Abstract
The moisture content (MC) and electrical conductivity (EC) in substrates are major root-zone environmental factors that affect the transpiration rate and subsequent plant growth in soilless culture. For maintaining optimum root-zone environments, efficient real-time irrigation control is required based on the substrate EC, substrate MC, and transpiration. The objectives of this study were to clarify the relationship between substrate MC and EC and analyze the changes in substrate EC, plant growth, and water use efficiency under different moisture control regimes. Irrigation systems maintaining three regimes of substrate MC (70–85, 60–85, and 50–85%) were set as treatments, and a conventional irrigation using accumulated radiation served as a control. Subsequent changes in the substrate EC and transpiration rate were continuously measured at different substrate MCs, and the relationships between these variables were derived. The transpiration rate was most sensitive to substrate EC at general cultivation conditions of a substrate EC of 2.5 to 4.5 dS·m−1 and a substrate MC of 60 to 85%. The transpiration rate tended to decrease with increasing substrate EC and decreasing substrate MC. More water was consumed in a higher substrate MC, which was controlled within a narrow range of MC. However, substrate EC was well-controlled below 4.5 dS·m−1 in a substrate MC of 70 to 85%. The relationship between the range of substrate MC and the increase in substrate EC was obtained using equations. Although more water was supplied for the control with a substrate MC of 70 to 85%, fruit productivity tended to increase compared to the other substrate MC treatments (60–85 and 50–85%). From the results, it is hypothesized that precise control of root-zone environments can be used to increase fruit productivity and water use efficiency and to minimize plant water stress as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Anothai, J., C.M.T. Soler, A. Green, T.J. Trout, and G. Hoogenboom. 2013. Evaluation of two evapotranspiration approaches simulated with the CSM-CERES-Maize model under different irrigation strategies and the impact on maize growth, development and soil moisture content for semi-arid conditions. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 176:64–76.
Azhar, N., B. Hussain, M.Y. Ashraf, and K.Y. Abbasi. 2011. Water stress mediated changes in growth, physiology and secondary metabolites of Desi Ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi L.). Pak. J. Bot. 43:15–19.
Barta, D.J. and T.W. Tibbitts. 2000. Calcium localization and tipburn development in lettuce leaves during early enlargement. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125:294–298.
Bernstein, N., M. Kravchik, and N. Dudai. 2010. Salinity-induced changes in essential oil, pigments and salts accumulation in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) in relation to alterations of morphological development. Ann. Appl. Biol. 156:167–177.
Charbonneau, J., A. Gosselin, and M.J. Trudel. 1988. Effect of electricconductivity of the nutrient solution on growth and development of greenhouse tomato cultivated with or without supplementary lighting. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:267–276.
Dorais, M., A.P. Papadopoulos, and A. Gosselin. 2001. Influence ofelectric conductivity management on greenhouse tomato yield and fruit quality. Agronomie 21:367–383.
Havrda, J., E. Gregorova, and F. Oujiri. 1989. Electric-conductivity of water-saturated porcelain mixture. 1. Method for determining electric-conductivity and its dependence on moisture-content. Silikaty 33:367–373.
Hellemans, B. 2006. Environmental control and paprika growing technique. Substratus Res. Center, the Netherlands.
Jovicich, E., D.J. Cantliffe, P.J. Stoffella, and D.Z. Haman. 2007. Bell pepper fruit yield and quality as influenced by solar radiationbased irrigation and container media in a passively ventilated greenhouse. HortScience 42:642–652.
Li, S.X., Z.H. Wang, S.S. Malhi, S.Q. Li, Y.J. Gao, and X.H. Tian. 2009. Nutrient and water management effects on crop production, and nutrient and water use efficiency in dry land areas of China. Adv. Agron. 102:223–265.
Moreira, D.R. and V.J.M. Cardoso. 1998. Effect of soil moisture content and the irrigation frequency on the sugarcane germination. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 33:721–729.
Moreshet, S., C. Yao, B. Aloni, L. Karni, M. Fuchs, and C. Stanghellini. 1999. Environmental factors affecting the cracking of greenhousegrown bell pepper fruit. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 74:6–12.
Nesci, A., M. Etcheverry, and N. Magan. 2004. Osmotic and matric potential effects on growth, sugar alcohol and sugar accumulation by Aspergillus section Flavi strains from Argentina. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96:965–972.
Nesmith, D.S., D.C. Bridges, and J.C. Barbour. 1992. Bell pepper responses to root restriction. J. Plant Nutr. 15:2763–2776.
Patane, C. 2011. Leaf area index, leaf transpiration and stomatal conductance as affected by soil water deficit and VPD in processing tomato in semi arid mediterranean climate. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 197:165–176.
Podesta, L., R. Vallone, E. Sanchez, and J.A. Morabito. 2010. Effect of water deficit irrigation on vegetative growth of young cheery trees (Prunus avium L.). Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrar. 42:73–91.
Ramos, A.J., N. Magan, and V. Sanchis. 1999. Osmotic and matric potential effects on growth, sclerotia and partitioning of polyols and sugars in colonies and spores of Aspergillus ochraceus. Mycol. Res. 103:141–147.
Rao, N.K.S. and R.M. Bhatt. 1988. Photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal diffusive resistance, and relative water-content of capsicum (bell pepper) grown under water-stress. Photosynthetica 22:377–382.
Rogiers, S.Y., D.H. Greer, R.J. Hutton, and S.J. Clarke. 2011. Transpiration efficiency of the grapevine cv. Semillon is tied to VPD in warm climates. Ann. Appl. Biol. 158:106–114.
Shin, J.H., J.S. Park, and J.E. Son. 2014. Estimating the actual transpiration rate with compensated levels of accumulated radiation for the efficient irrigation of soilless cultures of paprika plants. Agr. Water Manage. 135:9–18.
Sommer, H.E., C.L. Brown, and H.Y. Wetzstein. 1999. The influence of intermittent soil drying on growth, cell number, and final cell length in the pith of mature internodes in Helianthus annuus L. and Liquidambar styraciflua L. Plant Soil 210:51–59.
Stuhlfauth, T., K. Klug, and H.P. Fock. 1987. The production of secondary metabolites by digitalis-lanata during CO2 enrichment and water-stress. Phytochemistry 26:2735–2739.
Ta, T.H., J.H. Shin, E.H. Noh, and J.E. Son. 2012. Transpiration, growth, and water use efficiency of paprika plants (Capsicum annuum L.) as affected by irrigation frequency. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 53:129–134.
Ta, T.H., J.H. Shin, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son. 2011. Modeling of transpiration of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) plants based on radiation and leaf area index in soilless culture. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 52:265–269.
Tai, N.H., J.S. Park, T.I. Ahn, J.H. Lee, D.J. Myoung, Y.Y. Cho, and J.E. Son. 2010. Analysis of relationship among growth, environmental factors and transpiration in soilless culture of paprika plants. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 28:59–64.
Van Ieperen, W. 1996. Dynamic effects of changes in electric conductivity on transpiration and growth of greenhouse-grown tomato plants. J. Hortic. Sci. 71:481–496.
Wang, L.W., A.M. Showalter, and I.A. Ungar. 1997. Effect of salinity on growth, ion content, and cell wall chemistry in Atriplex prostrata (Chenopodiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84:1247–1255.
Xu, H.J., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1993. Photosynthesis, water relations and growth-responses of greenhouse tomato plants to high solution electric-conductivity and low soil-water content-after-effects in the stresses-released plants. Plant Physiol. 102:157–157
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, J.H., Son, J.E. Changes in electrical conductivity and moisture content of substrate and their subsequent effects on transpiration rate, water use efficiency, and plant growth in the soilless culture of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 56, 178–185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0154-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0154-6