Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element methods: Research in India over the last decade

  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a summary of major contributions of Indian mathematicians to the mathematical aspects of the finite element method in the last one decade: 2008–2017. We briefly trace out the historical origins of the topic in India and abroad. A section on the method itself is included so that this review is accessible to anybody with a background in partial differential equations and numerical techniques for solving it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blanca Ayuso de Dios, Konstantin Lipnikov, and Gianmarco Manzini, The nonconforming virtual element method, SAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 50(3) (2016), 879–904.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Badia and R. Codina, Thirupathi Gudi, and J. Guzmán, Error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Stokes problem under minimal regularity, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 34(2) (2014), 800–819.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Saumya Bajpai and Neela Nataraj, On a two-grid finite element scheme combined with Crank-Nicolson method for the equations of motion arising in the Kelvin-Voigt model, Comput. Math. Appl., 68(12, part B) (2014), 2277–2291.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Saumya Bajpai and Amiya K. Pani, On a three level two-grid finite element method for the 2D-transient Navier-Stokes equations, J. Numer. Math., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma-2016-1055.

  5. Saumya Bajpai, Neela Nataraj, and A. K. Pani, On fully discrete finite element schemes for equations of motion of Kelvin-Voigt fluids, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., 10 (2013a), 481–507.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Saumya Bajpai, Neela Nataraj, Amiya K. Pani, Pedro Damazio, and Jin Yun Yuan, Semidiscrete Galerkin method for equations of motion arising in Kelvin-Voigt model of viscoelastic fluid flow, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 29(3) (2013b), 857–883.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Saumya Bajpai, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya K. Pani, On a two-grid finite element scheme for the equations of motion arising in Kelvin-Voigt model, Adv. Comput. Math., 40(5–6) (2014), 1043–1071.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Balasuhdaram and P. K. Bhattacharyya, A mixed finite element method for fourth order elliptic equations with variable coefficients, Comput. Math. Appl., 10(3) (1984), 245–256.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Balasundaram and P. K. Bhattacharyya, A mixed finite element method for fourth order partial differential equations, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 66(10) (1986), 489–499.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Balasundaram and P. K. Bhattacharyya, A mixed finite-element method for fourth-order elliptic problems with variable coefficients, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 22(1) (1988), l–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. P. K. Bhattacharyya and S. Gopalsamy, An equilibrium finite element method for fourth order elliptic equations with variable coefficients, Comput. Math. Appl., 15(5) (1988), 405–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi, and Michel Fortin, Mixed finite element methods and applications, 44, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2013.

  13. Andrea Bonito and Alan Demlow, Convergence and optimality of higher-order adaptive finite element methods for eigenvalue clusters, S1AM J. Numer. Anal., 54(4) (2016), 2379–2388.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Braess, Finite elements, theory, fast solvers, and applications in elasticity theory, Cambridge, 3rd edition, 2007.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Susanne C. Brenner, Two-level additive Schwarz preconditioners for nonconforming finite element methods, Math. Comp., 65(215) (1996), 897–921.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Susanne C. Brenner and L. Ridgway Scott, The mathematical theory of finite element methods, 15, Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, third edition, 2008. ISBN 978-0-387-75933-3.

  17. Susanne C. Brenner, Thirupathi Gudi, Michael Neilan, and Li-yeng Sung, Co penalty methods for the fully nonlinear Monge-Ampère equation, Math. Comp., 80(276) (2011), 1979–1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Susanne C. Brenner, Shiyuan Gu, Thirupathi Gudi, and Li-yeng Sung, A quadratic Co interior penalty method for linear fourth order boundary value problems with boundary conditions of the Cahn-Hilliard type, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50(4) (2012), 2088–2110.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhiqiang Cai, Cuiyu He, and Shun Zhang, Discontinuous finite element methods for interface problems: Robust a priori and a posteriori error estimates, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55(1) (2017), 400–418.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Carsten Carstensen and M. Schedensack, Medius analysis and comparison results for first-order finite element methods in linear elasticity, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 35(4) (2015), 1591–1621.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Carsten Carstensen, Gouranga Mallik, and Neela Nataraj, A priori and a posteriori error control of discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the Kármán equations, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 139(1) (2019), 167–200.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carsten Carstensen, D. Peterseim, and M. Schedensack, Comparison results of finite element methods for the Poisson model problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50(6) (2012), 2803–2823.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Carsten Carstensen, Dietmar Gallistl, and Neela Nataraj, Comparison results of nonstandard P 2 finite element methods for the biharmonic problem, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 49(4) (2015), 977–990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Carsten Carstensen, Asha K. Dond, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya K. Pani, Error analysis of nonconforming and mixed FEMs for second-order linear non-selfadjoint and indefinite elliptic problems, Numer. Math., 133(3) (2016a), 557–597.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Carsten Carstensen, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya K. Pani, Comparison results and unified analysis for firstorder finite volume element methods for a Poisson model problem, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36(3) (2016b), 1120–1142.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sudipto Chowdhury, Thirupathi Gudi, and A. K. Nandakumaran, Error bounds for a Dirichlet boundary control problem based on energy spaces, Math. Comp., 86(305) (2017), 1103–1126.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. P. G. Ciarlet, The finite element method for elliptic problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. P. G. Ciarlet, Liliana Gratie, and Srinivasan Kesavan, Numerical analysis of the generalized von Kármán equations, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 341(11) (2005), 695–699.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. P. G. Ciarlet, On the finite element method, TIFR Lecture Notes, 49 (1975).

  30. R. W. Clough, The finite element method in plane stress analysis, Proceedings of Second ASCE Conference on Electronic Computation, Pittsburg, USA, 49 (1960), 345–378.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bhupen Deka and Rajen K. Sinha, L (L 2) and L (H 1) norms error estimates in finite element method for linear parabolic interface problems, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 32(3) (2011), 267–285.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. D. A. Di Pietro and A. Ern, Mathematical aspects of discontinuous Galerkin methods, Mathématiques et Applications, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. ISBN 9783642229800.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Asha K. Dond and Amiya K. Pani, A priori and a posteriori estimates of conforming and mixed FEM for a Kirchhoff equation of elliptic type, Comput. Methods Appl. Math., 17 (2) (2017), 217–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Asha K. Dond, Thirupathi Gudi, and Neela Nataraj, On a nonconforming finite element approximation for optimal control of the obstacle problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Math., 16(4) (2016), 653–666.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Asha K. Dond, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya Kumar Pani, Convergence of an adaptive lowest-order Raviart-Thomas element method for general second-order linear elliptic problems, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 37(2) (2017), 832–860.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Jérôme Droniou, Neela Nataraj, and Devika Shailaja, Numerical analysis for the pure Neumann control problem using the gradient discretisation method, Comput. Methods Appl. Math., 18(4) (2018), 609–637.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Jérôme Droniou, Neela Nataraj, and Devika Shaliaja, The gradient discretization method for optimal control problems, with super-convergence for non-conforming finite elements and mixed-hybrid mimetic finite differences, SIAM Jounal of Control and Optimization, 55(6) (2017), 3640–3672.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Gaddam and Thirupathi Gudi, Bubbles enriched quadratic finite element method for the 3d-elliptic obstacle problem, Comput. Meth. Appl. Math., 18(2) (2018), 223–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Dietmar Gallistl, Morley finite element method for the eigenvalues of the biharmonic operator, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 35(4) (2015), 1779–1811.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Ganesan and S. Srivastava, ALE-SUPG finite element method for convection-diffusion problems in time-dependent domains: Conservative form, Appl. Math. Comp., 303 (2017), 128–145.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Ganesan and L. Tobiska, Finite elements: Theory and algorithms, Cambridge IISc Series, Cambridge University Press, 2017. ISBN 9781108344159.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Vivette Girault, Jizhou Li, and Beatrice Rivière, Strong convergence of discrete DG solutions of the heat equation, J. Numer. Math., 24(4) (2016), 235–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Deepjyoti Goswami, Amiya K. Pani, and Sangita Yadav, Optimal error estimates of two mixed finite element methods for parabolic integro — differential equations with nonsmooth initial data, J. Sci. Comput., 56 (2013), 131–164.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Deepjyoti Goswami, Amiya K. Pani, and Sangita Yadav, Optimal L 2 estimates for semidiscrete Galerkin method applied to parabolic integro-differential equations with nonsmooth data, ANZIAM J., 55 (2014), 245–266.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Thirupathi Gudi, A new error analysis for discontinuous finite element methods for linear elliptic problems, Math. Comp., 79(272) (2010a), 2169–2189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Thirupathi Gudi, Some nonstandard error analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems, Calcolo, 47(4) (2010b), 239–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Thirupathi Gudi, Finite element method for a nonlocal problem of Kirchhoff type, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 50(2) (2012), 657–668.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Thirupathi Gudi and Hari Shanker Gupta, A fully discrete Co interior penalty Galerkin approximation of the extended Fisher-Kolmogorov equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 247 (2013), 1–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Thirupathi Gudi and Amiya K. Pani, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for quasi-linear elliptic problems of nonmonotone type, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 45(1) (2007), 163–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Thirupathi Gudi and Kamana Porwal, A reliable residual based a posteriori error estimator for quadratic finite element method for the elliptic obstacle problem, Comput. Meth. Appl. Math., 15 (2015), 145–160.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Thirupathi Gudi and Kamana Porwal, A Co interior penalty method for a fourth-order variational inequality of the second kind, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 32(1) (2016), 36–59.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Thirupathi Gudi, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya K. Pani, hp-discontinuous Galerkin methods for strongly nonlinear elliptic boundary value problems, Numer. Math., 109(2) (2008), 233–268.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Thirupathi Gudi, Neela Nataraj, and Kamana Porwal, An interior penalty method for distributed optimal control problems governed by the biharmonic operator, Comput. Math. Appl., 68(12, part B) (2014), 2205–2221.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Jun Hu, Zhongci Shi, and Jinchao Xu, Convergence and optimality of the adaptive Morley element method, Numer. Math., 121(4) (2012), 731–752.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. M. K. Kadalbajoo and A. S. Yadaw, Finite difference, finite element and B-spline collocation methods applied to two parameter singularly perturbed boundary value problems, JNAIAM. J. Numer. Anal. Ind. Appl. Math., 5(3–4) (2011), 163–180.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. M. K. Kadalbajoo and Arjun Singh Yadaw, Parameter-uniform finite element method for two-parameter singularly perturbed parabolic reaction-diffusion problems, Int. J. Comput. Methods, 9(4) (2012), 1250047, 16.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. M. K. Kadalbajoo, Arjun Singh Yadaw, and Devendra Kumar, Comparative study of singularly perturbed two-point BVPs via: Fitted-mesh finite difference method, B-spline collocation method and finite element method, Appl. Math. Comput., 204(2) (2008), 713–725.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Mohan K. Kadalbajoo and Puneet Arora, Taylor-Galerkin B-spline finite element method for the onedimensional advection-diffusion equation, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 26(5) (2010) 1206–1223.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Mohan K. Kadalbajoo and Arjun Singh Yadaw, An ɛ-uniform Ritz-Galerkin finite element method for numerical solution of singularly perturbed delay differential equations, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 55(2) (2009a), 265–286.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Mohan K. Kadalbajoo and Arjun Singh Yadaw, Parameter-uniform Ritz-Galerkin finite element method for two parameter singularly perturbed boundary value problems, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 55(2) (2009b), 287–300.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Mohan K. Kadalbajoo, Lok Pati Tripathi, and Alpesh Kumar, An error analysis of a finite element method with IMEX-time semidiscretizations for some partial integro-differential inequalities arising in the pricing of American options, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 55(2) (2017), 869–891.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. S. Kesavan, Finite element methods for the von Kármán equations, In Nonlinear problems of analysis in geometry and mechanics (Proc. Sympos., Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, 1979), 46, Res. Notes in Math., 137–142, Pitman, Boston, Mass.-London, (1981).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. S. Kesavan and M. Vanninathan, Sur une méthode d’éléments finis mixte pour 1’ équation biharmonique, RAIRO Anal Numer., 11(3) (1977), 255–270.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. B. V. Rathish Kumar and Sunil Kumar, Convergence of three-step Taylor Galerkin finite element scheme based monotone Schwarz iterative method for singularly perturbed differential-difference equation, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 36(8) (2015), 1029–1045.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Sunil Kumar and B. V. Rathish Kumar, A domain decomposition Taylor Galerkin finite element approximation of a parabolic singularly perturbed differential equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 293 (2017a), 508–522.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Sunil Kumar and B. V. Rathish Kumar, A finite element domain decomposition approximation for a semilinear parabolic singularly perturbed differential equation, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 18(1) (2017b), 41–55.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Sudeep Kundu, Amiya K. Pani, and Morrakot Khebchareon, On Kirchhoffs model of parabolic type, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 37(6) (2016), 719–752.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Sudeep Kundu, Saumya Bajpai, and Amiya K. Pani, Asymptotic behavior and finite element error estimates of Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic fluid flow model, Numer. Algorithms, 75(3) (2017), 619–653.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Y. Lin, V. Thomée, and Lars B. Wahlbin, Ritz-Volterra projections to finite-element spaces and applications to integro differential and related equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 28 (1991), 1047–1070.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Gouranga Mallik and Neela Nataraj, Conforming finite element methods for the von Kármán equations, Adv. Comput. Math., 42(5) (2016a), 1031–1054.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Gouranga Mallik and Neela Nataraj, A nonconforming finite element approximation for the von Kármán equations, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 50(2) (2016b), 433–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  72. K. Manickam and P. Prakash, Mixed finite element methods for fourth order elliptic optimal control problems, Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications, 9(4) (2016), 528–548.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. Luisa Donatella Marini, An inexpensive method for the evaluation of the solution of the lowest order Raviart-Thomas mixed method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 22(3) (1985), 493–496.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. B. Mercier, Topics in finite element solution of elliptic problems, TIFR Lecture notes, 63 (1979).

  75. G. Murali Mohan Reddy and Rajen K. Sinha, Ritz-Volterra reconstructions and a posteriori error analysis of finite element method for parabolic integro-differential equations, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 35(1) (2015), 341–371.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. S. Nicaise and I. Merabet, A mixed discontinuous finite element method for folded Naghdi’s shell in Cartesian coordinates, Math. Comp., 86(303) (2017), l–47.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. J. Nitsche, Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwen-dung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 36 (1971), 9–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. J. Nitsche, On Dirichlet problems using subspaces with nearly zero boundary conditions, In: The mathematical foundations of the finite element method with applications to partial differential equations, Proc. Sympos., Univ. Maryland, Baltimore, Md., (1972), Academic Press, New York, 603–627.

    Google Scholar 

  79. B. Pal and S. Ganesan, A finite element variational multiscale method for computations of turbulent flow over an aerofoil, Int. J. Adv. Engg. Sci. Appl. Math. 7 (2015), 14–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. B. Pal and S. Ganesan, Projection based variational multiscale method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in time-dependent domains, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 84 (2017), 19–40.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  81. Amiya K. Pani and Sangita Yadav, An hp-local discontinuous Galerkin method for parabolic integrodifferential equations, J. Sci. Comput., 46 (2011), 71–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. Ajit Patel, Lagrange multiplier method with penalty for elliptic and parabolic interface problems, J. of Appl. Math. and Comp., 37 (2011), 37–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. Ajit Patel, Amiya K Pani, and Neela Nataraj, Mortar element methods for parabolic problems, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 24 (2008), 1460–1484.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Ajit Patel, S. K. Acharya, and Amiya K Pani, Stabilized Lagrange multiplier method for elliptic and parabolic interface problems, Appl. Numer. Math., 120 (2017), 287–304.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. G. Pólya, Sur une interprétation de laméthode des différences finies qui peut fournir des bornes supérieures ou inférieures, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 235 (1952), 995–997.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. Debasish Pradhan, Neela Nataraj, and Amiya K. Pani, An explicit/implicit Galerkin domain decomposition procedure for parabolic integro-differential equations, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 28(1–2) (2008), 295–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. B. V. Rathish Kumar and S. V. S. S. N. V. G. Krishna Murthy, A finite element study of double diffusive mixed convection in a concentration stratified Darcian fluid saturated porous enclosure under injection/suction effect, J. Appl. Math., (2012), Art. ID. 5947d, 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  88. G. Murali Mohan Reddy and Rajen K. Sinha, On the Crank-Nicolson anisotropic a posteriori error analysis for parabolic integro-differential equations, Math. Comp., 85(301) (2016), 2365–2390.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Beatrice Riviere, Discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving elliptic and parabolic equations: Theory and implementation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008. ISBN 089871656X, 9780898716566.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  90. Vivek Sangwan and B. V. Rathish Kumar, Finite element analysis for mass-lumped three-step Taylor Galerkin method for time dependent singularly perturbed problems with exponentially fitted splines, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 33(6) (2012), 638–660.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  91. Alfred H. Schatz, An observation concerning Ritz-Galerkin methods with indefinite bilinear forms, Math. Comp., 28 (1974), 959–962.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. I. J. Schoenberg, Contribution to the problem of approximation of equidistant data by analytic functions, Parts A and B, Quart. Appl. Math., (4) (1946), 45–99, 112–141.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Jhuma Sen Gupta, Rajen Kumar Sinha, G. Murali Mohan Reddy, and Jinank Jain, New interpolation error estimates and a posteriori error analysis for linear parabolic interface problems, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 33(2) (2017), 570–598.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Rajen K. Sinha and Bhupen Deka, Finite element methods for semilinear elliptic and parabolic interface problems, Appl. Numer. Math., 59(8) (2009), 1870–1883.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Rajen Kumar Sinha and Bhupen Deka, A priori error estimates in the finite element method for non self-adjoint elliptic and parabolic interface problems, Calcolo, 43(4) (2006a), 253–278.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. Rajen Kumar Sinha and Bhupen Deka, On the convergence of finite element method for second order elliptic interface problems, Numer. Funct. Anal Optim., 27(1) (2006b), 99–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. Rajen Kumar Sinha and Bhupen Deka, An unfitted finite-element method for elliptic and parabolic interface problems, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 27(3) (2007), 529–549.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  98. Rolf Stenberg and Juha Videman, On the error analysis of stabilized finite element methods for the Stokes problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 53(6) (2015), 2626–2633.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. G. Strang, Piecewise polynomials and the finite element method, Bull. of AMS, 4 (1973), 1128–1137.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  100. J. L. Synge, Triangularisation in the hypercircle method for plane problems, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. Sect., 54(A) (1952), 341–367.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  101. V. Thomée, From finite differences to finite elements a short history of numerical analysis of partial differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 128(1–2) (2001), l–54.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimation techniques for finite element methods, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Sangita Yadav, Amiya K. Pani, and Neela Nataraj, Superconvergent discontinuous Galerkin methods for linear non-selfadjoint and indefinite elliptic problems, J. Sci. Comput., 54(1) (2013a), 45–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. Sangita Yadav, Amiya K Pani, and E.-J. Park, Superconvergent discontinuous Galerkin methods for nonlinear elliptic equations, Math. Comp., 82 (2013b), 1297–1335.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  105. Arjun Singh Yadaw and Mohan K. Kadalbajoo, Parameter-uniform Ritz-Galerkin finite element method for singularly perturbed delay differential equations with delay in convection term, Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 57(4) (2009), 459–474.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  106. O. C. Zienkiewicz, The finite element method in engineering science, McGraw-Hill, London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable inputs from P. K. Bhattacharyya, Thirupati Gudi, S. Kesavan, Amiya K. Pani, Rajen K. Sinha and M. Vanninathan which helped considerably in writing up this manuscript. The authors also thank U. K. Anandavardhanan for offering suggestions that has greatly improved the readability of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Neela Nataraj or A. S. Vasudeva Murthy.

Additional information

The emphasis of this article is on original and novel contributions from our own limited perspective. Obviously, this would mean some omissions for which we offer our apologies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nataraj, N., Vasudeva Murthy, A.S. Finite element methods: Research in India over the last decade. Indian J Pure Appl Math 50, 739–765 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-019-0352-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13226-019-0352-5

Key words

Navigation