Skip to main content
Log in

The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media are potentially valuable tools for disseminating cancer education messages, but the differential effects of various sites on persuasive outcomes are unknown. In an effort to inform future health promotion, this research tested the effects of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and blogs for delivering a cancer risk reduction message. Using an experimental design, participants were randomly placed in several conditions that delivered the same message but with different forms of social media. Effects on comprehension and attitudes were examined, as they are important variables in the behavior change process. YouTube led to higher comprehension and stronger attitudes toward cancer risk reduction than Twitter, but there were no differences between other sites. Additionally, YouTube led to stronger attitudes toward cancer risk reduction as compared to Facebook, but not any other sites. These results demonstrate that, even if the message is kept constant, the form of social media used to deliver content can have an effect on persuasive outcomes. More research is needed to determine the mechanisms behind the differences found, however. Altogether, this line of research is valuable for any individuals seeking to use social media for health promotion purposes and could have direct implications for the development of cancer risk reduction campaigns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22(5):453–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2013) Lifetime risk of developing or dying from cancer. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or-dying-from-cancer. Accessed 18 Aug 2014

  3. Archer NP, Head MM, Wollersheim JP, Yuan Y (1996) Investigation of voice and text output modes with abstraction in a computer interface. Interact Comput 8(4):323–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Armitage CJ (2005) Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychol 24(3):235–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Counts S, Fisher K (2011) Taking it all In? Visual attention in microblog consumption. Paper presented at the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain

  6. Duggan M, Ellison NB, Lampe C, Lenhart A, Madden M (2015) Social media update 2014. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/. Accessed 18 May 2015

  7. Flora JA, Maibach EW (1990) Cognitive responses to AIDS information: the effects of issue involvement and message appeal. Commun Res 17(6):759–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw JM, Foy R, Kaner EFS, Smith L, Bonetti D (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. Man Health Serv Res 2010:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heldman AB, Schindelar J (2013) Social media engagement and public health communication: implications for public health organizations being truly “social”. Public Health Rev 35(1)

  10. Hodas, NO, Lerman K (2012) How visibility and divided attention constrain social contagion. In: Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom): IEEE

  11. Hu Y, Sundar SS (2010) Effects of online health sources on credibility and behavioral intentions. Commun Res 37(1):105–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly B, Hornik R, Romantan A, Schwartz JS, Armstrong K, DeMichele A, Fishbein M, Gray S, Hull S, Kim A (2010) Cancer information scanning and seeking in the general population. J Health Commun 15(7):734–753

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayo Clinic (2012) Cancer prevention: 7 tips to reduce your risk. http://www.mayoclinic.org/cancer-prevention/art-20044816?pg=1. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  14. Perse EM, Nathanson AI, McLeod DM (1996) Effects of spokesperson sex, public service announcement appeal, and involvement on evaluations of safe-sex PSAs. Health Commun 8(2):171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purcell K (2013) Online Video 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/10/online-video-2013/. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Lauckner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lauckner, C., Whitten, P. The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction. J Canc Educ 31, 449–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0881-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0881-5

Keywords

Navigation