.com/minitab-tutorials/cronbachs-alpha-using-minitab.php. Accessed 20 Feb 2017
Mallinson LJ, Russell JM, Barker ME (2016) Attitudes and behaviour towards convenience food and food waste in the United Kingdom. Appetite 103:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.017
Marangon F, Tempesta T, Troiano S, Vecchiato D (2014) Food waste, consumer attitudes and behaviour. A study in the North-Eastern part of Italy. Riv Econ Agrar LXIX:201–209. https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-16922
Minitab (2017) Interpret the key results for correlation. http://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab-express/1/help-and-how-to/modeling-statistics/regression/how-to/correlation/interpret-the-results/. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
Parizeau K, von Massow M, Martin R (2015) Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario. Waste Manag 35:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.019
PJGDSV (2013) Monitoring report for county waste management plan, Suceava County (in Romanian). http://apmsv-old.anpm.ro/. Accessed 15 May 2017
Pop IN, Baciu C, Bican-Brişan N, Muntean O-L, Costin D, Rogozan GC (2015) Evaluating attitudes and behavior towards selective collection of waste in Cluj-Napoca city, Romania. Stud Ubb Ambient LX:87–101
Radzymińska M, Jakubowska D, Staniewska K (2016) Consumer attitude and behaviour towards food waste. J Agribus Rural Dev 1:175–181
Schmidt K (2016) What a waste! Developing the food waste-preventing behaviors scale—a useful tool to promote household food waste-prevention. Int J Food Nutr Sci 3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.15436/2377-0619.16.936
Stancu V, Haugaard P, Lähteenmäki L (2016) Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: two routes to food waste. Appetite 96:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025
Stefan V, Van Herpen E, Tudoran AA, Lähteenmäki L (2013) Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: the importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Qual Prefer 28:375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001
The Pennsylvania State University (2017) STAT 200. Elementary statistics. Lesson 10: one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat200/book/export/html/66. Accessed on 20 Feb 2017
Xu Q, Li X, Ding R, Wang D, Liu Y, Wang Q, Zhao J, Chen F, Zeng G, Yang Q, Li H (2017) Understanding and mitigating the toxicity of cadmium to the anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge. Water Res 124:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.067
Zhao J, Wang D, Li X, Yang Q, Chen H, Zhong Y, Zeng G (2015) Free nitrous acid serving as a pretreatment method for alkaline fermentation to enhance short-chain fatty acid production from waste activated sludge. Water Res 78:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.012
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the students who answered the questionnaires.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghinea, C., Ghiuta, OA. Household food waste generation: young consumers behaviour, habits and attitudes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 2185–2200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1853-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1853-1