Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recent progress, economic potential, and environmental benefits of mineral recovery geothermal brine treatment systems

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last few years, geothermal energy filled a critical spot as a reliable, environmentally friendly, and weather-independent thermal energy resource for use in several critical applications. Among the main challenges encountered in maintaining geothermal power plants are the scale and corrosion that damage the interior of the power plant elements due to the harsh chemical compositions existing in the geofluid as the working fluid for geothermal power plants. These problematic chemical elements can be of great use if extracted from the geofluid and utilized either by selling them as raw materials or by producing end-user products, thus achieving higher economic benefits. The economic and environmental aspects of these systems were not discussed in detail previously; thus, a work that covers this gap is highly needed. This work summarizes the progress done on treatment of geothermal brine by removal and recovery of minerals. Discussions of the methods used to remove various elements, namely boron, arsenic, silica, radionuclides, high value metals, lithium, and sulfur, are presented, and future research directions are included. Next, the environmental aspects and economic benefits of selling and reutilization of the recovered minerals are discussed. The authors concluded that these treatment systems are of high economic attractiveness, yet more pilot-scale studies in existing geothermal power plant are required. Furthermore, these treatment systems result in significantly reducing the environmental hazards and health risk associated with such fluids. However, experimental studies that discuss the safe use of treated geothermal brine are still required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelkareem MA et al (2018) Recent progress in the use of renewable energy sources to power water desalination plants. Desalination 435:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi A et al (2020) Applications of geothermal organic Rankine Cycle for electricity production. J Clean Prod :122950

  • Alhamid MI et al (2016) Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 53:733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljubury IMA, Ridha HDA (2017) Enhancement of evaporative cooling system in a greenhouse using geothermal energy. Renew Energy 111:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Radi M et al (2021) Progress in energy recovery and graphene usage in capacitive deionization. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol :1–57

  • Allison RP (1995) Electrodialysis reversal in water reuse applications. Desalination 103(1–2):11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ármannsson H, Kristmannsdóttir H (1992) Geothermal environmental impact. Geothermics 21(5–6):869–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arar Ö et al (2013) Application of electrodeionization (EDI) for removal of boron and silica from reverse osmosis (RO) permeate of geothermal water. Desalination 310:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba A, Ármannsson H (2006) Environmental impact of the utilization of geothermal areas. Energy Sources, Part B 1(3):267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacci E et al (2000) Geothermal power plants at Mt Amiata (Tuscany–Italy): mercury and hydrogen sulphide deposition revealed by vegetation. Chemosphere 40(8):907–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badruk M, Kabay N (2003) Removal of boron from Kizildere-Denizli geothermal brines using ion-exchange method. in Second United Nations Symposium on the Development and Use of Geothermal Resources, San Francisco

  • Badruk M, Mordigan H (2005) Boron Removal At Different Temperatures from Kizildere Geothermal Brine by Means of Coprecipitation with Al2 (SO4) 3. 18H2O and KAl3 (SO4) 2. OH (Natural Alunite)

  • Badruk M et al (1999) Removal of boron from wastewater of geothermal power plant by selective ion-exchange resins I Batch sorption–elution studies. Separation Sci Technol 34(13):2553–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakane PA (2013) Overview of extraction of mineral/metals with the help of geothermal fluid. in Proceedings of the 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford

  • Balat M, Ayar G (2005) Biomass energy in the world, use of biomass and potential trends. Energy Sources 27(10):931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bali M, Gueddari M (2019) Removal of phosphorus from secondary effluents using infiltration–percolation process. Appl Water Sci 9(3):54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer P et al (2013) Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26:446–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayramoglu G, Arica MY (2019) Star type polymer grafted and polyamidoxime modified silica coated-magnetic particles for adsorption of U (VI) ions from solution. Chem Eng Res Des 147:146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertani R (2016) Geothermal power generation in the world 2010–2014 update report. Geothermics 60:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth S (2000) Utilization of boron as a critical parameter in water quality evaluation: implications for thermal and mineral water resources in SW Germany and N Switzerland. Environ Geol 40(1–2):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boncukcuoǧlu R et al (2004) An empirical model for kinetics of boron removal from boron-containing wastewaters by ion exchange in a batch reactor. Desalination 160(2):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrmann T, Schweig M, Johnston JH (2019) Transforming silica into silicate–pilot scale removal of problematic silica from geothermal brine. in The International Symposium on Macrocyclic and Supramolecular Chemistry

  • Bourcier W, Lin M, Nix G (2005) Recovery of minerals and metals from geothermal fluids. Lawrence Livermore National Lab (LLNL), Livermore

  • Burton E et al (2003) Silica scale management: lowering operating costs through improved scale control, and adding value by extracting marketable by-products. Lawrence Livermore National Lab, CA (US)

  • Bloomquist RG (2006) Economic benefits of mineral extraction from geothermal brines. in Sohn International Symposium; Advanced Processing of Metals and Materials Volume 6: New, Improved and Existing Technologies: Aqueous and Electrochemical Processing. 2006

  • Boyle G (2004) Renewable energy. Open University

  • Chao Y-M, Liang T (2008) A feasibility study of industrial wastewater recovery using electrodialysis reversal. Desalination 221(1–3):433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S et al (2020) Quantitative assessment of the environmental risks of geothermal energy: A review. J Environ Manage 276:111287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiba A et al (2002) Removal of arsenic from geothermal water by high gradient magnetic separation. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 12(1):952–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi R (1986) Scaling and corrosion in geothermal equipment: problems and preventive measures. Geothermics 15(5–6):839–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPippo R (1991) Geothermal energy Electricity generation and environmental impact. Energy Policy 19(8):798–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPippo R (2012) Geothermal power plants: principles, applications, case studies and environmental impact. Butterworth-Heinemann

  • Dhansay T et al (2017) South Africa’s geothermal energy hotspots inferred from subsurface temperature and geology. S Afr J Sci 113(11–12):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirçivi P, Saygılı G (2008) Removal of boron from waste waters by ion-exchange in a batch system. World Acad Sci, Eng Techn 47:95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehyaei M et al (2019) Optimization of parabolic through collector (PTC) with multi objective swarm optimization (MOPSO) and energy, exergy and economic analyses. J Clean Prod 234:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elminshawy NA et al (2019) Performance of PV panel coupled with geothermal air cooling system subjected to hot climatic. Appl Therm Eng 148:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis A (1977) Geothermal fluid chemistry and human health. Geothermics 6(3–4):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faes W et al (2019) Corrosion behaviour of different steel types in artificial geothermal fluids. Geothermics 82:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-González R et al (2019) Effective removal of zinc from industrial plating wastewater using hydrolyzed olive cake: scale-up and preparation of zinc-based biochar. J Clean Prod 227:634–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB (2008) Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol Evol 23(2):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goosen MFA, Mahmoudi H, Ghaffour N (2014) Today’s and future challenges in applications of renewable energy technologies for desalination. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44(9):929–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzberger A, Hoffmann VU (2005) Photovoltaic solar energy generation. 112. Springer Science & Business Media

  • Gunnarsson I, Arnórsson S (2005a) Impact of silica scaling on the efficiency of heat extraction from high-temperature geothermal fluids. Geothermics 34(3):320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guessab M et al (1993) Waste-water treatment by infiltration-percolation on sand: results in Ben Sergao. Morocco Water Sci Technol 27(9):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee LF et al (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43(9):2317–2348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo W et al (2005) Effect of operating parameters in a submerged membrane adsorption hybrid system: experiments and mathematical modeling. J Membr Sci 247(1–2):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudmundsson S, Einarsson E (1989) Controlled silica precipitation in geothermal brine at the Reykjanes geo-chemicals plant. Geothermics 18(1–2):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup DL (1997) The interaction of silicic acid with sulfurous acid scale inhibitor. Trans Geother Resour Counc :49–54

  • Gallup DL, Kitz K (1997) Low-cost silica, calcite and metal sulfide scale control through on-site production of sulfurous acid from H {sub 2} S or elemental sulfur. Geothermal Resources Council, Davis

  • Gallup DL (2003) Simultaneous hydrogen sulfide abatement and production of acid for scale control and well stimulation. Proc. IGC2003, Reykjavik, Iceland

  • Gallup DL et al (2003) Laboratory investigation of silica removal from geothermal brines to control silica scaling and produce usable silicates. Appl Geochem 18(10):1597–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup DL (2007) Treatment of geothermal waters for production of industrial, agricultural or drinking water. Geothermics 36(5):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson I, Arnórsson S (2005b) Treatment of geothermal waste water to prevent silica scaling. in Proceedings world geothermal congress

  • Hansell A, Horwell C, Oppenheimer C (2006) The health hazards of volcanoes and geothermal areas. Occup Environ Med 63(2):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi, A., et al (2020) A review on geothermal Organic Rankine cycles: modeling and optimization. J Ther Anal Calorim :1–16

  • Herbert GJ et al (2007) A review of wind energy technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(6):1117–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirowatari K (1996) Scale prevention method by brine acidification with biochemical reactors. Geothermics 25(2):259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang TY, et al (2021) Life cycle assessment and techno-economic assessment of lithium recovery from geothermal brine. ACS Sustain Chem Eng

  • Inukai Y et al (2004) Removal of boron (III) by N-methylglucamine-type cellulose derivatives with higher adsorption rate. Anal Chim Acta 511(2):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamaly S et al (2014) A short review on reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies. Desalination 354:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jawahar C, Michael PA (2017) A review on turbines for micro hydro power plant. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:882–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamero J, Zarrouk SJ, Mroczek E (2018) Mineral scaling in two-phase geothermal pipelines: two case studies. Geothermics 72:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson A-S, Trägårdh G (1990) Ultrafiltration applications. Desalination 77:135–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabay N et al (2004) Removal and recovery of boron from geothermal wastewater by selective ion exchange resins I Laboratory tests. Reactive and Functional Polymers 60:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabay N et al (2004) Removal and recovery of boron from geothermal wastewater by selective ion- exchange resins. II Field Tests Desalination 167(1–3):427–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabay N et al (2009) Removal of boron from Balcova geothermal water by ion exchange–microfiltration hybrid process. Desalination 241(1–3):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabay N et al (2013) An innovative integrated system for boron removal from geothermal water using RO process and ion exchange-ultrafiltration hybrid method. Desalination 316:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaygusuz K (2004) Hydropower and the world’s energy future. Energy Source 26(3):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klass DL (1998) Biomass for renewable energy, fuels, and chemicals. Elsevier

  • Kalmykov D et al (2021) Operation of three-stage process of lithium recovery from geothermal brine: simulation. Membranes 11(3):175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogirou SA (2004) Solar thermal collectors and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 30(3):231–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi S, Mansouri S (2018) A comparative profitability study of geothermal electricity production in developed and developing countries: exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of different ORC configurations. Renewable Energy 115:600–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K et al (2000) Recovery of silica from the Sumikawa geothermal fluids by addition of cationic nitrogen-bearing reagents. in Proceedings World Geothermal Congress

  • Kaya C et al (2015) Pre-treatment with nanofiltration (NF) in seawater desalination—Preliminary integrated membrane tests in Urla. Turkey Desalination 369:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz WE (1979) The electrodialysis reversal (EDR) process. Desalination 28(1):31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N, Tuzen M, Kazi TG (2017) Simple and Rapid Dual-Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction as an Innovative Extraction Method for Uranium in Real Water Samples Prior to the Determination of Uranium by a Spectrophotometric Technique. J AOAC Int 100(6):1848–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper H et al (2013) Corrosion resistance of different steel grades in the geothermal fluid of Molasse Basin. Mater Corros 64(9):764–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristmannsdóttir H (1989) Types of scaling occurring by geothermal utilization in Iceland. Geothermics 18(1–2):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny K et al (2009) Coagulation—ultrafiltration system for river water treatment. Desalination 240(1–3):151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koltuniewicz AB, Witek A, Bezak K (2004) Efficiency of membrane-sorption integrated processes. J Membr Sci 239(1):129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristmannsdóttir H, Ármannsson H (2003) Environmental aspects of geothermal energy utilization. Geothermics 32(4–6):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato K et al (2002) Silica removal from the geothermal brine by addition of calcium compounds in a silica treatment reactor. J Geother Res Soc Japan 24(3):221–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazaei Y, Faghihian H, Kamali M (2011) Removal of thorium from aqueous solutions by sodium clinoptilolite. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289(2):529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampinen MJ, Kotiaho VM, El HajAssad M (2006) Application of axial fan theory to horizontal-axis wind turbine. Int J Energy Res 30(13):1093–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-A et al (2001) Use of ultrafiltration membranes for the separation of TiO2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(7):1712–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CC et al (2002) Experiments of a prototype wind-driven reverse osmosis desalination system with feedback control. Desalination 150(3):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Y-C et al (2014) Recovery of high-value metals from geothermal sites by biosorption and bioaccumulation. Biores Technol 160:182–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Martin PF, McGrail BP (2021) Rare-earth element extraction from geothermal brine using magnetic core-shell nanoparticles-techno-economic analysis. Geothermics 89:101938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JM, Bauman WC (1978) Recovery of lithium from brines. Google Patents

  • Llenas L et al (2011) Nanofiltration as pretreatment for scale prevention in seawater reverse osmosis desalination. Desalin Water Treat 36(1–3):310–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llenas L et al (2013) Selection of nanofiltration membranes as pretreatment for scaling prevention in SWRO using real seawater. Desalin Water Treat 51(4–6):930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malate R. et al (1999) Wellbore soaking: a novel acid treatment of geothermal injection wells. in Proc. 24th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering

  • Mathew S (2006) Wind energy: fundamentals, resource analysis and economics. Springer

  • Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manage 90(1):652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missimer TM et al (2016) Geothermal electricity generation and desalination: an integrated process design to conserve latent heat with operational improvements. Desalin Water Treat 57(48–49):23110–23118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metaxas M et al (2003) Thorium removal by different adsorbents. J Hazard Mater 97(1–3):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran EF et al (2018) Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(47):11891–11898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moya D, Aldás C, Kaparaju P (2018) Geothermal energy: power plant technology and direct heat applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 94:889–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2011) Cost–benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: A case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manage 92(12):3091–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokheimer EM et al (2013) Modeling and optimization of hybrid wind–solar-powered reverse osmosis water desalination system in Saudi Arabia. Energy Convers Manage 75:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mottier V et al (2000) Wastewater treatment by infiltration percolation: a case study. Water Sci Technol 41(1):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muga HE, Mihelcic JR (2008) Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. J Environ Manage 88(3):437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mroczek E, Graham D, Bacon L (2019) Removal of arsenic and silica from geothermal fluid by electrocoagulation. J Environ Chem Eng 7(4):103232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutia TM, Fridriksson T, Jónsdóttir IS (2016) Concentrations of sulphur and trace elements in semi-arid soils and plants in relation to geothermal power plants at Olkaria. Kenya Geothermics 61:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzella A et al (2018) Environmental and social aspects of geothermal energy in Italy. Geothermics 72:232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadav N (1999) Boron removal from seawater reverse osmosis permeate utilizing selective ion exchange resin. Desalination 124(1–3):131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nian Y-L, Cheng W-L (2018) Evaluation of geothermal heating from abandoned oil wells. Energy 142:592–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogara J, Zarrouk SJ (2018) Corrosion in geothermal environment: Part 1: Fluids and their impact. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1333–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nogara J, Zarrouk SJ (2018) Corrosion in geothermal environment Part 2: Metals and alloys. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada H et al (2004) Removal system of arsenic from geothermal water by high gradient magnetic separation-HGMS reciprocal filter. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 14(2):1576–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk N, Kavak D, Köse TE (2008) Boron removal from aqueous solution by reverse osmosis. Desalination 223(1–3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk N, Kavak D (2005) Adsorption of boron from aqueous solutions using fly ash: batch and column studies. J Hazard Mater 127(1–3):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulillo A, Striolo A, Lettieri P (2019) The environmental impacts and the carbon intensity of geothermal energy: a case study on the Hellisheiði plant. Environ Int 133:105226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascua CS et al (2007) Uptake of dissolved arsenic during the retrieval of silica from spent geothermal brine. Geothermics 36(3):230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker A (2005) Mining geothermal resources. US Department of Energy Research

  • Paranthaman MP et al (2017) Recovery of lithium from geothermal brine with lithium–aluminum layered double hydroxide chloride sorbents. Environ Sci Technol 51(22):13481–13486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polat H et al (2004) A new methodology for removal of boron from water by coal and fly ash. Desalination 164(2):173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qasim M et al (2019) Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination 459:59–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelstein S, Yorston M (2013) The prospects for cost competitive solar PV power. Energy Policy 55:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosillo-Calle F (2016) A review of biomass energy–shortcomings and concerns. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91(7):1933–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recepoğlu YK et al (2018) Packed bed column dynamic study for boron removal from geothermal brine by a chelating fiber and breakthrough curve analysis by using mathematical models. Desalination 437:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A et al (2021) Agricultural Waste Absorbents for Heavy Metal Removal. Green Adsorbents to Remove Metals, Dyes and Boron from Polluted Water. Springer, pp 195–228

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VK, Singal S (2017) Operation of hydro power plants-a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani M et al (2019) A comprehensive study of geothermal heating and cooling systems. Sustain Cities Soc 44:793–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah M et al (2019) Model design of condenser for solar assisted geothermal cooling system using software simulation. Model Earth Sys Environ 5(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakeri A et al (2020) Occurrence, origin and health risk of arsenic and potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in sediments and fish tissues from the geothermal area of the Khiav River, Ardebil Province (NW Iran). J Geochem Explor 208:106347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed ET et al (2021) Faradic capacitive deionization (FCDI) for desalination and ion removal from wastewater. Chemosphere 275:130001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santé  et al (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 1. World Health Organization

  • Seyhan S et al (2007) Application of iron-rich natural clays in Camlica, Turkey for boron sorption from water and its determination by fluorimetric-azomethine-H method. J Hazard Mater 146(1–2):180–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seki Y, Seyhan S, Yurdakoc M (2006) Removal of boron from aqueous solution by adsorption on Al2O3 based materials using full factorial design. J Hazard Mater 138(1):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BM et al (1998) Thermodynamics of borate ester formation by three readily grafted carbohydrates. Carbohyd Res 308(1–2):173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samatya S et al (2015) Utilization of geothermal water as irrigation water after boron removal by monodisperse nanoporous polymers containing NMDG in sorption–ultrafiltration hybrid process. Desalination 364:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki K et al (2018) Simultaneous immobilization of borate, arsenate, and silicate from geothermal water derived from mining activity by co-precipitation with hydroxyapatite. Chemosphere 207:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi R, Moore F, Keshavarzi B (2016) Mobility and chemical fate of arsenic and antimony in water and sediments of Sarouq River catchment, Takab geothermal field, northwest Iran. J Environ Manage 170:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita H et al (2003) Silica removal performance of seed from geothermal fluids. Geothermics 32(2):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultze LE, Bauer DJ (1984) Recovering lithium chloride from a geothermal brine. 8883:1984: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines

  • Shortall R, Davidsdottir B, Axelsson G (2015) Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:391–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Gao X, Gao C (2013) Evaluation of scaling potential in a pilot-scale NF–SWRO integrated seawater desalination system. J Membr Sci 443:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita H et al (1999) Field tests on silica removal from geothermal brines in Sumikawa and Onuma geothermal areas. J Chem Eng Jpn 32(5):696–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita H, Bando Y, Nakamura M (1998) Removal of silica from geothermal brine by seeding method using silica gel. J Chem Eng Jpn 31(1):150–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith YR, Kumar P, McLennan JD (2017) On the extraction of rare earth elements from geothermal brines. Resources 6(3):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarighaleslami AH et al (2020) Environmental life cycle assessment for a cheese production plant towards sustainable energy transition: natural gas to biomass vs natural gas to geothermal. Journal of Cleaner Production 275:122999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi V et al (2013) Progress in solar PV technology: research and achievement. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 20:443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson AI et al (2020) Corrosion testing of materials in simulated superheated geothermal environment. Corros Sci 108584

  • Turek M et al (2005) Electrodialytic treatment of boron-containing wastewater with univalent permselective membranes. Desalination 185(1–3):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaszewska B, Bodzek M (2013) The removal of radionuclides during desalination of geothermal waters containing boron using the BWRO system. Desalination 309:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaszewska B, Bodzek M (2013) Desalination of geothermal waters using a hybrid UF-RO process Part I Boron removal in pilot-scale tests. Desalination 319:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaszewska B et al (2017) The influence of selected factors on the effectiveness of pre-treatment of geothermal water during the nanofiltration process. Desalination 406:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda A et al (2003) Silica removal from Mokai, New Zealand, geothermal brine by treatment with lime and a cationic precipitant. Geothermics 32(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umeno J, Iwanaga T (1998) A study on the abatement technology of the harmful chemical components in geothermal hot water. in Proceedings of the 20th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop. University of Auckland Auckland, New Zealand

  • Veda A et al (2000) Recovery of silica from the Sumikawa geothermal fluids by addition of cationic reagents. J Geother Res Soc Japan 22(4):249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitolo S (1995) Silica separation from reinjection brines having different composition at Monte Amiata geothermal plant. WGC1995

  • Willis D et al (2018) Wind energy research: state-of-the-art and future research directions. Renew Energy 125:133–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz C (2017) Thermodynamic and economic investigation of geothermal powered absorption cooling system for buildings. Geothermics 70:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz E et al (2013) Removal of boron from geothermal water by RO system-I—effect of membrane configuration and applied pressure. Desalination 310:130–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagase T, Suginohara Y, Yanagase K (1970) The properties of scales and methods to prevent them. Geothermics 2:1619–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz AE et al (2008) Boron removal from geothermal waters by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 153(1–2):146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinaga T, Kawano K, Yanagase K (1984) Inhibition of silica scaling from geothermal water by reagent addition. J Jpn Geotherm Energy Assoc 21:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurdakoç M et al (2005) Kinetic and thermodynamic studies of boron removal by Siral 5, Siral 40, and Siral 80. J Colloid Interface Sci 286(2):440–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q et al (2019) Investment strategy of hydrothermal geothermal heating in China under policy, technology and geology uncertainties. J Clean Prod 207:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D et al (2015) Development of lower cost seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration technologies—A review. Desalination 376:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Muaz Al Radi

  2. Department of Sustainable and Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Sharjah, PO Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

    Omar Adil Al-Isawi, Aasim Ahmed Abdelghafar, Ahmad Fayez Abu Qiyas, Maryam AlMallahi & Mamdouh El Haj Assad

  3. Mec Mechanical Engineering Department, Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait

    Khalil Khanafer

Authors
  1. Muaz Al Radi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omar Adil Al-Isawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aasim Ahmed Abdelghafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad Fayez Abu Qiyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maryam AlMallahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Khalil Khanafer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mamdouh El Haj Assad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamdouh El Haj Assad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Domenico M. Doronzo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Radi, M., Adil Al-Isawi, O., Abdelghafar, A.A. et al. Recent progress, economic potential, and environmental benefits of mineral recovery geothermal brine treatment systems. Arab J Geosci 15, 832 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10115-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10115-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation