1 Introduction

ALK gene fusion is a well-known driver mutation present in 3–7% of cases diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1]. Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) is the most common ALK fusion partner, accounting for over 80% of fusion subtypes. The deep coverage of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for ALK fusion partners (over 90 types) increased between 2007 and 2020, and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exhibited potent activities [2]. In addition, several ALK double-fusion variants have been occasionally discovered and reported in cases with NSCLC [3,4,5]. Of note, these rare double-fusion partners might result in discrepant responses to ALK inhibitors, and further evidence would be urgently needed in this field. Here, we reported a case with concomitant ALK rare double-fusion, namely PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK in a patient diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma who showed favorable response to alectinib following chemotherapy failure.

2 Case presentation

A 32-year-old female with no smoking history was diagnosed with a mass in the upper lobe of the right lung with bilateral multiple intrapulmonary and brain metastases in July 2020 (Fig. 1A). Subsequent pulmonary puncture biopsy demonstrated lung adenocarcinoma, showing strongly positive expression of TTF-1 and Napsin A according to immunohistochemical analysis. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay via tumor tissue found no alteration in EGFR, ALK and ROS-1 genes when assayed in the resected lung tumor. Since July 2020, she underwent whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) at a dose of 36 Gy/1.8 Gy/20f, along with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of up to 56 Gy/20f using the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique. Also, she underwent chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus carboplatin, combined with an antiangiogenic agent, bevacizumab. Following two cycles of chemotherapy, she developed a partial response (PR), as shown in Fig. 1B. She experienced PR after maintenance therapy with pemetrexed and bevacizumab started after six cycles of treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Multiple intrapulmonary and brain metastases at baseline before treatment (A); partial response to chemotherapy plus bevacizumab after two cycles of treatment (B); progression of intrapulmonary metastasis and emergence of lymphangitis carcinomatosis (C); partial response to alectinib with significant decrease of intrapulmonary metastasis and lymphangitis carcinomatosis (D)

In November 2022, her intrapulmonary metastasis significantly increased, and she developed lymphangitis carcinomatosis, while the brain metastasis remained stable (Fig. 1C). She underwent clinical examinations to monitor disease progression and achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) of 27 months without any further advancement. Owing to the outbreak of COVID-19 in China in December 2022, the patient discontinued her treatment regimen. In February 2023, two months later, the patient developed bilateral pleural metastasis, which resulted in a worsening of her dyspnea. Subsequently, she underwent pleural space drainage, and the presence of malignant adenocarcinoma cells was confirmed. The NGS analysis was carried out in Geneseeq Technology Inc. using a 6-gene targeted panel (EGFR, ALK, ROS-1, BRAF, KRAS, and HER2), which identified the simultaneous presence of two fusion genes PLEKHA7-ALK (P18:A20, allelic frequency: 16.60%) and INPP5D-ALK (I2:A19, allelic frequency: 13.92%) in the pleural effusion sample (Fig. 2). Finally, alectinib was administered since April 2023. Notably, both the multiple intrapulmonary metastases and lymphangitis carcinomatosis significantly decreased after only one month of targeted therapy (Fig. 1D). She continued alectinib until December 2023, with a favorable PR and a significant 8-month PFS benefit..

Fig. 2
figure 2

Concomitant ALK double-fusion PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK detected by NGS testing

3 Discussion

This is the first case presenting a rare concomitant ALK double-fusion, namely PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK, in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma, who exhibited favorable sensitivity to alectinib. Due to the low incidence, research devoted to double ALK fusions is extremely lacking. It is critical to determine the activity of different ALK fusion partners in response to different ALK TKIs in order to make personalized therapeutic decisions. According to the previous evidence, only several cases with distinct ALK double-fusions have been reported (Table 1), and crizotinib and alectinib showed exceptional activities [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].

Table 1 Summary of the characteristics of ALK double-fusion subtypes in previous case reports

Here, we identified novel and concomitant ALK double-fusion partners, namely PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK, in a patient with NSCLC. The PLEKHA7-ALK fusion was first reported as an acquired drug resistance in a patient with lung cancer who had failed to adequately respond to osimertinib. When osimertinib and alectinib were subsequently administered in combination, it achieved a dramatic and confirmed PR with a 6-month duration of response [18]. In addition, the PLEKHA7-ALK fusion was also reported in renal cell carcinoma [19]. The pleckstrin homology domaincontaining A7 gene (PLEKHA7) encodes an adherens junction protein which is highly preserved in epithelial cells [20]. The PLEKHA7- ALK fusion protein remained the pleckstrin homology domain of PLEKHA7 and the kinase domain of ALK. Notably, the pleckstrin homology domain might further facilitate the dimerization and activation of the ALK kinase [21]. To the best of our knowledge, the INPP5D-ALK fusion has not been reported in lung cancer to date. The inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase D gene (INPP5D) is a risk-conferring gene for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) specifically expressed in microglia in the brain, and negatively regulates the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway controlling cell migration, proliferation, and survival [22, 23]. The present case demonstrated the rearrangement in exon 18 of the PLEKHA7 gene and exon 20 of the ALK gene, as well as the fusion of INPP5D (exon 2) and ALK (exon 19), forming a double-fusion variant PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK. Although there is no direct evidence to support INPP5D-ALK as a driver mutation, it is worth considering that INPP5D-ABL1 fusion has exhibited sensitivity to imatinib in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [24]. Therefore, it is possible that INPP5D-ALK fusion could be a driver mutation in our case of NSCLC. The patient in our case showed partial response to alectinib when her disease progressed following previous chemotherapy. Despite the presence of a rare ALK double-fusion, this patient demonstrated a significant partial response and has benefited from alectinib for the past eight months in terms of PFS. Our findings, in this case, lack explicit research support; therefore, we can only speculate that the rare ALK double-fusion PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK might provide a promising response to the ALK inhibitor alectinib.

The findings of the worldwide phase III ALEX trial indicate that alectinib and crizotinib provide comparable benefits in terms of PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) for patients with EML4-ALK variants 1 and 3a/b when used as the first-line treatement [25]. Although the available evidence on the association between variant types and treatment outcomes in the ALEX clinical trial is limited, patients treated with alectinib demonstrate superior response and improved survival compared to those treated with crizotinib in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, irrespective of the EML4-ALK variant. However, the ALK double-fusion remains rare, with only a few case reports being published owing to its low incidence and detection rate. Over the past five years, we conducted a thorough search and identified 16 distinct types of ALK double-fusion variants. The characteristics of these variants, as reported in these case reports, are summarized in Table 1. Among them, more than half (9/16) are EML4-ALK together with another rare ALK fusion type. Crizotinib and alectinib demonstrated a positive response and significant PFS improvement for patients carrying these heterogeneous ALK double-fusion variants. In addition, the ALK double-fusion partners, namely MRPL13-ALK and PPP1CB-ALK, were reported as acquired resistant variants to EGFR-TKI treatment. According to these 16 case reports examined, we could not find valuable information regarding differences in patient background, treatment efficacy, and prognosis between double-fusion and single-fusion variants. However, both crizotinib and alectinib showed potent activity and a favorable survival rate for these rare ALK double-fusion variants.

In conclusion, this case report described a novel ALK double-fusion involving PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK in lung adenocarcinoma. Also, alectinib demonstrated potent activity and improved survival outcomes for this rather rare variant. In addition, the NGS testing provides a reliable insight for the identification of novel fusion partners for ALK-rearranged NSCLC.