Skip to main content
Log in

Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Child Health: Implications for Policy

  • Maternal and Childhood Nutrition (AC Wood, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Nutrition Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Various policies to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) consumption in children have been implemented. Here, we review the evidence on whether these policies are effective in reducing SSB intake and whether a reduction in SSB intake results in a concomitant reduction in child obesity. We also highlight ethical concerns with such efforts.

Recent Findings

The evidence supporting relationship between SSB consumption and child body mass index (BMI) is consistently small and lacks causality. The effects of policies are unclear; taxation has no clear relationship to SSB purchasing, innovative marketing outlets make it difficult to examine the effects of restricting marketing on SSB consumption, and there is no evidence that reducing SSB availability in schools decreases consumption.

Summary

Research studies with rigorous and reproducible study designs are needed to examine whether reducing SSB consumption reduces child obesity, and to identify implementable policies that not only reduce SSB consumption but also child weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Park S, Pan L, Sherry B, Li R. The association of sugar-sweetened beverage intake during infancy with sugar-sweetened beverage intake at 6 years of age. Pediatrics. 2014;134:S56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosinger A, Herrick K, Gahche J, Park S. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among US youth, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2017;271:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lieb DC, Snow RE, DeBoer MD. Socioeconomic factors in the development of childhood obesity and diabetes. Clin Sports Med. 2009;28:349–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. •• Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes Rev. 2013;14:606–19. This study using the key criteria of causality evaluates observational and clinical trial evidence for the link between SSB consumption and prevalence of obesity.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen S, Choi HK, Lustig RH, Hsu C-Y. Sugar-sweetened beverages, serum uric acid, and blood pressure in adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009;154:807–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deboer MD, Scharf RJ, Demmer RT. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in 2-to 5-year-old children. Pediatrics. 2013;132:413–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. He B, Long W, Li X, Yang W, Chen Y, Zhu Y. Sugar-sweetened beverages consumption positively associated with the risks of obesity and hypertriglyceridemia among children aged 7–18 years in South China. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017;25:81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Forshee RA, Anderson PA, Storey ML. Sugar-sweetened beverages and body mass index in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1662–71. This is a meta-analysis of 12 studies (10 logitudinal and 2 randomized controlled trails) examining the association between SSB consumption and weight gain among children and adolescents.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and BMI in children and adolescents: reanalyses of a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:438–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:667–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han E, Powell LM. Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113:43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sleddens EF, Gerards SM, Thijs C, Vries NK, Kremers SP. General parenting, childhood overweight and obesity-inducing behaviors: A review. Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Horst K, Kremers S, Ferreira I, Singh A, Oenema A, Brug J. Perceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescents. Health Educ Res 2006;22:295-304.

  14. Frary CD, Johnson RK, Wang MQ. Children and adolescents' choices of foods and beverages high in added sugars are associated with intakes of key nutrients and food groups. J Adolesc Health. 2004;34:56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berkey CS, Rockett HR, Field AE, Gillman M, Colditz GA. Sugar-added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obesity. 2004;12:778–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newby P, Peterson KE, Berkey CS, Leppert J, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Beverage consumption is not associated with changes in weight and body mass index among low-income preschool children in North Dakota. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:1086–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blum JW, Jacobsen DJ, Donnelly JE. Beverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year period. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005;24:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mundt CA, Baxter-Jones A, Whiting SJ, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Mirwald RL. Relationships of activity and sugar drink intake on fat mass development in youths. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1245–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Striegel-Moore RH, Thompson D, Affenito SG, Franko DL, Obarzanek E, Barton BA, et al. Correlates of beverage intake in adolescent girls: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. J Pediatr. 2006;148:183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson L, Mander AP, Jones LR, Emmett PM, Jebb SA. Is sugar-sweetened beverage consumption associated with increased fatness in children? Nutrition. 2007;23:557–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Libuda L, Alexy U, Sichert-Hellert W, Stehle P, Karaolis-Danckert N, Buyken AE, et al. Pattern of beverage consumption and long-term association with body-weight status in German adolescents–results from the DONALD study. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:1370–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanselow MS, Pereira MA, Neumark-Sztainer D, Raatz SK. Adolescent beverage habits and changes in weight over time: findings from Project EAT. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1489–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlson JA, Crespo NC, Sallis JF, Patterson RE, Elder JP. Dietary-related and physical activity-related predictors of obesity in children: a 2-year prospective study. Child Obes. 2012;8:110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Olsen NJ, Andersen LB, Wedderkopp N, Kristensen PL, Heitmann BL. Intake of liquid and solid sucrose in relation to changes in body fatness over 6 years among 8-to 10-year-old children: the European Youth Heart Study. Obes Facts. 2012;5:506–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Laska MN, Murray DM, Lytle LA, Harnack LJ. Longitudinal associations between key dietary behaviors and weight gain over time: transitions through the adolescent years. Obesity. 2012;20:118–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laurson K, Eisenmann JC, Moore S. Lack of association between television viewing, soft drinks, physical activity and body mass index in children. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97:795–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:505–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Viner RM, Cole TJ. Who changes body mass between adolescence and adulthood? Factors predicting change in BMI between 16 year and 30 years in the 1970 British Birth Cohort. Int J Obes. 2006;30:1368–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. •• Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98:1084–102. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis anlayzes prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials seprately in children and adults to provide evidence that SSB consumption promotes weight gain.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Frazier-Wood A. Nutritional epidemiology data should be analyzed by nutritional epidemiologists. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Willett W, Stamfer M. Implications of total energy intake for epidemiologic analyses. In: Willet W, editor. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1220S–31S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. James J, Thomas P, Kerr D. Preventing childhood obesity: two year follow-up results from the Christchurch obesity prevention programme in schools (CHOPPS). BMJ. 2007;335:762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Chomitz VR, Antonelli TA, Gortmaker SL, Osganian SK, et al. A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1407–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, Chomitz VR, Ellenbogen SJ, Ludwig DS. Effects of decreasing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:673–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sichieri R, Trotte AP, De Souza RA, Veiga GV. School randomised trial on prevention of excessive weight gain by discouraging students from drinking sodas. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC, Katan MB. A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jou J, Techakehakij W. International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts. Health Policy. 2012;107:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. WHO. Taxes on sugary drinks: Why do it [Internet]? World Health Organization; 2016:2–5. [cited 2018 July 14] Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260253/WHO-NMH-PND16.5Rev.1eng.pdf;jsessionid=794038651F8DF37E27A9C42A62BBF7C2?sequence=1.

  40. Frieden TR, Dietz W, Collins J. Reducing childhood obesity through policy change: acting now to prevent obesity. Health Aff. 2010;29:357–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sonneville KR, Long MW, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Wang YC, Pomeranz JL, et al. BMI and healthcare cost impact of eliminating tax subsidy for advertising unhealthy food to youth. Am J Prev Med. 2012;49:124–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Long MW, Gortmaker SL, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Moodie ML, Sacks G, et al. Cost effectiveness of a sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2012;49:112–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhen C, Finkelstein EA, Nonnemaker JM, Karns SA, Todd JE. Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system. Am J Agric Econ. 2013;96:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cawley J, Frisvold DE. The Pass-Through of Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Retail Prices: The Case of Berkeley, California. J Policy Anal Manage. 2017;36:303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. • Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, Mcculloch CE, Madsen KA. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:1865–71. This study evaluates the impact of the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in Berkeley, California, which became the first US jurisdiction to implement such a tax.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ. 2016;h6704:352.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff. 2017;36:564–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, Miles DR et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar- sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(4).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leibowitz J, Rosch JT, Ramirez E, Brill J, Ohihausen M. A Review of Food Marketing to Children and Adolescents: Federal Trade Commission, Follow-Up Report. 2012.

  50. Powell LM, Szczypka G, Chaloupka FJ, Braunschweig CL. Nutritional content of television food advertisements seen by children and adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics. 2007;120:576–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Harris JL, Schwartz MB, Lodolce M, Munsell C, Fleming-Milici F, et al. Sugary drink FACTS 2014 some progress but much room for improvement in marketing to youth [Internet]. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity; 2017 [cited 2018 July 27]. Available from: http://www.sugarydrinkfacts.org/resources/sugarydrinkfacts_report.pdf.

  52. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Lobstein T, Rigby N, Baur LA, Brownell KD, et al. Sydney Principles’ for reducing the commercial promotion of foods and beverages to children. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:881–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Finkelstein DM, Hill EL, Whitaker RC. School food environments and policies in US public schools. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e251–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnston LD, Delva J, O’Malley PM. Soft drink availability, contracts, and revenues in American secondary schools. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:S209–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. USDA. Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act Smart Snacks in School [Internet]. United States Department of Agriculture; 2015. [updated 2017 Nov 28; cited 2018 June 20]. Available from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/healthierschoolday/tools-schools-focusing-smart-snacks.

  56. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Terry-Mcelrath YM. School policies and practices to improve health and prevent obesity: National secondary school survey results: School Years 2006–07 through 2012–14. Ann Arbor Michigan. 2015;6.

  57. Taber DR, Chriqui JF, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ. Banning all sugar-sweetened beverages in middle schools: reduction of in-school access and purchasing but not overall consumption. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. • Terry-Mcelrath YM, Chriqui JF, O’Malley PM, Chaloupka FJ, Johnston LD. Regular soda policies, school availability, and high school student consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48:436–44. This study provides evidence on state and district level policies on soda ban in high school and its effect on availability and consumption among students.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Cradock AL, Mchugh A, Mont-Ferguson H, Grant L, Barrett JL, Gortmaker SL, et al. Peer Reviewed: Effect of School District Policy Change on Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Among High School Students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8:A74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Johnson DB, Bruemmer B, Lund AE, Evens CC, Mar CM. Impact of school district sugar-sweetened beverage policies on student beverage exposure and consumption in middle schools. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45:S30–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. USFDA. Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label [Internet]. United States Food and Drug Administration; 2017. [updated 2018 June 6; cited 2018 June 10]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformatbelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm.

  62. Popova L. Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels: Lessons learned from the tobacco industry. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016;44:633.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. American Beverage Associaion. Really? Warning labels on soda [Internet]? ABA Blog; 2014. [cited 2018 June 14]. Available from: https://www.ameribev.org/education-resources/blog/post/really-warning-labels-on-soda/.

  64. Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE. A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:527–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Roberto CA, Wong D, Musicus A, Hammond D. The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20153185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gollust SE, Barry CL, Niederdeppe J. Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Prev Med. 2014;63:52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. WHO. World Health Organization global strategy on diet, physical activity and health: Marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2010. [cited 2018 June 16]. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/marketing-food-to-children/en/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabnam R. Momin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Shabnam Momin and Alexis C. Wood declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Maternal and Childhood Nutrition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Momin, S.R., Wood, A.C. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Child Health: Implications for Policy. Curr Nutr Rep 7, 286–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-018-0249-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-018-0249-7

Keywords

Navigation