Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing Corporate Governance Model with Chinese Characteristics and Accounting Information Disclosure: a Quasi-natural Experimental Study Based on a Special Institutional Arrangement

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 June 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

A new corporate governance model for SOEs with Chinese characteristics was implemented in China in 2016, in which a 4 + 1 (Chinese Communist Party committee, shareholders’ meeting, board of directors, board of supervisors + managers) corporate governance structure was formed by integrating the Party organization into the traditional Western 3 + 1 structure (shareholders’ meeting, board of directors, board of supervisors + managers), and it was a major breakthrough of the modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics. With this brand-new institutional arrangement as a quasi-nature experiment, the propensity score matching (PSM) and differences-in-differences (PSM-DID) methods have been used in this paper to empirically test the impact of the corporate governance model with Chinese characteristics on accounting information disclosure of state-owned enterprises (SOE). It has been found in the study that the corporate governance model with Chinese characteristics has improved the transparency of accounting information of SOEs in China, but no significant contribution to the quality of accounting information has been identified. Samples are subdivided in view of the influence of the hierarchy and internal governance of Chinese SOEs. In central government-owned enterprises or those with a low level of internal control, the new governance model plays a more prominent role in enhancing the transparency of accounting information. The study verifies the positive effect of the corporate governance model with Chinese characteristics in improving the level of accounting information disclosure. Also, the study has practical significance in enhancing the corporate governance system with Chinese characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Change history

References

  • Ahsan, T., Mirza, S. S., Al-Gamrh, B., & Bin-Feng, C. (2020). How to deal with policy uncertainty to attain sustainable growth: The role of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

  • Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2018). Moderation of the relationship between size of government and corruption by democracy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(4), 1210–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2021). Corruption, democracy, and public debt: A case of the Arab countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–13.

  • Bu, Q. (2015). Will Chinese legal culture constrain its corporate governance-related laws? Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 15(1), 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. C., & Wong, S. M. (2004). Political control and performance in China’s listed firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Wu, Q. (2016, January). Research on governance mode development of the state-owned enterprise: A framework on the theory of principal-agent. In International conference on humanities and social science 2016 (pp. 812–819). Atlantis Press.

  • Chen, D., Zhang, T., & Li, X. (2008). Law environment, government regulation and implicit contract: Empirical evidence from the scandals of China’s listed companies. Frontiers of Economics in China, 3(4), 560–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H., Li, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). The influence of party organization’s participation in governance on earnings management of state-owned listed companies. China Economic Studies, 2, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, X., Tan, Y., & Liu, J. (2012). Non-financial information, external financing, and investment efficiency: A study based on external institutional constraints. Management World, 7, 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouaibi, J. (2021). Innovation and financial performance in manufacturing companies: An empirical study Tunisian. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(4), 1870–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. (2016). Best practice in corporate governance: Building reputation and sustainable success. Routledge.

  • Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review77(s-1), 35–59.

  • Dewri, L. V. (2021). A critical assessment of interrelationship among corporate governance, financial performance, refined economic value added to measure firm value and return on stock. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–42.

  • Elston, J. (2019). Corporate governance: What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(2), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzeddine, B. M., & Jarboui, S. (2017). Do corporate governance mechanisms affect public transport firm value? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 916–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Hassan, A., & Elamer, A. A. (2020). Corporate governance, ownership structure and capital structure: Evidence from Chinese real estate listed companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 759–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J., Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2005). Earnings and dividend informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, O., Mantzari, E., & Mundy, J. (2021). Problematising the decision-usefulness of fair values: Empirical evidence from UK financial analysts. Accounting and Business Research, 51(4), 307–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghardallou, W., & Sridi, D. (2020). Democracy and economic growth: A literature review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3), 982–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, N. K., & Qiang, C. Z. W. (2010). China’s emerging informatization strategy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 128–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. In McFadden, D. L. (1976). Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4) (pp. 475–492). NBER.

  • Hitz, J. M. (2007). The decision usefulness of fair value accounting–A theoretical perspective. European Accounting Review, 16(2), 323–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, N., Huang, K. G., & Man Zhang, C. (2019). Public governance, corporate governance, and firm innovation: An examination of state-owned enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., & Kim, K. A. (2020). Corporate governance in China: A survey. Review of Finance, 24(4), 733–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. (2018). Analysis of the effect of investment governance of party organizations of state-owned enterprises under the situation of “strict party self-discipline.” Commercial Research, 4, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutert, W. (2016). Challenges ahead in China’s reform of state-owned enterprises. Asia Policy, 21, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lianchao, Y. U., Weiguo, Z. H. A. N. G., & Qian, B. I. (2019). Party organization embedding and corporate social responsibility. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 245(4), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. W. (2013). State ownership and corporate governance in China: An executive career approach. Columbia Business Law Review, 743.

  • Liu, F., Xu, J., & Cui, J. (2019a). Study on the effect of pre-decision mechanism discussed by the party organization of state-owned enterprises – from the perspective of game theory. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 3, 4–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Stafylas, D., Wu, J., & Muganhu, C. (2019b). Corporate governance and business growth: Evidence from China.

  • Liu, X., Kong, X., & Wang, K. (2020). Party organization governance and board dissent in state-owned enterprises: Evidence based on board resolution voting in listed companies. Management World, 5, 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., & Zhu, J. (2020). Tracing back to the source: Understanding the corporate governance of boards of directors in Chinese SOEs. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 129–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Wang, Y., & Shen, X. (2013). Party organization governance, redundant employees and executive compensation contract in state-owned enterprises. Management World, 5, 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Wang, Y., & Shen, X. (2012). Study on the effect of party organization governance in Chinese state-owned enterprises – from the perspective of “insider control.” China Industrial Economics, 8, 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, L. (2017). Three considerations of party organization embedding in the governance structure state-owned enterprises. Reform, 4, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Z., & Wei, Y. (2020). Research on the influence of party organization’s embedding on information transparency – empirical evidence from state-owned enterprises. Soft Science, 8, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols, M. F. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The accounting review77(s-1), 61–69.

  • Mete, M. H., & Belgin, O. (2021). Impact of knowledge management performance on the efficiency of R&D active firms: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–19.

  • Millar, C. C., Eldomiaty, T. I., Choi, C. J., & Hilton, B. (2005). Corporate governance and institutional transparency in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutlu, C. C., Van Essen, M., Peng, M. W., Saleh, S. F., & Duran, P. (2018). Corporate governance in China: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 55(6), 943–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naciti, V., Cesaroni, F., & Pulejo, L. (2021). Corporate governance and sustainability: A review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 1–20.

  • Peigong, L., & Yifeng, S. (2010). The corporate governance role of media: Empirical evidence from China. Economic Research Journal, 4, 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirchio, V. (2018). Corporate governance in China: Some empirical evidence.

  • Pistor, K., & Xu, C. (2005). Governing stock markets in transition economies: Lessons from China. American Law and Economics Review, 7(1), 184–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, S. (2020). Entrepreneurship in China and India. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(1), 321–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, J. (2018). Reframing corporate governance: Company law beyond law and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Shahab, Y., & Ye, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: Empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 15(2), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, H. (2018). Pre-procedure - the key to ensuring the party’s leadership over SOEs. Modern SOE Research, 5, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G. G., & Yang, J. F. (2013). Can high quality internal control improve accounting information transparency. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 7, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenev, S., Zhang, C., & Brefort, L. (2002). Corporate governance and enterprise reform in China: Building the institutions of modern markets. World Bank Publications.

  • Tsang, E. W. (2002). Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenhofer, A. (1990). Voluntary disclosure with a strategic opponent. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(4), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2014). The political logic of corporate governance in China’s state-owned enterprises. Cornell International Law Journal, 47(3), 631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. F., & Ravenscroft, S. P. (2015). Rethinking decision usefulness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 763–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2020). On the consistency of the logistic quasi-MLE under conditional symmetry. Economics Letters, 194, 109363.

  • Yan, C., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2023). Do anti-corruption campaigns affect IPO underpricing? Evidence from a central discipline inspection of the CSRC in China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(1), 100281.

  • Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., Xu, D., & Wang, J. (2010). Single-machine scheduling with a general sum-of-actual-processing-times-based and job-position-based learning effect. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3623–3630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Q. (2018). The application of pre-procedure to promote the major decision-making of state-owned enterprises. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 10, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuo, Z., Muhammad, B., & Khan, S. (2021). Underlying the relationship between governance and economic growth in developed countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(3), 1314–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was undertaken as part of the “The Modern Enterprise System with Chinese Characteristics and the Competitiveness of State-Owned Enterprises: A Study Based on the Party Organization’s ‘Pre discussion’ Approach” supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” by the Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. Grant number: 202311111.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Huo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors of this paper would like to update the affiliations of the first author Kaiyuan Yang as reflected below:

1 School of Accounting, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China

2 Chongqing Financial Technology Institute, Chongqing, China, 400067

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, K., Huo, X., Li, R. et al. Analyzing Corporate Governance Model with Chinese Characteristics and Accounting Information Disclosure: a Quasi-natural Experimental Study Based on a Special Institutional Arrangement. J Knowl Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01380-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01380-z

Keywords

Navigation