Abstract
Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) method is very useful in mapping subsurface contamination zones. In this study, 3D ERI is used to identify the distribution and depth of subsurface soil contamination zone near Al_Furat state company for chemical and pesticides industries in Hilla city, Iraq. A 3D pure image of electrical resistivity distribution is obtained from a perpendicular square grid (80 × 80 m) which consists of three parallel and three perpendicular lines. The electrical resistivity values range from < 1 to 21 O.m, and the total root mean square (RMS) after four iterations is about 7%. The image gives eight different depth slices for the estimated model with a depth interval of about 1 m. The maximum depth of investigation is 13.7 m. The results mapped the contamination zone, where high electrical resistivity values (about 21 O.m) are observed possibly due to accumulation of alkaline waste disposed from the company. The ERI results show that the subsurface layers up to a depth of 4.99 m are of moderate-to-high electrical resistivity values. The study reveals that 3D ERI is an effective tool for subsurface contamination zone mapping in various depths, which extends in this study from the near-surface to a depth of about 5 m below the ground level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdulameer A, Thabit JM, AL-Menshed FH, Merkel B (2018) Investigation of seawater intrusion in the Dibdibba Aquifer using 2D resistivity imaging in the area between Al-Zubair and Umm Qasr, southern Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 77:619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7798-3
Abdulrazzaq ZT (2011) Application of vertical electrical sounding to delineate and evaluate of aquifers characteristics in Baiji-Tikrit Basin. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Tikrit
Abdulrazzaq ZT, Aziz NA, Alwan HA (2015) Study of groundwater level in Samarra City by using 2D Resistivity Imaging Technique. Iraqi J Sci Technol 6(1):11–26
Abdulrazzaq ZT, Al-Heety AJ, Shanshal ZM (2019) Integration of 1D and 2D electrical resistivity techniques to determine the thickness and extension of the main aquifer in Al-Rehaemia Area, Al-Najaf Governorate, Central Iraq. Iraqi Bull Geol Min 15(1):1–13
ABEM (2016) Terrameter LS, User Manual, ABEM Instrument AB, Sweden. https://www.guidelinegeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ABEM-Terrameter-LS-2-User-Manual.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019
Acworth RI (1999) Investigation of dryland salinity using the electrical image method. Aust J Soil Res 37(4):623–636. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR98084
Alaya MB, Saidi S, Zemni T, Zargouni F (2014) Suitability assessment of deep groundwater for drinking and irrigation use in the Djeffara aquifers (Northern Gabes, south-eastern Tunisia). Environ Earth Sci 71:3387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2729-9
Al-Fouzan FA (2008) Optimization strategies of electrode arrays used in numerical and field 2D resistivity imaging surveys. PhD thesis, University of Sains Malaysia
AL-Tarazi E, El-Naqa A, El-Waheidi M, Abu Rajab J (2006) Electrical geophysical and hydrogeological investigations of groundwater aquifers in Ruseifa municipal landfill, Jordan. Environ Geol 50:1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0283-4
AL-Zubedi AS, Thabit JM (2014) Comparison between 2D imaging and vertical electrical sounding in aquifer delineation: a case study of south and south west of Samawa City (IRAQ). Arab J Geosci 7:173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0788-y
Andrews RJ, Barker R, Loke MH (1995) The application of electrical tomography in the study of the unsaturated zone in chalk at three sites in Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. Hydrogeol J 3(4):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050055
Aziz NA (2012) Three dimension electeical resistivity and ip imaging for soil layers invistgation at UOT-Baghdad. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Technology
Aziz NA, Abdulrazzaq ZT, Alwan HA (2015) The efficiency of 2D electrical resistivity arrays in shallow subsurface investigations: a comparative study between three conventional arrays. Iraqi J Sci Technol 6(3):83–88
Benson AK, Payne KL, Stubben MA (1997) Mapping groundwater contamination using dc resistivity and VLF geophysical methods—a case study. Geophysics 62(1):80–86. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444148
Cahyna F, Mazac O, Vendhova D, Ward SH (1990) Determination of the extent of cyanide contamination by surface geoelectrical methods. Geotech Environ Geophys 2:97–106
Chu Y, Liu S, Wang F, Cai G, Bian H (2017) Estimation of heavy metal-contaminated soils’ mechanical characteristics using electrical resistivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:13561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8718-x
Cozzolino M, Di Giovanni E, Mauriello P, Piro S, Zamuner D (2018) Geophysical Methods for Cultural Heritage. In: Geophysical Methods for Cultural Heritage Management. Springer Geophysics. Springer, Cham, pp 9-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74790-3_3
Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophys Prospec 52:379–398
Dahlin T, Bernstone C, Loke M (2007) A 3-D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken, Sweden. Geophysics 67(6):1692–1700. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1527070
Delgado-Rodriguez O, Shevnin V, Ochoa-Valdes J, Ryjov A (2006) Geoelectrical characterization of a site with hydrocarbon contamination caused by pipeline leakage, Geofís. Intl 45(1):63–72
Directorate of Water Well Drilling (2003) Information bank—Babil Governorate Library, Ministry of water resources, Iraq
Dobrin MB, Savit CH (1988) Introduction to geophysical prospecting. McGraw-Hill, New York
Edwards LS (1977) A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP. Geophysics 42(5):1020–1036. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440762
FBSA (2013) Results of specialized control and audit work on the activities of Al-Furat company for chemical industries/ministry of industry and minerals for the period from 1/1/2010 to 30/11/2013. Federal board of supreme audit, Republic of Iraq, Report No. 2511, pp 23. https://www.fbsa.gov.iq/ar/reports/view/67. Accessed Aug 2018
Fukue M, Minato T, Horibe H, Taya N (1999) The micro-structures of clay given by resistivity measurements. Eng Geol 54:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00060-5
Glewa SM, Al-Alwani M (2013) Evaluation of the effect of Solid Waste leachate on soil at Hilla City. J Babylon Univ Eng Sci 21(3):894–906
Griffiths D, Barker R (1993) Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-9851(93)90005-J
Hassan, AA (2014) Electrical resistivity method for water content characterisation of unsaturated clay soil. PhD theses, Durham University. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10806/
Heather L, Stahl A, Leberfinger L, Warren J (1999) Electrical Imaging: a method for identifying potential collapse and other karst features near roadways. Science Applications international corporation, Middletown
Jodeiri Shokri B, Doulati Ardejani F, Moradzadeh A (2016) Mapping the flow pathways and contaminants transportation around a coal washing plant using the VLF-EM, Geo-electrical and IP techniques—a case study, NE Iran. Environ Earth Sci 75:62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4776-x
Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (2001) Trace element in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press, London
Karim H, AL-Qaissy M, Aziz NA (2013) Differentiating clayey soil layers from electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) and induced polarization (IP). Eng Tech J 31:2316–2334
Karim H, AL-Qaissy M, Aziz NA (2014) 2D and 3D resistivity imaging for soil site investigation. Eng Tech J 32:249–272
Kaya MA, Ozurlan G, Sengul E (2007) Delineation of soil and groundwater contamination using geophysical methods at an open waste-disposal site in Canakkale, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 135:441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9662-x
Keller G, Frischknecht F (1966) Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, New York
Koda E, Tkaczyk A, Lech M, Osinski P (2017) Application of electrical resistivity data sets for the evaluation of the pollution concentration level within landfill subsoil. Appl Sci 7:262. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030262
LaBrecque DJ, Morelli G, Daily B, Ramirez A, Lundegard P (1995) Occam’s inversion of 3-D ERT data. In: Spies B (ed) Three-dimensional electromagnetics. SEG, Tulsa, pp 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802154.ch37
Laloy E, Javaux M, Vanclooster M, Roisin C, Bielders CL (2011) Electrical resistivity in a loamy soil: identification of the appropriate pedo-electrical model. Vadose Zo. J. 10:1023–1033
Liao Q, Deng Y, Shi X, Sun Y, Duan W, Wu J (2018) Delineation of contaminant plume for an inorganic contaminated site using electrical resistivity tomography: comparison with direct-push technique. Environ Monit Assess 190:187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6560-3
Loke MH (1999) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2D and 3D surveys. https://pages.mtu.edu/~ctyoung/LOKENOTE.PDF. Accessed Aug 2019
Loke MH (2002) RES2DINV ver. 3.50. Rapid 2-D resistivity and IP inversion using the least square method. Geotomo Software, Penang
Loke MH (2004) Tutorial: 2-D and 3D electrical imaging surveys. https://sites.ualberta.ca/~unsworth/UA-classes/223/loke_course_notes.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019
Loke MH (2012) Tutorial 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging Surveys. https://www.geotomosoft.com/downloads.php. Accessed Aug 2019
Mares S (1984) Introduction to applied geophysics. D-Re-dial Pub. Com, Dordrecht
McGrath RJ, Styles P, Thomas E, Neale S (2002) Integrated high-resolution geophysical investigations as potential tools for water resource investigations in karst terrain. Env Geol 42(5):552–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0519-2
MOEN (Iraqi Ministry of Environment) (2013) Expectation of environment status in Iraq. First report, Baghdad
Murad OF (2012) Obtaining chemical properties through soil electrical resistivity. J Civil Eng Res 2(6):120–128. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20120206.08
Ong JB, Lane JW Jr, Zlotnik VA, Halihan T, White EA (2010) Combined use of frequency-domain electromagnetic and electrical resistivity surveys to delineate near-lake groundwater flow in the semi-arid Nebraska Sand Hills, USA. Hydrogeol J 18:1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0617-x
Oyubu AO (2015) Soil resistivity and soil ph profile investigation: a case study of delta state university faculty of engineering complex. IJSER 6(10):583–588
Roy A, Apparao A (1971) Depth of investigation in direct current method. Geophysics 36(5):943–959. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440226
Sudha K, Israil M, Mittal S, Rai J (2009) Soil characterization using electrical resistivity tomography and geotechnical investigations. J Appl Geophy 67(1):74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.09.012
Thabit JM, Khalid FH (2016) Resistivity imaging survey to delineate subsurface seepage of hydrocarbon contaminated water at Karbala Governorate. Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 75:87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4880-y
Todd DK, Mays LW (2005) Groundwater hydrology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Tsourlos P (1995) Modelling interpretation and inversion of multi-electrode resistivity survey data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of York
Xie J, Li Y, Zhai C, Li C, Lan Z (2009) CO2 absorption by alkaline soils and its implication to the global carbon cycle. Environ Geol 56:953–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1197-0
Yoon GL, Park JB (2001) Sensitivity of leachate and fine contents on electrical resistivity variations of sandy soils. J Hazard Mater 84:147–161
Zohdy AA, Eaton GP, Mabey DR (1974) Application of surface geophysics to groundwater investigations; united states geological survey (USGS) techniques of water resources investigations, book 2, chapter D1, 66 P. https://doi.org/10.3133/twri02D1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aziz, N.A., Abdulrazzaq, Z.T. & Agbasi, O.E. Mapping of subsurface contamination zone using 3D electrical resistivity imaging in Hilla city, Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 78, 502 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8520-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8520-9