Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

2D- and 3D-FEM modeling of rock masses at the Şilenkar viaduct site (NE Turkey) with regard to bearing capacity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The aim of this research was to examine the bearing capacity features of the rock masses at the site of Şilenkar viaduct which is a part of the highway substitution project at the Yusufeli Dam construction in NE Turkey. The rock masses at the study area are consisting of Late Cretaceous-aged micritic limestones and sandstones. Geotechnical analyses were conducted as part of the present study to include three phases as field and laboratory examinations, bearing capacity evaluations, and numerical analyses. The bearing capacity properties of the rock masses were examined via Hoek-Brown failure criterion-based empirical methods. A finite element method-based 2D and 3D models were used for defining the principal stresses and vertical displacements that make up at the level of foundation caused by viaduct building and traffic loads. A comparison was then made between the calculated bearing capacity values and the major principal stress values determined numerically. For this study, the 2D-FEM modeling gives realistic solutions compared to the 3D-FEM modeling. It was found that the major principal stress (σ1: 2.10 MPa) is smaller than the allowable bearing capacity (qa: 2.93 MPa). Furthermore, the vertical displacements at the level of foundations ranged between Uv: 0.058 and 2.04 cm. Based on the findings, it was concluded that no engineering problem may develop at the viaduct site with regard to bearing capacity. Lastly, in order to make a strong construction design, it is suggested that the 2D- and 3D-FEM modeling techniques by comparing their results should be combined together.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alemdağ S (2015) Assessment of bearing capacity and permeability of foundation rocks at the Gumustas Waste Dam Site (NE Turkey) using empirical and numerical analysis. Arab J Geosci 8:1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1236-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alemdağ S, Gürocak Z, Solanki P, Zaman M (2008) Estimation of bearing capacity of basalts at Atasu Dam site, Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-007-0112-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alnuaim AM, Hamid WM, Alshenawy AO (2021) Investigation of the factors affecting the ultimate bearing capacity of bridge piles in limestone with a calibrated 3D FEM. Arab J Geosci 14(372):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06710-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell GF (1992) Engineering in rock masses. Heinemann, London, p 359

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. Wiley, New York, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishnoi BL (1968) Bearing capacity of a closely jointed rocks. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposed. Rock Mech Rock Eng 1:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman RE (1989) Introduction to rock mechanics. Wiley, New York, p 562

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proceedings of NARMS-TAC2002, Mining Innovation and Technology, Toronto, Canada, 267–273

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (2018) Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI-2018 edition. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11:445–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carter TG, Diederichs MS (2013) Quantification of the Geological Strength Index chart. 47th US Rock Mechanics and Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, USA

  • ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: International Society of Rock Mechanics Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey, p 628

  • Kanik M, Ersoy H (2019) Evaluation of the engineering geological investigation of the Ayvali dam site (NE Turkey). Arab J Geosci 12(89):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4243-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya A, Bulut F, Dağ S (2018) Bearing capacity and slope stability assessment of rock masses at the Subasi viaduct site, NE, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11(162):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3477-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konak N, Hakyemez HY (2001) Tectonic units of the easternmost part of the Pontides: stratigraphical and structural implications. In: Derman AS, Toksoy F, Yılmaz E (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Petroleum Geology and Hydrocarbon Potential of the Black Sea Area, vol 4, Şile-Turkey, pp 93–103

  • Kulhawy FH, Carter JP (1992) Settlement and bearing capacity of foundations on rock masses and socketed foundations in rockmasses. In: Bell FG (ed) Engineering in rock masses. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford, pp 231–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Li N, Yu C, He M (2021) Bearing capacity behaviour of prestressed anchor cable under slope blasting excavation. Arab J Geosci 14(747):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07113-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merifield RS, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2006) Limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity of rock masses using the generalized Hoek-Brown criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:920–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi A (2011) Comparative bearing capacity analysis of spread footing foundation on fractured granites. Environ Eng Geosci 17(3):281–292. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.17.3.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974) Foundation engineering. Wiley, New York, p 514

    Google Scholar 

  • Rad HS, Mohitazar M, Dizadji M (2013) Distinct element simulation of ultimate bearing capacity in jointed rock foundations. Arab J Geosci 6(11):4427–4434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0667-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc (2020a) RocData v5.0 rock, soil and discontinuity strength analysis. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, www.rocscience.com

  • Rocscience Inc (2020b) RS2 v9.0 finite element analysis for excavations and slopes. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, www.rocscience.com

  • Rocscience Inc (2020c) RS3 v1.0 3D finite element analysis for rock and soil. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, www.rocscience.com

  • Serrano A, Olalla C (1994) Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31(2):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)92799-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano A, Olalla C, Gonzalez J (2000) Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses based on the modified Hoek–Brown criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(6):1013–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00028-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowers GF (1979) Introductory soil mechanics and foundations: geotechnical engineering, 4th edn. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu CT (2020) Engineering geological assessment and determination of bearing capacity of the Buyukyenice dam site (Balıkesir, Turkey). Arab J Geosci 13(662):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05672-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun S (2019) Bearing capacity assessment of the rock masses at the Şilenkar (Yusufeli-Artvin) viaduct site. RTE University, Rize, MSc Thesis, p 47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Ma J, Ji Y, Cao S (2021) Calculation method and influencing factors of uplift bearing capacity of rock-socketed pedestal pile. Arab J Geosci 14(243):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06567-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie DC (1999) Foundations on rock, 2nd edn. E and FN Spon, London, pp 131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Zhao M, Zhao H, Zhang R (2020) Numerical study on bearing capacity of ring foundations for storage tanks on a rock mass. Arab J Geosci 13(1249):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06255-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayberk Kaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaya, A., Uzun, S. 2D- and 3D-FEM modeling of rock masses at the Şilenkar viaduct site (NE Turkey) with regard to bearing capacity. Arab J Geosci 14, 1726 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08208-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08208-7

Keywords

Navigation