Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dosimetric study of different radiotherapy planning approaches for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) based on fused CT and MRI imaging

  • Special Issue Article
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric characteristics for hippocampal avoidance (HA) between the treatment plans based on fused CT and MRI imaging during whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) pertaining to: (1) 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), (2) dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT), and (3) RapidArc for patients with brain metastases. In our study, HA was defined as hippocampus beyond 5 mm, and planning target volume (PTV) was obtained subtracting HA volume from the volume of whole brain. There were 10 selected patients diagnosed with brain metastases receiving WBRT. These patients received plans for 3D-CRT (two fields), dIMRT (seven non-coplanar fields) and RapidArc (dual arc). The prescribed dose 30 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered to the whole-brain clinical target volume of patients. On the premise of meeting the clinical requirements, we compared target dose distribution, target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), dose of organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MU) and treatment time between the above three radiotherapy plans. V90 %, V95 % and TC of PTV for 3D-CRT plan were lowest of the three plans. V90 %, V95 % and HI of PTV in RapidArc plan were superior to the other two plans. TC of PTV in RapidArc plan was similar with dIMRT plan (P > 0.05). 3D-CRT was the optimal plan in the three plans for hippocampal protection. The median dose (Dmedian) and the maximum doses (Dmax) of hippocampus in 3D-CRT were 4.95, 10.87 Gy, which were lowest among the three planning approaches (P < 0.05). Dmedian and Dmax of hippocampus in dIMRT were 10.68, 14.11 Gy. Dmedian and Dmax of hippocampus in RapidArc were 10.30 gGy, 13.92 Gy. These parameters of the last two plans pertain to no significant difference (P > 0.05). When WBRT (30 Gy,10F) was equivalent to single dose 2 Gy,NTDmean of hippocampus in 3D-CRT, dIMRT and RapidArc were reduced to 3.60, 8.47, 8.20 Gy2, respectively. In addition, compared with dIMRT, MU of RapidArc was reduced and the treatment time was shortened by nearly 25 %. All three radiotherapy planning approaches in our study can meet the clinical requirements of HA. Although TC in 3D-CRT was lowest, hippocampus was protected best by this plan. So many radiation fields and the design of non-coplanar fields lead to the complication of dIMRT. TC and HI in RapidArc were superior to the other two plans with the precise of meeting the clinical requirements. The difference in protection for hippocampus between dIMRT and RapidArc was statistically significant. In addition, RapidArc can remarkably reduce MU and the treatment time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bullard DE, Cox EB, Seigler HF (1981) Central nervous system metastases in malignant melanoma. Neurosurgery 8(1):26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehta M, Hoban P, Mackie TR (2009) Commissioning and quality assurance of rapidarc radiotherapy delivery system: In Regard to Ling Et Al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;72:575–581): Absence of data does not constitute proof; the proof is in tasting the pudding. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(1):4–6

  3. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M et al (2006) Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases—a randomized controlled trial. Jama-J Am Med Assoc 295(21):2483–2491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ et al (2011) Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol 29(3):272–278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta MP, Tsao MN, Whelan TJ et al (2005) The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(1):37–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Truc G, Martin E, Mirjolet C, Chamois J, Petitfils A, Crehange G (2013) The role of whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal-sparing. Cancer Radiother 17(5–6):419–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roman DD, Sperduto PW (1995) Neuropsychological effects of cranial radiation: current knowledge and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(4):983–998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeAngelis LM, Delattre JY, Posner JB (1989) Radiation-induced dementia in patients cured of brain metastases. Neurology 39(6):789–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L et al (2013) Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 109(1):152–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin SY, Yang CC, Wu YM, et al (2015) Evaluating the impact of hippocampal sparing during whole brain radiotherapy on neurocognitive functions: a preliminary report of a prospective phase II study. Biomed J

  11. Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA et al (2014) Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol 32(34):3810–3816

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gondi V, Tome WA, Marsh J et al (2010) Estimated risk of perihippocampal disease progression after hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy: safety profile for RTOG 0933. Radiother Oncol 95(3):327–331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghia A, Tome WA, Thomas S et al (2007) Distribution of brain metastases in relation to the hippocampus: implications for neurocognitive functional preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(4):971–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chera BS, Amdur RJ, Patel P, Mendenhall WM (2009) A radiation oncologist’s guide to contouring the hippocampus. Am J Clin Oncol 32(1):20–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gondi V, Tolakanahalli R, Mehta MP et al (2010) Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a “how-to” technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78(4):1244–1252

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Knisely JP, Yu JB (2011) Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a “how-to” technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy: in regard to Gondi v, et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;78:1244–1252). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):957–958; author reply 958

  17. Mizumatsu S, Monje ML, Morhardt DR, Rola R, Palmer TD, Fike JR (2003) Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation. Cancer Res 63(14):4021–4027

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Monje ML, Mizumatsu S, Fike JR, Palmer TD (2002) Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction. Nat Med 8(9):955–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giaj Levra N, Sicignano G, Fiorentino A, et al (2015) Whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for brain metastases: a dosimetric volumetric-modulated arc therapy study. Radiol Med

  20. Gondi V, Tolakanahalli R, Mehta MP, Tome WA (2011) Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a “How-to” technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy: In Regard to Gondi V, et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;78:1244–1252) Response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 79(3):958

  21. Nevelsky A, Ieumwananonthachai N, Kaidar-Person O et al (2013) Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy using Elekta equipment. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 14(3):4205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Otto K (2008) Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 35(1):310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Willins J, Kachnic L (2008) Re: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: Patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems—response. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(17):1266–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong KKL, Tu J, Sun Z, Dissanayake DW (2013) Methods in research and development of biomedical devices. World Scientific, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong KK, Chu WC (2015) Ethics policies and procedures in imaging and interventional radiology. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38(2):375–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Duthoy W, De Gersem W, Vergote K et al (2004) Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(3):794–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G et al (2009) Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol 92(1):111–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Kesteren Z, Belderbos J, van Herk M et al (2012) A practical technique to avoid the hippocampus in prophylactic cranial irradiation for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 102(2):225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Palma D, Vollans E, James K et al (2008) Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(4):996–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cozzi L, Dinshaw KA, Shrivastava SK (2008) A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fxed feld IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 89:180–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiesa S, Balducci M, Azario L et al (2013) Development of a modelling to correlate site and diameter of brain metastases with hippocampal sparing using volumetric modulated Arc therapy. Biomed Res Int 2013:568597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of Yangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (No. YZ2011085) and the“333” Training Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No. BRA2014158).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Institute of Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou, 225000, Jiangsu Province, China

    Bu-Hai Wang, Wei Hua, Xiang Gu, Jun Li, Li-Qin Liu & Yu-Xiang Huang

  2. Department of Respiratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

    Xiao-Lei Wang

Authors
  1. Bu-Hai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-Lei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li-Qin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yu-Xiang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bu-Hai Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, BH., Hua, W., Gu, X. et al. Dosimetric study of different radiotherapy planning approaches for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) based on fused CT and MRI imaging. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38, 767–775 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0397-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0397-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation