Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed Messages: The enduring significance of email in school principals’ work

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amid the increasing digitisation of schools, relatively little work has examined the ways in which digital technologies are reconfiguring the work of school principals. With an approach based on the sociology of work, this paper draws on 19 in-depth interviews with Australian school principals to examine their everyday experiences of digital work—with particular attention paid to the enduring influence of email as a key work tool. On one hand, email was seen as a constant and unremarkable feature of ‘modern’ school leadership. Yet, these accounts also highlighted how the intensification and extension of individual principals’ labour practices were being exacerbated by multiple layers and technologies of surveillance, expectations of constant availability, and increased accountabilities imposed through email. Of particular significance were the detrimental ways in which email-based work was described as reshaping the affective dimensions of principals’ work. Against this background, the paper considers what steps might be taken to mitigate such pressures, and perhaps move towards alternate forms of digitally-supported work that are more sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, P. (1989). Management, labour process and agency. Work, Employment and Society, 3(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2010). Preparing leaders to work with emotions in culturally diverse educational communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(5), 642–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., Zipin, L., & Sellar, S. (2015). Negotiating with the neighbours. In B. Lingard, G. Thompson, & S. Sellar (Eds.), National testing in schools (pp. 199–211). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cambier, R., & Vlerick, P. (2020). You’ve got mail: Does workplace telepressure relate to email communication? Cognition, Technology & Work, 22(3), 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society, 28(4), 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döveling, K., Harju, A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures. Social Media+Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117743141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, P., & Thompson, P. (2017). Contemporary work. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59(2), 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., Stacey, M., Wilson, R., & Gavin, M. (2019). Intensification of teachers’ work under devolution: A ‘tsunami’ of paperwork. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(5), 613–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, F. (2015). Is work intensification extra stress? Journal of Personal Psychology, 14(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2018). Counterproductive. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Andrijasevic, R. (2020). Virtually absent. Feminist Review [forthcoming]

  • Heffernan, A., & Pierpoint, A. (2020). Autonomy, accountability, and principals’ work: An Australian study. Australian Secondary Principals’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, A. (2021). Retaining Australia’s school leaders in ‘challenging’ contexts: The importance of personal relationships in principal turnover decisions. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, A. (2018). The principal and school improvement: Theorising discourse, policy, and practice. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, K., Paasonen, S., & Petit, M. (Eds.). (2015). Networked affect. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochbein, C., & Meyers, C. (2021). Incorporating time demands into studies of principal time use. School Leadership & Management, 41(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1851671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, A., Thompson, G., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2018). Teachers’ and school leaders’ perceptions of commercialisation in Australian public schools. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2013). Working online, living offline. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 7(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2013). Thriving amid the performative demands of the contemporary audit culture. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 750–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance. Governance, 8(1), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostogriz, A. (2012). Accountability and the affective labour of teachers: A Marxist-Vygotskian perspective. Australian Educational Researcher, 39(4), 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D., Loi, N., & Gudex, B. (2019). Understanding the relationship between work intensification and burnout in secondary teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 25(2), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. (2016). Mindful tech: How to bring balance to our digital lives. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahfouz, J. (2020). Principals and stress. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 48(3), 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society, 13(1), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, A., & Riley, P. (2017). Emotional demands, emotional labour and occupational outcomes in school principals. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 45(3), 484–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. (2018). An examination of the boundary between work and home for knowledge workers. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 9(3), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, K., & Wajcman, J. (2019). Have mobile devices changed working patterns in the 21st century? Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustosmäki, A. (2018). The intensification of work. In M. Tammelin (Ed.), Family, work and well-being (pp. 77–90). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K., & Hauseman, D. C. (2019). The use of e-mail and principals’ work. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(3), 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K., Wang, F., & Hauseman, D. C. (2015). Complexity and Volume. Societies, 5(2), 537–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A. (2003). Understanding teachers’ work. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(5), 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, P., See, S-M., Marsh, H., & Dicke, T. (2021) The Australian Principal Occupational Health, Safety and Wellbeing Survey (IPPE Report). Sydney: Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.

  • Russell, E. (2017). Strategies for effectively managing email at work. Acas Research Report (06/17).

  • Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT: Perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2021). The human labour of school data: Exploring the production of digital data in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 47(3), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., & Johnson, N. (2017). High-tech, hard work: An investigation of teachers’ work in the digital age. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stich, J., Tarafdar, M., Stacey, P., & Cooper, S. (2019). Appraisal of email use as a source of workplace stress. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(2), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2017). Place-based methods for researching schools. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., Mockler, N., & Hogan, A. (2021). Making work private: Autonomy, intensification and accountability. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121996134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (2019). Digital policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 62(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1691030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J., & Myhill, M. (2008). Under ‘Constant Bombardment’: Work intensification and the teachers’ role. In D. Johnson & R. Maclean (Eds.), Teaching: Professionalization, development and leadership (pp. 25–43). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Heffernan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heffernan, A., Selwyn, N. Mixed Messages: The enduring significance of email in school principals’ work. Aust. Educ. Res. 50, 255–273 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00486-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00486-0

Keywords

Navigation