Abstract
Vaginitis is a common problem in women. Candida albicans is responsible for more than 85% of vaginal fungal infections. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of probiotic and fluconazole on the treatment and recurrence of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). This triple-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 married women, aged 18–49 years, with VVC, as confirmed by clinical and laboratory diagnosis. The participants were allocated into two groups using blocked randomization method. The fluconazole-treated group received a single dose of fluconazole (150 mg) supplemented with 30 placebo capsules of probiotic, and the probiotic-treated group got 30 probiotic capsules containing 1 × 109 CFU/g LA-5 with 1 fluconazole placebo capsule. The samples were taken from patients to evaluate the vaginal pH and microbiological tests before, 30–35 days, and 60–65 days after starting the treatment. The signs and symptoms were assessed before the intervention and the first and second follow-ups. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, independent t, and ANCOVA tests were then used for data analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.127) in the frequency of negative culture 30–35 days after starting the treatment, but the frequency of negative culture 60–65 days after starting treatment in the fluconazole group was significantly higher than that of the probiotic group (p = 0.016). The abnormal discharge and vulvovaginal erythema in the first and second follow-ups and also pruritus in the second follow-up in the fluconazole group were significantly lower than those in the probiotic group (p < 0.05). There was, however, no statistically significant difference in burning, frequent urination, dysuria, and dyspareunia between the groups (p > 0.05). Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation had an effect similar to that of fluconazole in treating most symptoms of VVC, but it was less effective than the latter in preventing recurrence.
Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT): IRCT20110826007418N5. Date of registration: 3 March 2021; URL: https://en.irct.ir/trial/50819; Date of first registration: 10 March 2021.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Vaginitis is a common problem in women. It is one of the most common reasons for women to visit health centers around the world [1]; therefore, it receives about 10 million visits per year [2]. Vaginitis is a general term that refers to the inflammation of the vaginal wall [3], leading to complaints such as itching, burning, and vaginal discharge [4]. The most common infections leading to vaginitis are bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and trichomonas vaginitis [4].
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a fungal infection that affects the vaginal mucosa [5]; it is, in fact, the second most common vaginal infection after bacterial vaginosis, as it is diagnosed in more than 40% of women with vaginal complaints [6]. It affects about 75% of women at least once in their reproductive ages, and half of women get it more than once in their lifetimes [7]. Candida albicans is responsible for more than 85% of vaginal fungal infections. The other non-albicans species contributing to vaginal fungal infections include C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis [8]. The prevalence of Candida spp. in Tabriz has been reported to be 25.2% [9].
Affected women often complain of symptoms such as vaginal discharge, burning, itching, vulvovaginal erythema, dyspareunia [10], and urinary symptoms such as frequent urination and dysuria [11]. Candida vaginitis can cause complications such as pain and discomfort, anxiety, low self-esteem, dysfunction, and sexual problems [12].
There are several antifungal drugs for VVC that can be used orally or intravaginally [13]. Azoles are considered the first line of treatment [14]. Antifungal agents have a wide range of side effects, such as chills, dizziness, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia [15], hepatotoxicity, and gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, and neurological symptoms [16, 17]. Extensive and long-term use of oral and topical medications of azoles and other antifungal agents can increase the incidence of VVC caused by non-albicans Candida species that are more resistant to treatment [18]. Due to the resistance of some Candida spp. to common treatments, as well as the side effects of these drugs, disease recurrence and the high cost of medical treatments [19,20,21], the use of effective products with fewer side effects has been considered [22].
Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when prescribed in an adequate amount, have health effects on the host [23]. Recently, probiotics such as Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. have been considered for the prevention and treatment of VVC [24, 25]. Some studies have reported that VVC is caused by the loss or decrease of some vaginal flora, and lactobacilli could be useful in the prevention of vaginal infections [26, 27]. Lactobacillus spp. are the natural microbiota of the human vulva and vagina, playing a key role in suppressing potential pathogens [28]. Probiotics can be administered orally, intravaginally, or in combination [29]. In most studies, probiotics have been used as an adjunctive therapy after treatment with an antifungal drug to increase the effectiveness of the antifungal drug [26, 30, 31]. It is proposed that the metabolites of the gut microbiota and probiotics could travel through the bloodstream to affect the distant sites of such organisms as the vagina, which may change its flora [32]. Free phenol and para-cresol are the bacterial metabolites produced by Clostridium difficile after antibiotic treatment [33]. These metabolites can enter the circulation and reduce keratin 10 expression in keratinocytes, as well as disrupting the integrity of the epidermal barrier [34]. Miyazaki et al. [34] demonstrated that skin hydration could be improved by reducing serum total levels of phenol, which could be reduced by the daily administration of prebiotic galactooligosaccharide and Bifidobacterium breve. In addition, the consumption of lactobacilli could be used to prevent genital infections and improve genital flora [28]. Probiotics used in the prevention and treatment of Candida infections include Limosilactobacillus fermentum RC-14, L. fermentum B-54, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1, L. rhamnosus GG, and Lactobacillus acidophilus [18].
Given the numerous reports on the effect of probiotics against VVC [35, 36], a more effective and newer antifungal drug with probiotic origin is needed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of probiotic capsules with fluconazole capsules on the treatment and improvement of symptoms in women, aged 15–49 years, with VVC. The present research is one of the few studies comparing the effect of probiotics with the antifungal drug on the treatment and recurrence of VVC.
Methods
Type of Study and Participants
Eighteen women with VVC, who had been referred to Al-Zahra and Taleghani teaching hospitals and health centers in Tabriz, Iran, from May 2021 to January 2022, were enrolled in this randomized, triple-blinded (participants, outcome evaluators, and statistical analysts were blind) controlled clinical trial. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.848) and registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT code: IRCT20110826007418N5).
Regarding the inclusion criteria, married women, aged 15–49, with positive Candida spp. culture result and willingness participated in the study. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria included pregnancy; lactation; menopause; use of antibiotics; immunosuppressive drugs; vaginal medications during the last 2 weeks; autoimmune diseases; chronic diseases such as diabetes, menstrual bleeding, or any abnormal uterine bleeding during the visit of the participants; recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (four or more cases during the year); symptoms of drug allergy; and consumption of any probiotic products.
Sampling
The researcher explained the study aims and procedures to the patients; we assessed the participants based on the eligibility criteria and asked them to sign a written informed consent form. To diagnose VVC, two sterile swabs were taken from the posterior fornix of the vagina from eligible individuals. We measured vaginal pH using pH meter paper. The first sample was stretched on a slide. We conducted the Whiff test by adding 1–2 drops of 10% potassium hydroxide to it. The second sample was placed inside the tube containing sterile physiological serum and sent back to the laboratory and cultured in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA; Merck, Germany) containing 0.05% chloramphenicol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The cultured medium was incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. The growth colonies were transferred to Chromo agar; after 24 h, the type of colonies was identified. In addition, a stained slide with methylene blue was prepared by a microbiologist for the direct observation of fungal cells, clue cells, and other abnormalities. The patients with positive Wiff test, Trichomonas vaginitis, and other non-Candida vaginitis were excluded.
Randomization and Intervention
Allocation of individuals in groups was done randomly using a computerized table of random numbers through random blocks of 4 and 6 with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Probiotic supplementations or fluconazoles were prepared in sequentially numbered bottles based on the allocation sequence and delivered to the participants in the order in which they entered the study. The sequence generation and preparation of the bottles were done by a person not involved in the sampling or data collection.
Each bottle contained 30 white capsules and one red capsule; they were divided into two types: the first type contained a red capsule of fluconazole (150 mg) and 30 white capsules of probiotic placebo; the second one had 30 white capsules of probiotic and a red capsule of fluconazole placebo. The probiotic capsules contained 1 × 109 CFU/g L. acidophilus LA-5 that had been ordered from Christian Hansen (Hoersholm, Denmark) and potato starch (Shahdine, Iran). The placebo capsules only contained potato starch and were similar in appearance to probiotic supplementation. Fluconazole oral capsules were bought from Amin Pharmaceutical Co (Iran). For the placebo of fluconazole, the capsules were filled with pure potato starch; they were similar to fluconazole capsules in terms of appearance.
The women were asked to use a red capsule on the first day; then, other capsules were used once a day. The participants were advised to keep the drugs in a refrigerator (below 25 °C), take them after lunch, drink a full glass of water before taking the capsules, and not to get any other medications at least 2 h before and after taking them. In addition, they were asked to observe personal hygiene during the treatment period and not use vaginal showers, vaginal creams, herbal medicines, and antibiotics, as well as other medicines.
Outcomes and Data Collection
Follow-up
During the study (days 12 to 15), a telephone call reminded the regular use of medications to investigate any possible side effects. The first and second follow-ups were performed 30–35 days and 60–65 days after starting the treatment. In addition, we took the samples from patients to evaluate the vaginal pH and microbiological tests. We assessed the signs and symptoms for vaginal discharge, itching, burning, inflammation, and vulvovaginal erythema, dysuria, and dyspareunia. The level of patients’ satisfaction and side effects was determined. All untreated patients were treated with the routine treatment (clotrimazole) after the second follow-up (60–65 days after starting treatment).
Statistical Analysis
SPSS software, version 20.0 (Chicago, IL, USA), was used for statistical analysis. Pearson chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, and Fisher’s exact test were then used to compare the qualitative data obtained for the probiotic-treated and fluconazole-treated groups. The independent t-test and ANCOVA were also used for the comparison of the groups in terms of vaginal pH before and after intervention, respectively. Also, we conducted repeated measures ANOVA for the vaginal pH and reported results of effects of group, time, and group × time. All analyses were done based on intention-to-treat. Significance was set at p-value < 0.05.
Results
Totally, we randomly assigned 80 patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis who had inclusion criteria to the probiotic or fluconazole groups. Thirty-five to 40 days after starting the treatment, four patients in the probiotic group (two patients due to nausea, one due to stomach problems, and one other due to the lack of cooperation) and seven patients in the fluconazole group (one patient due to nausea and six due to the lack of cooperation) were excluded from the study. However, in the first follow-up, out of seven patients excluded from the fluconazole group, the symptoms of four of them were checked by phone (Fig. 1). In the fluconazole group, seven participants did not attend for examination. One participant refused to take the medicine due to a nausea, one was hospitalized, one was infected with coronaviruses, one participant was not present in Tabriz, and three participants did not answer their phones. In the probiotic group, four participants did not attend for examination. Three participants did this due to a nausea and stomach problem, and one did not answer the phone calls.
The mean age, weight, and BMI of the patients were 35.59 ± 4.36 years old, 73.12 ± 11.64 kg, and 27.23 ± 4.16 kg/m2 in both groups, respectively. Most of the participants were housewives (95%), and 40% of them had undergraduate education and used withdrawal as a contraception method. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
The frequency of negative culture days 35–40 after starting treatment was 27.8% (n = 10) in the probiotic group and 45.5% (n = 15) in the fluconazole group; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.127). Meanwhile, the frequency of negative culture 60–65 days after starting treatment in the fluconazole group (46.9%) was significantly higher than that in the probiotic group (19.4%) (p = 0.021) (Table 2).
The mean pH before the intervention was higher in the probiotic group than in the fluconazole one (4.16 ± 0.26 vs. 4.02 ± 0.25, p = 0.019). Meanwhile, the mean pH was not statistically different based on the ANCOVA test and the control of the baseline value, 30–35 (p = 0.921) and 60–65 days (p = 0.879) after starting the treatment (Table 3). According to repeated measure ANOVA, the effects of group (p = 0.943), time (p = 0.123), and group × time (0.602) were not statistically significant.
The most common complaint of the patients before the intervention was abnormal vaginal discharge (95%), 23 patients (57.5%) in the probiotic group, and 20 (50%) in the fluconazole group suffered from severe discharge. Thirty-five to 40 days after starting treatment, the amount of discharge in both groups was decreased; this was such that in the probiotic group, only six persons (16.7%) and, in the fluconazole group, only one person (2.8%) complained of severe discharge (p = 0.035). In addition, 60–65 days after starting treatment, this number remained unchanged in the probiotic group; in the fluconazole group, no person complained of severe discharge, which was still statistically significant (p = 0.035).
Before the intervention, 16 patients (40%) in the probiotic group and 15 (37.5%) in the fluconazole group complained of vulvovaginal erythema. After the intervention, the frequency of erythema was decreased in both groups. Upon 35–40 and 60–65 days, after starting treatment, none of the patients in the study groups complained of severe erythema and edema, but this difference in the fluconazole group was significantly less than that in the probiotic one (p < 0.05). There was, however, no statistically significant difference between the two study groups in the frequency of other symptoms such as itching, burning, frequent urination, dysuria, and dyspareunia 35–40 and 60–65 days after starting treatment (p > 0.05) (Table 4).
In the vaginal examination, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of cervical appearance, vaginal inflammation, amount, and color of secretions between the two groups before the intervention (p > 0.05). There was also no statistically significant difference in the signs in the first and second follow-up between the two groups, except for vaginal inflammation, which was significantly lower in the first (p = 0.006) and second (p = 0.015) post-intervention follow-up (Table 5).
The level of satisfaction with treatment in the fluconazole group was significantly higher than that in the probiotic group (p = 0.020) 35–40 days after starting the treatment. The side effects of treatment with probiotics were observed in two people with the symptoms of nausea (n = 1) and flatulence (n = 1). In addition, the side effects of treatment with fluconazole were observed in two people with the symptoms of nausea (n = 1) and stomach problem (n = 1).
Discussion
In this study, probiotics were less effective than fluconazole in improving and preventing the recurrence of discharge and vulvovaginal erythema. However, there was no statistically significant difference between probiotics and fluconazole in improving other clinical signs and symptoms. The frequency of negative culture 35–40 days after starting the treatment in the study groups was not statistically significant, thus indicating the effect of probiotics in the treatment of VVC, but the frequency of negative culture 60–65 days after starting treatment in the fluconazole group was significantly higher, which could indicate the greater effect of fluconazole in preventing the recurrence of the disease.
In this study, the most common complaints of patients in both groups were abnormal vaginal discharge (95%) and pruritus (78.7%), which was similar to other studies [15, 37]. In addition, the vaginal pH of 93.8% of the patients was 4–4.5, which was similar to that found by Hainer and Gibson [4], thus demonstrating that the vaginal pH in VVC is usually in the normal range (4 to 4.5).
There are very few studies that have used probiotics alone to treat or prevent the recurrence of VVC [38, 39], while most works have used probiotics as an adjunctive therapy after treatment with an antifungal drug [26, 31, 40]. However, the antifungal effect of probiotics has been reported in many studies [41, 42]. Several studies have demonstrated that some probiotics including L. rhamnosus, L. casei, and L. acidophilus could reduce the pathogenicity of Candida spp. by inhibiting biofilm formation. Among these lactobacilli, there are differences in the number of probiotics required to produce this inhibitory effect, thus indicating that the effect of probiotics is species-dependent [43].
Martinez et al. [26] prescribed one dose of fluconazole plus probiotics supplement (containing 1 × 109 CFU L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14) twice a day for the first group; the second group received fluconazole plus placebo of probiotic for 28 days. In the fourth week, the probiotic group had significantly lower vaginal discharge and other symptoms of vaginitis like itching, burning, dyspareunia, and dysuria. In addition, the presence of yeast detected by culture was significantly lower, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the presence of pH > 4, which was similar to the results of the present study.
Kovachev and Vatcheva-Dobrevska [40] also demonstrated the improvement of the clinical symptoms of VVC in the patients receiving vaginal probiotics including L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophiles, and L. delbrueckii, with an antifungal drug being more in comparison to the group receiving an antifungal drug alone. In addition, Carriero et al. [44] came up with a similar result, showing that the proportion of symptoms improvement in the group receiving Lactiplantibacillus plantarum after fluconazole treatment was higher than that in the group getting fluconazole alone. Kohler et al. [45] also demonstrated that probiotics reduced the expression of the genes involved in the biosynthesis of ergosterol and a drug efflux pump involved in fluconazole’s resistance in C. albicans. In addition, several mechanisms could be considered for the inhibition of VVC by different species of lactobacilli, such as the production of biosurfactants like surlactin; reduction in luminal pH; production of various antimicrobial substances including acetic acid, lactic acid, and hydrogen peroxide; bacteriocins such as larger heat-labile proteins (LHLP), non-lanthionine-containing membrane-active peptides (MAP), and small heat-stable lantibiotics (SHSL); and stimulation of adaptive and innate immune responses, such as the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines [46, 47].
The study done by Vladareanu et al. [39] showed that the oral administration of L. plantarum P17630 to patients with a history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), in comparison to placebo, improved the colonization of lactic acid bacteria in the vagina and reduced some clinical symptoms including discharge and vaginal inflammation and redness. In addition, no side effects were reported during the study, thus recommending the use of this oral product for the successful prevention of vulvovaginal candidiasis episodes. Ang et al. [38] also reported that the use of probiotics in pregnant women with VVC for 8 weeks reduced abnormal discharge, itching, and burning, in comparison to the placebo group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the quality of sexual activity.
In a review conducted by Hempel et al. [48], the probiotics were well tolerated in 235 studies, and 387 studies accurately reported the presence or absence of side effects. In some case studies, bacteremia was potentially associated with the use of probiotics, but randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant increased relative risk (RR) of the overall number of experienced side effects, such as gastrointestinal problems and infection, in the probiotic group, as compared to the placebo ones.
The use of lactobacilli, in comparison with oral or topical antifungal therapies, could reduce the risk of pathogenic resistance to treatment and the risk of side effects, as well as decreasing the financial costs of production and purchase. In addition, such a treatment is more acceptable for women looking for more natural ways to maintain their health [36].
The use of probiotics alone for the treatment of VVC was one of the strengths of the present study. The use of a single species (LA-5) can also determine its specific effect on VVC. One of the limitations of the study was, however, the loss of the follow-up of the first and second examinations in 10% (n = 4) of the probiotic group and 17.5% (n = 7) of the fluconazole one; this could be the reason for non-cooperation in both groups, which were almost the same. In addition, different types of probiotics with different doses should be used to evaluate their specific effect on the treatment of VVC. The effect of oral and vaginal use of lactobacilli should also be assessed.
Conclusion
L. acidophilus can reduce most symptoms of Candida vaginitis, like fluconazole, although it was less effective than the latter in improving some of the symptoms. The culture results also showed that L. acidophilus could be used to treat Candida, but fluconazole was more effective in preventing the recurrence. Considering the obtained findings, the laboratory effect on the inhibition of Candida spp., the side effects of chemical drugs, and treatment failure due to the emergence of resistant species, further studies are needed to evaluate the anti-Candida properties of L. acidophilus by performing more clinical trials and identifying exact mechanisms.
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the limitations of ethical approval involving the patient data and anonymity, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable requests.
Abbreviations
- VVC:
-
Vulvovaginal candidiasis
- IRCT:
-
Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials
- LHLP:
-
Larger heat-labile proteins
- MAP:
-
Membrane-active peptides
- SHSL:
-
Small heat-stable antibiotics
References
Owen MK, Clenney TL (2004) Management of vaginitis. Am Fam Physician 70(11):2125–2132
Russo R, Superti F (2019) Randomised clinical trial in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: efficacy of probiotics and lactoferrin as maintenance treatment. Mycoses 62(4):328–335
Karasz A, Anderson M (2003) The vaginitis monologues: women’s experiences of vaginal complaints in a primary care setting. Soc Sci Med 56(5):1013–1021
Hainer BL, Gibson MV (2011) Vaginitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 83(7):807–815
Alexander NJ, Baker E, Kaptein M et al (2004) Why consider vaginal drug administration? Fertil Steril 82(1):1–12
Anderson MR, Klink K, Cohrssen A (2004) Evaluation of vaginal complaints. JAMA 291(11):1368–1379
Mitchell H (2004) Vaginal discharge–causes, diagnosis, and treatment. BMJ 328(7451):1306–1308
Weissenbacher T, Witkin SS, Ledger WJ et al (2009) Relationship between clinical diagnosis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and detection of Candida species by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(2):125–129
Sehhatie-Shafaie F, Namazi A (2014) Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical findings of candidiasis and trichomoniasis in women supported by selected health centers of Tabriz. Iran Crescent J Med Biol Sci 1(4):130–135
Abdelmonem AM, Rasheed SM, Mohamed AS (2012) Bee-honey and yogurt: a novel mixture for treating patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):109–114
Carr PL, Felsenstein D, Friedman RH (1998) Evaluation and management of vaginitis. J Gen Intern Med 13(5):335–346
Goncalves B, Ferreira C, Alves CT et al (2016) Vulvovaginal candidiasis: epidemiology, microbiology and risk factors. Crit Rev Microbiol 42(6):905–927
Watson MC, Grimshaw JM, Bond CM, Mollison J, Ludbrook A (2002) Oral versus intra-vaginal imidazole and triazole anti-fungal agents for the treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush): a systematic review. BJOG 109(1):85–95
Felix TC, de Brito Röder DVD, dos Santos PR (2019) Alternative and complementary therapies for vulvovaginal candidiasis. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 64(2):133–141
Ahangari F, Farshbaf-Khalili A, Javadzadeh Y, Adibpour M, Sadeghzadeh OB (2019) Comparing the effectiveness of Salvia officinalis, clotrimazole and their combination on vulvovaginal candidiasis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 45(4):897–907
Jafarzadeh L, Separdar A, Lori Gavini Z et al (2019) Effect of clotrimazole-Satureja bachtiarica vaginal cream and clotrimazole vaginal cream in patients with vaginal candidiasis. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 21(11):14–22
Karimi FZ, Bakhshi M, Dadgar S, Maleki-Saghooni N (2018) Review of anti-Trichomonas vaginalis herbs and their therapeutic effects. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 20(12):96–109
Xie HY, Feng D, Wei DM et al (2017) Probiotics for vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:Cd010496
Eftekhari AD, Anvari M, Ranji N (2015) Investigation of ERG11 gene mutations in fluconazole resistant Candida albicans isolated from a number of Rasht hospitals. Pathobiol Res 18(3):98–107
Fazel N, Hashemian M, Ramezani M, Akaberi A (2012) Comparative effect alone honey and mix with chlotrimazol on vaginitis candidacies. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 14(8):48–54
Tajik-Ijdan F, Kazemi A, Nowrozi H (2017) Comparing the effects of alcoholic extract of ginseng with itraconazole against Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Feyz J Kashan Univ Med Sci 21(3):211–217
Nobahar B, Javedanmehr M (2018) Herbal medicines for treatment of antifungal and bacterial vaginitis in reproductive aged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Herald NAMSCA 3:462–467
Quigley EM (2011) Gut microbiota and the role of probiotics in therapy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 11(6):593–603
Fernandez MF, Boris S, Barbes C (2003) Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 94(3):449–455
Khanafari A, Esmaeilzadeh M, Sepahi AA (2009) Potential ability of probiotics isolated from Iranian local yogurts to produce lactacins. Iran J Nutr Sci Food Technol 4(1):Pe67–Pe78, En68
Martinez R, Franceschini SA, Patta MC et al (2009) Improved treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis with fluconazole plus probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Lett Appl Microbiol 48(3):269–274
Shi Y, Chen L, Tong J, Xu C (2009) Preliminary characterization of vaginal microbiota in healthy Chinese women using cultivation-independent methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(3):525–532
Ronnqvist D, Forsgren-Brusk U, Husmark U, Grahn-Hakansson E (2007) Lactobacillus fermentum Ess-1 with unique growth inhibition of vulvo-vaginal candidiasis pathogens. J Med Microbiol 56(Pt 11):1500–1504
Reid G, Burton J, Devillard E (2004) The rationale for probiotics in female urogenital healthcare. MedGenMed 6(1):49
Hua Y, Lin M, Wang L-d, Xia L (2008) Observation of curative effect of miconazole and Lactobacillus on vulvovaginal candidiasis treated. Chin J Microecol 20:386–387
Nouraei S, Amir Ali Akbari S, Jorjani M et al (2012) Comparison between fluconazole with oral protexin combination and fluconazole in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 375806
Szántó M, Dózsa A, Antal D et al (2019) Targeting the gut-skin axis—probiotics as new tools for skin disorder management? Exp Dermatol 28(11):1210–1218
Dawson LF, Donahue EH, Cartman ST et al (2011) The analysis of para-cresol production and tolerance in Clostridium difficile 027 and 012 strains. BMC Microbiol 11(1):1–10
Miyazaki K, Masuoka N, Kano M, Iizuka R (2014) Bifidobacterium fermented milk and galacto-oligosaccharides lead to improved skin health by decreasing phenols production by gut microbiota. Benef Microbes 5(2):121–128
Falagas ME, Betsi GI, Athanasiou S (2006) Probiotics for prevention of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: a review. J Antimicrob Chemother 58(2):266–272
Jeavons HS (2003) Prevention and treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis using exogenous Lactobacillus. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 32(3):287–296
Ramezani_Tehrani R, Farahmand M, Abedini M, Hashemi Z (2012) Prevalance of vaginitisin iranian women--symptoms and clinical association. Islamic Azad Univ Tehran Med Brench 22(4):62–68
Ang XY, Chung FYL, Lee BK et al (2022) Lactobacilli reduce recurrences of vaginal candidiasis in pregnant women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Appl Microbiol 132(4):3168–3180
Vladareanu R, Mihu D, Mitran M et al (2018) New evidence on oral L. plantarum P17630 product in women with history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC): a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22(1):262–267
Kovachev SM, Vatcheva-Dobrevska RS (2015) Local probiotic therapy for vaginal Candida albicans infections. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 7(1):38–44
Ribeiro F, De Barros P, Rossoni R, Junqueira J, Jorge A (2017) Lactobacillus rhamnosus inhibits Candida albicans virulence factors in vitro and modulates immune system in Galleria mellonella. J Appl Microbiol 122(1):201–211
Rossoni RD, de Barros PP, de Alvarenga JA et al (2018) Antifungal activity of clinical Lactobacillus strains against Candida albicans biofilms: identification of potential probiotic candidates to prevent oral candidiasis. Biofouling 34(2):212–225
Matsubara VH, Wang Y, Bandara H, Mayer MPA, Samaranayake LP (2016) Probiotic lactobacilli inhibit early stages of Candida albicans biofilm development by reducing their growth, cell adhesion, and filamentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(14):6415–6426
Carriero C, Lezzi V, Mancini T, Selvaggi L (2007) Vaginal capsules of lactobacillus plantarum p17630 for prevention of relapse of candida vulvovaginitis: an Italian multicentre observational study. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 2(2/3):155
Köhler GA, Assefa S, Reid G (2012) Probiotic interference of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 with the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012:636474
Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Díaz J, Muñoz-Quezada S, Gómez-Llorente C, Gil A (2012) Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann Nutr Metab 61(2):160–174
Silva MP, Rossoni RD, Junqueira JC, Jorge AOC (2016) Probiotics for prevention and treatment of candidiasis and other infectious diseases: Lactobacillus spp. and other potential bacterial species. Probiotics and Prebiotics in Human Nutrition and Health. Avaiable at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/51414
Hempel S, Newberry S, Ruelaz A et al (2011) Safety of probiotics used to reduce risk and prevent or treat disease. Evid Rep Technol Assess 200:1–645
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all women for their kind participation in this research project.
Funding
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences provided funding, but it had no role in designing and conducting the study, writing this manuscript writing, and submitting it for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All of the authors contributed to the conception and design of the study and revised the manuscript. ZM drafted the manuscript under direct supervision of PY. MM and SMAC conducted statistical analysis. AHR helped to prepare medicine. HSK and PG conducted the microbiological evaluations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent of Participants
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the research and technology deputy of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.848). The informed written consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mollazadeh-Narestan, Z., Yavarikia, P., Homayouni-Rad, A. et al. Comparing the Effect of Probiotic and Fluconazole on Treatment and Recurrence of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: a Triple-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Probiotics & Antimicro. Prot. 15, 1436–1446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-022-09997-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-022-09997-3