Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally Invasive Locked Plating of Distal Tibia Fractures is Safe and Effective

  • Symposium: Recent Advances in Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Distal tibial fractures are difficult to manage. Limited soft tissue and poor vascularity impose limitations for traditional plating techniques that require large exposures. The nature of the limitations for traditional plating techniques is intrinsic to the large exposure required to approach distal tibia, a bone characterized by limited soft tissue coverage and poor vascularity. The locking plate (LP) is a new device for treatment of fractures. We assessed the bone union rate, deformity, leg-length discrepancy, ankle range of motion, return to preinjury activities, infection, and complication rate in 21 selected patients who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis of closed distal tibia fractures with an LP. According to the AO classification, there were 12 Type A, 5 Type B, and 4 Type C fractures. The minimum followup was 2 years (average, 2.8 years; range, 2–4 years). Two patients were lost to followup. Union was achieved in all but one patient by the 24th postoperative week. Four patients had angular deformity less than 7°. No patient had a leg-length discrepancy more than 1.1 cm. Five patients had ankle range of motion less than 20° compared with the contralateral side. Sixteen patients had not returned to their preinjury sporting or leisure activities. Three patients developed a delayed infection. We judge the LP a reasonable device for treating distal tibia fractures. The level of physical activities appears permanently reduced in most patients.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A–B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anglen JO. Early outcome of hybrid external fixation for fracture of the distal tibia. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:92–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedi A, Le TT, Karunakar MA. Surgical treatment of nonarticular distal tibia fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:406–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM. Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:640–646.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bone L, Stegemann P, McNamara K, Seibel R. External fixation of severely comminuted and open tibial pilon fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;292:101–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borg T, Larsson S, Lindsjo U. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Preliminary results in 21 patients. Injury. 2004;35:608–614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourne RB. Pylon fractures of the distal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;240:42–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Collinge C, Sanders R, DiPasquale T. Treatment of complex tibial periarticular fractures using percutaneous techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Court-Brown CM, Walker C, Garg A, McQueen MM. Half-ring external fixation in the management of tibial plafond fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:200–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drosos G, Karnezis IA, Bishay M, Miles AW. Initial rotational stability of distal tibial fractures nailed without proximal locking: the importance of fracture type and degree of cortical contact. Injury. 2001;32:137–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fan CY, Chiang CC, Chuang TY, Chiu FY, Chen TH. Interlocking nails for displaced metaphyseal fractures of the distal tibia. Injury. 2005;36:669–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury. 1997;28 Suppl 1:A7–A12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:401–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Field JR, Hearn TC, Caldwell CB. Bone plate fixation: an evaluation of interface contact area and force of the dynamic compression plate (DCP) and the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) applied to cadaveric bone. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:368–373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Francois J, Vandeputte G, Verheyden F, Nelen G. Percutaneous plate fixation of fractures of the distal tibia. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:148–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Friedlaender GE, Perry CR, Cole JD, Cook SD, Cierny G, Muschler GF, Zych GA, Calhoun JH, LaForte AJ, Yin S. Osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7) in the treatment of tibial nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83 Suppl 1:S151–S158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frigg R. Locking Compression Plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the Dynamic Compression Plate and the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix). Injury. 2001;32 Suppl 2:63–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frigg R. Development of the Locking Compression Plate. Injury. 2003;34 Suppl 2:B6–B10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guidance Document for the Preparation of Investigational Device Exemptions and Pre-market Approval Applications for Bone Growth Stimulator Devices. Rockville MD, United States Food and Drug Administration, 1988.

  19. Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury. 2007;38:365–370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Cooper J. Minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia–results in 20 patients. Injury. 2006;37:877–887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J, Jr. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury. 1997;28 Suppl 1:A42–A47; discussion A47–A48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gachter A. Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:345–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holt ES. Arthroscopic visualization of the tibial plafond during posterior malleolar fracture fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:206–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Im GI, Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma. 2005;59:1219–1223; discussion 1223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Imade S, Takao M, Nishi H, Uchio Y. Arthroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous fixation for triplane fracture of the distal tibia. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:e123–e128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen KW, Biert J, van Kampen A. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients. Int Orthop. 2007;31:709–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Khoury A, Liebergall M, London E, Mosheiff R. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:818–824.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kneifel T, Buckley R. A comparison of one versus two distal locking screws in tibial fractures treated with unreamed tibial nails: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Injury. 1996;27:271–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2007;32:697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Loren GJ, Ferkel RD. Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:412–421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maffulli N, Toms AD, McMurtie A, Oliva F. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures. Int Orthop. 2004;28:159–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marsh JL, Bonar S, Nepola JV, Decoster TA, Hurwitz SR. Use of an articulated external fixator for fractures of the tibial plafond. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1498–1509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller MD. Arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation of an adult Tillaux fracture of the ankle. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:117–119.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mosheiff R, Safran O, Segal D, Liebergall M. The unreamed tibial nail in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures. Injury. 1999;30:83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1990.

  36. Othman M, Strzelczyk P. Results of conservative treatment of “pilon” fractures. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2003;5:787–794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1093–1110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O, Predieri M, Steinemann S, Gautier E. The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990;109:304–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Redfern DJ, Syed SU, Davies SJ. Fractures of the distal tibia: minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Injury. 2004;35:615–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sarmiento A, Latta LL. 450 closed fractures of the distal third of the tibia treated with a functional brace. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:261–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shanmugam C, Rahmatalla A, Maffulli N. Percutaneous fixation of distal tibial fractures using locking plates. Tech Orthop. 2007;22:162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shanmugam C, Rahmatalla A, Maffulli N. Strain in distal tibial osteotomy stabilized with metaphyseal and distal tibial locking compression plates. Tech Orthop. 2007;22:162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury. 2003;34 Suppl 2:B11–B19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Toms AD, McMurtie A, Maffulli N. Percutaneous plating of the distal tibia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:199–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tull F, Borrelli J, Jr. Soft-tissue injury associated with closed fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11:431–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vallier HA, Le TT, Bedi A. Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures (4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond): plating versus intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Watson JT, Moed BR, Karges DE, Cramer KE. Pilon fractures. Treatment protocol based on severity of soft tissue injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;375:78–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2006;37:531–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Stefano Turino, MD, for his assistance in preparing the pictures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Maffulli MD, PhD, MS, FRCS(Orth).

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

This work was performed at Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital—275 Bancroft Road, London E1 4DG, United Kingdom.

About this article

Cite this article

Ronga, M., Longo, U.G. & Maffulli, N. Minimally Invasive Locked Plating of Distal Tibia Fractures is Safe and Effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 975–982 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0991-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0991-7

Keywords

Navigation