Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Genetics Curriculum for Community Health Workers: KEEP IT (Keeping Each other Engaged Program via IT) Community Health Worker Training

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We developed a curriculum for community health workers (CHWs) using an innovative, community-engaged focus group and Delphi process approach. Equipping CHWs with knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) and genetics could help enhance identification of women at risk for HBOC, referral, and navigation through genetic services. We conducted focus groups with five CHWs and a three-round Delphi process with eight experts. In the first round of the Delphi process, participants rated and commented on draft curriculum modules. The second round involved live video discussion to highlight points of confusion and concern in the modules. The curriculum was revised and refined based on quantitative and qualitative data and reassessed by the experts in Round 3. Ultimately, agreement was achieved on eight of 10 modules when assessing for clarity of learning objectives, seven out of 10 when assessing for adult learning theory, and nine out of 10 when assessing for participants’ ability to learn desired knowledge. We plan to virtually deliver this curriculum to CHWs to enhance their HBOC and genomic competencies. By equipping CHWs to understand and participate in genomics education, we can enable more equitable participation in genomics-informed clinical care and research. Beyond this curriculum, the Delphi methodology can further be used to design content for new CHW curriculums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. John EM, Miron A, Gong G et al (2007) Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1 mutation carriers in 5 US racial/ethnic groups. Jama 298(24):2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.24.2869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietze EC, Sistrunk C, Miranda-Carboni G, O’Regan R, Seewaldt VL (2015) Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology. Nat Rev Cancer 15(4):248–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF et al (2010) Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. Jama 304(9):967–975. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC (2000) Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Jama 283(5):617–624. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.5.617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson HD, Fu R, Zakher B, McDonagh M, Pappas M, Stillman L US (2019) Preventive services task force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Medication use for the risk reduction of primary breast cancer in women: a systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 

  6. Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R (2019) Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama 322(7):666–685. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.8430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khoury MJ, Bowen MS, Clyne M et al (2018) From public health genomics to precision public health: a 20-year journey. Genet med: official j Am Coll Med Genet 20(6):574–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith CE, Fullerton SM, Dookeran KA et al (2016) Using genetic technologies to reduce, rather than widen, health disparities. Health Aff (Millwood) 35(8):1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halbert CH, McDonald J, Vadaparampil S, Rice L, Jefferson M (2016) Conducting precision medicine research with African Americans. PloS one 11(7):e0154850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonald JA, Barg FK, Weathers B et al (2012) Understanding participation by African Americans in cancer genetics research. J Natl Med Assoc 104(7-8):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30172-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scherr CL, Ramesh S, Marshall-Fricker C, Perera MA (2019) A Review of African Americans’ beliefs and attitudes about genomic studies: opportunities for message design. Front genet 10:548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00548

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheppard VB, Graves KD, Christopher J, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Talley C, Williams KP (2014) African American women’s limited knowledge and experiences with genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. J genet counsel 23(3):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9663-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ojinnaka CO, Adepoju OE (2021) Racial and ethnic disparities in health information technology use and associated trends among individuals living with chronic diseases. Popul Health Manag. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2021.0055

  14. Tarver WL, Haggstrom DA (2019) The use of cancer-specific patient-centered technologies among underserved populations in the United States: systematic review. J Med Int Res 21(4):e10256. https://doi.org/10.2196/10256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson T, Seo J, Griffith J, Baxter M, James A, Kaphingst KA (2013) “You don't have to keep everything on paper”: African American women’s use of family health history tools. J commun genet 4(2):251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0138-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walker DM, Hefner JL, Fareed N, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS (2020) Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemed j e-health : the official j Am Telemed Assoc 26(5):603–613. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halbert CH, Jefferson M, Allen CG et al (2021) Racial differences in patient portal activation and research enrollment among patients with prostate cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 5:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1200/cci.20.00131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce RP, Stevermer JJ (2020) Disparities in use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20963893

  19. Shah SK, Nakagawa M, Lieblong BJ (2020) Examining aspects of successful community-based programs promoting cancer screening uptake to reduce cancer health disparity: a systematic review. Prevent med 141:106242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brandford A, Adegboyega A, Combs B, Hatcher J (2019) Training community health workers in motivational interviewing to promote cancer screening. Health promot pract 20(2):239–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918761384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen CG, McBride CM, Balcazar HG, Kaphingst KA (2016) Community health workers: an untapped resource to promote genomic literacy. J health commun 21(sup2):25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1196272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen LS, Goodson P, Jung E, Popoola O, Kwok OM, Muenzenberger A (2015) A survey of Texas health educators’ family health history-based practice. Am J Health Behav 39(5):632–639. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.39.5.5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen LS, Zhao S, Stelzig D et al (2018) Development and evaluation of a genomics training program for community health workers in Texas. Genet med: official j Am Coll Med Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.236

  24. Powell C (2003) The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 41(4):376–382. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vankova D, Videnova J (2019) Delphi technique for curriculum development. ICERI2019 Proceedings 

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Allen CG, Brownstein JN, Satsangi A, Escoffery C (2016) Community health workers as allies in hypertension self-management and medication adherence in the United States, 2014. Preventing chronic disease, vol 13, p E179. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160236

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Viswanathan M, Kraschnewski J, Nishikawa B et al (2009) Outcomes of community health worker interventions. Evidence report/technology assessment (181):1-144, A1-2, B1-14, passim

    Google Scholar 

  28. Attipoe-Dorcoo S, Chattopadhyay SK, Verughese J, Ekwueme DU, Sabatino SA, Peng Y (2021) Engaging community health workers to increase cancer screening: a community guide systematic economic review. Am j prevent med 60(4):e189–e197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vadaparampil ST, Moreno Botero L, Fuzzell L et al (2021) Development and pilot testing of a training for bilingual community education professionals about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer among Latinas: ÁRBOLES Familiares. Transl Behav Med. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab093

  30. Kikut AI, O’Brien JM (2018) A collaborative community model for including minorities in genetic research. JAMA Ophthalmol 136(4):313–314. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded through the American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant awarded to the Hollings Cancer Center,  Medical University of South Carolina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin G. Allen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, C.G., Hatch, A., Qanungo, S. et al. Development of a Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Genetics Curriculum for Community Health Workers: KEEP IT (Keeping Each other Engaged Program via IT) Community Health Worker Training. J Canc Educ 39, 70–77 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02377-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02377-7

Keywords

Navigation