Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties of MCM-41 Silica Nanoparticles Obtained from Recycled Glass and TEOS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Silicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are wide applications that can be given to MCM-41 type silica nanoparticles. On the other hand, glass waste is produced in large quantities and is difficult to remove. Therefore, in this research work, the physicochemical properties of silica nanoparticles with mesoporous hexagonal structure type MCM-41 synthesized by alkaline sol-gel with sodium silicate (SS) obtained from recycled glass are compared against them synthesized at the same conditions but with commercial tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS). To obtain sodium silicate, an alkaline fusion process was performed and confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The products of the sol-gel synthesis were analyzed by low-angle X-ray diffraction (SAXRD), adsorption-desorption of N2, SEM and FTIR. The results show that, through the alkaline fusion process, the glass waste can be converted to sodium silicate and therefore can be used for the synthesis of MCM-41 type nanoparticles with physicochemical characteristics very similar to that obtained with commercial TEOS, as it was found that using SS as precursor spherical nanoparticles with a certain agglomeration can be obtained and that these particles have the hexagonal pore structure as the TEOS obtained particles, with a low broadening of the interplanar spaces and cell parameter; also, was observed that the surface properties are almost the same for samples obtained with both precursors. Therefore, the MCM-41 nanoparticles synthesized with glass waste could be used in any application in which this type of structure could be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is contained within the article.

References

  1. Medeiros de Paula G, de Paula L, Freire Rodrigues MG (2022) Production of MCM-41 and SBA-15 hybrid silicas from industrial waste. Silicon 14:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00831-5

  2. INEGI (2019) Censo Nacional de Gobiernos Municipales y Demarcaciones Territoriales de la Ciudad de Mexico 2019. México

  3. Keawthun M, Krachodnok S, Chaisena A (2014) Conversion of waste glasses into sodium silicate solutions. Int J Chem Sci 12:83–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodier L, Savastano H (2018) Use of glass powder residue for the elaboration of eco-efficient cementitious materials. J Clean Prod 184:333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.02.269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yurdakul A, Gunkaya G, Dolekcekic E, Kavas T, Karasu B (2015) Novel glass compositions for fiber drawing. Ceram Int 41:13105–13114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2015.07.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sari Yilmaz M, Karamahmut N, Mermer (2016) Conversion of fly ashes from different regions to mesoporous silica: effect of the mineralogical composition. J Solgel Sci Technol 78:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-3963-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akbar H, Krishan G, Prajapati SD, Saini R (2016) Determination of reactive silica (SiO2) of fly ash. Rasayan J Chem 9:27–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu ZS, Li WK, Huang CY (2014) Synthesis of mesoporous silica materials from municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash. Waste Manag 34:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chandrasekar G, You KS, Ahn JW, Ahn WS (2008) Synthesis of hexagonal and cubic mesoporous silica using power plant bottom ash. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 111:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Foletto EL, Gratieri E, de Oliveira LH, Jahn SL (2006) Conversion of rice hull ash into soluble sodium silicate. Mater Res 9:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392006000300014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin LY, Bai H (2013) Efficient method for recycling silica materials from waste powder of the photonic industry. Environ Sci Technol 47:4636–4643. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301504w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee YR, Soe JT, Zhang S, Ahn JW, Park MB, Ahn WS (2017) Synthesis of nanoporous materials via recycling coal fly ash and other solid wastes: A mini review. Chem Eng J 317:821–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandrasekar G, Ahn WS (2008) Synthesis of cubic mesoporous silica and carbon using fly ash. J Non Cryst Solids 354:4027–4030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Majchrzak-Kucȩba I, Nowak W (2011) Characterization of MCM-41 mesoporous materials derived from polish fly ashes. Int J Miner Process 101:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2011.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arumugam A, Ponnusami V (2013) Synthesis of SBA-15 from low cost silica precursor obtained from sugarcane leaf ash and its application as a support matrix for lipase in biodiesel production. J Solgel Sci Technol 67:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-013-3070-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kresge C, Leonowicz M, Rot W et al (1992) Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 359:710–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/359710a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Talavera-Pech WA, Ávila-Ortega A, Pacheco-Catalán D, Quintana-Owen P, Barrón-Zambrano JA (2019) Effect of functionalization synthesis type of amino-MCM-41 mesoporous silica nanoparticles on its RB5 adsorption capacity and kinetics. Silicon 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9975-0

  18. Baccile N, Grosso D, Sanchez C (2003) Aerosol generated mesoporous silica particles. J Mater Chem 13:3011–3016. https://doi.org/10.1039/B307757H

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Iskandar F, Gradon L, Okuyama K (2003) Control of the morphology of nanostructured particles prepared by the spray drying of a nanoparticle sol. J Colloid Interface Sci 265:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00519-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosuge K, Sato T, Kikukawa N, Takemori M (2004) Morphological control of rod- and fiberlike SBA-15 type mesoporous silica using water-soluble sodium silicate. Chem Mater 16:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1021/CM030622U

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hung C, Bai H, Karthik M (2009) Ordered mesoporous silica particles and Si-MCM-41 for the adsorption of acetone: A comparative study. Sep Purif Technol 64:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2008.10.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Karthik M, Lin LY, Bai H(2009) Bifunctional mesoporous Cu–Al–MCM-41 materials for the simultaneous catalytic abatement of NOx and VOCs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 117:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROMESO.2008.06.016

  23. Szegedi A, Popova M, Goshev I, Mihály J (2011) Effect of amine functionalization of spherical MCM-41 and SBA-15 on controlled drug release. J Solid State Chem 184:1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSSC.2011.03.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma L, Ji J, Yu F, Ai N, Jiang H (2013) Post-synthesis of TiO 2/MCM-41 from aqueous TiCl 4 solution: Structure characteristics and epoxy catalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 165:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.05.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kang JK, Park JA, Kim JH, Lee CG, Kim SB (2016) Surface functionalization of mesoporous silica MCM-41 with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane for dye removal: kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies. Desalin Water Treat 57:7066–7078. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1014856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mello MR, Phanon D, Silveira GQ, Llewellyn PL, Ronconi CM (2011) Amine-modified MCM-41 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 143:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.02.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Benhamou A, Basly JP, Baudu M, Derriche Z, Hamacha R (2013) Amino-functionalized MCM-41 and MCM-48 for the removal of chromate and arsenate. J Colloid Interface Sci 404:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.04.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Han A, Qiao Y (2007) Effects of surface treatment of MCM-41 on motions of confined liquids. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:5743–5746. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/18/035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abo-El-Enein SA, Eissa MA, Diafullah AA, Rizk MA, Mohamed FM (2009) Removal of some heavy metals ions from wastewater by copolymer of iron and aluminum impregnated with active silica derived from rice husk ash. J Hazard Mater 172:574–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nordström J, Nilsson E, Jarvol P, Nayeri M, Palmqvist A, Bergenholtz J, Matic A (2011) Concentration- and pH-dependence of highly alkaline sodium silicate solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 356:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.12.085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li B, Li H, Zhang X, Fan P, Liu L, Li B, Dong W, Zhao B(2019) Calcined sodium silicate as an efficient and benign heterogeneous catalyst for the transesterification of natural lecithin to L-α-glycerophosphocholine. Green Process Synth 878–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2017-0190

  32. Vinai R, Soutsos M (2019) Production of sodium silicate powder from waste glass cullet for alkali activation of alternative binders. Cem Concr Res 116:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meka AK, Niu Y, Karmakar S, Hartono B, Zhang J (2016) Facile synthesis of large-pore bicontinuous cubic mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular gene delivery. 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.201600021

  34. Varache M, Bezverkhyy I, Saviot L, Bouyer F, Baras F, Bouyer F (2015) Optimization of MCM-41 type silica nanoparticles for biological applications: Control of size and absence of aggregation and cell cytotoxicity. J Non Cryst Solids 408:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.10.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Talavera-Pech WA, Esparza-Ruiz A, Quintana-Owen P, Vilchis-Nestor AR, Carrera-Figueiras C, Ávila-Ortega A (2016) Effects of different amounts of APTES on physicochemical and structural properties of amino-functionalized MCM-41-MSNs. J Solgel Sci Technol 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-4163-4

  36. Kleitz F, Schmidt W, Schüth F (2003) Calcination behavior of different surfactant-templated mesostructured silica materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 65:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00506-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vivero-escoto JL (2009) Surface functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular drug delivery. Graduate theses and dissertations. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd

  38. Smarsly B, Gibaud A, Ruland W, Sturmayr D, Brinker CJ (2005) Quantitative SAXS analysis of oriented 2D hexagonal cylindrical silica mesostructures in thin films obtained from nonionic surfactants. Langmuir 21:3858–3866. https://doi.org/10.1021/la046916r

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The XRD analyses were carried out at the National Laboratory of Nano and Biomaterials, Cinvestav-IPN; funded by the projects FOMIX-Yucatán 2008-108160, CONACYT LAB-2009-01-123913, 292692, 294643, 188345 and 204822. Thanks are due to Dra. Patricia Quintana-Owen for the access to LANNBIO, to M.C. Daniel Aguilar Treviño for obtaining the diffractograms, and to Eng. Emilio Corona for corrective maintenance of the D-8 Advance diffractometer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Ramírez-Arévalo, Pérez-López, and Talavera-Pech; methodology, material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Ramírez-Arévalo, Quintana-Owen, Fajardo-San Miguel, and Talavera-Pech; investigation: Ramírez-Arévalo; resources, Pérez-López, and Talavera-Pech; writing—original draft preparation, Talavera-Pech; writing—review and editing Quintana-Owen, Fajardo San-Miguel, and Pérez-López. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Talavera-Pech.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable, the research did not involve human participants and/or animals.

Consent to Participate

All authors have agreed to participate in this research.

Consent for Publication

The article was written by the named authors, who are all aware of its content and have given their permission to be published.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Statement of Novelty

This article addressed a new approach to recycling waste glass giving it new properties as a nanomaterial and demonstrating that using the same synthesis procedure, the nanomaterials synthesized from this refuse could give almost the same properties as nanomaterials obtained from a commercial product.

In this work, we synthesize and compare the physicochemical properties of MCM-41 silica nanoparticles obtained from (1) sodium silicate (SS) from a recycled glass of our institution and (2) commercial TEOS. The results showed that using the same procedure synthesis, there is no difference in the morphological, structural, and surface properties of synthesized materials regardless of whether they were obtained with a comercial TEOS or with SS from recycled glass.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez-Arévalo, M.S., Pérez-López, T., Quintana-Owen, P. et al. Comparative Study of Physicochemical Properties of MCM-41 Silica Nanoparticles Obtained from Recycled Glass and TEOS. Silicon 15, 2653–2661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02206-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02206-4

Keywords

Navigation