Abstract
Earthquakes of 5.8 and 5.4 Richter scale recently occurred one after another in Korea, changing the Korean peninsula from an earthquake safe zone but ‘earthquake danger zone’. Therefore, seismic reinforcements must expand to include structures with low seismic resistance in order to prepare for earthquakes on a larger scale in the future. This study investigated the performances of various seismic reinforcement systems such as X-braced steel rod reinforcement, steel shear wall with circular opening reinforcement, and slit damper reinforcement using shaking table test and computational analyses of seismic data in order to establish a proper seismic reinforcement plan. These three seismic reinforcement systems could increase the stiffness and strength of existing structures and reduce maximum drift ratio in the event of an earthquake.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI no.41, Reston, VA, USA.
Badoux, M., & Jirsa, J. O. (1990). Steel bracing of RC frames for seismic retrofitting. Journal of Structural Engineering, 116(1), 55–74.
Bagheri, B., Choi, K.-Y., Oh, S.-H., & Ryu, H.-S. (2016). Shaking table test for evaluating the seismic response characteristics of concentrically braced steel structure with and without hysteretic dampers. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(1), 23–39.
Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). (2006). Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Commission for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
Driver, R. G., Kulak Elwi, A. E., & Kennedy, D. J. L. (1998a). Cyclic tests of four-story steel plate shear wall. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(2), 112–120.
Driver, R. G., Kulak Elwi, A. E., & Kennedy, D. J. L. (1998b). FE and simplified models of steel plate shear wall. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(2), 121–130.
Elgaaly, M., & Caccese, V. (1993). Post-buckling behavior of steel-plate shear walls under cyclic loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(2), 588–605.
Federation Internationale du Beton (FIB). (2003). Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. State-of-Art Report, Bulletin FIB no.24, Thomas Telford, London, UK.
Kim, Y.-S., & Bae, J.-H. (2016). Status of seismic design of Korea and improvement tasks, issue and point. National Assembly Research Service, 1216, 1.
Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). (2017). http://necis.kma.go.kr.
Maheri, M. R., & Sahebi, A. (1997). Use of steel bracing in reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structures, 19(12), 1018–1024.
Maheri, M. R., & Yazdani, S. (2016). Design of steel brace connection to an RC frame using uniform force method. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 116(1), 131–140.
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees Command Language Manual, USA.
Newman, A. (2001). Structural renovation of buildings: Methods, details, and design example. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Roberts, T. M. (1995). Seismic resistance of steel plate shear walls. Engineering Structures, 17(5), 344–351.
Sabouri-Ghomi, S., Ventura, M., & Kharrazi, M. (2005). Shear analysis and design of ductile steel plate walls. Engineering Structures, 131(6), 878–889.
Shin, K.-J., Lee, S.-H., Lee, H.-D., & Kwon, H.-S. (2016). seismic-Strengthening effect of steel shear wall with circular opening through shaking table test on reinforced concrete frame. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(2), 107–114.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2017R1A2 B3009984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, HM., Lee, HD. & Shin, KJ. Shaking Table Test and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame with Steel Shear Wall with Circular Opening and Slit Damper. Int J Steel Struct 18, 1420–1430 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0161-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0161-4