Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classic Psychedelic Use and Current Meditation Practice

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Previous research has investigated potential synergies between classic psychedelics and meditation practice, but relatively little remains known about the relationship between classic psychedelic experiences and engagement with meditation practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between classic psychedelic experiences and engagement with two popular types of meditation: mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness or compassion meditation.

Method

This retrospective, population-based observational study included 2822 respondents aged 18 years or older in the United States. Using covariate-adjusted regression models, this study examined associations of classic psychedelic experiences with current practice of mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness or compassion meditation.

Results

In covariate-adjusted regression models, lifetime classic psychedelic use was associated with a higher frequency of current mindfulness meditation practice but not current loving-kindness or compassion meditation practice. Both psychological insight and “ego dissolution” were associated with a higher frequency of current mindfulness meditation practice and current loving-kindness or compassion meditation practice. Notably, when psychological insight and “ego dissolution” were entered into the regression model simultaneously, only greater psychological insight was associated with having a higher frequency of current mindfulness meditation practice and current loving-kindness or compassion meditation practice.

Conclusions

Although the findings in this study cannot demonstrate causality, they suggest that classic psychedelic experiences may exert a positive effect on the cultivation and maintenance of health-related behaviors such as regular meditation practice, with psychological insight appearing to be a stronger predictor than “ego dissolution.”

Preregistration

This study was not preregistered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data and Stata syntax are available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22099673.v1 [Data] and https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22092968.v1 [Syntax].

References

Download references

Funding

OS was supported by the Osmond Foundation and Ekhaga Foundation. SG was supported by a grant (K23AT010879) from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Support for this research was also provided by FORMAS, Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (grant number: FR-2018/0006), Three Springs Foundation through the Monash Centre for Consciousness & Contemplative Studies, the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, and the University of Wisconsin—Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and with funding from the Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Charlotta Simonsson: writing — original draft. Richard Chambers: funding acquisition; writing — review and editing. Peter S. Hendricks: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; supervision; writing — review and editing. Simon B. Goldberg: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; supervision; writing — review and editing. Walter Osika: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; supervision; writing — review and editing. Marco Schlosser: writing — review and editing. Adam Ryde: writing — review and editing. Emma Christersson: writing — review and editing. Otto Simonsson: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; investigation; methodology; project administration; supervision; writing — review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotta Simonsson.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Study procedures were determined to be exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin—Madison.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

Conflict of Interest

PSH is on the scientific advisory board of Bright Minds Biosciences Ltd., Eleusis Benefit Corporation, and Reset Pharmaceuticals Inc. EC is a board member of Osmond Foundation. OS and RC are co-founders of Eudelics AB. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simonsson, C., Chambers, R., Hendricks, P.S. et al. Classic Psychedelic Use and Current Meditation Practice. Mindfulness 14, 763–768 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02103-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-023-02103-w

Keywords

Navigation