Abstract
Rockburst, as a common disaster in geotechnical construction, such as mines, tunnels, and hydropower stations, induces huge economic losses and poses a great safety threat to construction workers. To estimate the rockburst disaster more reasonably, a method for estimating the rockburst intensity grade is proposed based on the improved entropy weight method-similar cloud model (IEWM-SCM). The IEWM-weighted rockburst estimation index can solve the problem of the imprecise objective weight in the traditional entropy weight method. Concurrently, based on the preference correction coefficient in the IEWM, the interference of abnormal values in the collected rockburst engineering case data samples is eliminated, so that the accuracy of rockburst estimation is higher, whereas the introduction of the similar cloud model theory can transfer the rockburst estimation index to the concept of cloud, thus eliminating the uncertainty and fuzziness during the rockburst estimation process. Therefore, a new method for estimating the rockburst is established based on these two methods. Moreover, seven comparative models were established for comparative analysis and finally applied to the Jinping II Hydropower Station, Jiangbian Hydropower Station, Cangling Tunnel, and Maluping Mine. Results show that the present model has higher accuracy and applicability, which offers a new method for estimating rockburst.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Adoko AC, Gokceoglu C, Wu L, Zuo QJ (2013) Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min 61(4):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.010
Afraei S, Shahriar K, Madani SH (2018) Statistical assessment of rock burst potential and contributions of considered predictor variables in the task. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 72:250–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.10.009
Ahmad M, Hu JL, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Ahmad F, Tang XW, Rahman ZU, Nawaz A, Abrar M (2021) Rockburst hazard prediction in underground projects using two intelligent classification techniques: a comparative study. Symmetry-Basel 13(4):632. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040632
Cai W, Dou LM, Si GY, Cao AY, Gong SY, Wang GF, Yuan SS (2019) A new seismic-based strain energy methodology for coal burst forecasting in underground coal mines. Int J Rock Mech Min 123:104086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104086
Faradonbeh RS, Taheri A, Sousa LRE, Karakus M (2020a) Rockburst assessment in deep geotechnical conditions using true-triaxial tests and data-driven approaches. Int J Rock Mech Min 128:104279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104279
Faradonbeh RS, Haghshenas SS, Taheri A, Mikaeil R (2020b) Application of self-organizing map and fuzzy c-mean techniques for rockburst clustering in deep underground projects. Neural Comput Appl 32(12):8545–8559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04353-z
Farhadian H (2021) A new empirical chart for rockburst analysis in tunnelling: Tunnel rockburst classification (TRC). Int J Min Sci Techno 31(4):603–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.03.010
Ghasemi E, Gholizadeh H, Adoko AC (2020) Evaluation of rockburst occurrence and intensity in underground structures using decision tree approach. Eng Comput 36(1):213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00695-9
Gong FQ, Wang YL, Wang ZG, Pan JF, Luo S (2021) A new criterion of coal burst proneness based on the residual elastic energy index. Int J Min Sci Techno 31(4):553–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.04.001
He ZC, Gong FQ, Luo S (2021) Evaluation of the rockburst proneness of red sandstone with prefabricated boreholes: an experimental study from the energy storage perspective. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12(1):2117–2154. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1955754
Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div 106(9):1013–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(80)90029-3
Ke B, Khandelwal M, Asteris PG, Skentou AD, Mamou A, Armaghani DJ (2021) Rock-burst occurrence prediction based on optimized naive bayes models. IEEE Access 9:91347–91360. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089205
Keneti A, Sainsbury BA (2018) Review of published rockburst events and their contributing factors. Eng Geol 246:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.005
Khosravi A, Simon R (2018) Verification of the CSDS model in estimating the postpeak behavior of hard rocks. Int J Geomech 18(3):04017166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001090
Kidybinski A (1981) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min 18(4):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)91194-3
Li DY, Liu CY, Gan WY (2009) A new cognitive model: cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 24(3):357–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20340
Li SJ, Feng XT, Li ZH, Chen BR, Zhang CQ, Zhou H (2012) In situ monitoring of rockburst nucleation and evolution in the deeply buried tunnels of Jinping II hydropower station. Eng Geol 137:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.03.010
Li ZQ, Xue YG, Li SC, Qiu DH, Zhang LW, Zhao Y, Zhou BH (2020) Rock burst risk assessment in deep-buried underground caverns: a novel analysis method. Arab J Geosci 13(11):388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05328-4
Liang WZ, Zhao GY, Wang X, Zhao J, Ma CD (2019) Assessing the rockburst risk for deep shafts via distance-based multi-criteria decision making approaches with hesitant fuzzy information. Eng Geol 260:105211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105211
Liu ZB, Shao JF, Xu WY, Meng YD (2013) Prediction of rock burst classification using the technique of cloud models with attribution weight. Nat Hazards 68(2):549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0635-9
Pu YY, Apel DB, Wang C, Wilson B (2018) Evaluation of burst liability in kimberlite using support vector machine. Acta Geophys 66(5):973–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0178-2
Qiu DH, Li SC, Zhang LW (2013) Study on Rockburst Intensity Prediction Based on Efficacy Coefficient Method. Appl Mech Mater 353–356:1277–1280. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.353-356.1277
Rastegarmanesh A, Moosavi M, Kalhor A (2020) A data-driven fuzzy model for prediction of rockburst. Georisk 15(2):152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2020.1751208
Russenes B (1974) Analysis of rock spalling for tunnels in steep valley sides (in Norwegian). Master Thesis of Science, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim
Sepehri M, Apel DB, Adeeb S, Leveille P, Hall RA (2020) Evaluation of mining-induced energy and rockburst prediction at a diamond mine in Canada using a full 3D elastoplastic finite element model. Eng Geol 266:105457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105457
Simser BP (2019) Rockburst management in Canadian hard rock mines. J Rock Mech Geotech 11(5):1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.005
Sousa LRE, Miranda T, Sousa RLE, Tinoco J (2017) The use of data mining techniques in rockburst risk assessment. Engineering-Prc 3(4):552–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.002
Turchaninov A, Markov G, Gzovsky M, Kazikayev D, Frenze U, Batugin S, Chabdarova U (1972) State of stress in the upper part of the Earth’s crust based on direct measurements in mines and on tectonophysical and seismological studies. Phys Earth Planet in 6:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(72)90005-2
Wang CL, Wu AX, Lu H, Bao TC, Liu XH (2015) Predicting rockburst tendency based onfuzzy matter-element model. Int J Rock Mech Min 75:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.02.004
Wang XT, Li SC, Xu ZH, Xue YG, Hu J, Li ZQ, Zhang B (2019) An interval fuzzy comprehensive assessment method for rock burst in underground caverns and its engineering application. B Eng Geol Environ 78(7):5161–5176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01453-3
Wang MW, Liu QY, Wang X, Shen FQ, Jin JL (2020) Prediction of rockburst based on multidimensional connection cloud model and set pair analysis. Int J Geomech 20(1):04019147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001546
Xie HP, Pariseau G (1993) Fractal character and mechanism of rock bursts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(4):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)91718-X
Xu C, Liu XL, Wang EZ, Zheng YL, Wang SJ (2018) Rockburst prediction and classification based on the ideal-point method of information theory. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 81:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.014
Xue YG, Li ZQ, Li SC, Qiu DH, Tao YF, Wang L, Yang WM, Zhang K (2019) Prediction of rock burst in underground caverns based on rough set and extensible comprehensive evaluation. B Eng Geol Environ 78(1):417–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1117-1
Xue YG, Bai CH, Qiu DH, Kong FM, Li ZQ (2020) Predicting rockburst with database using particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machine. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 98:103287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103287
Yu JC, Liu SG, Gao L (2019) Rock burst classification prediction method based on weight inverse analysis cloud model. IOP Confer Series Earth Environ Sci 283:12023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/283/1/012023
Zhang LW, Zhang XY, Wu J, Zhao DK, Fu H (2020) Rockburst prediction model based on comprehensive weight and extension methods and its engineering application. B Eng Geol Environ 79(9):4891–4903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01861-4
Zhou J, Li XB, Shi XZ (2012) Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines. Safety Sci 50(4):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065
Zhou KP, Lin Y, Deng HW, Li JL, Liu CJ (2016a) Prediction of rock burst classification using cloud model with entropy weight. T Nonferr Metal Soc 26(07):1995–2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64313-3
Zhou JB, Chen H, Yan B, Zhang W, Feng W (2016b) Identification of pedestrian crowding degree in metro transfer hub based on normal cloud mode. J Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition). 46(01): 100–107 https://doi.org/10.13229/j.cnki. Jdxbgxb2016b01015
Zhou JB, Zhang SC, Guo S, Zhao J (2020) Identification approach of pedestrian crowd in metro station based on improved cloud model. J China Railway Soc 42(03):104–113
Zhou H, Chen SK, Li HR, Liu T, Wang HL (2021) Rockburst prediction for hard rock and deep-lying long tunnels based on the entropy weight ideal point method and geostress field inversion: a case study of the Sangzhuling Tunnel. B Eng Geol Environ 80(5):3885–3902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02175-9
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (51934003) and the Major Science and Technology Special Project of Yunnan Province (No. 202202AG050014). This support is gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant number 51934003 and Science and Technology Special Project of Yunnan Province Grant number 202102AG050024.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ML contributed to data curation, software, and writing—original draft. KL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, supervision, and funding acquisition. QQ contributed to investigation, software, and data curation. RY contributed to writing—review and editing and data curation. GX contributed to writing—review and editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, M., Li, K., Qin, Q. et al. Rockburst estimation model based on IEWM-SCM and its application. Environ Earth Sci 82, 88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10764-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10764-y