Abstract
Numerous recent studies have demonstrated that the commensal microbiota plays an important role in host immunity against infections. During the infection process, viruses can exhibit substantial and close interactions with the commensal microbiota. However, the associated mechanism remains largely unknown. Therefore, in this study, we explored the specific mechanisms by which the commensal microbiota modulates host immunity against viral infections. We found that the expression levels of type I interferon (IFN-I) and antiviral priming were significantly downregulated following the depletion of the commensal microbiota due to treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics (ABX). In addition, we confirmed a unique molecular mechanism underlying the induction of IFN-I mediated by the commensal microbiota. In vivo and in vitro experiments confirmed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) can suppress herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection by inducing IFN-I expression via the retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) signalling pathway. Therefore, the commensal microbiota-induced production of IFN-I provides a potential therapeutic approach to combat viral infections. Altogether, understanding the complexity and the molecular aspects linking the commensal microbiota to health will help provide the basis for novel therapies already being developed.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), the most prevalent and widespread sexually transmitted pathogen globally, primarily causes genital herpes by infecting the skin and mucous membranes of the lower genital tract [1,2,3]. This virus can also remain dormant in the ganglia, causing recurrent infections [4, 5]. Additionally, HSV-2 infection is closely associated with the pathogenesis of reproductive tract malignancies, such as cervical cancer, penile cancer and prostate cancer; it has increased their incidences [6,7,8]. HSV-2 infection has also significantly increased the risk of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection owing to its epidemiological synergy with HIV-1 infection and transmission [3, 9, 10]. Recently, there has been a rapid increase in the global incidence and recurrence rates of HSV-2 infection, but an effective drug to treat this infection is still lacking [1, 2]. The main challenge associated with this is the ability of this virus to establish recurrent infections and its lifelong latency, as it can suppress the host immune response and evade immune recognition by maintaining latency in the dorsal root ganglion [11]. Hence, it is of scientific and clinical significance to search for an effective therapeutic method that functions by targeting the mechanisms underlying viral pathogenicity in the host.
Interferons (IFNs), as host-produced antiviral compounds, play a pivotal role in resisting viral infections [12,13,14]. Among them, type I IFN (IFN-I) have been employed for treating various viral infections for more than 60 years owing to their potent antiviral effects [15]. IFN-I, which includes IFN-α and IFN-β, can be secreted by cells in an autocrine and paracrine manner to activate a signalling cascade. By binding to the IFN-I receptor (IFNAR), IFN-I signals to the nucleus, triggering the expression of a large number of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) with antiviral activities [16,17,18]. In fact, by establishing a restrictive antiviral state in cells and regulating immune cell subsets essential for the antiviral response, IFN-I is a major player in the treatment of most viral infections [19,20,21]. Given the importance of IFN-I for organismal health, it is necessary to better understand mechanistically how the constitutive IFN-I immune response is regulated in normal individuals and subsequently dysregulated, giving rise to disease.
Our bodies are colonised by trillions of microorganisms, collectively known as the commensal microbiota [22, 23]. The commensal microbiota passively colonise and exert antiviral effects by modulating the maturation of immune cells and inducing the release of immune factors [24,25,26]. However, how the human microbiome influences viral infections remains a mystery. The composition of the commensal microbiota in hamsters changed significantly following SARS-CoV-2 infection in a manner correlated with the severity of the infection [27]. Probiotics have also been implicated in inhibiting viral respiratory infections by blocking the binding of viruses to the target host cells and modulating the anti-virus natural immune response [28].
Further, in a mouse model of influenza infection, it was revealed that administering Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), which is an important intestinal probiotic, can reduce the viral load and inhibit viral infection by activating autoimmune responses [29, 30]. These results confirm that lactobacilli can regulate viral infections, but the regulatory mechanisms underlying the effects of lactobacilli on viral infections of the female reproductive and genital tract remain unclear. Further, previous studies mostly involved Lactobacillus spp., which has been shown to be important in the defence of the female genital tract against a wide range of urogenital pathogens, including HIV-1 [31, 32]. As a microecological regulator of reproductive vaginal viral infections, LGG is one of the most widely adopted probiotics [33,34,35]. Therefore, we hypothesised that LGG protects against viral infection by modulating the host immune system. We explored the specific mechanisms by which the commensal microbiota modulates host immunity against such viral infections. In this study, we demonstrate that the commensal microbiota can induce systemic tonic IFN-I and antiviral priming. Moreover, we identified a specific molecular mechanism underlying the commensal microbiota-mediated induction of IFN-I. In vitro and in vivo experimentation results suggest that LGG can suppress HSV-2 infection by inducing IFN-I expression via the retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) signalling pathway.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Bacterial Growth Condition
In this experiment, LGG (ATCC 53103) was used, which is a strain of Lactobacillus and a gram-positive facultative anaerobe. The strain was inoculated into MRS Liquid medium (027312, HuanKai Microbial, Guangdong, China) at 37 °C, 160 rpm, cultured in an anaerobic environment with GENbag (45534 Biomerieux, French) shaken for 24 h, and then centrifuged at 5000 × g for 5 min and resuspended in PBS to obtain concentration of 108 CFU/mL.
Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics (ABX) Treatment
To establish the gut microbiota-depleted specific pathogen free (SPF) mouse model, after 1 week of acclimation, ABX treatment was performed according to the following protocol. The broad-spectrum antibiotic cocktail consisted of four antibiotics: neomycin (1 g/L), ampicillin (1 g/L), metronidazole (1 g/L) and vancomycin (0.5 g/L). The mixture was dissolved in sterilised water. Mice received the ABX solution by intragastric gavage (i.g). for at least 10 days at 200 μL per mouse per day. After 10 days i.g, faecal samples were collected and aerobically and anaerobically cultured to determine microbiota depletion. We used qPCR to quantify of bacterial 16S rDNA in faeces of mice treated (or not) with ABX. During the treatment period, the weight changes and physical states of the mice were monitored daily. The antibiotics were replaced with regular sterilised water after stopping the ABX treatment to enable microbiota recolonisation.
Animal Experiments
Regular SPF mice were fed under SPF conditions in the Southern Medical School experimental animal centre. All wild type (WT) and IFNAR1-knockout (Ifnαr1−/−) mice were experimented in the adult stage (typically 6–8 weeks) and only females were used in this study. Two types of mice were used in this experiment: WT SPF mice and Ifnαr1−/− SPF mice. The mice were administered PBS (200 μL each mouse) or LGG (108 CFU/mL, 200 μL each mouse) by i.g. every other day for 14 days, and then their organs were removed to extract RNA for ISGs expression analysis. Experiments in vivo were performed in technical triplication and were repeated three times independently. All animal experimentation was approved by the Southern Medical University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Approval protocol no. SMUL2021045).
Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Gene Expression Analysis
After 10 days of ABX treatment, RNA was extracted from the thymus, spleen, mLN and colon of WT and Ifnαr1−/− female SPF mice using the EasyPure® RNA Purification Kit (ER701-01, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and converted into complementary DNA using the EasyScript® All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (AE341-02, TransGen Biotech) for qRT-PCR, which was performed with the Automatic Fluorescence Quantitative PCR instrument (LightCycler®480 II, Roche) using TransStart® Top Green qPCR SuperMix (+Dye I) kit (AQ132-11, TransGen Biotech). To standardise the expression level of each gene, gene expression was normalised by GAPDH. All the primers used in the experiment were showed in Table 1.
Cell Culture and Infection
HEK293T cells (GNHu17, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, China) were cultured in 90% Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (12800017, Gibco, USA) with 10% foetal bovine serum (10099, Gibco, USA), at 37 °C with 5% CO2 cell culture chamber (MCO-170ACL-PC, PHCbi, Japan). To explore whether the RIG-I signalling pathways regulate the ISGs expression in vitro, HEK293T cells were treated with RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro, 100 μM) (HY-P1934, Med Chem Express, China), RIG-I agonists (KIN1408, 10 μM) (HY-19961, Med Chem Express, China) or DMSO (0.1%) and incubated for 12 h before adding IFN-β to stimulate the cells for 2 h. Then the cells were harvested to isolate RNA for ISGs expression analysis via qRT-PCR. To investigate whether the RIG-I signalling pathways influence the HSV-2 infection in vitro, HEK293T cells were treated with RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro, 100 μM), RIG-I agonists (KIN1408, 10 μM), DMSO (0.1%) or acyclovir (6 μM) (59277-89-3, Meilunbio, China) which was to be the positive control and incubated for 12 h before HSV-2 infection. Then, we observed the cytopathic effect under confocal fluorescence microscopy and analysed the viral titre in the culture supernatant of HSV-2-infected HEK293T cells using qRT-PCR.
Immunofluorescence
HEK293T cells were treated with RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro, 100 μM), RIG-I agonists (KIN1408, 10 μM), DMSO (0.1%) or acyclovir (6 μM) and incubated for 12 h before HSV-2 infection. Then, the cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde in confocal dishes, followed by lipid bilayer cell membrane breaking using 0.3% TritonX-100, 5% BSA for closure, followed by incubation with mouse monoclonal antibody to HSV1 + HSV2 gB (ab6506, Abcam, UK), followed by staining treatment with goat anti-mouse FITC secondary antibody (SSA020, Sino Biological, China) and DAPI (C1005, Beyotime, China). All mentioned above steps were performed after three times washing with PBS. After the pre-processing, confocal fluorescence microscopy was performed with a 40 × objective, and fluorescence was selected at FITC (488 nm) and DAPI (405 nm).
Mouse HSV-2 Infection
To establish the HSV-2 infection model, C57BL/6 female mice were injected subcutaneously in the thigh with 2 mg per mouse of sterile PBS suspension of medroxyprogesterone acetate (XianJu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China) on day 7 prior to infection. On the seventh day after the medroxyprogesterone acetate injection, C57BL/6 female mice were anaesthetised via the intraperitoneal injection of 2% pentobarbital sodium. Then, the mice were attacked with HSV-2 via vaginal instillation, using 10 μL each time, for a total of 20 μL per mouse, making the attack doses to be 1.92 × 107 PFU/mL. The body weight, clinical signs and symptoms and survival of the mice were monitored on a daily basis. Based on previous studies, the disease symptoms of HSV-2 challenged mice were scored as follows: grade 0–5 mean healthy; genital erythema; moderate genital inflammation; genital lesion; hind limb paralysis; death [36]. Then, vaginal swabs were taken 5 and 10 days after the assault, and HSV-2 DNA was isolated and analysed by qRT-PCR.
Statistical Analysis
Data were displayed as the mean ± SEM of three replicates in triplicate, based on at least three independent experiments each with triplicate assays. Data were analysed using the GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). For statistical analysis, differences between treatment groups were compared using Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Regulation of Systemic IFN-I Responses by the Commensal Microbiota
To investigate the importance of the commensal microbiota in the response of the host to IFN-I, we first analysed the expression levels of IFN-I-activated antiviral ISGs upon microbiota depletion via treatment with ABX in mice. These commensal microbiota-depleted ABX-treated mice had significantly lower expression levels of ISGs (IRF7, OASL2, IFIT1, ISG15 and MX1) in various systemic tissues such as thymus, spleen, mLN and colon than the PBS-treated WT mice (Fig. 1A–D and G, H). This suggested that commensal microbiota can affect the expression of ISGs in various tissues and organs throughout the body.
As IFN-I is unique in its dynamic functions and in its pattern of expression, to further demonstrate that commensal microbiota can regulate IFN-I expression, the microbiota of Ifnαr1−/− mice was depleted via ABX administration. Relative expression of a panel of ISGs was analysed by qRT-PCR. The expression levels of ISGs in Ifnαr1−/− mice with ABX treatment did not change significantly compared to Ifnαr1−/− mice without ABX treatment (Fig. 1E, F), indicating that depletion of the microbiota does not regulate the response to IFN-I in the absence of IFN-I sensing, and that the microbiota exerts its protective effects via IFN-I. Our results demonstrated that the commensal microbiota can specifically regulate the responses to IFN-I.
LGG Induces IFN-I Expression
Many commensal microbes colonise the human body [23, 37, 38], but the specific commensal bacteria that affect the responses to IFN-I and the associated specific mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, we continued to explore the commensal bacteria and the specific mechanisms by which they affect responses to IFN-I. Previous studies dominantly focusing on Lactobacillus spp. found that such microbes are vital in the defence of the female genital tract against a wide range of urogenital pathogens. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying how lactobacilli affect viral infections of the female reproductive tract remain unclear. Therefore, we hypothesised that LGG protects against reproductive tract infection by affecting the production of IFN-I. We explored the modulation of host immunity-specific mechanisms.
To further verify the LGG ability to enhance IFN-I production, expression of ISGs was analysed by qRT-PCR in ABX-treated mice treated with LGG strains or PBS control. ABX-treated mice administered LGG had significantly higher expression levels of antiviral ISGs (IRF7, OASL2, IFIT1, ISG15 and MX1) in the thymus, spleen, mLN and colon than PBS-treated mice (Fig. 2A–D and G, H). This suggests that LGG can affect the expression of ISGs in different tissues and organs throughout the body.
To further investigate whether LGG can specifically affect IFN-I expression, the microbiota of Ifnαr1−/− mice was modulated via LGG i.g. LGG treatment did not have incremental effect on the expression of ISG in the thymus, spleen, mLN and colon of Ifnαr1−/− mice (Fig. 2E, F and G, H), demonstrating the LGG-specific regulation of the IFN-I response.
RIG-I Signalling Pathways Affect HSV-2 Infection by Inducing IFN-I Expression
During viral infections, host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) can recognise the pathogen-associated molecular patterns and induce the production of IFN-I, which exerts a broad-spectrum antiviral effect by binding to the IFN-α/β receptor and inducing the expression of ISGs [16, 39, 40]. RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) are among the most important intracellular PRRs for innate immunity [41,42,43]. We analysed the expression profiles of RIG-I, which is a PRR that plays an integral role in the host defence against viruses and can mediate IFN-I-associated immune responses. In the innate immune response, DDx58 encodes RIG-I, while MDA5 is an intracellular allosteric RNA monitoring protein and an important member of RLRs family, which recognise cytoplasmic viral nucleic acids and activate downstream cascade signals, leading to the production of IFN-I and pro-inflammatory cytokines in order to resist viral infections, that is the reason why we chose the two genes to analyse [44,45,46]. Figure 3A, B shows that LGG i.g. to WT mice could significantly increase RIG-I expression (DDx58, MDA5).
Subsequently, we investigated whether IFN-I expression occurred via RIG-I signalling pathways. HEK293T cells were treated with a RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro, a Vibrio vulnificus quorum-sensing molecule, inhibits RIG-I polyubiquitination) and RIG-I agonists (KIN1408, an agonist of the RIG-I pathway) to determine whether IFN-I induces ISGs expression and affects virus infection levels by qRT-PCR. Figure 3C shows that the RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro) could significantly downregulate the DDx58 and MDA5 of RIG-I relative genes while RIG-I agonists (KIN1408) significantly upregulated them. The mRNA expression levels of IFN-β and ISGs, namely, OASL2, IFIT1, IRF7 and ISG15, in RIG-I signalling pathways were significantly downregulated with RIG-I inhibitor, while upregulation with RIG-I agonists (Fig. 3D–F). Subsequently, the level of viral infection was detected via qRT-PCR and confocal fluorescence microscopy. Figure 3G shows that the inhibition of RIG-I signalling pathways could significantly increase the viral titre in the culture supernatant of HSV-2-infected HEK293T cells, while agonists of RIG-I signalling pathways could significantly decrease the viral titre. The qRT-PCR results were also confirmed via confocal fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3H-I). The results shown in Fig. 3 demonstrate that the LGG-induced IFN-I response was dependent on RIG-I, affecting HSV-2 infection.
LGG-Induced IFN-I Enhances Host Anti-HSV-2 Infection
To further assess the anti-viral activity of LGG. WT and Ifnαr1−/− mice were administered LGG every other day via i.g. last for 14 days before challenged with HSV-2. The results showed that the LGG administration significantly alleviated disease severity in WT ABX-treated mice, with lower daily paralysis scores and cumulative disease scores (Fig. 4A, D and G) and disease incidence (Fig. 4B and E), as well as improved survival (Fig. 4C and F). LGG significantly reduced HSV-2 titres in mice vagina (Fig. 4H). HSV-2 titres from the vaginal swabs post infection also confirmed the protective efficacy of LGG against HSV-2 infection in vivo. In addition, the results obtained from observing Ifnαr1−/− mice i.g. administered LGG showed that LGG did not significantly affect susceptibility to HSV-2 infection and the severity of infection in mice (Fig. 4D–H), demonstrating that the antiviral activity of LGG is mediated by IFN-I signalling.
In summary, our findings indicate that the commensal microbiota has a critical role in host immunity to viral infection. Among these microorganisms, LGG could inhibit HSV-2 infection by affecting the expression of IFNs via RIG-I signalling pathways.
Discussion
Recently, numerous studies have confirmed that the commensal microbiota plays an important role in host immunity against infections, especially viral infections [26, 47]. However, the relationship between the commensal microbiota and viral infections of the female reproductive and genital tract needs to be elucidated. Similar to previous studies [26]. Our study showed that the commensal microbiota can specifically regulate responses to IFN-I expression (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we analysed the specific mechanisms by which the commensal microbiota regulates IFN-I. Previous studies have confirmed that lactobacilli play a pivotal role in immunomodulation and viral infections in the host [48]. One previous study focused mainly on Lactobacillus spp. showed that it is an important defender of the female genital area against many genitourinary infections, including HIV-1 [49,50,51]. As a microecological regulator of reproductive vaginal viral infection, LGG is one of the most widely adopted probiotics [33, 52]. Therefore, we investigated whether LGG can regulate IFN-I in hosts and its specific mechanisms. The expression levels of ISGs (IRF7, OASL2, IFIT1, ISG15 and MX1) in various systemic tissues throughout the body of the ABX-treated mice were increased significantly after LGG administration (Fig. 2A–D), while Ifnαr1−/−mice showed no significant expression increase of these ISGs (Fig. 2E–H).
During viral infections, host PRRs can recognise pathogen-associated molecular patterns and induce the production of IFN-I, which exerts a broad-spectrum antiviral effect by binding to the IFANR1 and inducing the expression of ISGs [39, 40]. The intracellular RLRs are among the most important intracellular PRRs for innate immunity [41,42,43]. Figures 2H and 3A–B show that LGG administration to ABX-treated mice could significantly increase RIG-I expression.
Subsequently, we investigated whether IFN-I expression occurred via RIG-I signalling pathways. HEK293T cells were treated with a RIG-I inhibitor (Cyclo Phe-Pro) and RIG-I agonists (KIN1408) to determine if IFN-I induces ISGs and virus infection levels by qRT-PCR. Figure 3D–F shows that the mRNA expression levels of IFN-β and ISGs in RIG-I signalling pathways were significantly downregulated with RIG-I inhibitor, while upregulation with RIG-I agonists. Subsequently, the level of viral infection was detected via qRT-PCR and confocal fluorescence microscopy. Figure 3G–I shows that the inhibition of RIG-I signalling pathways could significantly increase the viral titre of HSV-2-infected HEK293T cells, while agonists of RIG-I signalling pathways could significantly decrease the viral titre of HSV-2-infected HEK293T cells. These results demonstrate that the LGG-induced IFN-I response was dependent on RIG-I, affecting HSV-2 infection.
To further evaluate the antiviral activity of LGG, we subsequently determined whether LGG could affect HSV-2 infection via IFN-I. WT or Ifnαr1−/− ABX-treated mice were administered with LGG every other day for 14 days prior to infection with HSV-2. The results showed that WT mice with LGG had significantly alleviated signs of HSV-2 infection and significantly lower viral loads than mice with PBS (Fig. 4A–C and H). In addition, the administration of LGG did not significantly affect the susceptibility to HSV-2 infection and the severity of viral infection in Ifnαr1−/− mice (Fig. 4D–H). These data suggest that LGG cannot alter responses to IFN-I in the absence of IFN-I, demonstrating that the antiviral activity of LGG is mediated through the IFN-I pathway. Therefore, we propose that LGG could inhibit HSV-2 infection by inducing the expression of IFN-I via RIG-I signalling pathways.
There are still a number of potential limitations to the present study. First, although we demonstrate that LGG is mediated by IFN-I signalling and that the IFN-I response depends on RIG-I, we did not analyse the expression of IFN-I and their downstream ISGs after LGG administration to mice in which RIG-I signalling pathways had been inhibited in RIG-knockout mice. Second, this study has not identified the LGG-derived metabolites and metabolic products that affect RIG-I to induce IFN-I production in hosts. These limitations will be addressed in future studies.
Conclusion
In summary, we show that the level of expression of ISGs through the host IFN-I pathway was downregulated significantly following the depletion of the commensal microbiota due to treatment with ABX. In addition, we confirmed a unique molecular mechanism underlying the induction of IFN-I mediated by the commensal microbiota. In vivo and in vitro, it was confirmed that LGG can suppress HSV-2 infection by inducing IFN-I expression via the RIG-I signalling pathway. Hence, LGG-induced production of IFN-I provides a potential therapeutic approach to combat viral infections.
Availability of Data and Materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- LGG:
-
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
- IFN-I:
-
Interferon type I
- ABX:
-
Broad-spectrum antibiotics
- HSV-2:
-
Herpes simplex virus type 2
- RIG-I:
-
Retinoic acid-inducible gene-I
- HIV-1:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- IFNAR:
-
IFN-I receptor
- ISGs:
-
IFN-stimulated genes
- SPF:
-
Specific pathogen free
- WT:
-
Wild type
- Ifnαr1−/− :
-
IFNAR1-knockout
- mLN:
-
Mesenteric lymphoid node
- RNA:
-
Ribonucleic acid
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- CFU:
-
Colony-forming units
- PFU:
-
Plaque-forming units
- IACUC:
-
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
- qRT-PCR:
-
Quantitative reverse transcriptase‑polymerase chain reaction
- cDNA:
-
Complementary DNA
- DMSO:
-
Dimethyl sulfoxide
- GAPDH:
-
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- HEK293T:
-
Human embryonic kidney 293 with SV40 T-antigen
- BSA:
-
Bovine serum albumin
- FITC:
-
Fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I
- DAPI:
-
4′,6-Diamidino-2′-phenylindole
- SEM:
-
Standard error of measurement
- IRF7:
-
Interferon regulatory factor 7
- OASL2:
-
Oligoadenylate synthetase-like 2
- IFIT1:
-
Interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1
- ISG15:
-
Interferon-stimulated gene 15
- MX1:
-
Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1
- DDx58:
-
DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 58
- MDA5:
-
Interferon induced with helicase C domain 1
- RLRs:
-
RIG-I-like receptors
- i.g.:
-
Intragastric gavage
- mRNA:
-
Messenger RNA
- PRRs:
-
Pattern recognition receptors
References
Rechenchoski DZ, Faccin-Galhardi LC, Linhares REC, Nozawa C (2017) Herpesvirus: an underestimated virus. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 62:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-016-0482-7
James C, Harfouche M, Welton NJ et al (2020) Herpes simplex virus: Global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ 98:315–329. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.19.237149
Suazo PA, Tognarelli EI, Kalergis AM, González PA (2015) Herpes simplex virus 2 infection: Molecular association with HIV and novel microbicides to prevent disease. Med Microbiol Immunol 204:161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00430-014-0358-x
Wald A, Ericsson M, Krantz E et al (2004) Oral shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2. Sex Transm Infect 80:272–276. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2003.007823
Gupta R, Warren T, Wald A (2007) Genital herpes. The Lancet 370:2127–2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61908-4
Golais F, Mrázová V (2020) Human alpha and beta herpesviruses and cancer: Passengers or foes? Folia Microbiol 65:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-020-00780-x
Thomas F, Elguero E, Brodeur J et al (2011) Herpes simplex virus type 2 and cancer: a medical geography approach. Infect Genet Evol 11:1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2011.04.009
Sutcliffe S (2010) Sexually transmitted infections and risk of prostate cancer: Review of historical and emerging hypotheses. Future Oncol 6:1289–1311. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.10.95
Barnabas RV, Wasserheit JN, Huang Y et al (2011) Impact of herpes simplex virus type 2 on HIV-1 acquisition and progression in an HIV vaccine trial (the Step Study). JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 57:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31821acb5
Stefanidou M, Ramos I, Mas Casullo V et al (2013) Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) prevents dendritic cell maturation, induces apoptosis, and triggers release of proinflammatory cytokines: Potential links to HSV-HIV synergy. J Virol 87:1443–1453. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01302-12
Tognarelli EI, Palomino TF, Corrales N et al (2019) Herpes simplex virus evasion of early host antiviral responses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00127
Huber JP, David Farrar J (2011) Regulation of effector and memory T-cell functions by type I interferon. Immunology 132:466–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03412.x
Durbin JE, Fernandez-Sesma A, Lee C-K et al (2000) Type I IFN modulates innate and specific antiviral immunity. J Immunol 164:4220–4228. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4220
Gough DJ, Messina NL, Clarke CJP et al (2012) Constitutive type I interferon modulates homeostatic balance through tonic signaling. Immunity 36:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.011
Snell LM, McGaha TL, Brooks DG (2017) Type I interferon in chronic virus infection and cancer. Trends Immunol 38:542–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2017.05.005
Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT (2014) Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat Rev Immunol 14:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3581
Schoggins JW (2019) Interferon-stimulated genes: What do they all do? Annual Review of Virology 6:567–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015756
Schreiber G (2017) The molecular basis for differential type I interferon signaling. J Biol Chem 292:7285–7294. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R116.774562
McNab F, Mayer-Barber K, Sher A et al (2015) Type I interferons in infectious disease. Nat Rev Immunol 15:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3787
Stetson DB, Medzhitov R (2006) Type I interferons in host defense. Immunity 25:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.007
Yan N, Chen ZJ (2012) Intrinsic antiviral immunity. Nat Immunol 13:214–222. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2229
Erturk-Hasdemir D, Kasper DL (2013) Resident commensals shaping immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 25:450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2013.06.001
Ottman N, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Belzer C (2012) The function of our microbiota: Who is out there and what do they do? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2012.00104
Steed AL, Christophi GP, Kaiko GE et al (2017) The microbial metabolite desaminotyrosine protects from influenza through type I interferon. Science 357:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5336
Bradley KC, Finsterbusch K, Schnepf D et al (2019) Microbiota-driven tonic interferon signals in lung stromal cells protect from influenza virus infection. Cell Rep 28:245-256.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.105
Stefan KL, Kim MV, Iwasaki A, Kasper DL (2020) Commensal microbiota modulation of natural resistance to virus infection. Cell 183:1312-1324.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.047
Sencio V, Machelart A, Robil C et al (2022) Alteration of the gut microbiota following SARS-CoV-2 infection correlates with disease severity in hamsters. Gut Microbes 14:2018900. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.2018900
Man WH, de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA, Bogaert D (2017) The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:259–270. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.14
Kumova OK, Fike AJ, Thayer JL et al (2019) Lung transcriptional unresponsiveness and loss of early influenza virus control in infected neonates is prevented by intranasal Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. PLOS Pathogens 15:e1008072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008072
Llewellyn A, Foey A (2017) Probiotic modulation of innate cell pathogen sensing and signaling events. Nutrients 9:1156. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9101156
Mastromarino P, Cacciotti F, Masci A, Mosca L (2011) Antiviral activity of Lactobacillus brevis towards herpes simplex virus type 2: Role of cell wall associated components. Anaerobe 17:334–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.04.022
Lu W, Feng Y, Jing F et al (2018) Association between gut microbiota and CD4 recovery in HIV-1 infected patients. Front Microbiol 9:1451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01451
Capurso L (2019) Thirty years of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG: a review. J Clin Gastroenterol 53:S1. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001170
Colodner R, Edelstein H, Chazan B, Raz R (2003) Vaginal colonization by orally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Isr Med Assoc J 5:767–769
Zhai T, Ren W, Wang P, Zheng L (2022) Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG protects against atherosclerosis by improving ketone body synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 106:8233–8243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-12265-7
Shestakov A, Jenssen H, Nordström I, Eriksson K (2012) Lactoferricin but not lactoferrin inhibit herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in mice. Antiviral Res 93:340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.01.003
Gimblet C, Meisel JS, Loesche MA et al (2017) Cutaneous leishmaniasis induces a transmissible dysbiotic skin microbiota that promotes skin inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 22:13-24.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.06.006
Proctor DM, Relman DA (2017) The landscape ecology and microbiota of the human nose, mouth, and throat. Cell Host Microbe 21:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.011
Goubau D, Deddouche S, e Sousa CR (2013) Cytosolic sensing of viruses. Immunity 38:855–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.007
Iwasaki A (2012) A virological view of innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:177–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150203
Rehwinkel J, Gack MU (2020) RIG-I-like receptors: their regulation and roles in RNA sensing. Nat Rev Immunol 20:537–551. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0288-3
Loo Y-M, Gale M (2011) Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity 34:680–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.003
Kawai T, Akira S (2008) Toll-like receptor and RIG-I-like receptor signaling. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1143:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1443.020
Prasov L, Bohnsack BL, Husny ASE et al (2022) DDX58(RIG-I)-related disease is associated with tissue-specific interferon pathway activation. J Med Genet 59:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107447
Peng B, Nguyen TM, Jayasinghe MK et al (2022) Robust delivery of RIG‐I agonists using extracellular vesicles for anti‐cancer immunotherapy. J Extracell Vesicles 11:e12187. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12187
Schenten D, Medzhitov R (2011) The control of adaptive immune responses by the innate immune system. Adv Immunol 109:87–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387664-5.00003-0
Erttmann SF, Swacha P, Aung KM et al (2022) The gut microbiota prime systemic antiviral immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I axis. Immunity 55:847-861.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2022.04.006
Amabebe E, Anumba DOC (2018) The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of lactobacilli. Front Med (Lausanne) 5:181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00181
Boris S, Barbés C (2000) Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect 2:543–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00313-0
Lai SK, Hida K, Shukair S et al (2009) Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is trapped by acidic but not by neutralized human cervicovaginal mucus. J Virol 83:11196–11200. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01899-08
Zhong L, Zheng J, Lin L, Cong Q, Qiao L (2023) Perspective on human papillomavirus infection treatment by vaginal microbiota. Abstract Interdisciplinary Medicine 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/inmd.v1.2, https://doi.org/10.1002/INMD.20220020
Gamallat Y, Meyiah A, Kuugbee ED et al (2016) Lactobacillus rhamnosus induced epithelial cell apoptosis, ameliorates inflammation and prevents colon cancer development in an animal model. Biomed Pharmacother 83:536–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.07.001
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (82025024), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272384 and 82072334), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515110578), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project-Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (202201011480) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M662990).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lei Zheng and Xiumei Hu conceived the idea. Jingyu Wang and Mei Huang designed and performed the experiments. Bo Situ, Xiumei Hu, Yuqi Du, Haoming Chen and Taiyu Zhai assisted performing the experiments. Zixiong Li, Zihao Ou, Yiyi Huang, Fan Bu, Haojun Zhen, Ruoru Pan, Yubing Wang and Xiaohan Zhao contributed to analysis with constructive discussions. Jingyu Wang, Mei Huang and Xiumei Hu contributed significantly to analysis results and manuscript preparation. Bo Situ, Lei Zheng and Xiumei Hu contributed to reviewing and editing manuscript. All authors read and approved the final.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate
All the research involving animal were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University (Approval protocol no. SMUL2021045).
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
12602_2023_10137_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplementary Figure 1: Bacterial 16S rDNA in feces of mice with and without ABX treatment were analyzed by qPCR. (TIF 321 KB)
12602_2023_10137_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplementary Figure 2: ELISA analysis of IFN-β in the colon tissue of WT mice with PBS or LGG i.g. after ABX treatment. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test. (TIF 668 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Huang, M., Du, Y. et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Regulates Host IFN-I Through the RIG-I Signalling Pathway to Inhibit Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-023-10137-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-023-10137-8