Abstract
The heterogeneity of fractured and karstic aquifers is generally ignored, and not having an understanding of the hydrogeological evolution and functioning of these could potentially result in wrong water resource management practices. The geophysical methods are useful tools for hydrogeological investigations, helping in the detection of porosity and permeability zones in the subsoil that are important properties in the aquifer characterization. The combination of these with the measurement in situ of the physicochemical parameters of the groundwater can offer a detailed knowledge of the aquifer system. The study was conducted in the municipality of Tula, Tamaulipas, Mexico, where airborne geophysical data were analyzed. Then, 17 groundwater sampling points were established to measure physicochemical parameters (pH, Electric Conductivity and REDOX) and ionic concentration, to associate structures with zones of recharge, transport or storage of groundwater. It was found that the area with the greatest potential for groundwater recharge is located at the N and NW of the study area, with structures trending N–S and NE–SW, which favor the flow of groundwater to the convergence zone, located to the S of the study area. Also, near to the convergence zona, a fracture system with perpendicular direction to the groundwater flow acts as a barrier and divides the aquifer. Due to the chemistry characteristics of the groundwater, it was concluded that the main contribution of groundwater is through structures crossing evaporite rocks of the Guaxcama Formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguayo Camargo JE (1998) The middle cretaceous EL Abra limestone at its type locality (facies, diagenesis and oil emplacement), east-central Mexico. Rev Mex Ciencias Geol 15:1–8
Anatolia NW, Apaydin A (2010) Relation of tectonic structure to groundwater flow in the Beypazari. Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0605-1
Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geoghemistry, Groundwater and Pollution, Second edi. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Amsterdam
Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0402-9
Benson RC, Yuhr LB (2015) Site characterization in karst and pseudokarst terraines. Miami
Baranov B, Naudy H (1964) Numerical calculation of the formula of reduction to the magnetic pole. Geophysics 29:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439334
Capaccioni B, Didero M, Paletta C, Salvadori P (2001) Hydrogeochemistry of groundwaters from carbonate formations with basal gypsiferous layers: an example from the Mt Catria-Mt Nerone ridge (Northern Appennines, Italy). J Hydrol 253:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00480-2
CONAGUA (2015) Actualización de la disponibilidad media anual de agua en el acuífero Tula - Bustamante. Diario Oficial de la Federación, pp 1–18
CONAGUA (2017) Estadísticas del Agua en México, 2017th edn. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México
Custodio E, Llamas R (1983) Hidrología Subterránea. Omega, Barcelona
Delinom RM (2009) Structural geology controls on groundwater fl ow : Lembang Fault case study. West Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0453-z
Demlie MB, Mengistu H, Tessema A et al (2011) The relationship between lineaments and borehole yield in North West Province, South Africa: results from geophysical studiesLa relation entre linéaments et débit des forages dans la province du Nord-Ouest, Afrique du Sud: résultats d’études géophysiquesD. Hydrogeol J 20:351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0803-5
Dentith M, Mudge S (2014) Geophysics for the mineral exploration geoscientist. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139024358.002
Eguiluz de Antuaño S, Aranda García M, Marrett R (2000) Tectónica de la Sierra Madre Oriental, México. Bol la Soc Geol Mex 53:1–26
Ford D, Williams PD (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Jhon Wiley & Sons Ltd., England
García Oviedo A, Josep Pons M (2005) Rudistas del cretácico superior del centro al sureste de México (Recuento sistemático de rudistas americanos). Universitat Autonoa de Barcelona
Geosoft (2018) Performing euler deconvolution with grav/mag interpretation. https://my.geosoft.com/elearning/step. Accessed 5 Sept 2018
Hartmann A, Goldscheider N, Wagener T et al (2014) Karst water resources in a changing world: review of hydrological modeling approaches. Rev Geophys 52:218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443.Received
Hirt C, Claessens S, Fecher T et al (2013) New ultrahigh-resolution picture of Earth’s gravity field. Geophys Res Lett 40:4279–4283. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50838
Howari FM, Aldouri R, Sadiq A (2016) Gravity investigations of recent sinkholes and karst pits of Dahal Al-Hamam, State of Qatar. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5298-x
Kanta A, Soupios P, Barsukov P et al (2013) Aquifer characterization using shallow geophysics in the Keritis Basin of Western Crete, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 70:2153–2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2503-z
Karami GH, Bagheri R, Rahimi F (2016) Determining the groundwater potential recharge zone and karst springs catchment area: Saldoran region, western Iran. Hydrogeol J 24:1981–1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1458-z
Kazakis N, Oikonomidis D, Voudouris KS (2015) Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment with disparate models in karstic, porous, and fissured rock aquifers using remote sensing techniques and GIS in Anthemountas basin, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 74:6199–6209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4641-y
Krienen L, Heuser M, Höbig N et al (2017) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical characterization of two karstic discharge areas in San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7166-8
Li L, Guo H, Wang P, Jia WJ (2016) Research on RTP aeromagnetic gradient data and its applicability in different latitudes. Appl Geophys 13:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-016-0534-4
Litwin L, Andreychouk V (2008) Characteristics of high-mountain karst based on GIS and remote sensing. Environ Geol 54:979–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0893-5
López Loera H, Ramos Leal JA, Dávila Harris P et al (2015) Geophysical exploration of fractured-media aquifers at the Mexican mesa central: Satellite City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Surv Geophys 36:167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9302-2
Manuel L-C, Bouamama M, Gisbert J, Pulido A (2001) Factors which determine the hydrogeochemical behaviour of karstic springs. A case study from the Betic Cordilleras Spain. Appl Geochem Appl Geochem 16:1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00012-9
Minero CJ, Enos P, Aguayo CJE (1983) Sedimentation and diagenesis of mid-cretaceous platforms margin East-Central Mexico, with accompanying field guide. Dallas Geological Society, Dallas, pp 1–168
Morán-Ramírez J, Ramos-Leal JA, López-Álvarez B et al (2013) Comportamiento hidrogeoquímico de flujos subterráneos en acuíferos cársticos fracturados, aplicando modelación inversa: Caso huasteca potosina. Bol la Soc Geol Mex 65:71–82
Myers RL (1968) Biostratigaphy of the Cardenas Formation (Upper Cretaceous) San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Paleontol Mex 24:1–89
Padilla JR (1978) Bosquejo Geologico estructural De La Sierra Madre Oriental. Univ Nac Autónoma México Inst Geol 2:45–54
Pérez Corona FY, López Loera H (2011) Caracterización geofísica de ambientes cársticos, caso: Poljé de Joya de Luna, San Luis Potosí. Instituto Potosino de Investigación Cinetífica y Tecnológica, México
Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. Am Geophys Union Trans 25:914–928
Planer-Friedrich B (2000) Hydrogeological and hydrochemical investigations in the Rioverde basin. Mexico Freib on-line Geosci 3:246
Pórcel RAD, Pérez GCC (2017) Integrated water resources management and the Mexican prospects. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6633-6
Redhaounia B, Ilondo BO, Gabtni H et al (2016) Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) applied to karst carbonate aquifers: case study from Amdoun, Northwestern Tunisia. Pure Appl Geophys 173:1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1173-z
Reeves C (2006) Aeromagnetic surveys. GEOSOFT, Delft
Roback RC, Johnson TM, McLing TL et al (2001) Uranium isotopic evidence for groundwater chemical evolution and flow patterns in the Eastern Snake River Plain aquifer, Idaho. Bull Geol Soc Am 113:1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<1133:UIEFGC>2.0.CO;2
Saidi S, Hosni S, Mannai H et al (2017) GIS-based multi-criteria analysis and vulnerability method for the potential groundwater recharge delineation, case study of Manouba phreatic aquifer, NE Tunisia. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6840-1
Schiller A, Schattauer I, Ottowitz D (2016) Advanced data processing of airborne electromagnetic data for imaging hidden conduit networks in the coastal karst plain of Tulum ( Mexico). Boletín Geológico y Minero 127:7–19
Servicio Geológico Mexicano (2006) Atlas de riesgo municipios Antiguo Morelos, Nuevo Morelos, Ocampo y Tula del Estado de Tamaulipas. Servicio Geológico Méxicano, Mexico
Skeels DC (1967) What is residual gravity. Geophysics 32:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439896
Sun Z, Ma R, Wang Y et al (2016) Using isotopic, hydrogeochemical-tracer and temperature data to characterize recharge and flow paths in a complex karst groundwater flow system in northern China. Hydrogeol J 24:1393–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1390-2
Sun H, Cheng M, Su C et al (2017) Characterization of shallow karst using electrical resistivity imaging in a limestone mining area. Environ Earth Sci 76:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7112-9
Torres Rivera S, Ramos Leal JA, Dávila Harris P (2018) Desarrollo de la metodología MEPAM para la determinación de la conexión hidráulica entre una zona de recarga y una de descarga, caso Joya de Luna y Guaxcamá. Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, San Luis Potosí
Torres-Rivera S, Ramos-Leal JA, Rodríguez-Robles U et al (2019) Metodología polínica ambiental (MEPAM) para estudios hidrogeológicos en zonas cársticas. Caso Joya de Luna-Guaxcamá, S.L.P. Rev Mex Ciencias Geológicas 36:1–12. https://doi.org/10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2019.1.565
Tóth J (1999) Groundwater as a geologic agent: an overview of the causes, processes, and manifestations. Hydrogeol J 7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050176
Yousif M, Oguchi T, Anazawa K, Ohba T (2015) Framework for investigation of Karst aquifer in an arid zone, using isotopes, remote sensing and GIS applications: the Northwestern Coast of Egypt. Environ Process 2:37–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0063-9
Yuan J, Xu F, Deng G, Tang Y (2018) Using stable isotopes and major ions to identify hydrogeochemical characteristics of karst groundwater in Xide country, Sichuan Province. Carbonates Evaporites 33:223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0333-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guevara-Mansilla, O., López-Loera, H., Ramos-Leal, J.A. et al. Characterization of a fractured aquifer through potential geophysics and physicochemical parameters of groundwater samples. Environ Earth Sci 79, 352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09096-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09096-y