Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of the Asymmetric Cellulose Acetate Membrane Synthesis Variables for Porosity and Pure Water Permeation Flux Using Response Surface Methodology: Microfiltration Application

  • Research Article-Chemical Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Membranes play a vital role in membrane-based water treatment processes. Thus, improvement in the membrane fabrication stage can greatly affect the overall performance of these technologies. Accordingly, this study focuses on optimizing the fabrication process of a microfiltration cellulose acetate membrane prepared using a pore-templating method. The effects of synthesis variables and their interactions were investigated using face-centered composite design through response surface methodology (RSM). Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and glycerin concentrations in the casting solution in addition to evaporation time and hydrochloric acid (HCl) bath time were selected as the independent variables, while the membrane porosity and pure water flux were considered as the response variables. Significant increase in both responses was observed by increasing CaCO3 and glycerin concentrations (P value < 0.05). However, the effect of evaporation time was found to be statistically insignificant on both responses. The effect of the HCl bath time was found to significantly affect the membrane porosity but not the pure water flux. RSM models for both responses were statistically evaluated in terms of the coefficient of determination (R2), and the estimated values (96.74% for the porosity model and 83.85% for the flux model) indicated good fit of the model to the experimental values. Multiple response optimization was employed, and the membrane produced at optimum conditions proved to have good agreement with the predicted values (16.2% error in flux and 3.66% error in porosity). The membrane was successfully applied for paint pigment rejection and oil emulsion rejection, and rejection efficiencies of 95.6% and 80% were achieved for color and oil, respectively, confirming the applicability of the membrane produced at the obtained optimum condition for wastewater treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anis, S.F.; Hashaikeh, R.; Hilal, N.: Microfiltration membrane processes: a review of research trends over the past decade. J. Water Process Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kulozik, U.: Chapter 1—Ultra- and microfiltration in dairy technology. In: Basile, A.; Ghasemzadeh, K. (eds.). Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Membrane Processes in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnological Field, pp. 1–28. Elsevier (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813606-5.00001-4

  3. Davis, R.H.: Chapter 2—Microfiltration in pharmaceutics and biotechnology. Basile, A.; Ghasemzadeh, K. (eds.). Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Membrane Processes in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnological Field, pp. 29–67. Elsevier (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813606-5.00002-6

  4. Achiou, B.; et al.: Manufacturing of tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane based on natural pozzolan for pretreatment of seawater desalination. Desalination 419, 181–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dang, H.T.T.; Tran, H.D.; Tran, S.H.; Sasakawa, M.; Narbaitz, R.M.: Treatment and reuse of coalmine wastewater in Vietnam: application of microfiltration. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 53(3), 133–142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2018.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouiya, M.; et al.: Fabrication and characterization of a ceramic membrane from clay and banana peel powder: application to industrial wastewater treatment. Mater. Chem. Phys. 227, 291–301 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasouli, Y.; Abbasi, M.; Hashemifard, S.A.: Fabrication, characterization, fouling behavior and performance study of ceramic microfiltration membranes for oily wastewater treatment. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 7(4), 476–495 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2019.1667070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Saini, P.; Bulasara, V.K.; Reddy, A.S.: Performance of a new ceramic microfiltration membrane based on kaolin in textile industry wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. Commun. 206(2), 227–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1482281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui, Z.; et al.: Fabricating PVDF hollow fiber microfiltration membrane with a tenon-connection structure via the thermally induced phase separation process to enhance strength and permeability. Eur. Polym. J. 111, 49–62 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mansoori, S.; Davarnejad, R.; Matsuura, T.; Ismail, A.F.: Membranes based on non-synthetic (natural) polymers for wastewater treatment. Polym. Test. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng, B.; Yao, Z.; Wang, X.; Crombeen, M.; Sweeney, D.G.; Tam, K.C.: Cellulose-based materials in wastewater treatment of petroleum industry. Green Energy Environ. 5(1), 37–49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saljoughi, E.; Mohammadi, T.: Cellulose acetate (CA)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) blend asymmetric membranes: preparation, morphology and performance. Desalination 249(2), 850–854 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saljoughi, E.; Sadrzadeh, M.; Mohammadi, T.: Effect of preparation variables on morphology and pure water permeation flux through asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 326(2), 627–634 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kusworo, T.D.; Hadiyanto, H.; Deariska, D.; Nugraha, L.: Enhancement of separation performance of asymmetric cellulose acetate membrane for produced water treatment using response surface methodology. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q. 24(2), 139–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ170112026K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Su Shen, S.; Chen, H.; Hua Wang, R.; Ji, W.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, R.: Preparation of antifouling cellulose acetate membranes with good hydrophilic and oleophobic surface properties. Mater. Lett. 252, 1–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, M.-X.; Niu, H.-M.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhan, H.-B.: Natural cellulose microfiltration membranes for oil/water nanoemulsions separation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 564, 142–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.12.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mu, C.; Su, Y.; Sun, M.; Chen, W.; Jiang, Z.: Remarkable improvement of the performance of poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membranes by the additive of cellulose acetate. J. Membr. Sci. 350(1–2), 293–300 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kellenberger, C.R.; Luechinger, N.A.; Lamprou, A.; Rossier, M.; Grass, R.N.; Stark, W.J.: Soluble nanoparticles as removable pore templates for the preparation of polymer ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 387–388, 76–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaiser, A.; Stark, W.J.; Grass, R.N.: Rapid production of a porous cellulose acetate membrane for water filtration using readily available chemicals. J. Chem. Educ. 94(4), 483–487 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, J.R.; Mount, E.M.; Giles, H.F.: 25—Design of experiments. In: Wagner, J.R., Mount, E.M., H. F. B. T.-E. (Second E. Giles (eds.) Plastics Design Library, pp. 291–308. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baneshi, M.M.; et al.: A high-flux P84 polyimide mixed matrix membranes incorporated with cadmium-based metal organic frameworks for enhanced simultaneous dyes removal: response surface methodology. Environ. Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Díaz-Cruz, J.M.; Esteban, M.; Ariño, C.: Experimental design and optimization. In: Chemometrics in Electroanalysis. Monographs in Electrochemistry. Springer, Cham. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21384-8_4

  23. Vasanth, D.; Pugazhenthi, G.; Uppaluri, R.: Performance of low cost ceramic microfiltration membranes for the treatment of oil-in-water emulsions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 48(6), 849–858 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2012.712598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuang, W.; et al.: Investigation of internal concentration polarization reduction in forward osmosis membrane using nano-CaCO3 particles as sacrificial component. J. Membr. Sci. 497, 485–493 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suthabanditpong, W.; Takai, C.; Razavi-Khosroshahi, H.; Okada, Y.; El-Salmawy, M.S.; Fuji, M.: Influence of CaCO3 pore-forming agent on porosity and thermal conductivity of cellulose acetate materials prepared by non-solvent induced phase separation. Adv. Powder Technol. 30(1), 207–213 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hess, S.C.; Kohll, A.X.; Raso, R.A.; Schumacher, C.M.; Grass, R.N.; Stark, W.J.: Template-particle stabilized bicontinuous emulsion yielding controlled assembly of hierarchical high-flux filtration membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(1), 611–617 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/am506737n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feng, C.; Wang, R.; Shi, B.; Li, G.; Wu, Y.: Factors affecting pore structure and performance of poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoro propylene) asymmetric porous membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 277(1–2), 55–64 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jami’An, W.N.R.; Hasbullah, H.; Mohamed, F.; Yusof, N.; Ibrahim, N.; Ali, R.R.: Effect of evaporation time on cellulose acetate membrane for gas separation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gebru, K.A.; Das, C.: Removal of bovine serum albumin from wastewater using fouling resistant ultrafiltration membranes based on the blends of cellulose acetate, and PVP-TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Environ. Manag. 200, 283–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. He, X.: Fabrication of defect-free cellulose acetate hollow fibers by optimization of spinning parameters. Membranes (Basel) 7(2), 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7020027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sudiarti, T.; Wahyuningrum, D.; Bundjali, B.; Made Arcana, I.: Mechanical strength and ionic conductivity of polymer electrolyte membranes prepared from cellulose acetate-lithium perchlorate. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/223/1/012052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gorassini, A.; Adami, G.; Calvini, P.; Giacomello, A.: ATR-FTIR characterization of old pressure sensitive adhesive tapes in historic papers. J. Cult. Herit. 21, 775–785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rajeswari, A.; Jackcina-Stobel-Christy, E.; Ida Celine Mary, G.; Jayaraj, K.; Pius, A.: Cellulose acetate based biopolymeric mixed matrix membranes with various nanoparticles for environmental remediation-A comparative study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Almojjly, A.; Johnson, D.; Hilal, N.: Investigations of the effect of pore size of ceramic membranes on the pilot-scale removal of oil from oil-water emulsion. J. Water Process Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100868

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Bahrain, P.O. Box 32038, Isa Town, Kingdom of Bahrain

    Zainab Mohammed Redha, Qais Bu-Ali, Yousif Ahmed Saeed & Ali Mohammed Ali

Authors
  1. Zainab Mohammed Redha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qais Bu-Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yousif Ahmed Saeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Mohammed Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zainab Mohammed Redha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest to declare for this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammed Redha, Z., Bu-Ali, Q., Saeed, Y.A. et al. Optimization of the Asymmetric Cellulose Acetate Membrane Synthesis Variables for Porosity and Pure Water Permeation Flux Using Response Surface Methodology: Microfiltration Application. Arab J Sci Eng 46, 6593–6607 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05298-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05298-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation