Skip to main content
Log in

Postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with anastomotic leak before and after hospital discharge

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) is the most feared complication after colorectal surgery and time to diagnosis is variable. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of patient who had an AL during or after hospital discharge. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections without proximal diversion during the period 2008–2018 was conducted. The sample was divided into two groups: patients who had AL during hospitalization (G1) and those who had AL after hospital discharge (G2). Demographics, operative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 853 patients were included; AL was diagnosed in 60 (7%) patients and was more frequent during initial hospitalization than after hospital discharge (G1: 49 (82%) vs. G2: 11 (18%), p < 0.001). Demographics were similar between groups. Most patients were treated with laparoscopic lavage and diverting ileostomy in both groups (G1: 92% vs. G2: 82%, p = 0.30). Severity of peritonitis at reoperation and length of hospital stay after AL were similar between groups (G1: 11 vs. G2: 9 days, p = 0.54). Overall postoperative morbidity (G1: 57% vs. G2: 36%, p = 0.31), mortality (G1: 10% vs. G2: 27%, p = 0.15) and intestinal reconstruction rate (G1: 92% vs. G2: 100%, p = 1) were similar between groups. Outpatient onset of anastomotic leak did not increase the severity of peritonitis, had no impact on the type of treatment performed, and showed similar postoperative morbidity and mortality as compared to those having AL during hospitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas MS, Margolin DA (2016) Management of colorectal anastomotic leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Telem DA, Chin EH, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: a case-control study. Arch Surg 145(4):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg 101:424–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gessler B, Bock D, Pommergaard HC (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence in colon cancer surgery—a population-based registry study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Branagan G, Wessex Finnis D, Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goto Saori, Hasegawa Suguru, Hida Koya, Uozumi Ryuji, Kanemitsu Yukihide, Watanabe Toshiaki, Sugihara Kenichi, Sakai Yoshiharu (2017) Multicenter analysis of impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection of colon cancer. Surgery 162(2):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD007635

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM et al (2011) Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 35:186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38(6):1531–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(8):583–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet M-C, Frering V, Faucheron J-L, Chasserant P (2018) Short-term outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for 157 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 270:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim SC, Doshi V, Castasus B, Lim JK, Mamun K (2006) Factors causing delay in discharge of elderly patients in an acute care hospital. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35:27–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch CH, Sommers L, Olsen A, Mullen L, Winograd CH (1990) The natural history of functional morbidity in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:1296–1303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Telem DA, Sur M, Tabrizian P, Chao TE, Nguyen SQ, Chin EH, Divino CM (2010) Diagnosis of gastrointestinal anastomotic dehiscence after hospital discharge: impact on patient management and outcome. Surgery 147:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiran Ravi P et al (2004) Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 198(6):877–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Byrn JC, Schlager A, Divino CM, Weber KJ, Baril DT, Aufses AH (2006) The Management of 38 Anastomotic Leaks After 1,684 Intestinal Resections. Dis Colon Rectum 49(9):1346–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas A. Rotholtz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Cristian A. Angeramo, Nicolas H. Dreifuss, Francisco Schlottmann, Maximiliano E. Bun and Nicolas A. Rotholtz have no conflict of interest, financial ties or funding/support to disclose.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Formal consent is not required for this type of study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angeramo, C.A., Dreifuss, N.H., Schlottmann, F. et al. Postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with anastomotic leak before and after hospital discharge. Updates Surg 72, 463–468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00754-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00754-1

Keywords

Navigation