Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic significance of persistent restrictive filling pattern after cardiac resynchronization therapy

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Echocardiography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may improve left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction as well as systolic dysfunction. Diastolic dysfunction is a key for prognosis in patients with heart failure; therefore, we aimed to clarify the impact of CRT on diastolic function and prognosis.

Methods

In 67 patients who underwent CRT, LV diastolic function was assessed by pulsed Doppler transmitral flow pattern at baseline and 1 week after CRT, and classified into restrictive filling pattern (RFP) and non-RFP groups. Volume responders were defined by reduction of LV end-systolic volume >15 % at 6 months after CRT. The clinical endpoint comprised death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event (MACE).

Results

During the follow-up period (479 ± 252 days), 26 patients (38.8 %) had reached the endpoint of MACE. In Cox proportional hazard analyses, RFP at 1 week after CRT was associated with the endpoints independently of age and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV at baseline. Thirty (44.8 %) patients were identified as volume responders, who had better prognosis than non-responders. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on their filling pattern at 1 week after CRT and volume responses. The worst prognosis was observed in the RFP and non-responder group, and the best was observed in the non-RFP and responder group. For the remaining 2 groups with intermediate prognosis, the RFP and responder group showed poorer prognosis compared to the non-RFP and non-responder group.

Conclusions

Persistent RFP after CRT may be a strong prognostic predictor, which should be treated with more intensive therapy to improve the prognosis of patients following CRT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al.; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al.; MADIT-CRT Trial Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2012;126:1784–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang J, Kurrelmeyer KM, Torre-Amione G, et al. Systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony in patients with diastolic heart failure and the effect of medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shanks M, Bertini M, Delgado V, et al. Effect of biventricular pacing on diastolic dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen A, Haass M, Zugck C, et al. Prognostic value of Doppler echocardiographic mitral inflow patterns: implications for risk stratification in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1049–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seo Y, Ishizu T, Kawano S, et al. Combined approach with Doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide to stratify prognosis of patients with decompensated systolic heart failure. J Cardiol. 2008;52:224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:107–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, et al. Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011;124:1527–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arshad A, Moss AJ, Foster E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is more effective in women than in men: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porciani MC, Valsecchi S, Demarchi G, et al. Evolution and prognostic significance of diastolic filling pattern in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2006;112:322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu CM, Zhang Q, Yip GW, et al. Are left ventricular diastolic function and diastolic asynchrony important determinants of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy? Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:1083–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu CM, Fang F, Zhang Q, et al. Improvement of atrial function and atrial reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waggoner AD, Faddis MN, Gleva MJ, et al. Improvements in left ventricular diastolic function after cardiac resynchronization therapy are coupled to response in systolic performance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2244–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu CM, Bleeker GB, Fung JW, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2005;112:1580–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Borleffs CJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:483–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo Y, Ito H, Nakatani S, et al. The role of echocardiography in predicting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ J. 2011;75:1156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto T, Oki T, Yamada H, et al. Prognostic value of the atrial systolic mitral annular motion velocity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:333–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parsai C, Bijnens B, Sutherland GR, et al. Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:940–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hui W, Abd El Rahman MY, Schuck R, et al. Diastolic asynchrony and myocardial dysfunction in patients with univentricular heart after Fontan operation. J Echocardiogr. 2013;11:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takagi T, Takagi A, Yoshikawa J. Low diastolic wall strain is associated with raised post-exercise E/E′ ratio in elderly patients without obvious myocardial ischemia. J Echocardiogr. 2014;12:106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Grants: Yoshihiro Seo received a research grant from Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation and Kazutaka Aonuma from Hitachi Aloka Medical Ltd. Masayoshi Yamamoto, Naoto Kawamatsu, Kimi Sato, Akinori Sugano, Akiko Atsumi, Yoshie Harimura, Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka, Fumiko Sakamaki, and Tomoko Ishizu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human rights statements and informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000(5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Seo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Seo, Y., Ishizu, T. et al. Prognostic significance of persistent restrictive filling pattern after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Echocardiogr 13, 20–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-014-0234-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-014-0234-0

Keywords

Navigation