Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bioremediation potential of bacterial consortium on different wastewaters for electricity and biomass feedstock generation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cooperative relationships of natural environmental microbial consortia and synthetic microbial consortia have inspired for studying microbial interactions and various engineering applications. In this current study, different industrial wastewaters (distillery spent wash (DSW), pharmaceutical and dairy wastewater) were treated in three different microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with single and mixed culture bacteria. The performance of MFCs was evaluated considering the major parameters like organic matter removal, voltage generation and biomass production using mixed and single cultures. The maximum COD removal efficiency of 72.5 ± 0.5% from DSW, 85 ± 0.5% from pharmaceutical wastewater and 86 ± 0.5% from dairy wastewater were observed. The results indicate the effective symbiotic relation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus cereus for bioremediation in MFC. The maximum voltage generation of 350.2 ± 0.5 mV in MFC using DSW, 705.4 ± 0.5 mV in MFC using pharmaceutical wastewater and 787.47 ± 0.5 mV in MFC using dairy wastewater were observed relatively higher than other previous study using mixed culture. The produced CO2 from the biogas of anode chamber was transferred from anodic chamber to cathodic chamber for effective utilization in microalgal growth. The maximum algal biomass of 0.52 ± 0.05 g/L from MFC1B+P, 0.82 ± 0.05 g/L from MFC2B+P and 0.95 ± 0.05 g/L from MFC3B+P was observed. First order of kinetic model was performed, and as a result, the model was found appropriate and validate the experimental results. This study reveals the possibility of using adapted microbial consortia in MFCs for achieving efficient bioremediation of organic and inorganic contaminates and concomitant bioelectricity generation using different industrial wastewater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Islam A, Hwa Teo S, Awual MR, Taufiq-Yap YH (2020) Ultrathin assembles of porous array for enhanced H2 evolution. Sci Rep 10(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Islam A, Teo SH, Awual MR, Taufiq-Yap YH (2020) Assessment of clean H2 energy production from water using novel silicon photocatalyst. J Clean Prod 244:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed J, Thakur A, Goyal A (2021) Chapter 1: Industrial wastewater and its toxic effects. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839165399-00001

  4. Teo SH, Islam A, Taufiq-Yap YH, Awual MR (2021) Introducing the novel composite photocatalysts to boost the performance of hydrogen (H2) production. J Clean Prod 313:127909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127909

  5. Zhang T, Wang X, Zhang X (2014) Recent progress in TiO2-mediated solar photocatalysis for industrial wastewater treatment. Int J Photoenergy 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/607954

  6. Amit, Kumar, N., Verma, S., Park, J., Jaiswal, A. K., Ghosh, U. K., and Gautam, R. (2022) Utilization of nano-sized waste lime sludge particles in harvesting marine microalgae for biodiesel feedstock production. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering 2021 7:1, 7(1), 99–107. [online] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41204-021-00195-0 (Accessed April 2, 2022)

  7. Gautam R Nayak J K Daverey A and Ghosh U K (2022) Emerging sustainable opportunities for waste to bioenergy: an overview. Waste-to-Energy Approaches Towards Zero Waste, 1–55

  8. Yeamin M. Bin, Islam MM, Chowdhury AN, Awual MR (2021) Efficient encapsulation of toxic dyes from wastewater using several biodegradable natural polymers and their composites. J Clean Prod 291:125920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahammad, S. Z. and Sreekrishnan T. R. (2016) Energy from wastewater treatment. Bioremediation and Bioeconomy 523–536

  10. Awual MR (2015) A novel facial composite adsorbent for enhanced copper(II) detection and removal from wastewater. Chem Eng J 266:368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasan MN, Shenashen MA, Hasan MM, Znad H, Awual MR (2021) Assessing of cesium removal from wastewater using functionalized wood cellulosic adsorbent. Chemosphere 270:128668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khandaker S, Bashar MM, Islam A, Hossain MT, Teo SH, Awual MR (2022) Sustainable energy generation from textile biowaste and its challenges: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 157(January):112051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Znad H, Al-Mohammedawi H, Awual MR (2021) (2021) Integrated pre-treatment stage of biosorbent – sonication for mixed brewery and restaurant effluents to enhance the photo-fermentative hydrogen production. Biomass and Bioenergy 144(November 2020):10589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belov V, Komandresova T, Samarkin A (2017) IOP Conference Series: earth and environmental science a review on advanced treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. IOP Conf. Ser Earth Environ. Sci 63:12025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das MP, Bashwant M, Kumar K, Das J (2012) Control of pharmaceutical effluent parameters through bioremediation. J Chem Pharm Res 4(2):1061–1065

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madukasi EI, Dai X, He C, Zhou J (2010) Potentials of phototrophic bacteria in treating pharmaceutical wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(1):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pilli S. Sellamuthu B. Pandey A. K. and Tyagi R. D. (2020) Treatment of wastewater containing pharmaceuticals: biological treatment. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 463–520

  18. Kumar V. and Chandra, R. (2020) Metagenomics analysis of rhizospheric bacterial communities of Saccharum arundinaceum growing on organometallic sludge of sugarcane molasses-based distillery. 3 Biotech 10(7) 1–18. [online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02310-5

  19. Saner AB, Mungray AK, Mistry NJ (2016) Treatment of distillery wastewater in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Desalination Water Treat 57(10):4328–4344. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.994107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vijayaraghavan K, Ramanujam TK (2000) Performance of anaerobic contact filter in series for treating distillery spentwash. Bioprocess Eng 22(2):109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmad T Aadil, R. M Ahmed H., Rahman U. ur, Soares, B. C. V., Souza, S. L. Q., Pimentel, T. C., Scudino, H., Guimarães, J. T., Esmerino, E. A., Freitas, M. Q., Almada, R. B., Vendramel, S. M. R., Silva, M. C., and Cruz, A. G. (2019) Treatment and utilization of dairy industrial waste: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 88(December 2018):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinha N. and Dahiya P. (2022) Removal of emerging contaminants from pharmaceutical wastewater through application of bionanotechnology. Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes 247–264

  23. Patel H. K. Kalaria R. K. Jokhakar P. H. Patel C. R. and Patel B. Y. (2022) Removal of emerging contaminants in water treatment by an application of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes, 385–400

  24. Kull K (2010) Ecosystems are made of semiosic bonds: consortia, umwelten, biophony and ecological codes. Biosemiotics 3(3):347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayat K, Menhas S, Bundschuh J, Chaudhary HJ (2017) Microbial biotechnology as an emerging industrial wastewater treatment process for arsenic mitigationA critical review. J Clean Prod 151:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan X, Acquah I, Liu H, Li W, Tan S (2019) A critical review on saline wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor (MBR) from a microbial perspective. Chemosphere 220:1150–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nayak JK, Amit, Ghosh UK (2018) An innovative mixotrophic approach of distillery spent wash with sewage wastewater for biodegradation and bioelectricity generation using microbial fuel cell. J Water Process Eng 23:306–313

  28. Khandaker S, Das S, Hossain MT, Islam A, Miah MR, Awual MR (2021) Sustainable approach for wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells and green energy generation—a comprehensive review. Journal of Molecular Liquids 344:117795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gautam R Nayak J K Talapatra K. N Amit and Ghosh U. K. (2021) Assessment of different organic substrates for bio-electricity and bio-hydrogen generation in an integrated bio-electrochemical system. Materials Today: Proceedings, (xxxx), 6–10

  30. Jahnke J P Sarkes D.A Liba, J L Sumner J. J and Stratis-Cullum, D. N. (2021) Improved microbial fuel cell performance by engineering E. coli for enhanced affinity to gold. Energies 14(17)

  31. Rojas-Flores S, Pérez-Delgado O, Nazario-Naveda R, Rojales-Alfaro H, Benites SM, De La Cruz-Noriega M, Otiniano NM (2021) Potential use of papaya waste as a fuel for bioelectricity generation. Processes 9(10):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. García-Mayagoitia, S., Fernández-Luqueño, F., Morales-Acosta, D., Carrillo-Rodríguez, J. C., García-Lobato, M. A., De La Torre-Saenz, L., Alonso-Lemus, I. L., and Rodrĺguez-Varela, F. J. (2019) Energy generation from pharmaceutical residual water in microbial fuel cells using ordered mesoporous carbon and Bacillus subtilis as bioanode. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 7(14), 12179–12187. [online] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01281 (Accessed April 1, 2022)

  33. Qiao YJ, Qiao Y, Zou L, Wu XS, Liu JH (2017) Biofilm promoted current generation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbial fuel cell via improving the interfacial redox reaction of phenazines. Bioelectrochemistry 117:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Akhbari A, Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohammadi P, Mansouri Y, Irandoust M, Isa MH (2012) Kinetic modeling of carbon and nutrients removal in an integrated rotating biological contactor-activated sludge system. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(2):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weng C, Molof AH (1974) Nitrification in the biological fixed-film rotating disk system 46(7):1674–1685

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar V, Wati L, FitzGibbon F, Nigam P, Banat IM, Singh D, Marchant R (1997) Bioremediation and decolorization of anaerobically digested distillery spent wash. Biotech Lett 19(4):311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Werner CM, Hoppe-Jones C, Saikaly PE, Logan BE, Amy GL (2015) Attenuation of trace organic compounds (TOrCs) inbioelectrochemical systems. Water Res 73:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang B, Li A, Cui D, Cai R, Ma F, Wang Y (2014) Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of sulfamethoxazole by Pseudomonas psychrophila HA-4, a newly isolated cold-adapted sulfamethoxazole-degrading bacterium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(10):4671–4681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Elakkiya E, Matheswaran M (2013) Comparison of anodic metabolisms in bioelectricity production during treatment of dairy wastewater in Microbial Fuel Cell. Bioresour Technol 136:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanjay S, Udayashankara TH (2020) Dairy wastewater treatment with bio-electricity generation using dual chambered membrane-less microbial fuel cell. Mater Today Proceedings 35, Part 3, (2021) 308–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.533

  41. Amit, Nayak JK, Ghosh UK (2020) Microalgal remediation of anaerobic pretreated pharmaceutical wastewater for sustainable biodiesel production and electricity generation. J Water Process Eng 35(2020):101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101192

  42. Singh R, Gautam N, Mishra A, Gupta R (2011) Heavy metals and living systems: an overview. Indian Journal of Pharmacology 43(3):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kaewchai S, Prasertsan P (2002) Biosorption of heavy metal by thermotolerant polymer-producing bacterial cells and the bioflocculant. J Sci Technol 24(3):421–430

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mehrarad F, Ziarati P, Mousavi Z (2016) Removing heavy metals from pharmaceutical effluent by pelargonium grandiflorum. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal 9(1):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Maness PC, Huang J, Smolinski S, Tek V, Vanzin G (2005) Energy generation from the CO oxidation-hydrogen production pathway in Rubrivivax gelatinosus. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(6):2870–2874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chaudhuri SK, Lovley DR (2003) Electricity generation by direct oxidation of glucose in mediatorless microbial fuel cells. Nat Biotechnol 21(10):1229–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nayak JK, Ghosh UK (2019) Post treatment of microalgae treated pharmaceutical wastewater in photosynthetic microbial fuel cell (PMFC) and biodiesel production. Biomass and Bioenergy 131(2019):105415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105415

  48. Zhang J, Zheng P, Zhang M, Chen H, Chen T, Xie Z, Cai J, Abbas G (2013) Kinetics of substrate degradation and electricity generation in anodic denitrification microbial fuel cell (AD-MFC). Biores Technol 149:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Velvizhi G, Venkata Mohan S (2012) Electrogenic activity and electron losses under increasing organic load of recalcitrant pharmaceutical wastewater. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(7):5969–5978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mohanakrishna G, Venkata Mohan S, Sarma PN (2010) Bio-electrochemical treatment of distillery wastewater in microbial fuel cell facilitating decolorization and desalination along with power generation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 177(1–3):487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Choudhury P, Ray RN, Bandyopadhyay TK, Bhunia B (2020) Fed batch approach for stable generation of power from dairy wastewater using microbial fuel cell and its kinetic study. Fuel 266(2020):117073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117073

  52. Mazzucotelli C. A. Agüero M. V. del Rosario Moreira M., and Ansorena, M. R. (2016) Optimization of medium components and physicochemical parameters to simultaneously enhance microbial growth and production of lypolitic enzymes by Stenotrophomonas sp. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 63(3), 407–418. [online] http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/bab.1378 (Accessed July 29, 2020)

  53. Venkata Mohan S, Mohanakrishna G, Srikanth S, Sarma PN (2008) Harnessing of bioelectricity in microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing aerated cathode through anaerobic treatment of chemical wastewater using selectively enriched hydrogen producing mixed consortia. Fuel 87(12):2667–2676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Borja A, Elliott M, Andersen JH, Cardoso AC, Carstensen J, Ferreira JG, Heiskanen AS, Marques JC, Neto JM, Teixeira H, Uusitalo L, Uyarra MC, Zampoukas N (2013) Good environmental status of marine ecosystems: what is it and how do we know when we have attained it? Mar Pollut Bull 76(1–2):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Jiménez AM, Borja R, Martín A, Raposo F (2006) Kinetic analysis of the anaerobic digestion of untreated vinasses and vinasses previously treated with Penicillium decumbens. J Environ Manage 80(4):303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Monod J. (1949) A certain number. Annual Reviews in M, 3(Xl) 371–394

  57. Ã D T S (2008) Kinetic of carbonaceous substrate in an upflow anaerobic sludge sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating 2 4 dichlorophenol (2 4 DCP). 86, 121–131

  58. Prakash N. Sockan V. and Raju V. (2011) Anaerobic digestion of distillery spent wash. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 4(3) 134–140. [online] http://www.ejournalofscience.org/archive/vol4no3/vol4no3_3.pdf

  59. Liwarska-Bizukojc, E., Galamon, M., and Bernat, P. (2018) Kinetics of biological removal of the selected micropollutants and their effect on activated sludge biomass. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 229(11)

Download references

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

    Jagdeep Kumar Nayak, Rahul Gautam & Uttam Kumar Ghosh

  2. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

    Jagdeep Kumar Nayak

Authors
  1. Jagdeep Kumar Nayak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rahul Gautam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Uttam Kumar Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jagdeep Kumar Nayak: investigation, analysis and writing initial draft; Rahul Gautam: Editing, analysis and proof reading; Uttam Ghosh: conceptualization, funding, project administration and final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagdeep Kumar Nayak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nayak, J.K., Gautam, R. & Ghosh, U.K. Bioremediation potential of bacterial consortium on different wastewaters for electricity and biomass feedstock generation. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 14, 11295–11308 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02992-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02992-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation