Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of Dose Rates to Non-human Biota of Terrestrial Environment around Kaiga Generating Station, Kaiga

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the radiological impact of naturally occurring radionuclides (238U and 232Th) and fallout radionuclide (137Cs) in the soil around the Kaiga Generating Station (KGS), Kaiga, on the terrestrial non-human biota was investigated. Through the analysis of 113 soil samples collected from 2015 to 2021, the study determined mean activity concentrations of 2.9 ± 1.4, 19.6 ± 5.2, and 24.1 ± 4.3 Bq kg−1 d.w. for 137Cs, 238U, and 232Th, respectively, in surface soil samples. Utilizing the ERICA assessment tool (v2.0) and employing the Tier-2 approach, the study estimated radiological doses to reference organisms in the terrestrial ecosystem around Kaiga. Lichens and bryophytes exhibited the highest activity concentrations for 137Cs, 238U, and 232Th, while annelids showed the lowest activity for 137Cs, and for 238U and 232Th, amphibians exhibited the minimum activity. The total dose rates (internal + external) ranged from 1.9E−03 to 6.7E−01 µGy h−1. Despite the highest dose rate of 6.7E−01 µGy h−1 observed in lichen and bryophytes, all assessed dose rates remained below the ERICA screening level of 10 µGy h−1. Risk quotient values for all reference organisms were less than 1 (RQ < 1), indicating negligible risk to non-human biota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Sotiropoulou, H. Florou and M. Manolopoulou, Radioactivity measurements and dose-rate calculations using ERICA tool in the terrestrial environment of Greece. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23 (2016) 10872–10882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ICRP, The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, ICRP publication 103, Ann. ICRP 37, Oxford, (2007).

  3. J. Petrovic, M. Dordevic, R. Dragovic, B. Gajic and S. Dragovic, Assessment of radiation exposure to human and non-human biota due to natural radionuclides in terrestrial environment of Belgrade, the capital of Serbia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(7) (2018) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Vives i Batlle, M. Balonov, K. Beaugelin-Seiller, N.A. Beresford, J. Brown, J.J. Cheng et al., Intercomparison of absorbed dose-rates for non-human biota. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 46(4) (2007) 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Vives i Batlle, K. Beaugelin-Seiller, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, J. Horyna, A. Hosseini et al., The estimation of absorbed dose-rates for non-human biota: an extended intercomparison. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 50(2) (2011) 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N.A. Beresford, C.L. Barnett, J.E. Brown, J.J. Cheng, D. Copplestone, V. Filistovic et al., Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in nonhuman biota. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 47(4) (2008) 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B.J. Howard and C.M. Larsson, The ERICA Integrated Approach and its contribution to protection of the environment from ionising radiation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99(9) (2008) 1361–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Gomina, M. T. Kolo, O. I. Olarinoye, M. Bashir, I. K. Suleiman and A. S. Gene, Assessment of non-human biota dose at the El Amin University proposed site, Minna, Nigeria, ICRP Digital Workshop on the System of Radiological Protection, 14 October–3 November, (2021). https://icrp.org/page.asp?id=527.

  9. E.M. Karimullina, L.N. Mikhailovskaya, E.V. Antonova and V.N. Pozolotina, Radionuclide uptake and dose assessment of 14 herbaceous species from the east-Ural radioactive trace area using the ERICA Tool. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(14) (2018) 13975–13987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Mazeika, D. Marciulioniene, T. Nedveckaite and O. Jefanova, The assessment of ionising radiation impact on the cooling pond freshwater ecosystem non-human biota from the Ignalina NPP operation beginning to shut down and initial decommissioning. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 151 (2016) 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Torudd and P. Saetre, Assessment of long-term radiological effects on plants and animals from a deep geological repository: no discernible impact detected. Ambio, 42(4) (2013) 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0403-9.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N.A. Beresford, J. Brown, D. Copplestone, J. Garnier-Laplace, B. Howard, C-M. Larssonet et al., D-ERICA: an integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application, A Deliverable Report for the Project ERICA (2007) (Contract No. FI6R-CT-2004-508847).

  13. J.E. Brown, B. Alfonso, R. Avila, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, G. Prohl and A. Ulanovsky, The ERICA tool. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99 (2008) 1371–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C-M. Larsson, An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99 (2008) 1364–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ERICA Assessment Tool 2.0, available from: www.erica-tool.com.

  16. A.K. Patra, J. Sudhakar, P.M. Ravi, J.P. James, A.G. Hegde and M.L. Joshi, Natural radioactivity distribution in geological matrices around Kaiga environment. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 270 (2006) 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.P. James, B.N. Dileep, R.M. Mulla, R.M. Joshi, M.S. Vishnu, P.D. Nayak et al., Evaluation of internal dose to members of the public at the Kaiga site, India, due to the ingestion of primordial radionuclide 40K. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 153(1) (2013) 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Hazou, C.J. Guembou Shouop, E.J. Nguelem Mekongtso, M. Ndontchueng Moyo, J.F. Beyala Ateba and P.K. Tchakpele, Preliminary assessment of natural radioactivity and associate radiation hazards in a phosphate mining site in southern area of Togo. Radiation Detection Technology and Methods, 3 (2019) 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. InterWinner 6.0 https://www.itech-instruments.com/InterWinner_E.html, Accessed on 11.04.2021.

  20. ERICA Assessment Tool Help, 2021, ERICA Assessment Tool 2.0, Available from: www.erica-tool.com.

  21. N.A. Beresford, C.L. Barnett, B.J. Howard, W.A. Scott, J.E. Brown and D. Copplestone, Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99 (2008) 1393–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.E. Brown, N.A. Beresford and A. Hosseini, Approaches to providing missing transfer parameter values in the ERICA tool—how well do they work? Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 126 (2013) 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wildlife Transfer Parameter Database, WTD, 2020. Available from: www.wildlifetransferdatabase.org/.

  24. ICRP, Dose coefficients for nonhuman biota environmentally exposed to radiation, ICRP Publication 136. Ann. ICRP 46(2) (2017).

  25. UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, report to the general assembly with scientific annexes, vol 1: sources, UNSCEAR 2000, United Nation, New York, (2000).

  26. Pre-operational environmental radiological and micrometeorological studies around Kaiga atomic power project site. BARC/1999/E/023, 1999, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

  27. M. Saniewski, P. Wietrzyk-Pelka, T. Zalewska, M. Olech and M.H. Wegrzyn, Bryophytes and lichens as fallout originated radionuclide indicators in the Svalbard archipelago (High Arctic). Polar Science, 25 (2020) 100536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Vandenhove, J.V. i Batlle and L. Sweeck, Potential radiological impact of the phosphate industry on wildlife. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 141 (2015) 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Hosseini, J.E. Brown, M. Dowdall, W. Standring and P. Strand, Application of an environmental impact assessment methodology to a site discharging low levels of radioactivity to a freshwater environment in Norway. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173 (2011) 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Cujic and S. Dragovic, Assessment of dose rate to terrestrial biota in the area around coal fired power plant applying ERICA tool and RESRAD BIOTA code. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 188 (2017) 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. G.M. Woodwell and T.P. Gannutza, Effects of chronic gamma irradiation on lichen communities of a forest. American Journal of Botany, 54(10) (1967) 1210–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Copplestone, J. Hingston and A. Real, The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 99 (2008) 1456–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Cerne, B. Smodis, M. Strok and L. Benedik, Radiation impact assessment on wildlife from an uranium mine area. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 246 (2012) 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. US DOE, A graded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota, DOE-STD-1153. US DOE, Washington (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanyam Jain.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, S., Joshi, R.M., Ajith, T.L. et al. Assessment of Dose Rates to Non-human Biota of Terrestrial Environment around Kaiga Generating Station, Kaiga. MAPAN (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00719-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00719-w

Keywords

Navigation