Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair with synthetic mesh and biological mesh: an Italian study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Repair of an incisional hernia (IH) generates costs on several levels and domains of society. The aim of this study was to make a complete cost analysis of incisional hernia repair (IHR) with synthetic and biological mesh and to compare it with financial reimbursement. Patients were grouped into three levels to determine the complexity of their care, and hence, the costs involved. Group 1 included patients without comorbidities, who underwent a “standard” incisional hernia repair (SIHR), with synthetic mesh. Group 2 included patients with comorbidities, who underwent the same surgical procedure. Group 3 included all patients who underwent a “complex” IHR (CIHR) with biological mesh. Total costs were divided into direct (including preoperative and operative phases) and indirect costs (medications and working days loss). Reimbursement was calculated according to Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG). From 2012 to 2014, 76 patients underwent prosthetic IHR: group 1 (35 pts); group 2 (30 pts); and group 3 (11 pts). The direct costs of preoperative and operative phases for groups 1 and 2 were €5544.25 and €5020.65, respectively, and €16,397.17 in group 3. The total reimbursement in the three groups was €68,292.37 for group 1, €80,014.14 for group 2, and €72,173.79 for group 3, with a total loss of €124,658.43, €69,675.36, and €100,620.04, respectively. All DRGs underestimate the costs related to IHR and CIHR, thus resulting in an important economic loss for the hospital. The cost analysis shows that patient-related risk factors do not alter the overall costs. To provide a correct “cost-based” reimbursement, different DRGs should be created for different types of hernias and prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long term follow up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair for incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–583

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Millikan KW (2003) Incisional hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83:1223–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, Turnage RH (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 342:392–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S, Franz M, Hultman CS, Kilbridge JF, Rosen M, Silverman RP, Vargo D, The Ventral Hernia Working Group (2010) Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 148:544–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Itani KM, Rosen M, Vargo D, Awad SS, Denoto G 3rd, Butler CE, RICH Study Group (2012) Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. Surgery 152:498–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollettino ufficiale della Regione del Veneto. Bur n. 88 del 25 novembre 2011. http://bur.regione.veneto.it/BurvServices/pubblica/DettaglioDgr.aspx?id=235948. Accessed 1 Dec 2016

  8. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietański M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13:407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillion JF, Sanders D, Miserez M, Muysoms F (2016) The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis. Hernia 20:819–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finan KR, Kilgore ML, Hawn MT (2009) Open suture versus mesh repair of primary incisional hernias: a cost-utility analysis. Hernia 13:173–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynolds D, Davenport DL, Korosec RL, Roth JS (2013) Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 17:159–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Israelsson LA, Jönsson L, Wimo A (2003) Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture or mesh. Hernia 7:114–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K et al (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19:1–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, Bauder AR, Fox JP, Drebin JA, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ (2016) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases. The case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263:1010–1017

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SR, MD: study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, final version approval. AG, MD: data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, final version approval. SP, MD: design of the study, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, final version approval. GP, MD: manuscript writing, final version approval. AG, MD: data collection, final version approval. EP, MD: data collection, final version approval. RB, MD: study design, data collection and analysis, manuscript writing, approval of final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Rampado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rampado, S., Geron, A., Pirozzolo, G. et al. Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair with synthetic mesh and biological mesh: an Italian study. Updates Surg 69, 375–381 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0453-9

Keywords

Navigation