Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients with Rare Cancers: Thyroid Cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Internet offers an easy and quick access to a vast amount of patient information. However, several studies point to the poor quality of many websites and the resulting hazards of false information. The aim of this study was to assess quality of information on thyroid cancer. A patients’ search for information about thyroid cancer on German websites was simulated using the search engine Google and the patient portal “Patienten-Information.de”. The websites were assessed using a standardized instrument with formal and content aspects from the German Cancer Society. Supporting the results of prior studies that analysed patient information on the Internet, the data showed that the quality of patient information on thyroid cancer is highly heterogeneous depending on the website providers. The majority of website providers are represented by media and health providers other than health insurances, practices and professionals offering patient information of relatively poor quality. Moreover, most websites offer patient information of low-quality content. Only a few trustworthy, high-quality websites exist. Especially Google, a common search engine, focuses more on the dissemination of information than on quality aspects. In order to improve the patient information from the Internet, the visibility of high-quality websites must be improved. For that, education programs to improve patients’ eHealth literacy are needed. A quick and easy evaluation tool for online information suited for patients should be implemented, and patients should be taught to integrate such a tool into their research process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

afgis:

Action Forum on Health Information Systems

ÄZQ:

Agency for Quality in Medicine

DNEbM:

German Network for Evidence-Based Medicine

GCS:

German Cancer Society

HONcode:

Health on the Net Code of Conduct

References

  1. Waldeyer A, Fanghänel J, Pera F (2009) Anatomie des Menschen. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A (2009) Evidenzbasierte Patienteninformation: Wünsche der Betroffenen. Dtsch Arztebl International 106(51–52):A-2554

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steckelberg A, Berger B, Köpke S, Heesen C, Mühlhauser I (2005) Kriterien für evidenzbasierte Patienteninformationen. Z ärztl Fortb Qualitätssich 99:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  4. Middel CE (2011) Ethische Aspekte von Patienteninformationen–Können Informationen auch schaden? Public Health Forum 19(1):10.e1–10.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber L (2011) Evidenzbasierte Patienteninformationen zu Asthma bronchiale. http://www.staempfliverlag.com/annot/564C42696D677C7C393738333635363137373336347C7C504446.?sq=2&title=Evidenzbasierte%20Patienteninformationen%20zu%20Asthma%20bronchiale. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  6. Hirschberg I (2010) Bewertung und Wirkung von evidenzbasierten Gesundheitsinformationen-Die Perspektive der Nutzer. http://www.grin.com/de/e-book/158865/bewertung-und-wirkung-von-evidenzbasierten-gesundheitsinformationen-die. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  7. Jazbinsek D (2000) (Hrsg.). Gesundheitskommunikation. Springer. ISBN 978-3-663-08098-5

  8. Schaefer S, Kirschning S (2010) Gut informiert entscheiden: Patienten- und Verbraucherinformationen am ÄZQ. Z ärztl Fortb Qualitätssich 104(7):578–584

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domittner B (2011) Bedeutung und Einfluss von Online-Gesundheitsinformationen auf Beratungsleistungen gesundheitsinformierender Einrichtungen. http://www.fgoe.org/projektfoerderung/gefoerderte-projekte/FgoeProject_3034/61061.pdf. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  10. Eichenberg C, Malberg D (2011) Gesundheitsinformationen im Internet. Psychotherapie im Dialog 12(2):128–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zschorlich B, Gechter D, Janßen S, Inger M, Swinehart T, Wiegard B, Koch K et al (2015) Z ärztl Fortb Qualitätssich 109:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fahy E, Hardikar R, Fox A, Mackay S (2014) Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape. Austral Med J 7(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. https://www.afgis.de/. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  14. https://www.healthonnet.org/HONcode/German/. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  15. http://www.discern.de/. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  16. Liebl P, Seilacher E, Koester MJ, Stellamanns J, Zel J, Huebner J (2015) What cancer patients find in the Internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information—analysis of information on German websites. Oncol Res Treatm 38:212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henf A, Wesselmann S, Huthmann D, Muenstedt K, Huebner J (2014) Complementary and alternative medicine in German cancer centers. Oncol Res Treat 37:390–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin: Patienteninformation.de. Ein Service der Bundesärztekammer und der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung. http://www.patienten-information.de/. Version: 2015. – [Online; Stand 14. Juni 2015]. Last assessed 12 March 2016

  19. Chen H, Yu P, Hailey D, Wang N (2013) Methods for assessing the quality of data in public health information systems: a critical review. Studies Health Technol Inform 204:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fuchs T, Hanaya H, Seilacher E, Koester MJ, Keinki C, Liebl P, Huebner J (2016) Information deficits and second opinion seeking—a survey on cancer patients. Cancer Investig 28:1–8. doi:10.1080/07357907.2016.1242012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ebel MD, Stellamanns J, Keinki C, Rudolph I, Huebner J (2015) Cancer patients and the internet: a survey among German cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 30:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neuhauser L, Kreps GL (2008) Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Educ Couns 71(3):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurz-Milcke E, Gigerenzer G, Martignon L (2008) Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1128:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M, Gigerenzer G (2010) Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect? Med Decis Mak 30(6):672–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jutta Huebner.

Additional information

Jutta Huebner and Natalie Herth contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuenzel, U., Monga Sindeu, T., Schroth, S. et al. Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients with Rare Cancers: Thyroid Cancer. J Canc Educ 33, 960–966 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1173-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1173-z

Keywords

Navigation