Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture behaviour and design of steel tensile connections with staggered bolt arrangements

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental, numerical, and reliability study on the fracture behaviour of bolted steel tensile connections with various bolt arrangements. A total of 36 full-scale specimens were tested under tension until fracture. The main test parameters included the geometric pattern of the connections and the connection details such as pitch, gauge, edge distance and material. The test results show that the predictions of the ultimate capacity based on the s2/4g rule can be conservative, which may be mainly due to the ‘reinforcement’ effect of the biaxial stress state that exists between the bolt holes. However, for the specimens fabricated using higher strength steel with lower ductility, the conservatism is reduced substantially. Moreover, the test efficiency, which is defined as the ratio of the test ultimate capacity over the theoretical capacity of the gross section, was also examined. A higher test efficiency can be found when the hole spacing/edge distance is decreased/increased, although substantial increase in the edge distance can be ineffective. In addition, less ductile steel can lead to lower test efficiency. Furthermore, a numerical study was undertaken, where good agreements were observed between the numerical and the test results. With available test data, reliability analysis was finally performed to re-examine the rationale behind the resistance factors used in the current design codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS (2011). Analysis User’s manual, v6.11. Dassault Systems Simulia Corp., Providence, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2005). Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM A370 (2002). Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. American Society for Testing and Material, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • AS 4100-1998 (1998). Steel Structures. Australian Standard, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijlaard, P. P. (1940). “Theory of local plastic deformations.” Publication of the International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineers, 6, pp. 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • BS EN 10025-2 (2004). Hot rolled products of structural steels, Part 2: Technical delivery conditions for non-alloy structural steels. British Standards Institution, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • BS-5950 (2000). Structural use of steelwork in building, part 1: Code of practice for design, Rolled and welded sections. British Standards Institution, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements D. D. A. and Teh, L. H. (2013). “Active shear planes of bolted connections failing in block shear.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 139 (3), pp. 320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, V. H. (1922). “Rules for rivet hole deductions in tension members.” Engineering News-Record, 89, pp. 847–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA-S16-09 (2009). Limit States Design of Steel Structures. Canadian Standards Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dexter, R. J., Graeser, M., Saari, W.K., Pascoe, C., Gardner, C. A., and Galambos, T. V. (2000). Structural shape material property survey. Technical Report for Structural Shape Producers Council, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 3 (2005). Design of Steel Structures-Part 1-8: Design of Joints, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., Lam, A. C. C., and Yam, M. C. H. (2013). “Influence of shear lag on ultimate tensile capacity of angles and tees.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 84, pp. 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. W. and Rumpf, J. L. (1965). “Analysis of bolted butt joints.” Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 91, pp. 181–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. W., Galambos, T. V., Kulak, G. L., and Ravindra M. K. (1978). “Load and resistance factor design criteria for connectors.” Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 104 (9), pp. 1427–1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. M., and Schuster, R. M. (2010). “Cold formed steel tension members with two and three staggered bolts.” Proc., 20th Int. Specialty Conf. on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, University of Missouri, Rolla, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord, E. H., Gaylord, C. N., and Stallmeyer, J. E. (1992). Design of Steel Structures. 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josi, G., Grondin, G., and Kulak, G. (2004). “Fatigue of joints with staggered holes.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 9 (6), pp. 614–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. J. L. and Gad Aly, M. (1980). “Limit states design of steel structures-performance factors.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, pp. 45–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulak, G. L., Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H. A. (1987). Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints. 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoube, R. A. and Yu, W. W. (1996). “Additional design considerations for bolted connections.” Proc. Thirteenth International Specialty Conference on Cold-formed Steel Structures, 575–593, St. Louis, Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. (1968). Steel structure. New-Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Može, P., Beg, D., and Lopatiè, J. (2007). “Net cross-section design resistance and local ductility of elements made of high strength steel.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63 (11), pp. 1431–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munse, W. H. and Chesson, E. (1963). “Riveted and bolted joints: net section design.” Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 89, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, E. P. and Takhirov, S. M. (2002). “Bolted large seismic steel beam-to-column connections part 1: Experimental study.” Engineering Structures, 24 (12), pp. 1523–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. J. and Bartlett, F. M. (2002a). “Review of resistance factor for steel: data collection.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29, pp. 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. J. and Bartlett, F. M. (2002b). “Review of resistance factor for steel: resistance distributions and resistance factor calibration.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29, pp. 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, G. H. and Fisher, J. W. (1966). “A440 steel joints connected by A490 bolts.” Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 92, pp. 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teh, L. H. and Clements, D. D. A. (2012). “Tension capacity of staggered bolted connections in cold-reduced steel sheets.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138 (6), pp. 769–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. M., Munse, W. H., and Cayci, M. A. (1952). “A study of the practical efficiency under static loading of riveted joints connecting plates.” Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin no. 402, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, M. C. H., Grondin, G. Y., Wei, F., and Chung, K. F. (2011). “Design for block shear of coped beams with a welded end connection.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 137 (8), pp. 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, F., Fang, C., Yam, M.C.H. et al. Fracture behaviour and design of steel tensile connections with staggered bolt arrangements. Int J Steel Struct 15, 863–879 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-1208-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-1208-4

Keywords

Navigation