Skip to main content
Log in

Monte Carlo calculated output correction factors for Gafchromic EBT3 film for relative dosimetry in small stereotactic radiosurgery fields

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To calculate small field output correction factors, \({k}_{{Q}_{clin},{Q}_{msr}}^{{f}_{clin},{f}_{msr}}\), for Gafchromic EBT3 film using Monte Carlo simulations. These factors were determined for a Novalis Trilogy linear accelerator equipped with Brainlab circular cones with diameters of 4.0 to 30.0 mm. The BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the Novalis Trilogy linear accelerator and the Brainlab cones with diameters 4.0 to 30 mm. The DOSXYZnrc code was used to simulate Gafchromic EBT3 film with the atomic composition specified by the manufacturer. Small field correction factors were calculated according to new IAEA TRS-483 Code of Practice for small field dosimetry. The depth of calculation was 10 cm and a source to surface distance of 100 cm. The X-ray beam used in the simulations was a 6 MV SRS. The correction factors were then used to determine field output factors with Gafchromic EBT3 film. These field output factors were validated using three solid state detectors and applying correction factors from the TRS-483 Code of Practice. The solid state detectors were IBA SFD diode, PTW 60018 SRS diode and PTW 60019 microDiamond. The Monte Carlo calculated output correction factors, \({k}_{{Q}_{clin},{Q}_{msr}}^{{f}_{clin},{f}_{msr}}\), for Gafchromic EBT3 film ranged between 0.998 to 1.004 for Brainlab circular cones with diameters between 4.0 and 30.0 mm. The uncertainty for these factors was 2.0%. The field output factors obtained with Gafchromic EBT3 film were within 2% of the mean results obtained with the three solid state detectors. For field sizes 4 mm diameter and above, Gafchromic EBT3 film has field output correction factors within 1% of unity. Therefore, Gafchromic EBT3 film can be considered to be correction less and supports the assumption made about this film in the TRS-483 Code of Practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjo A (2008) Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys 35:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agency IAE (2017) Dosimetry of Small Static Fields Used in External Beam Radiotherapy. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfonso R, Andreo P, Capote R, Huq MS, Kilby W, Kjäll P, Mackie T, Palmans H, Rosser K, Seuntjens J (2008) A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. Med Phys 35:5179–5186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutherland JGH, Rogers DWO (2010) Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film. Med Phys 37:1110–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morales JE, Butson M, Crowe SB, Hill R, Trapp JV (2016) An experimental extrapolation technique using the Gafchromic EBT3 film for relative output factor measurements in small X-ray fields. Med Phys 43:4687–4692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walters BRB, Rogers DWO (2004) DOSXYZnrc Users Manual. NRC Report PIRS 794 (rev B)

  7. Morales JE, Hill R, Crowe SB, Kairn T, Trapp JV (2014) A comparison of surface doses for very small field size X-ray beams: Monte Carlo calculations and radiochromic film measurements. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37:303–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawrakow I, Mainegra-Hing E, Rogers DWO, Tessier F, Walters BRB (2011) The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. NRC Report PIRS 701

  9. Kim JH, Hill R, Kuncic Z (2012) An evaluation of calculation parameters in the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo codes and their effect on surface dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 57:N267–N278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walters BRB, Kawrakow I (2007) Technical note: overprediction of dose with default PRESTA-I boundary crossing in DOSXYZnrc and BEAMnrc. Med Phys 34:647–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Popescu IA, Shaw CP, Zavgorodni SF, Beckham WA (2005) Absolute dose calculations for monte carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams. Phys Med Biol 50:3375–3392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Azangwe G, Grochowska P, Georg D, Izewska J, Hopfgartner J, Lechner W, Andersen CE, Beierholm AR, Helt-Hansen J, Mizuno H, Fukumura A, Yajima K, Gouldstone C, Sharpe P, Meghzifene A, Palmans H (2014) Detector to detector corrections: a comprehensive experimental study of detector specific correction factors for beam output measurements for small radiotherapy beams. Med Phys 41:072103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bassinet C, Huet C, Derreumaux S, Brunet G, Chéa M, Baumann M, Lacornerie T, Gaudaire-Josset S, Trompier F, Roch P (2013) Small fields output factors measurements and correction factors determination for several detectors for a CyberKnife® and linear accelerators equipped with microMLC and circular cones. Med Phys 40:071725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moignier C, Huet C, Makovicka L (2014) Determination of the correction factors for detectors used with an 800 MU/min CyberKnife (R) system equipped with fixed collimators and a study of detector response to small photon beams using a Monte Carlo method. Med Phys 41(7):071702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander FIO, Wassim J (2018) Correction factors for diode and diamond detectors in the measurement of small field output factors, using film dosimetry as reference. Biomed Phys Eng Express 4(5):055011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Underwood TS, Rowland BC, Ferrand R, Vieillevigne L (2015) Application of the Exradin W1 scintillator to determine Ediode 60017 and microDiamond 60019 correction factors for relative dosimetry within small MV and FFF fields. Phys Med Biol 60(17):6669–6683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wegener S, Sauer OA (2017) Separation of scatter from small MV beams and its effect on detector response. Med Phys 44:1139–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Girardi A, Fiandra C, Giglioli FR, Gallio E, Ali OH, Ragona R (2019) Small field correction factors determination for several active detectors using a Monte Carlo method in the Elekta Axesse linac equipped with circular cones. Phys Med Biol 64(11):11NT01

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yarahmadi M, Wegener S, Sauer OA (2017) Energy and field size dependence of a silicon diode designed for small-field dosimetry. Med Phys 44:1958–1964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynch BD, Kozelka J, Ranade MK, Li JG, Simon WE, Dempsey JF (2006) Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT GAFCHROMIC film. Med Phys 33:4551–4556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rink A, Lewis DF, Varma S, Vitkin IA, Jaffray DA (2008) Temperature and hydration effects on absorbance spectra and radiation sensitivity of a radiochromic medium. Med Phys 35:4545–4555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheung T, Butson MJ, Yu PK (2005) Post-irradiation colouration of Gafchromic EBT radiochromic film. Phys Med Biol 50:N281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arjomandy B, Tailor R, Anand A, Sahoo N, Gillin M, Prado K, Vicic M (2010) Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies. Med Phys 37:1942–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Desroches J, Bouchard H, Lacroix F (2010) Potential errors in optical density measurements due to scanning side in EBT and EBT2 Gafchromic film dosimetry. Med Phys 37:1565–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuss M, Sturtewagen E, De Wagter C, Georg D (2007) Dosimetric characterization of GafChromic EBT film and its implication on film dosimetry quality assurance. Phys Med Biol 52:4211–4225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartmann B, Martisikova M, Jakel O (2010) Homogeneity of Gafchromic EBT2 film. Med Phys 37:1753–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzalez-Lopez A, Vera-Sanchez JA, Lago-Martin JD (2015) Small fields measurements with radiochromic films. J Med Phys 40:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saur S, Frengen J (2008) GafChromic EBT film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanner: a novel background correction method and full dose uncertainty analysis. Med Phys 35:3094–3101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some of the calculations were performed on an in-house computer cluster comprising of 64 computing nodes connected in parallel and running on Linux CentOS version 6. This cluster was constructed from funds provided by QUT. Also, some of the computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the HPC and Research Support Group, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. We would like to thank David F. Lewis of Ashland Inc. for providing the information on the atomic composition of Gafchromic EBT3 radiochromic film modelled in this study. We thank Brainlab for providing the specifications of the circular cones and useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnny E. Morales.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declares any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales, J.E., Butson, M., Hill, R. et al. Monte Carlo calculated output correction factors for Gafchromic EBT3 film for relative dosimetry in small stereotactic radiosurgery fields. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 609–616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00860-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00860-9

Keywords

Navigation