Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In situ field measurement of wind erosion and threshold velocity in relation to soil properties in arid and semiarid environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field measurement of wind erosion linked to soil properties improves our understanding of erosion processes in arid and semiarid regions to combat this environmental threat. The aim of this study was to investigate wind erosion and threshold velocity (Vt) in relation to soil properties using a portable wind tunnel in 60 sites of Kerman, the largest province of Iran. The result indicated that wind erosion rates ranged from 0.03 g m−2 min−1 to 3.41 g m−2 min−1, indicating a wide variability in the erodibility of soils. Wind erosion was inversely attributed to Vt following a power function. In all cases, the influence of soil properties on wind erosion was supported by their opposite effect on threshold velocity. Clay and silt fractions, mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates, dry stable aggregates (DSA), shear strength, surface gravel, the concentrations of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, soil organic carbon (SOC) and calcium carbonate equivalent (CCE) were inversely proportional to wind erosion rates following nonlinear functions. Wind erosion was significantly increased as electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) increased. Critical values of 5.7–8.9 m s−1 at 10-m height for Vt, 7% for clay content, .3 mm for MWD, 25% for DSA, and 5% for surface gravel were recognized, approximately. Multiple regression analysis indicated that SAR and MWD were the best predictors of wind erosion rate. Meanwhile, MWD, surface gravel, clay content, and SOC had the best estimation for threshold velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arjmand Sajjadi S, Mahmoodabadi M (2015) Sediment concentration and hydraulic characteristics of rain-induced overland flows in arid land soils. J Soils Sediments 15:710–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1072-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asensio C, Lozano FJ, Ortega E, Kikvidze Z (2015) Study on the effectiveness of an agricultural technique based on Aeolian deposition, in a semiarid environment. Environ Eng Manag J 14:1143–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avecilla F, Panebianco JE, Buschiazzo DE (2015) Variable effects of saltation and soil properties on wind erosion of different textured soils. Aeolian Res 18:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman J, Contreras K, Hartage KH, MacDonald R (2006) Comparison of soil strength data obtained in situ with penetrometer and with vane shear test. Soil Tillage Res 87:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddock MC, Zobeck TM, van Pelt RS, Fredrickson EL (2011) Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed, crusted playa surfaces: cattle trampling effects. Aeolian Res 3:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton L, Hoyle F, Stefanova K, Murphy D (2016) Incorporating organic matter alters soil greenhouse gas emissions and increases grain yield in a semiarid climate. Agri Ecosyst Environ 231:320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Philips SL, Herrick JE, Johansen JR (2007) Wind erodibility of soils at Fort Irwin, California (Mojave Desert), USA, before and after trampling disturbance: implications for land management. Earth Surf Process Land 32:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Ruis SJ (2018) No-tillage and soil physical environment. Geoderma 326:164–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli P, Lugato E, Montanarella L, Panagos P (2016) A new assessment of soil loss due to wind erosion in European agricultural soils using a quantitative spatially distributed modeling approach. Land Degrad Dev 28:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Manuring and rotation effects on soil organic carbon concentration for different aggregate size fractions on two soils in northeastern Ohio, USA. Soil Tillage Res 81:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschiazzo DE, Zobeck TM, Aimar SB (1999) Wind erosion in loess soils of the semiarid Argentinian Pampas. Soil Sci 164(2):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell A, Webb NP, Guerschman JP, Thomas DT, Mata G, Handcock RN, Leys JF, Butler HJ (2018) Improving ground cover monitoring for wind erosion assessment using MODIS BRDF parameters. Remote Sens Environ 204:756–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Liu C, Li J, Zou X, Liu B, Kang L, Fang Y (2017) Wind erosion mass variability with sand bed in a wind tunnel. Soil Tillage Res 165:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chepil WS (1954) Factors that influence clod structure and erodibility of soil by wind: iII. calcium carbonate and decomposed organic matter. Soil Sci 77:473–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ćirić V, Manojlović M, Nešić LJ, Belić M (2012) Soil dry aggregate size distribution: effects of soil type and land use. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12(4):689–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Colazo JC, Buschiazzo DE (2010) Soil dry aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semiarid environment of Argentina. Geoderma 159:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colazo JC, Buschiazzo DE (2014) The impact of agriculture on soil texture due to wind erosion. Land Degrad Dev 26:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diouf B, Skidmore EL, Layton JB, Hagen LJ (1990) Stabilization fine sand by adding clay: laboratory wind tunnel study. Soil Technol 3:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Wang H, Liu X, Wang X (2004) A wind tunnel investigation of the influences of fetch length on the flux profile of a sand cloud blowing over a gravel surface. Earth Surf Process Land 29(13):1613–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekhtesasi MR, Akhavan Ghalibaf M, Azimzadeh HR, Emtehani MH (2003) Effects of salts on erodibility of soil by wind. Iran J Nat Resour 56:17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear DW, Krammes CA, Williamson DL, Zobeck TM (1994) Computing the wind erodible fraction of soils. J Soil J Water Conserv 49:183–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Physical Methods. Madison (WI), SSSA, pp 255–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Nickling WG, Nickolich G, Etyemezian VA (2017) Wind tunnel study of the aerodynamic and sand trapping properties of porous mesh 3-dimensional roughness elements. Aeolian Res 25:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuffrida F, Carla C, Angelo M, Cherubino L (2016) Effects of salt stress imposed during two growth phases on cauliflower production and quality. J Sci Food Agri 97:1552–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D (2004) Effect of soil crusting on the emission and transport of wind-eroded sediment: field measurements on loamy sandy soil. Geomorphology 58:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen LJ (2008) Updating soil surface conditions during wind erosion events using the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS). Trans ASABE 51(1):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen LJ, van Pelt S, Sharratt B (2010) Estimating the saltation and suspension components from field wind erosion. Aeolian Res 1:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Hua X, Mamtimin A, Tang SH (2011) Impact factor of soil wind erosion in the center of Taklimakan desert. J Arid Land 3(1):9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iran Meteorological Organization (2017) Meteorological Report of Kerman Province. 40p

  • Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986) Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Madison, WI, pp 425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheirabadi H, Mahmoodabadi M, Jalali VR, Naghavi H (2018) Sediment flux, wind erosion and net erosion influenced by soil bed length, wind velocity and aggregate size distribution. Geoderma 323:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Geoderma2018.02.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohake DJ, Hagen LJ, Skidmore EL (2010) Wind erodibility of organic soil. Soil Water Manag Conserv 74(1):250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent B, Marticorena B, Bergametti G, Chazette P, Maignan F, Schmechtig C (2005) Simulation of the mineral dust emission frequencies from desert areas of China and Mongolia using an aerodynamic roughness length map derived from the POLDER/ADEOS 1 surface products. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Hoffman GJ, Hopmans JW, Grattan SR, Suarez D, Corwin DL, Oster JD, Wu L, Amrhein C (2011) Evaluation of soil salinity leaching requirement guidelines. Agric Water Manag 98:502–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys JF, Smith J, MacRae C, Rickards J, Yang X, Randall L, Hairsine P, Dixon J, McTainsh G (2009) Improving the capacity to monitor wind and water erosion: a review. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forests, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Li FR, Zhao LY, Zhang TH (2003) Wind erosion and airborne dust deposition in farmland during spring in the Horqin Sandy Land of eastern Inner Mongolia, China. Soil Tillage Res 75:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XL, Liu LY, Wang JH (2004) Wind tunnel simulation of aeolian sandy soil erodibility under human disturbance. Geomorphology 59:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Okin GS, Alvarez L, Epstein H (2007) Quantitative effects of vegetation cover on wind erosion and soil nutrient loss in a desert grassland of southern New Mexico, USA. Biogeochemistry 85:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu LY, Shi PJ, Zou XY, Gao SY, Yan P, Li XY, Dong ZB, Wang JH (2003) Short-term dynamic of wind erosion of three newly cultivated grassland soils in Northern China. Geoderma 115:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López MV, deDios Herrero JM, Hevia GG, Gracia R, Buschiazzo DE (2007) Determination of the wind-erodible fraction of soils using different methodologies. Geoderma 139:407–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles L, Tatarko J (1986) Wind erosion effects on soil texture and organic matter. J Soil Water Conserv 41:191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon DJ, Clow GD, Tigges RK, Reynolds RL, Chavez PS (2004) Comparison of aerodynamically and model derived roughness lengths (Z0) over diverse surfaces, central Mojave Desert, California, USA. Geomorphology 63:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M (2011) Sediment yield estimation using a semi-quantitative model and GIS- remote sensing data. Int Agrophys 25(3):241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Ahmadbeigi B (2013) Dry and water-stable aggregates in different cultivation systems of arid region soils. Arab J Geosci 6:2997–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0566-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdà A (2013) WEPP calibration for improved predictions of interrill erosion in semi-arid to arid environments. Geoderma 204–205:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Geoderma2013.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Heydarpour E (2014) Sequestration of organic carbon influenced by the application of straw residue and farmyard manure in two different soils. Int Agrophys 28(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.2478/intag-2014-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Rajabpour H (2017) Study on the effect of initial soil moisture content on wind erosion rate using a laboratory wind tunnel. J Water Soil Conserv 24(2):167–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Rezaei Arshad R (2018) Long-term evaluation of water quality parameters of the Karoun River using a regression approach and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Marine Pollut Bull 126:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Yazdanpanah N, Rodríguez Sinobas L, Pazira E, Neshat A (2013) Reclamation of calcareous saline sodic soil with different amendments (I): redistribution of soluble cations within the soil profile. Agri Water Manag 120:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.08.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodabadi M, Ghadiri H, Yu B, Rose C (2014) Morpho-dynamic quantification of flow-driven rill erosion parameters based on physical principles. J Hydrol 514:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marticorena B, Bergametti G, Gillette D, Belnap J (1997) Factors controlling threshold friction velocity in semiarid and arid areas of the United States. J Geophys Res 102:23277–23287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazaheri MR, Mahmoodabadi M (2012) Study on infiltration rate based on primary particle size distribution data in arid and semiarid region soils. Arab J Geosci 5(5):1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0497-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menut L, Pérez C, Haustein K, Bessagnet B, Prigent C, Alfaro S (2013) Impact of surface roughness and soil texture on mineral dust emission fluxes modeling. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:6505–6520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzamostafa N, Hagen LJ, Stone LR, Skidmore EL (1998) Soil aggregate and texture effects on suspension components from wind erosion. Soil Sci 62:1351–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1 A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwadialo BE, Mbagwu JSC (1991) An analysis of soil components active in microaggregate stability. Soil Technol 4(4):343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Jeeney DR (1992) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. SSSA, USA, Chemical and Mineralogical Properties, p 1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Panayiotopoulos KP, Barbayiannis N, Papatolios K (2004) Influence of electrolyte concentration, sodium adsorption ratio, and mechanical disturbance on dispersed clay particle size and critical flocculation concentration in Alfisols. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:1415–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2006) Handbook of soil analysis, mineralogical. Springer, Organic and Inorganic Methods, p 993p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Presley D, Tatarko J (2009) Principles of wind erosion and its control. Kansas State University. Available at: http://www.weru.ksu.edu (accessed August 18, 2011)

  • Puget P, Chenu C, Balasdent J (2000) Dynamics of soil organic matter associated with particle- size fractions of water-stable aggregates. Eur J Soil Sci 51:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Gillette DA, Leys JF (1993) The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion thresholds. J Geophys Res 98:3023–3029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei Arshad R, Mahmoodabadi M, Farpoor MH, Fekri M (2019) Experimental investigation of rain-induced splash and wash processes under wind-driven rain. Geoderma 337:1164–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y (2008) Physics and modelling of wind erosion. Springer, Berlin, p 393

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KL, Mandal UK, Srinivas K, Vittal KOR, Mandal B, Grace JK, Ramesh V (2005) Long term soil management effects on crop yield and soil quality in a dryland Alfisol. Soil Tillage Res 83(2):173–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Guggenberger G, Paustian K, Haumaier L, Elliott ET, Zech W (2001) Sources and composition of soil organic matter fractions between and within soil aggregates. Soil Sci 52:607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ta W (2007) Study of the energy abrasion rates of five soil types subject to oblique impacts. Geoderma 140:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan L, Zhang W, Qu J, Zhang K, An Z, Wang X (2013) Aeolian sand transport over Gobi with different gravel coverages under limited sand supply: a mobile wind tunnel investigation. Aeolian Res 11:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tartarko J (2001) Soil aggregation and wind erosion: processes and measurements. Ann Arid Zone 40(3):251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • van Pelt RS (2014) Wind Erosion. USDA. Agricultural Research Service, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. UNL Faculty. p. 209-227

  • van Pelt RS, Zobeck TM (2007) Chemical constituents of fugitive dust. Environ Monit Assess 130:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Pelt RS, Baddock MC, Zobeck TM, Acosta-Martinez V, Schlegel AJ, Vigil MF (2013) Field wind tunnel testing of two silt loam soil on the North American Central High plains. Aeolian Res 10:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser SM, Strek G, Ribolzi O (2004) Techniques for simultaneous quantification of wind and water erosion in semiarid regions. J Arid Environ 59:699–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NP, Strong CL (2011) Soil erodibility dynamics and its representation for wind erosion and dust emission models. Aeolian Res 3:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NP, Herrick JE, Duniway MC (2014) Ecological site-based assessments of wind and water erosion, informing accelerated soil erosion management in rangelands. Ecol Appl 24:1405–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan N, Marschner P, Cao W, Zuo C, Qin W (2015) Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4:316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah N, Pazira E, Neshat A, Naghavi H, Moezi AA, Mahmoodabadi M (2011) Effect of some amendments on leachate properties of a calcareous saline- sodic soil. Int Agrophys 25(3):307–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdanpanah N, Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdà A (2016) The impact of organic amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in semiarid lands. Geoderma 266:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Geoderma2015.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Rosewell J (2001) Evaluation of WEPP for runoff and soil loss prediction at Gunnedah, NSW, Australia. Aust J Soil Res 39:1131–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani S, Mahmoodabadi M (2013) Effect of particle-size distribution on wind erosion rate and soil erodibility. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59(12):1743–1753. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2012.748984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YM, Wang XQ, Wang WK, Yang WK, Zhang DY (2006) The microstructure of microbiotic crust and its influence on wind erosion for a sandy soil surface in the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Geoderma 132:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Tan L, Zhang G, Qiu F, Zhan H (2014) Aeolian processes over gravel beds: field wind tunnel simulation and its application atop the Mogao Grottoes. China. Aeolian Res 15:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HL, Yi XY, Zhou RL, Zhao XY, Zhang TH, Drake S (2006) Wind erosion and sand accumulation effects on soil properties in Horqin Sandy Farmland, Inner Mongolia. CATENA 65:71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimbone SM, Vicker A, Morgan RPC, Vella P (1996) Field investigations of different techniques for measuring surface soil shear strength. Soil Technol 9:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobeck TM, Baddock M, van Pelt RS, Tatarko J, Acosta-Martinez V (2013) Soil property effects on wind erosion of organic soils. Aeolian Res 10:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou X, Li J, Cheng H, Wang J, Zhang C, Kang L, Liu W, Zhang F (2018) Spatial variation of topsoil features in soil wind erosion areas of northern China. CATENA 167:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Mahmoodabadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahabinejad, N., Mahmoodabadi, M., Jalalian, A. et al. In situ field measurement of wind erosion and threshold velocity in relation to soil properties in arid and semiarid environments. Environ Earth Sci 78, 501 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8508-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8508-5

Keywords

Navigation