Abstract
This paper first proposes scales to evaluate customers’ perceived service quality in public transport then identifies the demographic characteristic factors that may influence customer perceived service quality, as well as identifies any customer perception differences between the subcategories. The manager interview and random sampling method were used to survey 288 consumers of public transport buses. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to confirm the scale validity. Thereafter, structural equation modeling, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to assess the causal paths and service quality perceptions differences among the subgroups. The three dimensions of functional, convenience and physical environment quality were confirmed as underlying factors to assess customer perceived quality in a public transport setting. Age and owning a driver’s license are factors that directly and positively affect service quality, whereas education was negatively related to perceived quality. In contrast, relationships between being a car user, gender and perceived quality were not supported. The results also showed that younger commuters appear to have lower perceptions of service quality compared to adults. However, the current study does suggest that people with a university education and above may be a better audience for advertising appeals focused on one of these three significant dimensions of service quality. This study adds theoretical knowledge on how to accurately assess opinions of customers’ perception of service quality in public transport services, as well as how to provide sufficient insight on the direct role of demographic characteristics on customers’ perceived service quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beirão G, Sarsfield Cabral JA (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp Policy 14(6):478–489
Brady MK, Cronin JJ (2001) Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: a hierarchical approach. J Mark 65(July):34–49
Carmines EG, Zeller RA (eds) (1979) Reliability and validity assessment, vol 17. Sage, New York
Cipriani E, Gori S, Petrelli M (2012) A bus network design procedure with elastic demand for large urban areas. Public Transp 4(1):57–76
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2008) A stated preference experiment for measuring service quality in public transport. Transp Plan Technol 31(5):509–523
Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2010) How to capture the passengers’ point of view on a transit service through rating and choice options. Transp Rev 30(4):435–450
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 28(1):39–50
Friman Margareta (2004) Implementing quality improvements in public transport. J Public Transp 7:4
Ganesan-Lim C, Russell-Bennett R, Dagger T (2008) The impact of service contact type and demographic characteristics on service quality perceptions. J Serv Mark 22(7):550–561
Grönroos C (1984) A service quality model and its marketing implications. Eur J Mark 18(4):36–44
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19(2):139–151
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40:414–433
Hensher DA, Prioni P (2002) A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment. J Transp Econ Policy (JTEP) 36(1):93–113
Hensher DA, Stopher P, Bullock P (2003) Service quality-developing a service quality index in the provision of commercial bus contracts. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 37(6):499–517
Hu KC, Jen W (2006) Passengers’ perceived service quality of city buses in Taipei: scale development and measurement. Transp Rev 26(5):645–662
Karatepe OM, Yavas U, Babakus E (2005) Measuring service quality of banks: scale development and validation. J Retail Consum Serv 12(5):373–383
Kline RB (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford press, New York
Kotler P, Armstrong G (2010) Principles of marketing 13th global edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Kupek E (2006) Beyond logistic regression: structural equations modelling for binary variables and its application to investigating unobserved confounders. BMC Med Res Methodol 6(1):13
Ladhari R (2009) A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. Int J Qual Serv Sci 1(2):172–198
Litman T (2008) Valuing transit service quality improvements. J Public Transp 11(2):43–64
Mann E, Abraham C (2006) The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br J Psychol 97(2):155–176
Marimon F, Yaya PLH, Casadesus M (2012) Impact of e-quality and service recovery on loyalty: a study of e-banking in Spain. Total Qual Manag Business Excell 23(7–8):769–787(19)
Martín MS, Alcaraz ÁT, Carrascosa LL, Escudero EP, Cecilia AH, Whalley S (2012) The attitude of the Spanish population towards the use of public transport. In: Proceedings of the 1º Congreso Internacional de Estudios del Desarrollo, Santander, 14–16 November. http://congresoreedes.unican.es/actas/PDFs/82.pdf
Matas A (2004) Demand and revenue implications of an integrated public transport policy: the case of Madrid. Transp Rev 24(2):195–217
Mokhlis S (2012) The influence of service quality on satisfaction: a gender comparison. Public Adm Res 1(1):103
Moschis G, Curasi C, Bellenger D (2004) Patronage motives of mature consumers in the selection of food and grocery stores. J Consum Mark 21(2):123–133
Nutt PC (2006) Comparing public and private sector decision-making practices. J Public Admin Res Theor 16(2):289–318
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) Servqual. J Retail 64(1):12–40
Peterson RA, Kim Y (2013) On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J Appl Psychol 98(1):194–198
Ramseook-Munhurrun P, Lukea-Bhiwajee SD, Naidoo P (2010) Service quality in the public service. Int J Manag Mark Res (IJMMR) 3:1
Samat N, Ramayah T, Saad NM (2006) TQM practices, service quality, and market orientation: some empirical evidence from a developing country. Manag Res News 29(11):713–728
Schoettle B, Sivak M (2014) The reasons for the recent decline in young driver licensing in the United States. Traffic Injury Prev 15(1):6–9
Stafford MR (1996) Demographic discriminators of service quality in the banking industry. J Serv Mark 10(4):6–22
Teicher J, Hughes O, Dow N (2002) E-government: a new route to public sector quality. Manag Serv Qual 12(6):384–393
Wardman M, Hine J, Stradling SG (2001) Interchange and travel choice. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, Edinburgh
Yaya PLH, Marimon F, Casadesus M (2011) Customer’s loyalty and perception of ISO 9001 in online banking. Ind Manag Data Syst 111(8):1194–1213
Yaya PLH, Marimon F, Casadesus M (2012) Assessing e-service quality: the current state of E-S-QUAL. Total Qual Manag Business Excell 23(12):1363–1378
Yaya PLH, Marimon F, Casadesus M (2013) The contest determinant of delight and disappointment: the case study of online banking. Total Qual Manag Business Excell 24(12):1376–1389
Yaya PLH, Marimon F, Casadesus M (2014) Customer satisfaction and the role of demographic characteristics in online banking. In: Evaluating websites and web services: interdisciplinary perspectives on user satisfaction. IGI Global, pp 138–154
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yaya, L.H.P., Fortià, M.F., Canals, C.S. et al. Service quality assessment of public transport and the implication role of demographic characteristics. Public Transp 7, 409–428 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0099-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0099-7