Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social practices of knowledge mobilization for sustainable food production: nutrition gardening and fish farming in the kolli hills of India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concerns about food security are growing around the world, precipitated by climate change, resource degradation, a growing population and increasing income disparity. In India, food insecurity is high in many rural farming communities, especially among isolated tribal populations. In this study we examine how knowledge about sustainable food production is acquired and mobilized among small-scale farmers belonging to the Malayalis Tribe, who reside in the Kolli Hills region of Tamil Nadu, India. We focus on nutrition gardening and fish farming, two production practices recently introduced to alleviate poverty and malnutrition in the region. Using qualitative participatory research methods, we explored ways in which farmers are accessing, using and sharing knowledge about these practices, and barriers to equitable access. We also asked farmers what information is still lacking about these practices and what mechanisms could be put in place to improve access. This research revealed that participants in both nutrition gardening and fish farming rely primarily on external experts (non-governmental agricultural research and extension) for formal training (e.g. workshops) and advice, despite a long history and traditional knowledge of gardening and river fishing. Agricultural knowledge is also mobilized within the region less formally between individuals and households through face-to-face contact or verbal communication via mobile phones. The use of additional communication technologies (e.g. computers) to enhance access and mobilization of knowledge was perceived to be most relevant and beneficial for young, educated people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Intended to enhance livelihood security of rural household by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed employment per year for every household (Sharma n.d.).

References

  • Alayon-Gamboa, J. A., & Gurri-Garcia, F. D. (2008). Home Garden production and energetic sustainability in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. Human Ecology, 36, 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. (2004). Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. The Ecological Society of America, 2(1), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M., et al. (2012). Agroecologically Efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton, B., & Thilsted, S. H. (2013). Fisheries in transition: food and nutrition security implications for the global south. Global Food Security, 3(1), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, E., et al. (2014). Toward a more resilient agriculture. Solutions, 5(5), 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India 2011. (2011). Tamil Nadu profile. Retrieved from census of India website: June 30, 2014 from http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/censusinfodashboard/stock/profiles/en/I ND033_Tamil%20Nadu.pdf

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: putting the last first. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Casallas, P. E., Medina-Robles, V. M., & Velasco-Santamria, Y. M. (2011). Fish farming of native species in Columbia: current situation and perspectives. Aquaculture Research, 42(6), 823–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, E. (2009). Now it is an easy life: Women’s accounts of cassava, millets, and labor in south India. Culture and Agriculture, 31(2), 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., & Olsson, P. (2005). Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (1999). Conducting a PRA training and modifying PRA tools to your needs. An example from a participatory household food security and nutrition project in Ethiopia. Resource document. Retrieved June 1, 2014 from FAO website: http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X5996E/X5996E00.HTM

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2012). The state of food insecurity in the world: economic growth is necessary but not sufficient to accelerate reduction of hunger and malnutrition. Resource document. Retrieved June 1, 2014 from FAO website: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3027e/i3027e.pdf

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). Undernourishment around the world in 2013: Progress continues. Resource document. Retrieved June 1, 2014 from FAO website: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3434e/i3434e01.pdf

  • Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing Behaviour change: applying social practice theory to Pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, K. (2002). Competing discourses of sustainable consumption: does the ‘Rationalization’ of lifestyles make sense? Environmental Politics, 11(2), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Community Engaged Scholarship (n.d.). Defining our terms: Community engagement and knowledge mobilization. Resource document. Retrieved June 1, 2014 from http://www.theresearchshop.ca/sites/default/files/Hawkins%20CSAHS%20CE %20and%20KM%20definitions.pdf

  • Janssen, M. A., et al. (2006). Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnal, S., Weerahewa, J., & Gunaratne, L. H. P. (2012). Role of Homehgardens in Achieving Food Security in Batticola District, Sri Lanka. Singapore: IACSIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar-Range, S. (2001). Like Paddy in rock: local institutions and gender-roles in kolli hills. Chennai: MS Swaminathan Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (2008). Thinking about knowledge mobilization: A discussion paper prepared at the request of the canadian council on learning and the social sciences and humanities research council. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

  • M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation and University of Alberta (2011). Alleviating poverty and malnutrition in agrobiodiversity hotspots: Baseline study. Retrieved April 17, 2014 from APM Project website: http://www.ua-mssrf.org

  • Marsh, R. (1998). Building on traditional gardening to improve household food security. FNA/ANA, 22(1998), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan M. K., Swapna, M. P. & Kumar, N. (2004). Gender Dimensions of wild food management in Wayanad, Kerala. MS Swaminathan research foundation: Community agrobiodiversity centre & Utara devi resource centre for gender and development, MSSRF/RR/04/12.

  • Pickett, J. (2013). Food security: intensification of agriculture is essential, for which current tools must Be defended and New sustainable technologies invented. Food and Energy Security, 2(3), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponniah, A., et al. (2008). Concepts and practices in agriculture extension in developing countries: A source book. Retrieved January 2, 2015 from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/99

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropke, I. (2009). Theories of practice - new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2490–2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P. (2011). Food sovereignty and alternative paradigms to confront land grabbing and the food and climate crisis. Development, 54(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2001a). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2001b). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., & Thompson, J. (2009). Farmer first revisited: Innovations for agriculture research and extension. London: UK Practical Action Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. (n.d.). The Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act. Successful Social Protection Floor Experiences, 18:271289.

  • Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice, everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., & Hensel, O. (2014). Impact of extension education on improving knowledge of sustainable technical agricultural practices. CIGR Journal, 16(1), 198–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2013). India: Empowering the Poor in Tamil Nadu. Retrieved from The World Bank Website: June 30, 2014 from http://go.worldbank.org/5MO4FJ37Y0

  • University of Alberta and MSSRF. (2013). Alleivating Poverty and Malnutrition in Agro-Biodiversity Hotspots: Baseline Report. Retrieved from www.ua-mssrf.org/uploads/2/1/8/2/218218241/apm_baseline_report_final_02_april_2013.pdf

  • Wolfensen, K. M. (2013). Coping with the food and agriculture challenge: Smallholders’agenda. 2012 United nations conference on sustainable development. Retrieved January 8, 2015 from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/Coping_with_food_and_agriculture_challenge__Smallholder_s_agenda_Final.pdf

  • Yano, K., & Lanusosang, T. (2013). Globalisation and its impact on agriculture: an overview of Kohima District, Nagaland, India. International Journal of Bio- Resource and Stress Management, 4(4), 651–654.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the team members at the M.S Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF), Wyamba University in Sri Lanka and the University of Alberta. This research is supported by the Canadian International Food Security Research Fund, with funding from the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) as well as the Social Sciences Humanities and Research Council (SSHRC). Their financial, material and intellectual support is appreciatively acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suraya Hudson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hudson, S., Krogman, N. & Beckie, M. Social practices of knowledge mobilization for sustainable food production: nutrition gardening and fish farming in the kolli hills of India. Food Sec. 8, 523–533 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0580-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0580-z

Keywords

Navigation