Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosocial mediators between socioeconomic status and dietary habits among Japanese older adults

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Introduction: Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine psychosocial mediators between socioeconomic status (SES) and eating habits in older Japanese adults.

Subjects and methods

A questionnaire was mailed to a representative sample of people who were 60 years and older (N=1,000) living in a suburban area within the Tokyo city metropolitan limits, in Japan. There were 552 effective participants in the study.

Design

Dietary habits were evaluated by assessing the diversity of food that was consumed. SES was evaluated by educational attainment and household income. Four dimensions of psychosocial mediators were assessed: control expectancy, self-efficacy, social influence, and social support. Indirect effects of SES through the mediators were evaluated by using a multiple mediator model.

Results

The relationship between education and dietary habits was mediated by three variables excluding social support. Especially, social influence had the strongest mediating effect. These three significant variables explained the majority of differences in dietary habits resulting from education. The effects of household income were also similarly mediated by the identical variables.

Conclusion

Control expectancy, self-efficacy, and social influence mediate the relationship between SES and dietary habits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marmot MG. Epidemiology of socioeconomic status and health: are determinants within countries the same as between countries? Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;986: 16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;896: 3–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert SA, House JS. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: integrating individual, community, and societal-level theory and research. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC (eds) The handbook of social studies in health and medicine, Sage Publication, London. 2000;pp.115–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, Amouzou A (2007) Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries: an overview. The World Bank, Washington, DC. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/IndicatorsOverview.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herd P, Robert SA, House JA. Health disparities among older adults: life course influences and policy solutions. In: Binstock RH, George LK (Eds) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, 7th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2011;pp 121–134.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. De Irala-Estevez J, Groth M. A systematic review of socioeconomic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:706–714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vlismas K, Stavrinos V, Panaquiotakos DB. Socio-economic status, dietary habits and health-related outcomes in various parts of the world: a review. Cent Eur J Public Health 2009;17(2):55–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raffensperger S, Kuczmarski MF, Hotchkiss L, Cotugna N, Evans MK, Zonderman AB. Effect of race and predictors of socioeconomic status on diet quality in the HANDLS Study sample. J Natl Me Assoc 2010;102:923–930

    Google Scholar 

  9. Houston DK, Johnson MA, Poon LW, Clayton GM. Individual food and food group patterns of the oldest old. J Nutr Elder 1994;13(4):5–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guthrie JF, Lin BH. Overview of the diets of lower- and higher-income elderly and their food assistance options. J Nutr Educ Behav 2002;34:S31–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen RT. Socioeconomic status, nutrition, and health among the elderly. In: Wise DA (Ed) Perspectives on the Economics of Aging. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2004;pp313–331

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bamia C, Orfanos P, Ferrai P et al. Dietary patterns among older Europeans: the EPIC-Elderly study. Br J Nutr 2005;94:100–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson S, Syddall H, Jameson K et al. Current patterns of diet in communitydwelling older men and women: results from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Age Aging 2009;38:594–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Katsarou A, Tyrovolas S, Psaltopoulou T et al. Socio-economic status, place of residence and dietary habits among the elderly: the Mediterranean islands study. Public Health Nutr http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2035361613(10):1614-21

  15. Dijkstra SCl, Neter JE, Brouwer IA et al. Adherence to dietary guideline for fruit, vegetables and fish among older Dutch adults; the role of education, income and job prestage. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;18(2):115–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. James WPT, Nelson M, Ralph A, Leather S. Socioeconomic determinants of health: The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. Br Med J 1997;314:1545–1549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith GD, Brunner E. Socio-economic differentials in health: the role of nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 1997;56:75–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dollman J, Ridley K, Magarey A, Martin M, Hemphill E. Dietary intake, physical activity and TV viewing as mediators of the association of socioeconomic status with body composition: a cross-sectional analysis of Australian youth. Int J Obes 2007;31:45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C et al. Dietary habits mediate the relationship between socio-economic status and CVD factors among healthy adults: the ATTICA study. Public Health Nutr 2008;11(12):1342–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodwin JS, Leonard AG, Hooper EM, Garry PJ. Concern about cholesterol and its association with diet in a group of healthy elderly. Nutr Res 1985;5:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas SE, Kendrick OW, Eddy JM. Modification of a nutrition questionnaire for older adults and the ability of its knowledge and attitude evaluations to predict dietary adequacy. J Nutr Elder 1990;9(4):35–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Howard JH, Gates GE, Ellersieck MR, Dowdy RP. Investigating relationships between nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and belief and dietary adequacy of the elderly. J Nutr Elder 1998;17(4):35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lahmann PH, Kumanyika SK. Attitudes about health and nutrition are more indicative of dietary quality in 50- to 75-year-old women than weight and appearance concerns. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99(4):475–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Parmenter K, Waller J, Wardle J. Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Educ Res 2000;15:163–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ball K, MacFarlane A, Crawford D, Savige G, Andrianopoulos N, Worsley A. Can social cognitive theory constructs explain socio-economic variations in adolescent eating behaviors? A mediation analysis. Health Edu Res 2009;24(3):496–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leganger A, Kraft P. Control constructs: do they mediate the relation between education al attainment and health behavior? J Health Psychol 2003;8:361–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Turrell G, Kavanagh AM. Socio-economic pathways to diet: modeling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behavior. Public Health Nutr 2005;9:375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore GF, Tapper K, Lynch R et al. Associations between deprivation, attitudes towards eating breakfast and breakfast eating behaviors in 9-11-year-olds. Public Health Nutr 2007;10(6): 582–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beydoun MA, Wang Y. How do socio-economic status, perceived economic barriers and nutrition benefits affect quality of dietary intake among US adults? Euro J Clin Nutr 2008;62:303–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychol Health 1999;14(3):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hupkens C, Knibbe R, Drop M. Social class differences in food consumption: the explanatory value of permissiveness and health and cost consideration. Eur J Public Health 2000;10:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindstrom M, Hanson BS, Wirfalt E, Ostergren PO. Socioeconomic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruits and fruit juices. Eur J Public Health 2011;11(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (Eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2002;pp185–209

    Google Scholar 

  34. House JS. Understanding social factors and inequalities in health: 20th century progress and 21st century prospects. J Health Soc Behav 2002;43:125–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Freeman and Company, New York,WH, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Baranowski T, Perry CL, Parcel GS. How individuals, environment, and health behavior interact. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (Eds) Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research, and Practice, 3rd ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2002;pp 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  38. Toner HM, Morris JD. A social-psychological perspective of dietary quality in later adulthood. J Nutr Elder 1992;11(4):35–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Duyn M, Kristal A, Dodd K et al. Association of awareness, intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, and stage of dietary change with fruit and vegetable consumption: a national survey. Am J Heath Promot 2000;16(2):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Inglis V, Ball K, Crawford D. Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviors than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration. Appetite 2005;45:334–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grundy E, Holt G. The socioeconomic status older adults: How should we measure it in studies of health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:895–904

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Statistical Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Historical data 3 in Labour Force Survey. http://www.stat.go.jp/data/roudou/longtime/03roudou.htm. Accessed 19 April 2014 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kumagai S, Watanabe S, Shibata H et al. Effects of dietary variety on declines in high-level functional capacity in elderly people living in a community. Japanese Journal of Public Health 2003;50(12):1117–1124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kant AK. Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:615–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Muthén, Muthén. Mplus User’s guide Los Angels, CA, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  46. Preacher KJ, Hayes AJ. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008;40(3):879–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yamazaki S, Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Household income is strongly associated with health-related quality of life among Japanese men but not women. Public Health 2005;119:561–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Committee Report of Japanese Society of Public Health. Monitoring and report of public health. Japanese Journal of Public Health 2011;58:564–568 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kobayashi J. Social stratification and food: analyses of effects on health. Sociological Theory and Methods 2010;25(1): 81–93 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cancer Control and Health Promotion Division, Health Service Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2013 The National Health and Nutrition Survey. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002q1st-att/2r9852000002q1wo.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2014 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lindstrom M, Hanson BS, Brunner E et al. Socioeconomic differences in fat intake in a middle-aged population: report from the Malimo Diet and Cancer Study. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:438–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Murray TC, Rodgers WM, Fraser SN. Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status, control beliefs and exercise behavior: a multiple mediator model. J Behav Med 2012;35:63–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ball K., Crawford D, Mishra G. Socio-economic inequalities in women’s fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutr 2006;9(5): 623–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sandersphillips K. Correlates of healthy eating habits in low-income Black women and Latinas. Prev Med 1994;23(6):781–787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Watters J, Satia JA, Galanko JA. Associations of psychosocial factors with fruits and vegetable intake among African-Americans. Public Health Nutr 2007;10(7): 701–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kelsey KS, Kirkley BG, DeVellis RF et al. Social support as a predictor of dietary changes in a low-income population. Health Educ Res 1996;11(3):383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sorensen G, Stoddard A, Macario E. Social support and readiness to make dietary changes. Health Educ Behav 1998;25(5):586–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fowles ER, Bryant M, Kim S. Predictors of dietary quality in low-income pregnant women: a path analysis. Nurs Res 2011;60:286–294.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Green KE. Sociodemographic factors and mail survey response. Psychol Market 1996;13(2):171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Hox JJ, De Leeuw ED. A comparison of nonrespondense in mail, telephone and faceface surveys. Qual and Quant 1994;28:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Morland K, Wing S, Diez Roux A. The context effect of the local food environment on residents’ diets: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Public health 2002;92:1761–1767.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Cohen JL, Lakey B, Tiell K, Neeley LC. Recipient-provider agreement on enacted support, perceived support, and provider personality. Psychol Assessment 2005;17:375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vollmann M, Antoniw K, Hartung FM, Renner B. Social support as mediators of the stress buffering effect of optimism: the importance of differentiating the recipients’ and providers’ perspective. Eur J Pers 2011;25:146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidehiro Sugisawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugisawa, H., Nomura, T. & Tomonaga, M. Psychosocial mediators between socioeconomic status and dietary habits among Japanese older adults. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 130–136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0521-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0521-5

Keywords

Navigation