Skip to main content
Log in

Site characterization of the strong motion stations and evaluation of site effects in the Ankara region during the December 2007 and March 2008 moderate Bala earthquakes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local site conditions may significantly affect the amplitude and frequency of ground motion during earthquakes. Recordings of recent major earthquakes have demonstrated that soil conditions can generate prominent amplification of ground shaking and can be compared with the amplification predicted by numerical simulation. This study analyzes the ground motion data from the December 2007 and March 2008 moderate Bala earthquake series considering the effect of soil conditions on ground shaking in the southern part of Ankara, the capital city of Turkey. Initially, shear wave velocity profiles of the strong ground motion stations were evaluated to define site classifications for each station in Ankara and its surroundings. Strong motion data collected during the Bala earthquake series (M w range 5.6–4.8) were used to develop event-specific attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at various periods and different site conditions. Site amplification factors were derived from the regression results from the event-specific attenuation relationships for the Bala earthquake series. The implications of these ground motion amplification factors were also discussed and compared using the current seismic design codes. Finally, the response spectra from the recording stations were used to determine site amplification factors for different site conditions to evaluate the variability of the site response in localized regions in Ankara.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):94–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson NA, Somerville PG (1996) Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:S93–S99

    Google Scholar 

  • AFAD-ED (2007–2008) Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Authority. Earthquake Department, Ankara. http://kyh.deprem.gov.tr/ftpt.htm

  • Akkar S, Çağnan Z (2010) A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey, and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(6):2978–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyürek B, Duru M, Sütçü YF, Papak İ, Şaroğlu F, Pehlivan N, Gönenç O, Granit S, Yaşar T (1997) The surrounding geology of the city of Ankara and natural resources project. MTA compilation no. 9961 (in Turkish)

  • Asten MW, Boore DM (2005) Blind comparisons of shear-wave velocities at closely spaced sites in San Jose, California. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report-1169

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (2002) Empirical evidence for site coefficients in building code provisions. Earthq Spectra 18(2):189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Can H, Koçkar MK, Felek G (2013) Evaluation of the site characterization of the weak and strong motion stations installed in Ankara and it’s surroundings. Gazi University, DEMAR. Gazi University, Scientific Research Project; BAP-06/2011-22 (in Turkish)

  • Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR et al (2000) New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16(1):41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2010) A comparison of local site conditions with passive and active surface wave methods. In: Fifth international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics symposium in Honor of Professor I. M. Idriss San Diego, CA

  • Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2012) Local site characterization and seismic zonation study by utilizing active and passive surface wave methods: a case study for the northern side of Ankara, Turkey. Eng Geol 151:64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2013) A comprehensive study to define local site effects in northern Ankara, Turkey. In: SE-50EEE international conference on earthquake engineering—29 to 31 May, Skopje, R. Macedonia

  • Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2015) Evaluation of site effect within the tectonic basin in the northern side of Ankara. Eng Geol 192:76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol O, Yurdakul ME, Algan Ü, Gürel N, Herece E, Tekirli E, Ünsal Y, Yüksel M (1980) Geomorphological map of Ankara. MTA report no: 6875 (in Turkish)

  • Foti S, Parolai S, Albarello D, Picozzi M (2011) Application of surface-wave methods for seismic site characterization. Surv Geophys 32:777–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazi University, Earthquake Engineering Implementation and Research Center (GAZİ-DEMAR 2007 and 2008). Ankara. http://deprem.gazi.edu.tr/

  • Gosar A, Stopar R, Roser J (2008) Comparative test of active and passive multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) methods and microtremor HVSR method. RMZ Mater Geoenviron 55(1):41–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Gülkan P, Kalkan E (2002) Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey. J Seismolog 6(3):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K (2008) Development of surface-wave method and its application to site investigations. Ph.D. Thesis, Kyoto University

  • Holzer TL, Bennett MJ, Noce TE, Tinsley JC (2005) Shear wave velocity of surficial geologic sediments in northern California: statistical distributions and depth dependence. Earthq Spectra 21(1):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (1991) Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites. A report to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, University of California at Davis, September, revised March 1993

  • International Code Council, ICC (2009) International Building Code. Structural and fire- and life-safety provisions (seismic, wind, accessibility, egress, occupancy and roof codes), Whittier, CA

  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P (2004) Site-dependent spectra derived from ground motion records in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 20(4):1111–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçkar MK (2006) Engineering geological and geotechnical site characterization and determination of the seismic hazards of Upper Pliocene and Quaternary deposits situated towards the west of Ankara. Ph.D. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara

  • Koçkar MK, Akgün H (2007) Evaluation of site characterizations and site effects of the Ankara Basin, Turkey. In: Kyriazis D. Pitilakis (eds) 4th International conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-conference, June 25–28 Thessaloniki, Greece, Springer, Berlin. ISBN: 978-14020-5892-9, Paper ID: 1241: 1-10

  • Koçkar MK, Akgün H (2008) Development of a geotechnical and geophysical database for seismic zonation of the Ankara Basin, Turkey. Environ Geol 55(1):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçkar MK, Akgün H (2012) Evaluation of site effects of the Ankara Basin, Turkey. J Appl Geophys 83:120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçkar MK, Akgün H, Rathje EM (2008) Evaluation of site conditions for the Ankara Basin of Turkey based on seismic site characterization. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China, ID No: 07-0197

  • Koçkar MK, Akgün H, Rathje EM (2010) Evaluation of site conditions for the Ankara basin of Turkey based on seismic site characterization of near-Surface geologic materials. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A (2008) The earthquake sources in Ankara and its surroundings. Workshop for Earthquake Hazard and Risk of Ankara, Workshop Book, Gazi University, March 19, Ankara, pp 34–53 (in Turkish)

  • Koçyiğit A (2009) Seismicity of Ankara and source of the 2005–2007 Afşar (Bala-Ankara) earthquake. Map Mag 141(1):1–12 (in Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • KOERI (2010) Earthquake Records. Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/map/tr/index.html

  • Okada H (2003) The microtremor survey method, Geophysical Monograph Series no. 12. Published by Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), Tulsa

  • Özbey C, Sarı A, Manuel L, Erdik M, Fahjan Y (2004) An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampal S, Özmen B, Başkaya G, Gel AC, İnan E (2007) Development of weak and strong motion station in and around the Ankara. Gazi University, Scientific Research Project, BAP-00/2007-01 (in Turkish)

  • Park S, Elrick S (1998) Predictions of shear wave velocities in southern California using surface geology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:677–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multi-channel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64(3):800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J, Ivanov J (2007) Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW)-active and passive methods. Lead Edge TLE 26(1):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullammanappallil S, Honjas W, Louie JN (2003) Determination of 1-D shear wave velocities using the refraction microtremor method. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on the application of geophysical methodologies and NDT to transportation and infrastructure, Orlando, Florida

  • Rathje EM (2004) Evaluation of site effects during the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake and its Aftershocks. Final Project Report to United States Geological Survey Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program; USGS- Award No. 03HQGR0040

  • Rathje EM, Stokoe KH, Rosenblad BL (2003) Strong motion station characterization and site effects during the 1999 Earthquakes in Turkey. Earthq Spectra 19(3):653–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Koçkar MK, Özbey MC (2005) Observed site effects during the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake and its aftershocks. Seismol Res Lett 76(2):238

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix GJ (2005) Near-surface site characterization using surface waves, surface waves in geomechanics—direct and inverse modeling for soil and rocks. Lai CG, Wilmanski K (ed) CISM Lecture Notes, Springer, Wien-Newyork

  • Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA (2001) An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra 17(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Earthq Spectra 17(1):199–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan O, Tapırdamaz C, Ergintav S, İnan S, İravul Y, Saatçılar R et al (2010) Bala (Ankara) earthquakes: implications for shallow crustal deformation in Central Anatolian Section of the Anatolian Platelet (Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 19:449–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokimatsu K (1997) Geotechnical site characterization using surface waves. In: Ishihara K (ed) Proceedings of 1st international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN: 90 5410 578X, 3:1333-1368

  • Turkish Building Code (1998) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Prime Ministry and Emergency Management Presidency, Earthquake Department (formerly Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, General Directorate of Disaster Affairs), Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Wills CJ, Clahan KB (2006) Developing a map of geologically defined site- condition categories for California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(4A):1483–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills CJ, Petersen M, Bryant WA, Reichle M, Saucedo GJ, Tan S et al (2000) A site- conditions map for California based on geology and shear wave velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6B):S187–S208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills CJ, Gutierrez CI, Perez FG, Branum DM (2015) A next generation VS30 map for California based on geology and topography. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105(6):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express his gratitude to Professor Haluk Akgün for his invaluable comments and suggestions that helped to improve the manuscript. The author would also like to express his gratitude to Mr. A. Mert Eker and Mr. Karim Yousefi-Bavil who aided in the processing of the surface wave testing results, to Mr. Hakan Felek who provided field assistance and conducted the surface seismic testing studies and to Mrs Arzu Arslan-Kelam who provided assistance. Additionally, the author would like to acknowledge Mr. Ulubey Çeken who supplied the strong motion data from the temporary stations of AFAD-ED that were installed during the Bala earthquake series. The author would like to acknowledge the anonymous Reviewers for the excellent comments and suggestions that led to the improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kerem Koçkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçkar, M.K. Site characterization of the strong motion stations and evaluation of site effects in the Ankara region during the December 2007 and March 2008 moderate Bala earthquakes. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5921-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5921-x

Keywords

Navigation