Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of a locally adapted, secondary stroke risk factor self-management program on medication adherence among veterans with stroke/TIA

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 May 2016

Abstract

We targeted stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) survivors to engage in self-management practices to manage secondary stroke risk factors. We conducted a randomized, regional pilot trial of a locally adapted, secondary stroke prevention program. We implemented the program at two Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Program sessions targeted stroke risk factor self-management. Specifically, we evaluated the effect of the program on the reach, implementation, and effectiveness on patient self-efficacy; stroke-specific, health-related quality of life; and medication adherence for the prevalent stroke risk factors: (1) diabetes, (2) hypertension, and (3) hyperlipidemia. Medication possession ratios were calculated to evaluate medication adherence using VA pharmacy benefits data pre (6 months prior) and post (6 months after) the stroke/TIA event. Based upon the literature standard of 80 % compliance rate, we dichotomized compliance and modeled the data using logistical regression. Final sample included 174 veterans with an acute stroke or TIA who were randomized to receive either the intervention (n = 87) or attention control program (n = 87). Patient self-efficacy and stroke-specific, health-related quality of life at 6 months did not significantly differ between groups. We found improvements in medication adherence within the intervention group. In the intervention group, the odds of compliance with diabetes medications post-stroke were significantly larger than the odds of compliance prior to the stroke (odds ratio = 3.45 (95 % CI = 1.08–10.96). For compliance to hypertension medications, the intervention group showed significantly greater odds of compliance post intervention than pre intervention (odds ratio = 3. 68 (95 % CI = 1.81–7.48). The control group showed no difference in compliance rates from baseline to follow-up. For adherence to hypercholesterolemia medications, both the intervention (odds ratio = 5.98 (95 % CI = 2.81–12.76) and control groups (odds ratio = 3.83 (95 % CI = 1.83–8.01), had significant increases in the odds of compliance to statin medications; however, the comparison of changes in log odds of compliance between these two groups showed that the increases were not significantly different. We observed within group improvements in medication adherence among those receiving a post-stroke risk factor self-management program suggesting that a self-management format may be feasible to enable adherence to prescribed medications to reduce secondary stroke risk after stroke in concordance with guideline care. Additional research is needed to enhance intervention components to improve effectiveness outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Heart Association Statistical Update. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129:e28-292. doi:10.1161/01.cir

  2. Go A, Mozaffarian D, Roger V, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 127: e6-e245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams LS, Harris LE, Biller J. Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients. Neurology. 1999; 53: 1839-1843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai SM, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002; 33: 1840-1844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damush TM, Ofner S, Yu Z, et al. Implementation of a stroke self-management program: a randomized controlled pilot study of veterans with stroke. Trans Behav Med. 2011; 1(4): 561-572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfe CDA, Redfern J, Rudd AG, et al. Cluster randomized controlled trial of a patient and general practitioner intervention to improve the management of multiple risk factors after stroke: stop stroke. Stroke. 2010; 41: 2470-2476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmid AA, Anderson J, Kent T, et al. Using intervention mapping to develop and adapt a secondary stroke prevention program in Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers. Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Veterans Health Administration DoD. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation in the primary care setting. Washington: Department of Veteran Affairs; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veterans Health Administration DoD Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke. Washington, DC: Department of Veteran Affairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010; 47(9): 1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, Wmith EE, et al. Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in get with the guidelines stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 291-302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smaha LA. The American Heart Association get with the guidelines program. Am Heart J. 2004; 148(5 Suppl): S46-S48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. JCAHO 2005; Available at: URL: www.jcaho.org.

  13. Joint Commission. The Joint Commission launches new comprehensive stroke certification program. Jt Comm Perspect. 2012; 32(10): 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, et al. Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ovbiagele B, Saver JL, Fredieu A, et al. PROTECT: a coordinated stroke treatment program to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. Neurology. 2004; 63(7): 1217-1222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, et al. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009; 28(1): 75-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmid AA, Damush TM, Plue L, et al. Current blood pressure self-management: a qualitative study. Rehabil Nurs. 2009; 34(6): 223-229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Damush TM, Plue L, Bakas T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs. 2007; 32(6): 253-260. 262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shokar NK. Translating research into practice: the colorectal cancer screening experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 29(1): 10-12.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams LS, Kroenke K, Bakas T, et al. Case-management of post stroke depression: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2007; 38(3): 998-1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, et al. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002; 40(9): 771-781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Welch DC, West RL. The short portable mental status questionnaire: assessing cognitive ability in nursing home residents. Nurse Res. 1999; 48(6): 329-332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, et al. National Institutes of Health Stroke scale. Certification is reliable across multiple venues. Stroke. 2009; 40(7): 2507-2511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bandura A. Social foundations of thoughts and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2 year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care. 2001; 39: 1217-1223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lorig KR. Self-management education: more than a nice extra. Med Care. 2003; 41: 699-701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 327-356.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lorig K, Stewart AL, Ritter P, et al. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update a report from the American Heart Association Writing Group Members. Circulation. 2014; 129: e28-e292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zillich AJ, Jaynes HAW, Snyder ME, et al. Evaluation of specialized medication packaging combined with medication therapy management: adherence, outcomes, and costs among Medicaid patients. Med Care. 2012; 50: 485-493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 105-116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Peterson AM, Nau DP, Cramer JA, et al. A checklist for medication compliance and persistence studies using retrospective databases. Value Health. 2007; 10: 3-12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bushnell CD, Zimmer LO, Pan W, et al. Persistence with stroke prevention medications 3 months after hospitalization. Arch Neurol. 2010; 67: 1456-1463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Williams L, Weinberger M, Harris L, et al. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) scale. Stroke. 1999; 30: 1362-1369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan NA, Yun L, Humphries K, et al. Antihypertensive drug use and adherence after stroke: are there sex differences? Stroke. 2010; 41: 1445-1449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kronish IM, Diefenbach MA, Edmondson DE, et al. Key barriers to medication adherence in survivors of strokes and transcient ischemic attacks. J Gen Int Med. 2013; 28(5): 675-682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Carroll R, Whittaker J, Hamilton B, et al. Predictors of adherence to secondary preventive medication in stroke patients. Ann Behav Med. 2011; 41: 383-390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hohmann C, Neumann-Haefelin T, Klotz JM, et al. Adherence to hospital discharge medication in patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective, interventional 2-phase study. Stroke. 2013; 44(2): 522-524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the VA HSRD Investigator Initiated Research Grant IAB 05-297-2 and by the HSRD VA Stroke QUERI Center. The trial registration number is Current Clinical Trials NCT00355147. We thank the veteran participants and the staff at the VA Medical Centers for their time spent on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa M. Damush Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Implications

Policy: Nursing work tasks should be allocated for patient education to foster self-management practices during post-acute stroke care.

Research: Medication possession ratios from pharmacy data may serve as objective medication adherence outcomes.

Practice: Inclusion of medication adherence strategies during post-acute stroke care including how to refill, and strategies for adhering to prescriptions may improve patient adherence.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 5 List of medications in VHA PBM prescribed for clinical conditions: diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension

Appendix B

Table 6 Intervention content delivery fidelity

Appendix C

Table 7 Common reported patient goals for stroke self-management

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damush, T.M., Myers, L., Anderson, J.A. et al. The effect of a locally adapted, secondary stroke risk factor self-management program on medication adherence among veterans with stroke/TIA. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 6, 457–468 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0348-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0348-6

Keywords

Navigation