Skip to main content
Log in

A Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC-UV method for determination of fidaxomicin and its hydrolytic degradation products

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to develop a new and appropriate stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for the determination of fidaxomicin using stress degradation. This study aimed to reveal the complete degradation profile of fidaxomicin using HPLC under different stress conditions; here, the analyte and its degradation products were detected without any extraction or derivatization. The successful separation of fidaxomicin from its degradants was achieved on a reversed phase C18 column using a mobile phase composed of 0.1% ortho phosphoric acid (OPA) in water, acetonitrile and methanol (20:36.5:43.5% v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The eluent was monitored at 260 nm. Degradation of fidaxomicin was performed under acidic, alkali, oxidative and thermal stress conditions. The method was specific and showed acceptable resolutions. The linearity achieved in the concentration range of 5–30 µg mL−1. The % relative standard deviations (% RSD) for intra- and inter-day precision studies were 1.54% and 1.64%. The detection limit (LOD) and quantification limit (LOQ) of the developed method were found to be 0.4 µg mL−1and 1.3 µg mL−1, respectively. Overall, the method revealed six impurities, among them, impurity 1 and impurity 4 were found to be the common impurity for fidaxomicin, whereas impurity 2, 3 and 6 were alkali stress dependent while the impurity 5 was acid stress dependent. Thus, the HPLC method was found to be specific, linear, precise, accurate and robust and can be used in real-time stability study of fidaxomicin formulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HPLC:

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography

LOD:

Limit of Detection

LOQ:

Limit of Quantification

RSD:

Relative standard deviations

VWD:

Variable wavelength detector

References

  1. AP. Johnson. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs, 2007, 8, 168–73.

  2. L.J. Scott, K.A. Lyseng-Williamson, S.T. Duggan, Drugs Ther. Perspect. 28, 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Serra, L. Malpezzi, A. Bedeschi, C. Fuganti, P. Fonte, Antibiotics 6, 7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Dorst, R. Berg, C. Gertzen, D. Schäfle, S. Schnell, P. Sander, H. Gohlke, K. Gademann. ChemRxiv 11, 1–106 (2020)

  5. G. George, J.A. Walktey, A.J. Karlowsky, Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 26, 305–312 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Crawford, E. Huesgen, L. Danziger, Am. J. Health. Syst. Pharm. 69, 933–943 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. T.J. Louie et al., New Eng. J. of Med. 364, 422–31 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K.M. Mullane, S. Gorbach, Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 9, 767–777 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Lancaster, S.J. Matthews, Clin. Therapeut. 34, 1–3 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.S. Osburne, A.L. Sonenshein, J. Virol. 33, 945–953 (1980)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Artsimovitch, J. Seddon, P. Sears, Clin. Infect. Dis. 55, 127–131 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Crawford, E. Huesgen, L. Danziger, Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 69, 933–943 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang Hong-lei, Chen Ming-hong, Zhao Wei, Lian Yun-yamg, Chin. J. Pharm. Anal. 38, 1496–1499 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Tousseeva et al., Drugs in R&D 14, 309–14 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ICH Q1A (R2), Stability Testing Of New Drug Substance and Drug Product (2003)

  16. ICH Q1B, Photo stability Testing of New Drug Substance and Drug Product (2003)

  17. ICH Q2A (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures -Text and methodology (2015)

  18. L.R. Snyder, J.J. Kirkland, J.J. Joseph, Practical HPLC Method Development, 2nd edn. (WileyInter Science, New York, 2015), pp. 1–56

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.K. Sharma, M. Murugesan, J. Chromatogr. Sep. Tech. 8, 8–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.O. Kaila, M.A. Ambasana, R.S. Thakkar, H.T. Saravaia, A.K. Shah, Indian J Pharm Sci. 72, 592 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A.S. Coelho, I.F. Ribeiro, E.B. Lages, Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 56, 1–9 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B.M. Rao et al., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 41, 1146–1151 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Hamrapurkar, P. Patil, M. Phale, M. Gandhi, S. Pawar, Pharm. Methods. 2, 15–22 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to DST-FIST Facility of Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER), Anantapur, AP, India for the provided support in instrumentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hemraj Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, K.V., Sharma, H., Peraman, R. et al. A Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC-UV method for determination of fidaxomicin and its hydrolytic degradation products. J IRAN CHEM SOC 19, 785–792 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-021-02343-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-021-02343-4

Keywords

Navigation