Skip to main content
Log in

Probability prediction method for rockburst intensity based on rough set and multidimensional cloud model uncertainty reasoning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rockburst is a serious disaster caused by the sudden release of rock energy during underground construction in high-stress environments, resulting in severe damage to underground structures. Accurately predicting rockburst intensity is challenging, and establishing a reliable and precise prediction model is of great importance. In this study, we proposed a novel hybrid model for predicting rockburst intensity by integrating rough set theory and multidimensional cloud model uncertainty reasoning. The key steps of the proposed method are as follows: (1) Rockburst cases are collected, and the maximum shear stress \({\sigma }_{\theta }\), uniaxial compressive strength \({\sigma }_{c}\), uniaxial tensile strength \({\sigma }_{t}\), and elastic energy index \({W}_{{\text{et}}}\) are used as predictors for rockburst strength. (2) The Shannon entropy method is used to determine the weights of the four indicators, and a rockburst potential expression is constructed. (3) Rough set theory is used to reduce the number of indicators to construct a rockburst strength prediction rule library. (4) Qualitative data are transformed into quantitative data using the rules library and multidimensional cloud model to establish an uncertainty inference framework for predicting rockburst strength. Finally, we compared the performance of the hybrid model with existing models, and the results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves similar or even higher prediction accuracy. The use of cloud droplets in the model offers a significant advantage in the prediction of mixed rockburst intensities, enabling intuitive, rapid, and effective determination of the occurrence intensity of rockburst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are included in the article and its online supplementary material.

References

  • Adoko AC, Gokceoglu C, Wu L, Zuo QJ (2013) Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biao Z, Xing-guo D (2017) A cloud model for predicting rockburst intensity grade based on index distance and uncertainty measure. Rock Soil Mech 38:257–265. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2017.S2.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Feng X, Yang C, Chen B, Qiu S, Xu D (2013) Neural network estimation of rockburst damage severity based on engineering cases. ISRM SINOROCK 2013, OnePetro

  • Feng X-T, Wang L (1994) Rockburst prediction based on neural networks. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 4:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong F, Li X (2007) A distance discriminant analysis method for prediction of possibility and classification of rockburst and its application. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/chin J Rock Mech Eng 26:1012–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong F, Li X, Zhang W (2010) Rockburst prediction of underground engineering based on Bayes discriminant analysis method. Rock Soil Mech 31:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  • He S, Lai J, Zhong Y, Wang K, Xu W, Wang L, Liu T, Zhang C (2021) Damage behaviors, prediction methods and prevention methods of rockburst in 13 deep traffic tunnels in China. Eng Fail Anal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Inst Min Metall. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482288926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin-Lin Y, Xi-Bing L, Zi-Long Z, Ye L (2010) A fuzzy assessment method of rock-burst prediction based on rough set theory. Met Mine 39:26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamran M, Ullah B, Ahmad M, Sabri MMS (2022) Application of knn-based isometric mapping and fuzzy c-means algorithm to predict short-term rockburst risk in deep underground projects. Front Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1023890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamran M, Wattimena RK, Armaghani DJ, Asteris PG, Jiskani IM, Mohamad ET (2023) Intelligent based decision-making strategy to predict fire intensity in subsurface engineering environments. Process Saf Environ Prot 171:374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidega R, Ondiaka MN, Maina D, Jonah KAT, Kamran M (2022) Decision based uncertainty model to predict rockburst in underground engineering structures using gradient boosting algorithms. Geomech Eng. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.30.3.259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidybiński A (1981) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18(4):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee P, Tsui Y, Tham L, Wang Y, Li W (1998) Method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluations for rockburst prediction. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 17(5):493–501 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Du Y (2007) Artificial intelligence with uncertainty. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linsheng X, Lansheng W (1999) Study on the laws of rockburst and its forecasting in the tunnel of Erlang mountain road. Chin J Geotech Eng-Chin Ed 21:569–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Yuan Q, Li J (2008) Application of fuzzy probability model to prediction of classification of rockburst intensity. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27:3095–3103

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming-Zhou B, Lian-Jun W, Zhao-Yi X (2002) Study on a neutral network model and its application to predict the risk of rock blast. China Saf Sci J 12:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z, Grzymala-Busse J, Slowinski R, Ziarko W (1995) Rough sets. Commun ACM 38:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran L, Yi-Cheng Y, Guang-Quan Z, Nan Y, Hu C, Qi-Hu W (2019) Grading prediction model of rockburst based on rough set-multidimensional normal cloud. Neural Comput Appl 48:48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3859-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russenes B (1974) Analysis of rock spalling for tunnels in steep valley sides (in Norwegian). Master Thesis of Science, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim

  • Shang Y, Zhang J, Fu B (2013) Analyses of three parameters for strain mode rockburst and expression of rockburst potential. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 32:1520–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Wu Z and Chen X (2003) Approach to occurrence and mechanism of rockburst in deep underground mines. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 8

  • Tian R, Meng H, Chen S, Wang C (2020a) Comparative study on three rockburst prediction models of intensity classification based on machine learning. Chin J Gold Sci Technol 28:920–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian R, Meng H, Chen S, Wang C, Zhang F (2020b) Prediction of intensity classification of rockburst based on deep neural network. J Chin Coal Soc 45:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah B, Kamran M, Rui Y (2022) Predictive modeling of short-term rockburst for the stability of subsurface structures using machine learning approaches: T-sne, k-means clustering and xgboost. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Chen J, Yang J, Que J (2009) Method of distance discriminant analysis for determination of classification of rockburst. Rock Soil Mech 30:2203–2208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shang Y, Sun H, Yan X (2010) Study of prediction of rockburst intensity based on efficacy coefficient method. Rock Soil Mech 31:529–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xu Q, Chai H, Liu L, Xia Y, Wang X (2013) Rock burst prediction in deep shaft based on RBF-AR model. J Jilin Univ (earth Sci Ed) 43:1943–1949

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei H, Yang X, Zhou H (2011) Study on rock burst prediction method based on gray relational analysis theory. Yangtze River 42:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Wu D, Huang Y, Wang G, Shang M, Xu J, Shi X, Shan K, Zhou B, Zhao Y (2017) Water eutrophication assessment based on rough set and multidimensional cloud model. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 164:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zhu J (2000) A new model for classified prediction of rockburst and its application. Mei t’an Hsueh Pao (j China Coal Soc) 25(2):169–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin X, Liu QS, Huang X, Pan YC (2021) Real-time prediction of rockburst intensity using an integrated cnn-adam-bo algorithm based on microseismic data and its engineering application. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying-Chao W, Hong-Wen J, Zhang Q, Li-yuan Y, Zhi-Min X (2015) A normal cloud model-based study of grading prediction of rockburst intensity in deep underground engineering. Rock Soil Mech 36:1189–1194. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2015.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang D, Qiu D (2010) Application of extension evaluation method in rockburst prediction based on rough set theory. J China Coal Soc 35:1461–1465

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou H, Feng X-T (2011) An index for estimating the stability of brittle surrounding rock mass: Fai and its engineering application. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:401–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0150-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H-B (2005) Classification of rockburst using support vector machine. Yantu Lixue (rock Soil Mech) 26:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Xiao-hong L, Yi-yu L (2008) Application of bp neural network to the prediction of rockburst in Tongyu tunnel. Chin J Undergr Space Eng 4:494–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Shi X (2012) Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines. Saf Sci 50:629–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Mitri HS (2016) Classification of rockburst in underground projects: comparison of ten supervised learning methods. J Comput Civil Eng 30:04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Mitri HS (2018) Evaluation method of rockburst: state-of-the-art literature review. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 81:632–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects (No. QKHJC-ZK[2022]YB104) and Doctoral fund of Guizhou University (No.X2021011 and X2021010). The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Funding

Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects, QKHJC-ZK[2022]YB104, Doctoral fund of Guizhou University, X2021011, X2021011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This paper was written by GL, who independently completed the research design and data analysis, GL led the writing of the article, GL proofread all the drafts, HW made the first guidance of this paper, and HW objectively proofread the article. All authors contributed to the further revision of the article. HW provided important guidance in solving difficult or complex problems in the article. In addition, GL and KH went through the entire review process and confirmed the scientific validity of the article. Finally, all authors contributed to the writing and revision of the article with constructive comments and suggestions for improvement to ensure that the article could accurately express the complex findings.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 216 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, G., Wang, H., Hu, K. et al. Probability prediction method for rockburst intensity based on rough set and multidimensional cloud model uncertainty reasoning. Environ Earth Sci 83, 84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11403-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11403-2

Keywords

Navigation