Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Telephone Follow-up Design and Practice for Advanced Cancer Pain Patients

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe the design of a telephone follow-up protocol and to evaluate the feasibility of this protocol for advanced cancer pain patients. A series of nine telephone follow-up calls was implemented with 40 advanced cancer pain patients within 3 months after their discharge from the Department of Chemotherapy. Cancer pain information and the pain-related knowledge of the patients were collected by nurses using pain follow-up information sheets and the Patient Pain Questionnaire (PPQ); pain self-efficacy and the quality of life were reported by patients using the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale (CPSS) Chinese version and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Chinese version. The average score assessed by advanced cancer pain patients of the need for pain care from nurses was 24.28 (SD = 4.90). Twenty-one and eight patients completed all nine telephone follow-up calls and seven self-reported questionnaires, respectively. The pain intensity of patients at the time of follow-up was mild, but there had been breakthrough pain in the previous week. All patients were satisfied with the nurses’ pain follow-up practices. There was a highly positive correlation between the time of follow-up and the patients’ pain-related knowledge scores (r = 0.963**, p < 0.01). Patients’ pain self-efficacy scores and quality of life scores varied across different dimensions. The baseline pain self-efficacy subscales were associated with all dimensions of quality of life (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Telephone follow-up can be an effective method of transitional care. For advanced cancer pain patients, it is still necessary to further explore the cost effectiveness of this method, including the appropriate follow-up duration, endpoints, and outcome measures based on government requirements and policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J (2007) Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol 18:1437–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu S-Y, Wang J-J, Huang Y-g, Hu B, Wang K, Li PP, Wu Y-L, Zhang H-L, Zhang L, Zhang Q-Y, Qin S-K (2017) Managing pain in patients with cancer: the Chinese good pain management experience. J Glob Oncol 3:583–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiese Nursing Association (2017) Care guidelines for patients with cancer pain (expert consensus). Chinese Nursing Management 17(12):1585–1587

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Heath and Family Planing Commission of People’s Republic of China (2011) Notice of the office of the Ministry of Health on the development of the “standardized treatment demonstration ward of cancer pain”. Retrieved Jan 30, 2015, from http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/mohyzs/s3586/201104/51234.shtml

  5. Zhou M, Holden L, Bedard G, Zeng L, Lam H, Chu D, Lao N, Lauzon N, Chow E (2012) The utilization of telephone follow-up in the advanced cancer population: a review of the literature. J Comp Eff Res 1(6):509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes S (2000) Not a social event: the follow-up phone call. J Perianesth Nurs 15:253–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rustoen T, Valeberg BT, Kolstad E, Wist E, Paul S, Miaskowski C (2014) A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management. Cancer Nurs 37:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koller A, Miaskowski C, De Geest S, Opitz O, Spichiger E (2013) Results of a randomized controlled pilot study of a self-management intervention for cancer pain. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Verevkina N, Shi Y, Fuentes-Caceres VA, Scanlon DP (2014) Attrition in chronic disease self-management programs and self-efficacy at enrollment. Health Educ Behav 41:590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan-mei Qin, Dong Gou (2010) Pain management knowledge survey of cancer patients and their family members. Chinese Medical News 7:122–124

  11. He H-y (2008) Study on cancer pain self-efficacy, self-efficacy associated factors and its nursing intervention. Third Military Medical University, Chongqing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romano JM, Jensen MP, Turner JA (2003) The chronic pain coping inventory-42: reliability and validity. Pain 104:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chong-hua Wang M-QC, Zhang C-z et al (2005) The assessment of EORTC qlq-c30 in Chinese population. J Pract Oncol 20:353–355

    Google Scholar 

  14. EORTC-Quality of Life (1999) Retrieved Nov 2, 2014 from European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer. http://qol.eortc.org/questionnaire/eortc-qlq-c30/

  15. Hjermstad MJ, Fossa SD, Bjordal K, Kaasa S (1995) Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. J Clin Oncol 13:1249–1254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Koller A, Gaertner J, Geest SD, Hasemann M, Becker G (2018) Testing the implementation of a pain self-management support intervention for oncology patients in clinical practice. Cancer Nurs 41(5):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grande GE, Todd CJ (2000) Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? Palliat Med 14(1):69–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goebel JR, Sherbourne CD, Asch SM, Meredith L, Cohen AB, Hagenmaier E, Lanto AB, Simon B, Rubenstein LV, Shugarman LR, Lorenz KA (2010) Addressing patients’ concerns about pain management and addiction risks. Pain Manag Nurs 11:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shu-kui Qin J-JW (2017) Education for pain patients. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.-r, Qin (2012) The status and development trend of continuous nursing care for discharged patients. J Nurs Sci 27:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu H-y, L Q-X, Zhao J (2013) Effect of two-way follow-up on patients with moderate and severe cancer pain. J Nurs Sci 19:19–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jun-fang F, W D-d, Yu F-f (2014) Meta analysis of the effect of patients’ pain education on alleviating cancer pain. J Nurs Adm 1:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Z-y-y, H X-p, Ju M (2017) Study on self-efficacy and quality of life of cancer pain patients. J Pract Med:636–638

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks all the participants for their contributions to the survey.

Funding

The research is approved and supported by a grant from the Nursing Department of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (201305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Liu.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the ethics committee of our center. Written informed consent was obtained from every participating patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zou, B., Li, X., Huang, X. et al. Telephone Follow-up Design and Practice for Advanced Cancer Pain Patients. J Canc Educ 35, 751–759 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01523-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01523-4

Keywords

Navigation