Skip to main content
Log in

Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of a Compact and Lightweight Needle End-effector with Simple Force-feedback Implementation for Robotic CT-guided Needle Interventions

  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a compact and lightweight two degrees-of-freedom (DOF) needle end-effector to be applied to a teleoperated needle interventional robotic system. The suggested needle end-effector is computerized tomography (CT)-compatible and easy to sterilize. Because the proposed needle end-effector can be attached to a robotic manipulator, the needle can translate into and rotate in the human body. In addition, a 1-axis load cell is attached to the needle end-effector to measure the longitudinal force applied to the needle. With this force measurement, force-feedback ability has been implemented in the entire master-slave robotic system. Basic performance tests of repeatability and maximum insertion force were performed. Several force-feedback experiments to determine free space response and contact response, as well as a discrimination test, were conducted. Through this verification process, the suggested needle end-effector was found to have potential for application in real environments that require robotic CT-guided needle interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Heinrich, F. Joeres, K. Lawonn, and C. Hansen, “Comparison of projective augmented reality concepts to support medical needle insertion,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2157–2167, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. Han, J. H. Bae, K. C. Gregoriou, C. J. Ploch, R. E. Goldman, G. H. Glover, B. L. Daniel, and M. R. Cutkosky, “MR-compatible haptic display of membrane puncture in robot-assisted needle procedures,” IEEE Trans. Haptics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 443–454, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Khadem, C. Rossa, N. Usmani, R. S. Sloboda, and M. Tavakoli, “Robotics-assisted needle steering around anatomical obstacles using notched steerable needles,” IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1917–1928, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Xu, C. Zhou, and S. Y. Ko, “Closed-loop planar fuzzy control system for a curvature-controllable steerable beveltip needle,” Int. J. Control. Autom., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2421–2431, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. S. Fischer, I. Iordachita, C. Csoma, and G. Fichtinger, “MRI-compatible pneumatic robot for transperineal prostate needle placement,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatron., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. V. DAmico, R. Cormack, C. M. Tempany, S. Kumar, G. Topulos, H. M. Kooy, and C. N. Coleman, “Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer,” Int. Journal of Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 42, pp. 507–515, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Zangos, K. Eichler, K. Engelmann, and T. J. Vogl, “MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: Technique and preliminary results,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 174–182, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. E. Song, N. B. Cho, G. Ficsher, N. Hata, C. M. Tempany, G. Fichtinger, and I. Iordachita, “Development of a pneumatic robot for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy: new approaches,” In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, pp. 2580–2585, 2010.

  9. R. Kokes, K. Lister, R. Gullapalli, B. Zhang, A. MacMillan, H. Richard, and J. Desai, “Towards a teleoperated needle driver robot with haptic feedback for RFA of breast tumors under continuous MRI,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 445–455, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Y. Kim, H. S. Woo, J. H. Cho, and Y. K. Lee, “Development of a two DOF needle driver for CT-guided needle insertion-type interventions,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Sym. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 470–475, 2017.

  11. Y. S. Kwoh, J. Hou, E. Jonckheere, and S. Hayati, “A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Stoianovici, L. Whitcomb, J. Anderson, R. Taylor, and L. Kavoussi, “A modular surgical robotic system for image guided percutaneous procedures,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Cambridge, USA, 1998.

  13. K. Masamune, G. Fichtinger, A. Patriciu, R. Susil, R. Taylor, L. Kavoussi, J. Anderson, I. Sakuma, T. Dohi, and D. Stoianovici, “System for robotically assisted percutaneous procedures with computer tomography guidance,” Comput. Aided Surg., vol. 6, pp. 370–383, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Maurin, B. Bayle, O. Piccin, J. Gangloff, M. de Mathelin, C. Doignon, P. Zanne, and A. Gangi, “A patient-mounted robotic platform for CT-scan guided procedures,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 2417–2425, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Moon, J. B. Seo, and J. Choi, “Development of new end-effector for proof-of-concept of fully robotic multichannel biopsy,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 2996–3008, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Cha, J. Chung, W. K. Kim, and B. Yi, “Master-slave robotic system for 3 dimensional needle steering,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 857–862, 2010.

  17. Q. C. Nguyen, Y. Kim, and H. Kwon, “Optimization of layout and path planning of surgical robotic system,” Int. J. Control. Autom., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 375–384, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. D. Lorenzo, Y. Koseki, E. D. Momi, K. Chinzei, and A. M. Okamura, “Coaxial needle insertion assistant with enhanced force feedback,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 379–389, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O. Piccin, L. Barbe, B. Bayle, M. de Mathelin, A. Gangi, “A force feedback teleoperated needle insertion device for percutaneous procedures,” Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1154–1168, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Song, K. Kim, and J. Lee, “Development of optical fiber bragg grating force-reflection sensor system of medical application for safe minimally invasive robotic surgery,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 074301–8, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. J. Madhani, G. Niemeyer, and J. K. Salisbury Jr., “The Black Falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada, pp. 936–944, 1998.

  22. K. Kim, J. Lee, “Design and evaluation of a slave manipulator with roll-pitch-roll wrist and automatic tool loading mechanism in telerobotic surgery,” Int. J. Med. Robot., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 421–435, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. A. Mansy, J. R. Grahe, and R. H. Sandler, “Elastic properties of synthetic materials for soft tissue modeling,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 2115–2130, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. M. Murray, Z. Li, and S. S. Sastry, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press, Berkeley, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Dede and S. Tosunoglu, “Fault-tolerant teleoperation systems design,” Ind. Robot., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 365–372, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. L. Park, S. Elayaperumal, B. Daniel, S. C. Ryu, M. Shin, J. Savall, R. J. Black, B. Moslehi, and M. R. Cutkosky, “Real-time estimation of 3-D needle shape and deflection for MRI-guided interventions,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 906–914, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Barbe, B. Bernard, M. de Michel, and G. Afshin, “In vivo model estimation and haptic characterization of needle insertions,” Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 26, pp. 1283–1301, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Kim, S. Kim, S. H. Choi, J. S. Oh, and S. B. Choi, “Force modeling for incision surgery into tissue with haptic application,” SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. R. Lee, C. H. Uhm, M. S. Seong, J. S. Oh, S. B. Choi, “Repulsive force control of minimally invasive surgery robot associated with three degrees of freedom electrorheological fluid-based haptic master,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 228, pp. 1606–1621, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Yang, Y. Xie, S. Liu, and D. Sun, “Force modeling, identification, and feedback control of robot-assisted needle insertion: a survey of the literature,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 561, pp. 1–38, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Jiang, P. Li, Y. Yu, J. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Experimental study of needle-tissue interaction forces: effect of needle geometries, insertion methods and tissue characteristics,” J. Biomech., vol. 47, pp. 3344–3353, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. Suh and K. Kim, “Design of a discrete bending joint using multiple unit PREF joints for isotropic 2-DOF motion,” Int. J. Control. Autom., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2017.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Ju and H. I. Son, “Evaluation of haptic feedback in the performance of a teleoperated unmanned ground vehicle in an obstacle avoidance scenario,” Int. J. Control. Autom., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168–180, 2019.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. A. J. Madhani, Design of Teleoperated Surgical Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1998.

  35. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, 2003.

  36. K. B. Reed, A. M. Okamura, and N. J. Cowan, “Modeling and control of needles with torsional friction,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2905–2916, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungwook Suh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Guest Editors Doo Yong Lee (KAIST) and Jaesoon Choi (Asan Medical Center). This work was supported by the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program, Grant Number 10077502, Development of an Intelligent Cardiovascular Intervention Assist Robot System with 3-Dimensional Cardiac Mapping System and Blood Vessel Visualization, and by Grant Number NK217E, Development of Highly Efficient and Safe Industrial Manipulator for Human–Robot Collaboration. All applicable international, national, or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Kiyoung Kim received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2012. He is a Senior Researcher with the Department of Medical Assistant Robotics, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM). He was a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Hamlyn Centre, Imperial College London, UK. His research interests are primarily in the areas of surgical manipulators, continuum robotics, and human-robot physical interactions.

Hyunsoo Woo received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2009. He is currently a Principal Investigator and Head of the Department of Medical Assistant Robotics, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM). He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at KAIST. His research interests include surgical/rehabilitation robotics, robotic prostheses, and industrial robotic manipulators.

Jang Ho Cho received his M.S. and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2004 and 2010, respectively. From 2011 to 2013, he was a Linneaus Postdoctoral Researcher with the Lund Center for Control of Complex Engineering Systems, Department of Automatic Control, Lund University, Sweden. He is currently a Senior Researcher in the Department of Medical Assistant Robotics, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM). His research interests include time delay control, teleoperation, haptic interactions, and parallel robots for medical applications.

Jungwook Suh received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2007, 2009, and 2013, respectively. From 2014 to 2019, he worked as a senior researcher at the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI). He is currently an Assistant Professor at the Department of Robot and Smart System Engineering, Kyungpook National University (KNU), Daegu, Korea. His research interests include robotics and mechanism design for medical devices and robots.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K., Woo, H., Cho, J.H. et al. Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of a Compact and Lightweight Needle End-effector with Simple Force-feedback Implementation for Robotic CT-guided Needle Interventions. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18, 85–101 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0235-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-019-0235-x

Keywords

Navigation