Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the nasal profile and other craniofacial structures. Lateral cephalometric images of 124 adults were collected for this purpose. Statistical analyses such as regression analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) were conducted on nasal and craniofacial anatomical parameters and their relationships. The regression analysis revealed that nasal length was related to maxillary height; nasal depth was related to the position of the maxilla and anterior cranial base length; and nasal base angle was related to upper dentoalveolar height. CCA revealed that nasal parameters (nasal length, depth, and hump) correlated more strongly with craniofacial parameters (maxillary height, anterior–posterior position of the maxilla, and maxillary length). Individuals with maxillary development curved anteriorly upwards had a straighter and smaller nasal profile, while those with maxillary development curved posteriorly downwards had a more arched and large nasal profile. The shape of the nasal dorsum was affected by the maxillomandibular rotation, while the increase in nasal base inclination was accompanied by an upward rotation of the maxillary plane, an increase in the upper dentoalveolar height, and an increase in the lower facial height. While it was observed that each nasal parameter was correlated with the underlying craniofacial structures to some extent, it was also observed that it would be more useful to evaluate the cumulative effects posed by craniofacial parameters. Various combinations of skeletal and dental structures are related to the nasal profile in varying forms and knowing these relationships will help reshape the face and provide aesthetic harmony.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aung SC, Foo CL, Lee ST (2000) Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the oriental nose with a new classification of Oriental nasal types. Br J Plast Surg 53:109–116
Bennet WD, Zeman KL, Jarabek AM (2003) Nasal contribution to breathing with exercise: effect of race and gender. J Apply Physiol 95:497–503
Buschang PH, Viazis A, Delacuz R, Oakes C (1992) Horizontal growth of the soft-tissue nose relative to maxillary growth. J Clin Orthod 24:111–118
Buschang PH, De La Cruz R, Viazis AD, Demirjian A (1993) Longitudinal shape changes of the nasal dorsum. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 104:539–543
Choe KS, Yalamanchili HR, Litner JA, Sclafani AP, Quatela VC (2006) The Korean American woman`s nose in-depth nasal photogrammatic analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 8(5):319–323
Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290
D’Aloisio D, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V (1992) A comparative and correlational study of the cranial base in North American blacks. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 102:449–455
Evteev AA, Grosheva AN (2019) Nasal cavity and maxillary sinuses form variation among modern humans of Asian descent. Am J Phys Anthropol 169(3):513–525
Fernandez-Rivero P, Smyth-Chamosa E, Suarez-Quintanilla D, Cunqueiro-Suarez M (2003) Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile. Eur J Orthod 25:393–399
Gulsen A, Okay C, Isik Aslan B, Uner O, Yavuzer R (2006) The relationship between craniofacial structures and the nose in Anatolian Turkish adult: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:131.e15-131.e25
Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP (1998) Determining cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans in Birmingham. Angle Orthod 68:503–512
Jackson IT (1989) Maxillary hypoplasia. Clin Plast Surg 16(4):757–775
Jang YJ (2019) Aesthetic orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty by Derek Stainbecher. Facial Plast Surg 35(04):420
Jang YJ, Kim JH (2011) Classification of convex nasal dorsum deformities in Asian patients and treatment outcomes. J Plast Reconst Aesthet Surg 64:301–306
Jankowska A, Olszowska JJ, Jedlinski M, Grocholewicz K (2021a) Methods of analysis of the nasal profile: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2021:6680175. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6680175
Jankowska A, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K (2021b) Nasal morphology and its correlation to craniofacial morphology in lateral cephalometric analysis. Int J Environ Public Health 16(18):3064
Mehta N, Srivastava RK (2017) The Indian nose: an anthropometric analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(10):1472–1482
Meng HP, Goorhuis J, Kapila S, Nanda RS (1988) Growth changes in the nasal profile from 7 to 18 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 94(4):317–326
Mommaerts MY, Lippens F, Abeloos JV, Neyt LF (2000) Nasal profile changes after maxillary impaction and advancement surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:470–475
Nehra K, Sharma V (2009a) Nasal morphology as an indicator of vertical maxillary skeletal pattern. J Orthod 36:160–166
Porter JP, Olson KL (2003) Analysis of the African American female nose. Plast Reconst Surg 111(2):621–626
Posen JM (1967) A longitudinal study of the growth of the nose. Am J Orthod 53:746–756
Richardson ER (1980) Racial differences in dimensional traits of the human face. Angle Orthod 50:301–311
Robinson JM, Rinchuse DJ, Zulho TG (1986) Relationship of skeletal pattern and nasal form. Am J Orthod 89:499–506
Romo T, Abraham MT (2003) The ethnic nose. Facial Plast Surg 19:269–277
Strapasson RAP, Costa C, Melani RFH (2019) Forensic facial approximation: study of the nose in Brazilian subjects. J Forensic Sci 64:1640–1645
Sun AH, Steinbacher DM (2018) Orthognathic surgery and rhinoplasty: simultaneous or staged? Plast Reconst Surg 141(2):322–327
Sykes JM, Suarez GA (2016) Chin advancement, augmentation, and reduction as adjuncts to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 43(1):295–306
Taha AA, Ahmed AS (2020) A comprehensive assessment of the nasal profile among Iraqi adults with different skeletal classes: a retrospective study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 10:175–179
Tuncel U, Turan A, Kostakoğlu N (2013) Digital anthropometric shape analysis of 110 rhinoplasty patients in the Black Sea Region in Turkey. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 41:98–102
Acknowledgements
Local ethics committee approval was obtained before the study (Project Number: G.Ü-ET 563).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization; AG, SS; data curation: SS, AG; formal analysis: SS, BKİ; methodology: SS, AG, BKİ; writing-review and editing: SS, AG, BKİ.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patients whose photographs were used in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gülşen, A., Şibar, S. & Ismail, B.K. Relationship between the nasal profile and craniofacial structures: does part of the nasal profile reflect some craniofacial structures?. Anat Sci Int 98, 228–239 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00691-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00691-6