Abstract
Sustaining independent living for elderly people in their own homes is desirable for various reasons. As older people become frail or disabled, a ‘gap’ appears between the abilities they still have and the abilities that are required for independent living. To a certain extent robots may close this gap by providing functionality lost through frailty or disability. A scenario was created involving a re-enablement coach robot. This scenario was discussed with older people, informal carers, and care professionals in focus groups in the Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. The results provided insights into the acceptability of robots and showed that older people were open to the idea of having a robot supporting them in their daily life. Participants were also willing to have a robot perform higher level coordinating tasks while playing the role of the re-enablement coach. However, participants wanted the robot to operate at the same level of intelligence as a human carer. This implies that more attention needs to be given to the development of the social skills and behaviour of such robots. Additionally, participants acknowledged that such a robot would create tension between respecting the autonomy of the user (i.e. robot obeys all commands given by the user) and the promotion of independence in the long term (i.e. robot is programmed to maintain the abilities the user still has). Our results indicate that people preferred to resolve this tension in favour of autonomy. This choice, however, may decrease the user’s abilities in the longer term and thereby undermine users’ ability to live independently.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All other participants either participated in previous focus groups or in user tests of the ACCOMPANY project.
With the exception of one Dutch participant who was 42 years old, but due to her illness faced similar problems to those of older people.
References
Bedaf S, Gelderblom GJ, Syrdal DS, Lehmann H, Michel H, Hewson D, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K, de Witte L (2013) Which activities threaten independent living of elderly when becoming problematic: inspiration for meaningful service robot functionality. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 9(6):445–452. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.840861
Cameron C, Moss P (2007) Care work in Europe: current understandings and future directions. Routledge, Oxford
Bekey G, Ambrose R, Kumar V, Sanderson A, Wilcox B, Zheng Y (2006) International assessment of research and development in robotics (Final report). World Technology Evaluation Center. http://www.wtec.org/reports.htm. Accessed 2 June 2014
International Federation of Robotics. http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/. Accessed 29 July 2014
Fraunhofer IPA. http://www.care-o-bot.de/en/care-o-bot-3.html. Accessed 11 January 2016
Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNg Years (ACCOMPANY). www.accompany.eu. Accessed 1 June 2014
Butter M, Rensma A, van Boxsel J, Kalisingh S, Schoone M, et al. (2008) Robotics for healthcare - final report. European Commission, DG Information Society. http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/tno/uuid:beddf38c-e88c-4d2a-8394-e7234d9b3e8a/. Accessed 5 June 2014
http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/mds/centres/healthy-ageing/elders.aspx. Accessed 18 Jan 2014
Ritchie J, Spencer L (2002) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman AM, Miles MB (eds) The qualitative researcher’s companion. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 305–330
Flandorfer P (2012) Review article population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int J Popul Res 2012, Article ID 829835, 13 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/829835
Smarr CA, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzer TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2012) Older adults’ preferences and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In: Proceedings Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Boston, pp 153–157
Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161. doi:10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40. doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
Schoot CM (2006) Client-centred care: balancing between perspectives of clients and nurses in home care. Dissertation, Maastricht University
Eurostat. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home. Accessed 13 Dec 2013
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to colleagues in the ACCOMPANY consortium (The University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Hogeschool Zuyd, The Netherlands; Fraunhofer, Germany; University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Sienna, Italy; Maintien en Autonomie à Domicile des Personnes Agées, France; and University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; University of Twente, the Netherlands; University of Warwick, United Kingdom). We are also grateful to the focus group participants that agreed to take part in our study (written consent was obtained from all participants) and provide the contrasting views used in this text. Possible inaccuracies of information are under the responsibility of the project team. The text reflects solely the views of its authors. The European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The work described in this project was partially funded by the European project ACCOMPANY (Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNg Years). Grant Agreement No: 287624.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bedaf, S., Draper, H., Gelderblom, GJ. et al. Can a Service Robot Which Supports Independent Living of Older People Disobey a Command? The Views of Older People, Informal Carers and Professional Caregivers on the Acceptability of Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 8, 409–420 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0336-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0336-0