Introduction

Silicon (Si) wafer is a thin slice of semiconductor material, which could be used for many areas, such as solar cell, integrated circuits, sensors and optical devices, electronic devices and so on. However, the construction of these devices is dependent on quality and purity of silicon wafer (Shacham-Diamand et al. 2015). Metallization of Si wafer is a vital step on device fabrication, which could affect the functional performance of the device (Sudagar et al. 2013; Furukawa and Mehregany 1996). Electroless metal deposition was a more attractive process for metallization in many applications of nanotechnology. Electroless process is a fast, low cost and low energy process without voltage or vacuum condition (Andersson et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2001). Uniform and adherent metallic films by electroless could be produced on the surface of Si wafer. This process could be occurred by the complexed redox reactions of a reductant and an oxidizer in an electrolyte solution.

Nickel–phosphorus (Ni–P) alloy has excellent mechanical, electrical, magnetic and anticorrosive properties, which could be synthesized by electroless process. For electroless process, the deposition conditions, such as bath composition, plating temperature, pH, stirring, plating period, stabilizer and additives, could have a significant influence on the deposition rate, structure an chemical composition and the quality of film (Xie and Zhang 2002; Liu et al. 2006; Singh et al. 2014; Moniruzzaman and Roy 2011; Liu et al. 2015; Rahman and Jayaganthan 2015; Hua et al. 2013). The stability of the electrolyte bath was related with bath chemistry and stabilizer (Osifuye et al. 2014; Bulasara et al. 2011). Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the deposition conditions to obtain a good quality film. Xie and Zhang (Xie and Zhang 2002) studied the effects of bath chemistry and pH value on the structure and amorphous forming region for electroless Ni–P alloys with 9–10 at % P-content in the alkaline bath solution at plating temperature of 90 °C and found that deposition rates had a maximum value with increase in the concentration of Ni2+, \(H_{2} PO_{2}^{ - }\) and pH value, respectively. However, the deposition rates decreased with the increase in the concentration of citrate ions. The pH value is a significant factor on the complex ions between the Ni2+ ions and complex agent, and the P-content in the deposit depends on the solution pH value (Lobanova et al. 2011). Liu et al. (Liu et al. 2006) studied the deposition rate of electroless Ni–P films on Si substrates with prior to sensitization and activation treatment in an acid plating bath increased with increase of the pH and the plating temperature. Plating temperature is also a significant parameter in determining deposition rate, which is related with the nature of the plated material (Cheong et al. 2007). Until now, few reports studied the effect of plating temperature on electroless Ni–P film on Si substrates in an alkaline bath solution. In this work, the electroless Ni–P film was plated in an alkaline bath solution on the surface of p-type polycrystalline Si substrates. The effect of plating temperature on the morphology, crystallographic structure, chemical composition and deposition rate of Ni–P film was studied. At the same time, the deposition mechanism of electroless Ni–P film on Si wafers in the alkaline bath solution was addressed.

Experimental

The p-type polycrystalline Si wafers were used as the substrates (size: 15 × 15 × 0.2 mm). One surface of the substrate was etched by reactive ion etching process, which was described in detail in reference (Yoo et al. 2011). Prior to plating, the substrates were cleaned with acetone in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. A small deposition cell was used for the deposition of the film on the substrates. The bath chemistry and operation conditions are listed in Table 1. No additives and stabilizers were used. The deposition times corresponded at plating temperatures of 60, 70 and 80 °C were set for 40, 45 and 40 min, respectively. The volume of bath solutions was 50 mL. All solutions were dissolved in deionized water (Simplicity, Millipore) on a magnetic stirring apparatus with a magnetic stir bar. The pH of the solution was measured by pH meter (PHS-3C) under magnetic stirring, and was adjusted to a desired value by adding 5.0 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution at room temperature. A HH-S thermostatic bath was used to control the plating temperature. During plating process, the substrate was put into the electrolyte through a plastic clip without magnetic stirring.

Table 1 Bath chemistry and deposition conditions

The microstructure and morphology of the top surface and cross section of the film and the substrate were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6360 and Gemini Sigma 300/VP) operated in the high-vacuum mode, equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) detector. The thickness of the film was observed by optical microscopy (VHX-700FC), fitted with a digital camera. The chemical composition of each sample was tested by EDS detector at five locations to confirm uniformity. The crystallographic structure of the film was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Scintag, USA) equipped with a Cu-Kα radiation source at a scanning rate of 0.5°s−1 and scanning from 10° to 80° of 2θ.

Results

Substrate

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern and SEM micrographs of surface and fracture surface of pretreated Si substrate. The θ–2θ scan data exhibited strong 2θ peaks at 28.40°, 46.67°, 56.25° and 76.59°, respectively, corresponding to the (111), (220), (311) and (331) peaks compared with the standard d-values taken from JCPDS (43-0144). The XRD pattern revealed that the Si substrate is a polycrystalline structure (Fig. 1a). After reactive ion etching process, the substrate surface became relatively rough and consisted of many pyramid and pit structures (Fig. 1b). It can be observed from Fig. 1c that the fracture surface was composed of nanometer- to micrometer-sized pores, and the depth of these pores was about 4–5 μm. The surface morphology of the substrate could affect the microstructure and adherence of electroless Ni–P film.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD pattern (a) and SEM micrographs of surface (b) and fracture surface (c) of Si substrate after reactive ion etching process

Characterization of Ni–P film

Figure 2 shows the SEM micrographs of the film surface deposited at plating temperature of 60 °C. It can be seen from a low-magnification image (Fig. 2a) that the dense surface was composed of some large particles. No micro-cracks were found on the surface. Many flower patterns and large particles were present in Fig. 2b. Furthermore, the surface of the film was dense, observed by high-magnification SEM micrograph (Fig. 2c, d). A mesoscale colony structure can be observed on the top surface of the deposit. The mesoscale colony and nodules characters were present on the top surface due to the internal stress accumulation during the depositing process (Ashassi-Sorkhabi and Rafizadeh 2004). The film was composed of agglomerated mesoscale colony and nodules, which met and coalesced each other to form a compact layer.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM micrographs of top surface of the film deposited at plating temperature of 60 °C, a magnification ×1K, b magnification ×5K, c magnification × 5K and d magnification ×9.59K

Figure 3 shows the SEM micrographs of the top surface of the film deposited at 70 °C. After mechanical fracture, the Ni–P film exhibited relative softness. The film could be bended to be more than 90° angle, which can be observed by visible eyes. In Fig. 3a, the film was broken due to the effect of the mechanical fracture. However, it was evidence of delamination for the film on Si substrate. There seems to be a curved film on the surface. The mechanical property of the Ni–P film deposited at 70 °C would be studied in future work. Furthermore, the surface was dense and smooth, observed by high-magnification SEM micrograph. It seems to be many small particles, but no visible micro-cracks. A mesoscale nodular structure is evidence, with clear intercolony boundaries and surface grooves. These features indicate the film growth is a Volmer-Weber growth mode. The formation of mesoscale nodules resulted from nucleation extending laterally from an existing structural defects (Wu et al. 2015). As shown in Fig. 4, the chemical composition of the Ni–P film presents a uniform distribution. Furthermore, the Ni element was still present on the under layer (Fig. 4a). However, there were no signals of P element on the map scanning image (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM micrographs of the top surface of the film deposited at 70 °C. a Middle region and b the edge of sample

Fig. 4
figure 4

Map scanning analysis of the EDS of the surface of the film deposited at 70 °C. a Elemental P and b elemental Ni

Some micro-cracks were present on the upper layer of the film around the edge of sample (See Fig. 3b), where release of the hydrogen bubbles caused the microcrackings formation. The under layer was composed of nano-sized globular particles. Further, the under layer was composed of a sparse particle distribution. Some regions were not completely deposited by Ni–P particles. It could be influenced by the effect of the competitive of the initial nucleation stage. A mechanism of the electroless Ni–P plating on Si substrates is the nucleation reactions and then film growth. In the initial nucleation stage, the nucleation reactions could occur in the neighborhood of the original Ni nodules to form an irregular nodular structure (see Fig. 3b). The deposition mechanism of the electroless Ni–P plating on Si substrates will be addressed in “Discussions”.

When the plating temperature was increased to 80 °C, the surface of the film became relatively rough after deposition time of 40 min, at the same time the dendritic structure was formed on the surface, and lots of bubbles were released from the electrolyte due to the release of hydrogen. Figure 5 shows the SEM micrographs of the top surface of the film deposited at 80 °C. In Fig. 5a, b, the observed surface was rough. The dendritic structure was present, which was constituted with many small globular particles. The hump and nodules characters on the surface of the deposits were obviously found. No micro-cracking on the surface was observed.

Fig. 5
figure 5

SEM micrographs of the top surface of the film deposited at bath temperature of 80 °C. a Magnification ×1K and b magnification ×10K

Figure 6 shows the optical images of cross section of the Ni–P films on Si substrates. At 60 °C temperature, the film was uniform and the thickness was 1.47 ± 0.12 μm. It was indicated that the deposition rate was ~0.037 μm min−1. In Fig. 6a, the film bonded to the substrate has no evidence of delamination. With increasing bath temperature, the deposition rate remarkably increased. At plating temperature of 70 °C, the film thickness was increased to 3.7 ± 0.35 μm (Fig. 6b). It is depicted that the deposition rate was approximately 0.082 μm min−1. The adhesion of the film with the substrate was poor with evidence of delamination. However, the Ni–P film was also found at the untreated surface of Si substrate and the adhesion was also poor. It can be inferred that the Ni–P film could be produced on Si substrate surface without any pretreatment steps in an alkaline environment. With increasing bath temperature (Fig. 6c), the thickness was about 3.64 ± 0.14 μm and the deposition rate was approximately 0.091 μm min−1. The result clearly indicated that the deposition rate increased with increasing temperature up to 80 °C, which was consistent with the result of Ref. (Lobanova et al. 2011). This behavior could be due to the increase in the driving force of the reducing agent as a result of the increase in plating temperature (Abdel Hamid 2003; Hung 1985). However, the film had a delamination phenomenon. The adhesion of the electroless deposits to the substrate is primarily mechanical in nature (Wei et al. 2015). In the study, electroless Ni–P films were plated on Si substrates. The adhesion is dependent upon the surface morphology of the Si surface and the residual stress of the deposits. Mechanical and chemical roughening could provide enough areas and sites into which the Ni–P films became anchored and adhered to the substrates. The Ni–P films deposited at 70 and 80 °C adhered poor to Si substrates, which might result from the slow nucleation rate and the release of hydrogen bubbles. Lots of bubbles were observed during deposition, which flew through the void space at the interface between film and substrate, and then built-in pressure could break the integrity of the Ni–P film on the surface of the Si substrates (Zhang et al. 2006).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Optical images of cross section of the film deposited at the different bath temperatures. Bath temperature of 60 °C (a), 70 °C (b) and 80 °C (c)

Figure 7 presents the chemical composition of the film deposited at different plating temperatures. The P-content of the deposits was not changed significantly with increasing bath temperature, and the value was kept stable at about 12 wt%. As shown in EDS pattern, the as-prepared deposit was composed only of elemental Ni and P. The content of the Ni in the deposit was more than that of the P. It can be depicted that the films should be a high-P content alloy film. Therefore, the plating temperature had little effect on the chemical composition of the film. High-P deposits have amorphous structure and excellent performances in wear and corrosion resistances (Gil et al. 2008; Keong et al. 2002; Afroukhteh et al. 2012).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Chemical composition of the film deposited at different plating temperatures

The effect of plating temperature on the crystallographic structure of the deposits is shown in Fig. 8. In Fig. 8a, the deposition temperature was 60 °C, a board diffraction peak at ~45° indicates an amorphous phase formation. The diffraction peaks for polycrystalline Si substrate were also observed. Therefore, the thickness of Ni–P film was thin. With increasing deposition temperature, the structure of the film observed was still amorphous (Fig. 8b and c). The diffraction peak of polycrystalline Si substrate almost disappeared due to the increase in film thickness. The crystallographic structure of amorphous Ni–P alloy film is in agreement with the result of high-P deposits.

Fig. 8
figure 8

XRD patterns of Ni–P films on Si substrates a 60 °C, b 70 °C and c 80 °C

Discussions

The deposition of electroless Ni–P film is a complex auto-catalytic process. \({\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - }\) ions act as the reducing agent that participate in oxidation and reduction reactions. \({\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - }\) was absorbed on the catalytic surface and then reacted with H2O to form \({\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - }\), free electrons and hydrogen ions (H+), according to the following reactions (1) and (2) (Hsu et al. 2009):

$${\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}} \to {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - } + 2e^{ - } + 2H^{ + }$$
(1)
$${\text{Ni}}_{{}}^{2 + } + 2{\text{e}}^{ - } \to {\text{Ni}}^{0}$$
(2)

According to the reaction Eqs. (1) and (2), the deposition of electroless Ni could be described by the following reaction (3), which could occur in either alkaline or acid environment.

$${\text{Ni}}^{{ 2 { + }}} + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - } + {\text{ H}}_{ 2} {\text{O }} \to {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - } + 2{\text{H}}^{ + } + {\text{Ni}}^{0}$$
(3)

For the alkaline solution, the main reactions for conventional deposition of electroless Ni–P film will be expressed by the following equations according to the hydride transfer mechanism (Zhang et al. 2011):

$${\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - } + 2 {\text{OH}}_{{}}^{ - } \to {\text{H}}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}$$
(4)
$$N{\text{i}}_{{}}^{2 + } + 2H^{ - } \to {\text{Ni}}^{0} + {\text{ H}}_{ 2}\uparrow$$
(5)
$$H_{2} PO_{2}^{ - } + H_{{}}^{ - } \to 2OH_{{}}^{ - } + P + 1/ 2 {\text{H}}_{ 2}\uparrow$$
(6)
$${\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{O }} + {\text{H}}_{{}}^{ - } \to {\text{OH}}_{{}}^{ - } + {\text{H}}_{ 2}\uparrow$$
(7)

According to the Eqs. (4)–(7), the hydride transfer mechanism explains the occurrence of hydrogen evolution in a bath solution containing \({\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - }\). Abdel Hamid et al. (Abdel Hamid 2003) pointed out that the increase in pH value for the alkaline solution resulted in the decrease of the deposition rate due to the consumption of \(OH_{{}}^{ - }\) ions according to the following Eq. (8):

$${\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - } + {\text{OH}}^{ - } \to {\text{ H}}_{\text{ads}} {\text{ + H}}_{2} P{\text{O}}_{3}^{ - } + {\text{e}}^{\text{ - }}$$
(8)

The combination of two H atoms will result in the hydrogen evolution (Eq. 9) and reduction of \(N{\text{i}}_{{}}^{2 + }\) ions (Eq. 10)

$$2 {\text{H}}_{\text{ads}} \to {\text{ H}}_{ 2}\uparrow$$
(9)
$$2 {\text{H}}_{\text{ads}} + {\text{Ni}}_{{}}^{2 + } \to {\text{ Ni}}^{0} + {\text{ 2H}}_{{}}^{ + }$$
(10)

The reduced Ni mainly resulted from the reaction among the Ni ions and the reductant radicals (Abrantes and Correia 1994; Iwasa et al. 1968). However, the Si substrate could be oxidized in aqueous alkaline solution as following reaction Eq. (11):

$${\text{Si }} + {\text{ 2OH}}^{\text{ - }} \to {\text{ SiO}}_{ 2} + {\text{ H}}_{ 2} + {\text{ 2e}}^{ - }$$
(11)

On the other hand, as the Si substrate was immersed in the aqueous alkaline solution, the galvanic displacement reaction occurred, which is a spontaneous reaction. The spontaneous reaction for Ni deposition can be expressed as following Eq. (12) (Hsu et al. 2009):

$$2 {\text{Ni}}^{ 2+ } + {\text{ Si }} \to {\text{ 2Ni}}^{0} + {\text{ Si}}^{ 4+ }$$
(12)

During this spontaneous reaction, the Si substrate surface was oxidized and became a catalytic surface inducing further co-deposition of Ni–P film. Therefore, the oxidation and reduction reactions of H2PO2 ions began to occur, followed by co-deposition of Ni–P film. In this work, Si substrate was not done by sensitizing and activation processes, the Ni nucleation on the surface of Si substrate was limited due to self-activation. The evidence could be observed under dense layer with a sparse particle distribution (Fig. 3b). The EDS pattern in Fig. 4 also proved that the Ni nucleation was Ni nuclei particles were formed preferentially in initial nucleation stage. The above discussion has been ascertained by further experiments, as shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9 shows the SEM micrographs and chemical composition distribution of fracture surface of the film. The P-content in the deposit was approximately 24 ± 0.2 wt%. The thickness of the film was uniform and dense. However, the interface between the film and the substrate was not homogeneous due to the effect of the substrate surface. There are many big particles like some nodules infiltrated into Si substrate. The EDS line profile showed that Ni concentration has a sharp peak with a sudden increase at the interface between the deposit and the substrate, which is assertive evidence to prove that Ni nuclei particles were formed preferentially in initial nucleation stage.

Fig. 9
figure 9

SEM micrograph and line scanning analysis of the EDS of the fracture surface of the film (bath chemistry: 25 g L−1 Ni2+, 40 g L−1 \(H_{2} PO_{2}^{ - }\), 20 g L−1 Cit; Deposition conditions: pH of 10.0, bath temperature of 70 °C, no additive was used)

The reducing agent was added and the nucleated Ni particles were produced, and then Ni–P film was grown rapidly. Coincidentally with Ni reduction, \({\text{H}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - }\) ions are reduced to elemental P and oxidized to \({\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - }\) as the following reaction (13):

$$2 {\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{PO}}_{2}^{ - } \to {\text{H}}_{ 2} {\text{PO}}_{3}^{ - } + {\text{P}} + {\text{OH}}_{{}}^{ - } + 1/ 2 {\text{H}}_{2}$$
(13)

Island growth was evident and remarkable sparse sphere particle nucleation was present. Then, islands grew and then met one another and drove to form a continuous film. Adhesion of the Ni–P film with Si substrate is naturally poor because of the sparsely distributed Ni nuclei particles in initial nucleation stage (see Fig. 3b, Fig. 4b and Fig. 9). Nuclei are firstly bonded to the substrate surface. In initial nucleation stage, nucleation rate of Ni were insufficient, which could cause a weak adhesion between the Ni–P layer and Si substrate (Wei et al. 2015). Lack of attachment areas and sites on the Si wafer caused the Ni–P layer to peel off easily.

Conclusions

Ni–P film was electrolessly deposited on the surface of p-type polycrystalline Si in an alkaline bath solution at 60–80 °C and pH value of 10.0. The conclusions were made as following:

  1. (1)

    Ni–P films were composed of an amorphous phase, no regardless of plating temperature. The stable value P-content of the film was maintained at about 12 wt% with increasing bath temperature. The deposition rate of the film was increased with increasing bath temperature.

  2. (2)

    The surface of the film was dense and no cracking was found at the plating temperatures of 60 and 80 °C. However, the Ni–P film electrolessly deposited at 70 and 80 °C had a poor adherence to Si substrate with evidence of delamination because of the slow nucleation rate in the initial nucleation stage.

  3. (3)

    The nano-sized globular particles were formed at initial nucleation stage. The nuclear layer was composed of a sparse particle distribution. Some regions were not completely deposited by the nuclear particles, which could be influenced by the effect of the competitive between the initial nucleation stage and layer growth stage.

  4. (4)

    A mechanism of the proposed electroless Ni–P deposits on Si substrates is the nucleation reactions and film growth. In the initial nucleation stage, nucleation reactions could occur in the neighborhood of the original Ni nodules to form an irregular nodular structure.