Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vermicomposting of Green Organic Wastes Using Eisenia Fetida Under Field Conditions: a Case Study of a Green Campus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green leafy vegetables are part of the Mediterranean and Middle East diets, which generate tonnes of green leafy waste. Massive production of such wastes is a challenge for policymakers, scientists, and urban local bodies to use them in a sustainable manner to convert them into valuable products. Higher education institutions such as universities are among the sectors that produce considerable quantities of organic waste daily, generated from restaurants and cafeterias. Hence, this study explores the waste treatment of university campuses using a biotechnological approach, i.e., vermicomposting technology, for sustainable management. In this study, vermicomposting was carried out using three types of green wastes [Persian-Leek (Allium ampeloprasum var. persicum), Parsley (Petroselinum crispum), and Dill (Anthemum graveolens)] obtained from restaurants and cafeterias operating on a university campus. The experiment was conducted by preparing different treatments using green vegetable wastes in different ratios with paper waste and animal manure and vermicomposted using the epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. The results showed that the earthworms could not survive in 100% vegetable waste due to the feed's high moisture and nutrient content. Additionally, a mixture containing 50%, 25%, and 25% vegetable waste, cow dung, and paper waste is compatible with an efficient vermicomposting process. Parsley supported earthworm survival for 45 days. Moreover, the microbial assay showed that the vermicompost contained less than 3 CFU g−1 Salmonella sp. This confirms that the obtained vermicompost is safe for agricultural use. Therefore, vermicomposting fresh vegetable waste is a viable process to achieve the aim of a green campus.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Starovoytova, D.M.: Solid waste management (SWM) at a university campus (part 1/10): comprehensive-review on legal framework and background to waste management, at a global context. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 8(4), 2225–0948 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bringhenti, J.R., et al.: Organic waste composting and vermicomposting as sustainable practice in higher education institutions. In: Towards green campus operations, pp. 159–173. Springer (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Setyowati, M., Kusumawanto, A., Prasetya, A.: Study of waste management towards sustainable green campus in Universitas Gadjah Mada. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smyth, D.P., Fredeen, A.L., Booth, A.L.: Reducing solid waste in higher education: the first step towards ‘greening’a university campus. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 54(11), 1007–1016 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolong, N., Saad, I.: Characterization of university residential and canteen solid waste for composting and vermicomposting development. In: Green engineering for campus sustainability, pp. 193–206. Springer (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Torrijos, V., Dopico, D.C., Soto, M.: Integration of food waste composting and vegetable gardens in a university campus. J. Clean. Prod. 315, 128175 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, U., Jha, S., Lal, S.P.: Divulging satisfaction levels of residents for household waste management through vermicomposting at Dr. Rajendra prasad central agricultural university: a cross-sectional exploration. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 39(21), 48–55 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahçelioğlu, E., et al.: Integrated solid waste management strategy of a large campus: a comprehensive study on METU campus Turkey. J. Clean. Prod. 265, 121715 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu, Y., et al.: Environmental footprint assessment of green campus from a food-water-energy nexus perspective. Energy Procedia 152, 240–246 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ridhosari, B., Rahman, A.: Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 246, 119172 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fissi, S., et al.: The path toward a sustainable green university: the case of the University of Florence. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123655 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adeniran, A., Nubi, A., Adelopo, A.: Solid waste generation and characterization in the University of Lagos for a sustainable waste management. Waste Manage. 67, 3–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alias, F.S., et al.: Enhancing the potential of recyclables waste collection through waste bank programme experience from Hei in Malaysia. Plan. Malays. (2019). https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v17.i10.637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Montagnese, C., et al.: Food-based dietary guidelines around the world: eastern mediterranean and middle eastern countries. Nutrients 11(6), 1325 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coker, A., et al.: Solid waste management practices at a private institution of higher learning in Nigeria. Procedia Environ. Sci. 35, 28–39 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dery, F., Kuusaana, E., Owusu-Sekyere, E.: Solid waste characterization and recycling potential for university campuses in ghana: case study of two Ghanaian Universities. J. Waste Recycl. 3(1), 3 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Domínguez, J.: Earthworms and vermicomposting, pp. 63–77. Earthworms the ecological engineers of soil, Intech (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adi, A., Noor, Z.: Waste recycling: utilization of coffee grounds and kitchen waste in vermicomposting. Biores. Technol. 100(2), 1027–1030 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prakash, E.V., Singh, L.P.: Biomethanation of vegetable and fruit waste in co-digestion process. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 3(6), 493–495 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rupani, P.F., et al.: Effects of different vermicompost extracts of palm oil mill effluent and palm-pressed fiber mixture on seed germination of mung bean and its relative toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25(36), 35805–35810 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alshehrei, F., Ameen, F.: Vermicomposting: a management tool to mitigate solid waste. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(6), 3284–3293 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Budroni, M., et al.: Composition and functional profiling of the microbiota in the casts of Eisenia fetida during vermicomposting of brewers’ spent grains. Biotechnol. Rep. 25, e00439 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Badhwar, V.K., Singh, C.: Cow dung and tea waste amendments enhance the biotransformation of textile mill sludge into vermicomposts using Eisenia fetida. Res. Sq. (2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-438691/v1

  24. Nurhidayati, N., Usman, A., Muwarni, I.: Chemical composition of vermicompost made from organic wastes through the vermicomposting and composting with the addition of fish meal and egg shells flour. Universitas Islam Malang, Inst. Rep. (2017). https://jpacr.ub.ac.id/index.php/jpacr/article/view/309/pdf

  25. Chaudhuri, P., Debnath, S.: Physico-chemical changes during vermicomposting of a terrestrial weed, mikania micrantha and leaf litters of acacia auricutiformis and bambusa polymorpha mixed with cowdung. J. Environ. Biol. 41(2), 178–185 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thamizharasan, A., Mohan, A., Gajalakshmi, S.: Nutrient dynamics and assessment of nitrogen-fixing bacteria during vermicomposting of leaf litter of neem (Azadirachta indica) using two epigeic earthworms. J. Appl. Hortic. 23(1), 46–49 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prakash Duwadi, D., et al.: Utilization of different horticultural waste materials for vermicomposting by using Eisenia fetida in Mandhana Kanpur-UP, India. Pharma Innov. J. 10(9), 1201–1206 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rupani, P.F., Ibrahim, M.H., Ismail, S.A.: Vermicomposting biotechnology: recycling of palm oil mill wastes into valuable products. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2(1), 10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rupani, P.F., et al.: Recycling of palm oil industrial wastes using vermicomposting technology: its kinetics study and environmental application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24(14), 12982–12990 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rupani, P.F., Mohd Fadhil, M.D., Kanhere, Z.D.: Sustainable management of different organic waste by vermicomposting technology. Int. J. Agric. Technol. 9(3), 529–539 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bansal, S., Kapoor, K.: Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Biores. Technol. 73(2), 95–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Donoghue, D., Winn, E.: Comparison of the MSRV method with an in-house conventional method for the detection of Salmonella in various high and low moisture foods. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 17(4), 174–177 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gómez-Brandón, M., Lores, M., Domínguez, J.: Changes in chemical and microbiological properties of rabbit manure in a continuous-feeding vermicomposting system. Biores. Technol. 128, 310–316 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pramanik, P., Ghosh, G.K., Chung, Y.R.: Changes in nutrient content, enzymatic activities and microbial properties of lateritic soil due to application of different vermicomposts: a comparative study of ergosterol and chitin to determine fungal biomass in soil. Soil Use Manag. 26(4), 508–515 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Corti, G., et al.: Use of waste materials to improve soil fertility and increase crop quality and quantity. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. Hindawi (2012)

  36. Singh, S., et al.: Earthworms converting milk processing industry sludge into biomanure. Open Waste Manag. J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.2174/1876400201710010030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karwal, M., Kaushik, A.: Bioconversion of lawn waste amended with kitchen waste and buffalo dung in to value-added vermicompost using Eisenia foetida to alleviate landfill burden. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 23(1), 358–370 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Deka, H., et al.: Vermicomposting potentiality of Perionyx excavatus for recycling of waste biomass of java citronella-an aromatic oil yielding plant. Biores. Technol. 102, 11212–11217 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramnarain, Y.I., Ansari, A.A., Ori, L.: Vermicomposting of different organic materials using the epigeic earthworm Eisenia foetida. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 8(1), 23–36 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cui, Y., et al.: Losses and transformations of nitrogen at low value of C/N ratio compost. Russ. Agric. Sci. 45(6), 543–549 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lv, B., et al.: Effects of C/N ratio and earthworms on greenhouse gas emissions during vermicomposting of sewage sludge. Biores. Technol. 268, 408–414 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gupta, R., Garg, V.K.: Stabilization of primary sewage sludge during vermicomposting. J. Hazard. Mater. 153(3), 1023–1030 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. García-Sánchez, M., et al.: Stabilization of different starting materials through vermicomposting in a continuous-feeding system: changes in chemical and biological parameters. Waste Manage. 62, 33–42 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dominguez, J., Edwards, C.: Vermicomposting organic wastes: a review. In: Shakir Hanna SH, Mikhail WZA (eds.) Soil Zoology for Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, pp. 369–395. Cairo (2004).

  45. Ge, S., et al.: Characteristics of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and C/N ratio in chinese apple orchards. Open J. Soil Sci. 03(05), 213–217 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yadav, A., Garg, V.: Feasibility of nutrient recovery from industrial sludge by vermicomposting technology. J. Hazard. Mater. 168(1), 262–268 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jiang, T., et al.: Effect of C/N ratio, aeration rate and moisture content on ammonia and greenhouse gas emission during the composting. J. Environ. Sci. 23(10), 1754–1760 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Garg, V.K., Kaushik, P., Yadav, Y.K.: Effect of stocking density and food quality on the growth and fecundity of an epigeic earthworm (Eisenia fetida) during vermicomposting. Environmentalist 28(4), 483–488 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Suthar, S.: Earthworm production in cattle dung vermicomposting system under different stocking density loads. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 19(3), 748–755 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Edwards, C., Lofty, J.: Effects of earthworm inoculation upon the root growth of direct drilled cereals. J. Appl. Ecol. 533–543 (1980)

  51. Christensen, O.: The direct effects of earthworms on nitrogen turnover in cultivated soils. Ecol. Bull. 41–44 (1988)

  52. Fattorusso, E., et al.: The flavonoids of leek, allium porrum. Phytochemistry 57(4), 565–569 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bernaert, N., et al.: Antioxidant capacity, total phenolic and ascorbate content as a function of the genetic diversity of leek (Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum). Food chem. 134(2), 669–677 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Fatoorechi, V., Rismanchi, M., Nasrollahzadeh, J.: Effects of Persian leek (Allium ampeloprasum) on hepatic lipids and the expression of proinflammatory gene in hamsters fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet. Avicenna J. Phytomedicine 6(4), 418 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Miri, S.M. and A. Roughani. Allium species growing in Iran: Chemical compositions and pharmacological activity. In: Proceedings of the First National Congress and International Fair of medicinal plants and strategies for persian medicine that affect diabetes, October 2018.

  56. Villar, I., et al.: Changes in microbial dynamics during vermicomposting of fresh and composted sewage sludge. Waste Manage. 48, 409–417 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Demoling, F., Figueroa, D., Bååth, E.: Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39(10), 2485–2495 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Domínguez, J., et al.: Changes in the composition and function of bacterial communities during vermicomposting may explain beneficial properties of vermicompost. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–11 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, Y., et al.: Speciation of heavy metals and bacteria in cow dung after vermicomposting by the earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Bioresour. Technol. 245, 411–418 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ravindran, B., et al.: Influence of microbial diversity and plant growth hormones in compost and vermicompost from fermented tannery waste. Bioresour. Technol. 217, 200–204 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Monroy, F., Aira, M., Domínguez, J.: Reduction of total coliform numbers during vermicomposting is caused by short-term direct effects of earthworms on microorganisms and depends on the dose of application of pig slurry. Sci. Total Environ. 407(20), 5411–5416 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No funds received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Process and Environmental Technology Lab, KU Leuven, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium

    Parveen Fatemeh Rupani, Raf Dewil & Lise Appels

  2. Department of Environmental Health, Wollo University, 1145, Dessie, Amhara, Ethiopia

    Asha Embrandiri

  3. Centre for Environmental Sciences and Technology, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India

    Vinod Kumar Garg

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Madjid Abbaspour

  5. Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Raf Dewil

Authors
  1. Parveen Fatemeh Rupani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asha Embrandiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinod Kumar Garg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Madjid Abbaspour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raf Dewil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lise Appels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parveen Fatemeh Rupani.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rupani, P.F., Embrandiri, A., Garg, V.K. et al. Vermicomposting of Green Organic Wastes Using Eisenia Fetida Under Field Conditions: a Case Study of a Green Campus. Waste Biomass Valor 14, 2519–2530 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-02004-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-02004-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation