Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology Entrepreneurship: a Model for the European Case

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of specific country-level variables on employment in high-tech sectors, which is used as an index of technology entrepreneurship. The sample of the research includes the 28 EU member states for a 5-year time period. The study examines the statistical significance of specific literature-indicated quantitative country-level variables, uncovering the most prominent factors that can affect technology entrepreneurship at the EU level. Study’s empirical results highlight factors such as education, GDP, and venture capital investments as decisive determinants of European employment levels in high-tech sectors. The study’s empirical framework includes a mixed exploratory factor/multiple regression analysis, creating a solid statistical model constituting of 8 independent variables representing basic European external environment indices. The practical implication of this study is to contribute policy makers in promoting the most suitable policies that may boost technology entrepreneurship at a European level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Data are available on demand.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Acs, Z. J., Brooksbank, D. J., O’Gorman, C., Pickernell, D., & Terjesen, S. (2012). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship: An application to foreign direct investment. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 15(2), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi, M. B. G., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The relationship between export market orientation and export performance: An empirical study. Applied Economics, 49(23), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Prodan, I. (2008). Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: Testing a model on manufacturing firms. Technovation, 28(5), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atieno, O. P. (2009). An analysis of the strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research paradigms. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, 13‒18.

  • Audretsch, D., & Caiazza, R. (2016). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1247–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badzińska, E. (2016). The concept of technological entrepreneurship: The example of business implementation. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(3), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). The role of the entrepreneur in technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N. S., & Levie, J. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2009 executive report. Babson Park, MA, US: Babson College, Santiago, Chile: Universidad del Desarollo, Reykjavík, Iceland: Reykjavík University, London, UK: London Business School.

  • Bosma, N., Wennekers, S., & Amorós, J. E. (2012). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2011 extended report: Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial employees across the globe. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman, H., & Hulsink, W. (2002). A dynamic model of Cyber-entrepreneurship and cluster formation: Applications in the United States and in the Low Countries. Telematics and Informatics, 19(4), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2014). Inside the high-tech black box: A critique of technology entrepreneurship policy. Technovation, 34(12), 773–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byun, C. G., Sung, C. S., Park, J. Y., & Choi, D. S. (2018). A study on the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programs in higher education institutions: A case study of Korean graduate programs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2014). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria: American Counseling Association.

  • Dorf, R. C., & Byers, T. H. (2005). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. (2005). When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Trade Association for Business Angels, Seed Funds and Early Stage Market Players (EBAN). (2014). Statistics compendium 2014. Available at http://www.eban.org/. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • European Trade Association for Business Angels, Seed Funds and Early Stage Market Players (EBAN). (2017). Statistics compendium European early stage market statistics 2017. Available at http://www.eban.org/. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019a). Employment in high- and medium-high technology manufacturing sectors and knowledge-intensive service sectors. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=sdg_09_20. Accessed 22 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019b). Total GBAORD by NABS 2007 socio-economic objectives. Available at https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gba_nabsfin07&lang=en. Accessed 22 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019c). Patent applications to the European patent office (EPO) by priority year. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=tsc00009&lang=en. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019d). Gross domestic product at market prices. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tec00001&language=en. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019e). High-tech exports. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tin00140. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Eurostat. (2019f). General government expenditure by function (COFOG) - Education. Available at https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. Accessed 20 Oct 2019.

  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis (Understanding Statistics). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fellnhofer, K., & Puumalainen, K. (2017). Can role models boost entrepreneurial attitudes? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(3), 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J. J. M., Ferreira, F. A. F., Fernandes, C. I. M. A. S., Jalali, M. S., Raposo, M. L., & Marques, C. S. (2016). What Do We [Not] Know about technology entrepreneurship research? International Entrepreneurship and Management JournAl, 12(3), 713–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., Scott, E. L., & Stern, S. (2018). Strategy for start-ups. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Morales, V. J., Bolivar-Ramos, M. T., & Martin-Rojas, R. (2014). Technological variables and absorptive capacity’s influence on performance through corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1468–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A., Price, R., Maloney, M., Vojak, B., & Sim, E. (2009). Voices from the field: How exceptional electronic industrial innovators innovate. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Jain, K., Kurse, A., & Momaya, K. S. (2009). Technology entrepreneurship ecosystem in India: Findings from a survey. Mumbai: National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE).

  • Hindle, K., & Yencken, J. (2004). Public research commercialization, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: An integrated model. Technovation, 24(10), 793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsbeck, M., & Pickavé, E. N. (2012). Regional knowledge production as determinant of high-technology entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence for Germany. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabelle, D. A. (2013). Key factors affecting a technology entrepreneur’s choice of incubator or accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(2), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M. (1996). Thinking technology in mature industry firms: Understanding technology entrepreneurship. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7–8), 799–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Evans, D. (1995). A typology of technology-based entrepreneurs: A model based on previous occupational background. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 1(1), 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (2009). Statistics for management and economics (8th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilintzis, P., Samara, E., Carayannis, E. G., & Bakouros, Y. (2020). Business model innovation in Greece: Its effect on organizational sustainability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(3), 949–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachiewicz, S., & Matejun, M. (2010). The role of external environment in creating technology entrepreneurship in small and medium-sized enterprises. Management, 14(1), 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, S., & Everitt, B. S. (2004). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplume, A. O., Pathak, S., & Xavier-Oliveira, E. (2014). The politics of intellectual property rights regimes: An empirical study of new technology use in entrepreneurship. Technovation, 34(12), 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Kristopher, J. P., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matejun, M. (2016). Role of technology entrepreneurship in the development of innovativeness of small and medium-sized enterprises. Management, 20(1), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, C., Giones, F., & Dutta, D. K. (2019). Editorial: Technology commercialization and entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., Guerrero, M., & Greenman, A. (2017). Technology entrepreneurship research opportunities: Insights from across Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacu, C. M., & Avasilcai, S. (2014). Environmental factors influencing technological entrepreneurship: Research framework and results. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 309–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarov, M., Butryumva, N., & Sidorov, D. (2015). Development of technology entrepreneurship in a transition economy: An example of the Russian region with high scientific potential. In DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting 2017. 3rd Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, Scientific Conference on Managing Business Growth in a Volatile Environment. Dubrovnik: University of Dubrovnik.

  • Neessen, P. C., Caniëls, M. C., Vos, B., & De Jong, J. P. (2019). The intrapreneurial employee: Toward an integrated model of intrapreneurship and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 545–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures — Issues and applications. SAGE publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Venture capital investments. Available at https://stats.oecd.org/. Accessed 4 May 2019.

  • Osano, H. M., & Koine, P. W. (2016). Role of foreign direct investment on technology transfer and economic growth in Kenya: A case of the energy sector. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2016). Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: Informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 506–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S., Xavier-Oliveira, E., & Laplume, A. O. (2013). Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2090–2101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petti, C., & Zhang, S. (2011). Factors influencing technological entrepreneurship capabilities: Towards an integrated research framework for Chinese enterprises. Journal of Technology Management in China, 6(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., & Foo, M. D. (2004). Editorial — Technological entrepreneurship in emerging regions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P. H., Venkataraman, S., & Velamuri, R. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging regions around the world — Theory, evidence and implications. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmunssen, E. A., & Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26(2), 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, J. C., Leal, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2006). Information technology as a determinant of organizational learning and technological distinctive competencies. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, W. C., & Song, X. (2017). The role of education in technology use and adoption: Evidence from the Canadian workplace and employee survey. ILR Review, 70(5), 1219–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Barranco, M., Tobías, A., Redondo, D., Molina-Portillo, E., & Sánchez, J. M. (2017). Standardizing effect size from linear regression models with log-transformed variables for meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(44), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roja, A., & Năstase, M. (2014). Technology entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial strategies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Management Conference (pp. 107‒116). Bucharest: Academy of Economic Studies.

  • Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., & Bakouros, I. (2012). The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation, 32(11), 624–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. M., & Perez, O. U. (1998). Entrepreneurship networks and high technology firms: The case of Aragon. Technovation, 18(5), 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 33(2), 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, H., Chung, Y., & Hwang, H. (2019). Do technology entrepreneurship and external relationships always promote technology transfer? Evidence from Korean public research organizations. Technovation, 82–83, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, M., & Marxt, C. (2011). Defining technology entrepreneurship. In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1623‒1627). Piscataway, Changchun: IEEE.

  • Su-Chang, C., Hsi-Chi, H., Jen-Chia, C., Chun-Mei, C., Chin-Pin, C., & Chien-Hua, S. (2015). Can the entrepreneurship course improve the entrepreneurial intentions of students? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 557–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering. (1998). Wealth through technological entrepreneurship. The Canadian Academy of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therin, F. (2007). Handbook of research on techno-entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi, S. S., & Brahma, M. (2018). Technology entrepreneurship in emerging markets: An exploration of entrepreneurial models prevalent in India. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(1), 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (2004). Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, D., Guerrero, M., Ferreira, J. J., & Fernandres, I. F. (2019). New technology entrepreneurship initiatives: Which strategic orientations and environmental conditions matter in the new socio-economic landscape? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1577–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, D., & Turró, A. (2013). Conditioning factors for corporate entrepreneurship: An in(ex)ternal approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, S., Haskell, N., & Béliveau, D. (2018). Opportunity recognition by international high-technology start-up and growth photonics firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 22(1–2), 126–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2019). Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$). Available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD. Accessed 12 May 2019.

  • Wright, M., Siegel, D. S., & Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 909–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavlos Kilintzis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilintzis, P., Avlogiaris, G., Samara, E. et al. Technology Entrepreneurship: a Model for the European Case. J Knowl Econ 14, 879–904 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00950-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00950-x

Keywords

Navigation