Abstract
Purpose of Review
The number of left ventricular assist device implants has increased significantly in the last decade. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) optimization, trouble-shooting complications, and surgical planning require a multi-modality imaging approach. Echocardiography remains the imaging modality of choice, particularly for physiological evaluation but accurate anatomical evaluation of the entirety of the LVAD is often challenging if not impossible. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) offers additional information that is valuable in taking care of these complex patients. The purpose of this review is to understand the nuances of LVAD imaging and areas where CCT can aid LVAD evaluation and management.
Recent Findings
CCT has a well-established role in trouble-shooting complications particularly inflow and outflow cannula-related anatomic complications from suction and kinking. Even though the literature is scarce, there is evolving data to suggest that adverse inflow and outflow cannula positions may result in unfavorable outcomes. There is more interest in novel mechanisms of device implantation and planning for which data set from CCT is ideal. Functional evaluation of the right ventricle with CCT is becoming more sophisticated and maybe particularly useful in this patient population. Development in CCT technology has helped minimize safety concerns and improved image quality with reduction in LVAD-related artifacts.
Summary
CCT is an important adjunct modality to echocardiography for patients with LVAD. Information obtained from CCT may help our understanding of LVAD and in turn help reduce and managed LVAD-related complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
Pinney SP, Anyanwu AC, Lala A, Teuteberg JJ, Uriel N, Mehra MR. Left ventricular assist devices for lifelong support. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2845–61.
Kassi M, Estep JD. Role of multimodality imaging in patients with left ventricular assist device. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2016;31:510–22.
Carr CM, Jacob J, Park SJ, Karon BL, Williamson EE, Araoz PA. CT of left ventricular assist devices. Radiographics. 2010;30:429–44.
Horton SC, Khodaverdian R, Chatelain P, McIntosh ML, Horne BD, Muhlestein JB, et al. Left ventricular assist device malfunction: an approach to diagnosis by echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1435–40.
Estep JD, Stainback RF, Little SH, Torre G, Zoghbi WA. The role of echocardiography and other imaging modalities in patients with left ventricular assist devices. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1049–64.
Mak GS, Truong QA. Cardiac CT: imaging of and through cardiac devices. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2012;5:328–36.
Chrysant GS, Phancao AA, Horstmanshof DA, Jones S, Long JW. Clinical utility of imaging left ventricular assist devices with 320 row multidetector computed tomography. ASAIO J 2018, 1.
Feldman D, Pamboukian SV, Teuteberg JJ, Birks E, Lietz K, Moore SA, et al. The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:157–87.
Raman SV, Sahu A, Merchant AZ, Louis LB 4th, Firstenberg MS, Sun B. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular assist devices with cardiovascular computed tomography and impact on management. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:79–85.
Vivo RP, Kassi M, Estep JD, Bhimaraj A, Trachtenberg BH, Orrego CM, et al. MDCT assessment of mechanical circulatory support device complications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:100–2.
Mehra MR, Goldstein DJ, Uriel N, Cleveland JCJ, Yuzefpolskaya M, Salerno C, et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1386–95.
Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Wilhelm MJ, Lachat M, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, et al. Conventional radiography and computed tomography of cardiac assist devices. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2097–106.
•• Acharya D, Aryal S, Loyaga-Rendon R, Pamboukian SV, Tallaj J, Kirklin JK, Holman WL, Singh S. The use of computed tomography in preoperative planning for Heartware left ventricular assist device placement. ASAIO J. 2018. Novel use of CCT for pre-operative planning of HVAD.
Noecker AM, Cingoz F, Ootaki Y, Liu J, Kuzmiak S, Kopcak MW, et al. The Cleveland Clinic PediPump: anatomic modeling and virtual fitting studies in a lamb model. ASAIO J. 2007;53:716–9.
Anselmi A, Collin S, Haigron P, Verhoye JP, Flecher E. Device-specific evaluation of intraventricular left ventricular assist device position by quantitative coaxiality analysis. J Surg Res. 2017;213:110–4.
•• Anselmi A, Collin S, Haigron P, Verhoye JP, Flecher E. Virtual implantation of a novel LVAD: toward computer-assisted surgery for heart failure. J Surg Res. 2016;205:204–7 Novel use of CCT for virtual implantation.
Teigen LM, John R, Kuchnia AJ, Nagel EM, Earthman CP, Kealhofer J, et al. Preoperative pectoralis muscle quantity and attenuation by computed tomography are novel and powerful predictors of mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10:e004069. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004069.
Mohamed I, Lau CT, Bolen MA, El-Sherief AH, Azok JT, Karimov JH, et al. Building a bridge to save a failing ventricle: radiologic evaluation of short- and long-term cardiac assist devices. Radiographics. 2015;35:327–56.
•• Sorensen EN, Kon ZN, Feller ED, Pham SM, Griffith BP. Quantitative assessment of inflow malposition in two continuous-flow left ventricular-assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; . Important study delineating the affects of inflow cannula position and relation with outcomes.
Sacks J, Gonzalez-Stawinski GV, Hall S, Lima B, MacHannaford J, Dockery W, et al. Utility of cardiac computed tomography for inflow cannula patency assessment and prediction of clinical outcome in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:590–3.
Bolen MA, Popovic ZB, Gonzalez-Stawinski G, Schoenhagen P. Left ventricular assist device malposition interrogated by 4-D cine computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:186–8.
El Sabbagh A, Al-Hijji M, Gulati R, Rihal CS, Pollak PM, Behfar A. Percutaneous stenting of a left ventricular assist device outflow kink. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:e229–31.
Rogers JG, Managing VAD. Complications: our growth industry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2769–71.
Scandroglio AM, Kaufmann F, Pieri M, Kretzschmar A, Muller M, Pergantis P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment algorithm for blood flow obstructions in patients with left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2758–68.
Tran BC, Nijjar PS. Role of contrast CT for the diagnosis and the prognosis of suspected LVAD thrombosis. J Card Surg. 2017;32:162–5.
Utsunomiya D, Awai K, Tamura Y, Nishiharu T, Urata J, Sakamoto T, et al. 16-MDCT aortography with a low-dose contrast material protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:374–8.
Salem R, Remy-Jardin M, Delhaye D, Khalil C, Teisseire A, Delannoy-Deken V, et al. Integrated cardio-thoracic imaging with ECG-gated 64-slice multidetector-row CT: initial findings in 133 patients. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1973–81.
Garcia-Alvarez A, Fernandez-Friera L, Lau JF, Sawit ST, Mirelis JG, Castillo JG, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function and post-operative findings using cardiac computed tomography in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:896–903.
Trachtenberg BH, Cordero-Reyes A, Elias B, Loebe M. A review of infections in patients with left ventricular assist devices: prevention, diagnosis and management. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015;11:28–32.
Donahey EE, Polly DM, Vega JD, Lyon M, Butler J, Nguyen D, et al. Multidrug-resistant organism infections in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42:522–7.
Dell'Aquila AM, Avramovic N, Mastrobuoni S, Motekallemi A, Wisniewski K, Scherer M, Sindermann JR, Wenning C. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for improving diagnosis of infection in patients on CF-LVAD: longing for more insightsEur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; .
Kanapinn P, Burchert W, Korperich H, Korfer J. (18)F-FDG PET/CT-imaging of left ventricular assist device infection: a retrospective quantitative intrapatient analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2018.
Levy DT, Minamoto GY, Da Silva R, Puius YA, Peck N, Goldstein D, et al. Role of gallium SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of left ventricular assist device infections. ASAIO J. 2015;61:e5–10.
Maeda T, Tanoue Y, Nakashima A, Tominaga R. Atypical presentation of an apical pseudoaneurysm in a patient on prolonged left ventricular mechanical support. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:350–1.
Grinstein J, Kruse E, Sayer G, Fedson S, Kim GH, Sarswat N, et al. Novel echocardiographic parameters of aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices and clinical outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:976–85.
Phan K, Haswell JM, Xu J, Assem Y, Mick SL, Kapadia SR, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter interventions for aortic insufficiency in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIO J. 2017;63:117–22.
Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Ichihara Y, Miyamoto T, Yamazaki K. Outflow graft anastomosis site design could be correlated to aortic valve regurgitation under left ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs 2017.
Khoshbin E, Schueler S. Pre-transplant ventricular assist device explant. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:160–8.
Capoccia M. Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: are we about to witness a new “gold standard”? J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2016;3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd3040035.
Kalisz K, Buethe J, Saboo SS, Abbara S, Halliburton S, Rajiah P. Artifacts at cardiac CT: physics and solutions. Radiographics. 2016;36:2064–83.
Habets J, Mali WP, Budde RP. Multidetector CT angiography in evaluation of prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Radiographics. 2012;32:1893–905.
Symons R, Choi Y, Cork TE, Ahlman MA, Mallek M, Bluemke DA, et al. Optimized energy of spectral coronary CT angiography for coronary plaque detection and quantification. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12:108–14.
•• Secchi F, De Cecco CN, Spearman JV, Silverman JR, Ebersberger U, Sardanelli F, et al. Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:413–8. Artifact reduction using dual-energy CT based reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images
•• Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M. Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys. 2012;39:1904–16 Important articles regarding artifact reduction for better quality imaging; which is particularly relevant in patients with LVAS.
Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:190–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Chang is recipient of a Houston Methodist –Siemens Research Collaborative Grant.
Dr. Ramirez Giraldo is an employee of Siemens HealthCare.
All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiac Computed Tomography
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kassi, M., Hannawi, B., Alamzaib, S.M. et al. Utility of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 11, 30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-018-9466-0
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-018-9466-0