Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of pseudo cereal flours on some physical, chemical and sensory properties of bread

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, quinoa flour (QF) and buckwheat flour (BF) were used up to 20 % in the formulation of bread, replacing wheat flour. The formulated breads were evaluated for physical quality parameters, chemical and sensory properties. The highest ratios of QF and BF adversely affected volume and hardness values of the breads. Generally Fe, K, Mg, Mn, and Zn contents of the breads increased with increasing levels of QF and BF. While phytic acid content of the control bread was found to be 53.23 mg/100 g; this antinutrient increased up to 137.80 mg/100 g with 20 % QF usage. Bread containing 10 % QF or BF gave similar sensory scores compared to control. Also, bread produced with a QF:BF blend (50:50 w/w) at a 20 % level replacing wheat flour gave good sensory quality values except for pore structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AACC (1990) Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, 8th edn. AACC, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın C, Öğüt H (1991) Determination of some biological properties of Amasya apple and hazelnuts. Selcuk Univ J Agri 1:45–54 in Turkish

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojnanska T, Francakova H, Gazar R (2009) Influence of buckwheat addition on technical and nutrition quality of bread. Acta Fytotechnica Zootech Minariadne CISL 57–63

  • Bonafaccia G, Kreft I (1994) Technological and qualitative characteristics of food products made with buckwheat. Fagopyrum 14:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubert H, Hagenah WD (1987) Detection and measurement. In: Boumans PWJM (ed) Inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy. Wiley-Interscience Publishers, New York, pp. 536–567

  • Chauhan GS, Eskin NAM, Tkachuk R (1992) Nutrients and antinutrients in quinoa seed. Cereal Chem 69(1):85–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dini A, Rastrelli L, Saturnino P, Schettino O (1992) A compositional study of Chenopodium quinoa seeds. Nahrung 36:400–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harland BF, Harland J (1980) Fermentative reduction of phytate in rye, white and whole wheat breads. Cereal Chem 57(3):226–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh W, Lantzsch HJ (1983) Sensitive method for the rapid determination of phytate in cereals and cereal products. J Sci Food Agric 34:1423–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozioł M (1992) Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of Quinoa. (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J Food Compos Anal 5:35–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin LY, Liu HM, Yu Y, Lin SD (2009) Quality and antioxidant property of buckwheat enhanced wheat bread. Food Chem 112(4):987–991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Coulter L (1991) Quinoa flour in baked products. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 41:213–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall HG, Pomeranz Y (1982) Buckwheat: Description, breeding, production, and utilization. In: Pomeranz Y (ed) Adv Cereal Sci and Tech. AACC, St. Paul, pp. 157–203

  • Morita N, Hirata C, Park SG, Mitsunaga T (2001) Quinoa flours as a new foodstuff for improving dough and bread. J Appl Glycosci 48(3):263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranhotra GS, Gelroth BK, Glaser BK, Lorenz KJ, Johnson DL (1993) Composition and protein nutritional quality of quinoa. Cereal Chem 70(3):303–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard ES, Thompson LU (1997) Interactions and effects of phytic acid. In: Shahidi F (ed) Antinutrients and phytochemicals in foods. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 294–312

  • Schlick G, Bubenheim DL (1996) Quinoa: Candidate crop for NASA’s controlled ecological life support systems. In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. ASHS Press, Arlington, pp. 632–640

  • Skrabanja V, Kreft I, Golob T, Modic M, Ikeda S, Ikeda K, Kreft S, Bonafaccia G, Knapp M, Kosmelj K (2004) Nutrient content in buckwheat milling fraction. Cereal Chem 81(2):172–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steadman KJ, Burgoon MS, Lewis BA, Edwardson SE, Obendorf RL (2001) Minerals, phytic acid, tannin and rutin in buckwheat seed milling fractions. J Sci Food Agri 81:1094–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-G’alvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puenteb L, Mart’ınezc EA (2010) Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. J Sci Food Agric 90:2541–2547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijngaard HH, Arendt EK (2006) Buckwheat. Cereal Chem 83(4):391–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nermin Bilgiçli.

Additional information

Research Highlights

1. Quinoa flour (QF) and buckwheat flour (BF) were used in bread formulation up to %20 level.

2. The highest ratios of QF and BF gave low volume and hard texture in bread.

3. QF and BF improved Fe, K, Mg, Mn, and Zn contents of breads.

4. All levels of QF and BF significantly (p < 0.05) increased phytic acid content of breads.

5. Bread containing 10 % QF or BF gave similar sensory scores to control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilgiçli, N., İbanoğlu, Ş. Effect of pseudo cereal flours on some physical, chemical and sensory properties of bread. J Food Sci Technol 52, 7525–7529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1770-y

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1770-y

Keywords

Navigation