Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decoupling of bowtie and object effects for beam hardening and scatter artefact reduction in iterative cone-beam CT

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an important imaging modality for image-guided radiotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy. Feldkamp–Davis–Kress (FDK) method is widely adopted in clinical CBCT reconstructions due to its fast and robust application. While iterative algorithms have been shown to outperform FDK techniques in reducing noise and imaging dose, they are unable to correct projection-domain artefacts such as beam hardening and scatter. Empirical correction techniques require a holistic approach as beam hardening and scatter coexist in the measurement data. This multi-part proof of concept study conducted in MATLAB presents a novel approach to artefact reduction for CBCT image reconstruction. Firstly, we decoupled the beam hardening and scatter contributions originating from the imaging object and the bowtie filter. Next, a model was constructed to apply pixel-wise corrections to separately account for artefacts induced by the imaging object and the bowtie filter, in order to produce mono-energetic equivalent and scatter-compensated projections. Finally, the effectiveness of the correction model was tested on an offset phantom scan as well as a clinical brain scan. A conjugate-gradient least-squares algorithm was implemented over five iterations using FDK result as the initial input. Our proposed correction model was shown to effectively reduce cupping and shading artefacts in both phantom and clinical studies. This simple yet effective correction model could be readily implemented by physicists seeking to explore the benefits of iterative reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA (2012) Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 28(2):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Löve A, Olsson M-L, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M (2013) Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: a phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130388

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shieh CC, Gonzalez Y, Li B et al (2019) SPARE: Sparse-view reconstruction challenge for 4D cone-beam CT from a 1-min scan. Med Phys 46(9):3799–3811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biguri A, Soleimani M, Dosanjh M, Hancock S (2016) TIGRE: A MATLAB-GPU toolbox for CBCT image reconstruction. Biomed Phys Eng Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/2/5/055010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rit S, Vila Oliva M, Brousmiche S, Labarbe R, Sarrut D, Sharp GC (2014) The reconstruction toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the insight toolkit (ITK). J Phys Conf Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Aarle W, Jan Palenstijn W, De Beenhouwer J, Altantzis T, Bals S, Batenburg KJ, Sijbers J (2015) The ASTRA toolbox: a platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 157:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B, Richard S, Jaffray DA (2004) The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. Med Phys 31(12):3506–3520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poludniowski G, Evans PM, Hansen VN, Webb S (2009) An efficient Monte Carlo-based algorithm for scatter correction in keV cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 54(12):3847–3864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun M, Star-Lack JM (2010) Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition. Phys Med Biol 55(22):6695–6720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang A, Maslowski A, Messmer P et al (2018) Acuros CTS: A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter—Part II: system modelling, scatter correction, and optimization. Med Phys 45(5):1914–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benítez RB, Ning R (2010) Development of a beam hardening filter and characterization of the spatial resolution for a Cone Beam CT imaging system. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 7622:762237

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman AJ, Sinclair M (1985) A beam-hardening correction using dual-energy computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/30/11/007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meagher JM, Mote CD, Skinner HB (1990) CT image correction for beam hardening using simulated projection data. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.55865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mail N, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA (2009) The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality. Med Phys 36(1):22–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang G, Marshall N, Jacobs R, Liu Q, Bosmans H (2013) Bowtie filtration for dedicated cone beam CT of the head and neck: a simulation study. Br JRadiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kontson K, Jennings RJ (2015) Bowtie filters for dedicated breast CT: theory and computational implementation. Med Phys 42(3):1453–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blessing M, Bhagwat MS, Lyatskaya Y, Bellon JR, Hesser J, Zygmanski P (2012) Kilovoltage beam model for flat panel imaging system with bow-tie filter for scatter prediction and correction. Phys Med 28(2):134–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao W, Brunner S, Niu K, Schafer S, Royalty K, Chen G (2015) Patient-specific scatter correction for flat-panel detector-based cone-beam CT imaging. Phys Med Biol 60:1339–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dremel K, Fuchs T, Firsching M, Hanke R (2018) Beam hardening correction in X-ray computed tomography: a comparison of two iterative model-based reconstruction methods. Paper presented at: 11th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing; October 6–10, 2014; Prague. http:// https://www.ndt.net/events/ECNDT2014/app/content/Paper/576_Dremel_Rev1.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2018

  20. Abdoli M, Mehranian A, Ailianou A, Becker M, Zaidi H (2016) Assessment of metal artifact reduction methods in pelvic CT. Med Phys 43(4):1588–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M (2010) Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 37(10):5482–5493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M (2012) Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 39(4):1904–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giles W, Bowsher J, Hao L, Yin F-F (2011) Crescent artifacts in cone-beam. Med Phys 38(4):2116–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Braun H, Kyriakou Y, Kachelrieß M, Kalender WA (2010) The influence of the heel effect in cone-beam computed tomography: artifacts in standard and novel geometries and their correction. Phy Med Biol 55:6005–6021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bootsma GJ, Verhaegen F, Jaffray DA (2011) The effects of compensator and imaging geometry on the distribution of x-ray scatter in CBCT. Med Phys 38(2):897–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Icon Cancer Centre, Wahroonga, Australia

    Meng Cai, Mikel Byrne & Ben Archibald-Heeren

  2. Centre of Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Meng Cai, Peter Metcalfe, Anatoly Rosenfeld & Yang Wang

  3. Icon Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China

    Yang Wang

Authors
  1. Meng Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikel Byrne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ben Archibald-Heeren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Metcalfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anatoly Rosenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, M., Byrne, M., Archibald-Heeren, B. et al. Decoupling of bowtie and object effects for beam hardening and scatter artefact reduction in iterative cone-beam CT. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 1161–1170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00918-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00918-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation