Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of land degradation due to soil erosion based on current land use/landcover pattern using RS and GIS techniques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land degradation is a problem of grave concern and a major factor leading to it is soil erosion. Soil erosion and its rate are influenced by various factors intrinsic to the soil or related to the soil’s external environment. These factors include rainfall, soil erodibility, topographic characteristics, crop cover, and conservation practices. The revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) is a well-renowned empirical formula used to compute a particular area’s mean annual soil loss. Remote sensing (RS) and geographical information system (GIS) technologies make modeling and execution of RUSLE easy, reliable, and cost-effective. So, these were employed to compute the spatial distribution of soil erosion risk area in Nagavangala micro-watershed in Karnataka state, India. All the factors were generated using metrological data, CartoSat DEM, Quick bird imagery, and laboratory analysis data using GIS software and integrated in a GIS environment to estimate the soil loss rate. It was found that cropland (41.81%) was the dominant land use followed by agricultural plantation (41.5%) and scrubland (11.09%). The average annual soil loss of the watershed was estimated to be 9.80 t/ha/year. The average annual soil loss was highest in the area under scrubland (10.58 t/ha/year) followed by cropland (10.2 t/ha/year). The soil erosion map thus generated can serve as a basis for adopting suitable soil and water conservation measures in the watershed for sustainable management of the resources in it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andualem TG, Hagos YG, Kefale A, Zelalem B (2020) Soil erosion-prone area identification using multi-criteria decision analysis in Ethiopian highlands. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1407–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atoma H, Suryabhagavan KV, Balakrishnan M (2020) Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model and GIS in Huluka watershed, Central Ethiopia. Sustain Water Resour Manag 6(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayele NA, Naqvi HR, Alemayehu D (2022) Rainfall induced soil erosion assessment, prioritization and conservation treatment using RUSLE and SYI models in highland watershed of Ethiopia. Geocarto Int 37(9):2524–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu R, Dhyani BL, Kumar N (2004) Assessment of erodibility status and refined Iso- Erodent Map of India. Indian J Soil Conserv 32(2):171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag 24(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS at catchment scale. Water Resour Manag 21:1635–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SS, Pani P (2015) Estimation of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS techniques: a case study of Barakar River basin, Jharkhand, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1(4):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizuwerk A, Taddese G, Getahun Y (2003). Application of GIS for modeling soil loss rate in Awash river basin, Ethiopia. In International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari M K. (2015) Soil Resource Inventory in the Chikmegeri-3 Micro-Watershed of Koppal District using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques, PhD Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India

  • Dayakar P (2017) Cost of Land Degradation in India. Madras school of economics, 2: 1-36 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015: Revised world soil charter. Rome. Accessed Nov 2017.  http://www.fao.org/3/a-mn442e.pdf

  • Demirci A, Karaburun A (2012) Estimation of soil erosion using RUSLE in a GIS framework: a case study in the Buyukcekmece Lake watershed, northwest Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 66(3):903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diriba BT (2021) Surface runoff modelling using SWAT analysis in Dabus watershed, Ethiopia. Sustain Water Resour Manage 7(6):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan EH, Erpul G, Bayramin İ (2007) Use of USLE/GIS methodology for predicting soil loss in a semiarid agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 131(1):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015) World Soil Charter (also available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-mn442e.pdf)

  • Gelagay HS, Minale AS (2016) Soil loss estimation using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case of Koga watershed, Northwestern Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4(2):126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Srivastava A, Flanagan DC (2021) Improving and calibrating channel erosion simulation in the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model. J Environ Manag 291:112616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habtu W, Jayappa KS (2022) Assessment of soil erosion extent using RUSLE model integrated with GIS and RS: the case of Megech-Dirma watershed, Northwest Ethiopia. Environ Monit Assess 194:318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalambukattu J, Kumar S (2017) Modelling soil erosion risk in a mountainous watershed of Mid-Himalaya by integrating RUSLE model with GIS. Eurasian J Soil Sci 6(2):92–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kushwaha SPS (2013) Modelling soil erosion risk based on RUSLE-3D using GIS in a Shivalik sub-watershed. J Earth Syst Sci 122(2):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2001) Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degrad Dev 12:519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libourel É (2014) Géographies de Fernand VERGER: l’environnement comme horizon. Physio-Géo 8:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahala A (2018) Soil erosion estimation using RUSLE and GIS techniques—a study of a plateau fringe region of tropical environment. Arab J Geosci 11(13):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqsoom A, Aslam B, Hassan U, Kazmi ZA, Sodangi M, Tufail RF, Farooq D (2020) Geospatial assessment of soil erosion intensity and sediment yield using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model. ISPRS Int J Geo-Info 9(6):356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melaku ND, Renschler CS, Flagler J, Bayu W, Klik A (2018) Integrated impact assessment of soil and water conservation structures on runoff and sediment yield through measurements and modeling in the Northern Ethiopian highlands. Catena 169:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakeman AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18(8–9):761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Hofierka J, Zlocha M, Iverson LR (1996) Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10(5):629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad ME, Al-Ansari N, Knutsson S (2016) Annual runoff and sediment in Duhok reservoir watershed using SWAT and WEPP models. Eng 8(7):410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S (2018) A comparative study of soil erosion modelling by MMF, USLE and RUSLE. Geocarto Int 33(1):89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(5):1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostovari Y, Moosavi AA, Mozaffari H, Pourghasemi HR (2021) RUSLE model coupled with RS-GIS for soil erosion evaluation compared with T value in Southwest Iran. Arab J Geosci 14(2):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potdar S, Rajeev Srivastava S, Nagaraju MSS, Prasad J, Saxena RK (2003) Mapping of erosional soil loss in Nanda-Khairi watershed of Nagpur district of Maharashtra using remotely sensed data and GIS techniques. Agropedology 13(2):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agriculture Handbook No. 703, Washington DC, USA. 384p

  • Shinde V, Sharma A, Tiwari KN, Singh M (2011) Quantitative determination of soil erosion and prioritization of micro-watersheds using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 39(2):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Xu Y, Bennett SJ, Li Y (2015) Assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS: a case study of the Yangou watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 73(4):1715–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teshome A, Halefom A, Teshome M, Ahmad I, Taddele Y, Dananto M, Demisse S, Szucs P (2021) Soil erosion modelling using GIS and revised universal soil loss equation approach: a case study of Guna-Tana landscape, Northern Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 7(1):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirkey AS, Pandey AC, Nathawat MS (2013) Use of satellite data, GIS and RUSLE for estimation of average annual soil loss in Daltonganj watershed of Jharkhand (India). J Remote Sens Technol 1(1):20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsegaye L, Bharti R (2021) Soil erosion and sediment yield assessment using RUSLE and GIS-based approach in Anjeb watershed, Northwest Ethiopia. SN Appl Sci 3(5):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Issue 537 of Agriculture Handbook. Washington DC, USA. p. 58

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD, (1965) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Issue 282 of Agriculture Handbook. Washington DC, USA. p. 47

  • Zhang Y, Degroote J, Wolter C, Sugumaran R (2009) Integration of modified universal soil loss equation (MUSLE) into a GIS framework to assess soil erosion risk. Land Degrad Dev 20:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

• Anand Subramanyan and Dr. Ravikumar Dharmaraj: conceived and designed the research experiment.

• Anand Subramanyan: performed the experiments, managed the experimental analysis work, and collected the data.

• Dr. Ravikumar Dharmaraj: regularly supervised the research work.

• Dr. Ravikumar Dharmaraj and Dr. Konandur Thimmanaik Gurumurthy: contributed lab reagents and materials.

• Dr. Shobha Sampangi and Dr. Yallesh Kumar Holur Srinivasaiah: provided technical assistance.

• Dr. Ravikumar Dharmaraj: involved in the analysis of the data.

• Anand Subramanyan: interpreted the data and wrote the paper draft.

• All co-authors have critically reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anand Subramanyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subramanyan, A., Dharmaraj, R., Gurumurthy, K.T. et al. Assessment of land degradation due to soil erosion based on current land use/landcover pattern using RS and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci 16, 431 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11534-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11534-7

Keywords

Navigation